Which model of human Origin do you think makes the most sense the multi regional hypothesis or the out of Africa

[reptiles]

BTW both these models still believes the initial migrations of early hominids was out of Africa we can actually trace the earliest fossils of pre modern humans to jebel irhoud in East Africa around 300 thousand years ago.

Where the multi regional hypothesis differs is that instead of a single out of Africa migration within the last 50 thousand years from east Africa this model says there were multiple migrations outside from Africa however they did not all come from the same hominid for instance this model would say Europeans evolved from European homo Erectus which later evolved into the Neanderthals and cro magnons essentially Europeans are Cro-Magnon + neantheral hybrids with the Asians they evolved from Asian homo erectus to the peking man to modern Asians. This model essentially says the hybridization of archaic humans and early distinct homo erectuses lead to each modern race forming today.

The out of Africa model essentially says all modern humans descend from a single migration out of Africa which then branched out into all the Eurasian populations we see today the supports for this model is the fact that most of the genetic diversity found in humans is within Africa and all genetic diversity between eurasians is just a a subset of the diversity in Africa.

Both of these models are very bloody similar the only difference is in this model blacks Asians indian europeans and middle easterners are essentially differen't breeds of hybrids.



@africancel
@curryslayerordeath
@Maesthetic

 

[Deleted member 6892]

I dont care what anyone says!!! I wasnt no nigger!

 

[Looks234]

I dont care what anyone says!!! I wasnt no nigger!

Yeah you were shitskins

 

[FleshPerson]

Yeah you were shitskins

View attachment 1213582

he still lives.

 

[reptiles]

Yeah you were shitskins

View attachment 1213582

We all were NGL even the original Neanderthals European slc selection for fair skin is very recent early euros looked like very dark skinned people

 

[RODEBLUR]

BTW both these models still believes the initial migrations of early hominids was out of Africa we can actually trace the earliest fossils of pre modern humans to jebel irhoud in East Africa around 300 thousand years ago.

Where the multi regional hypothesis differs is that instead of a single out of Africa migration within the last 50 thousand years from east Africa this model says there were multiple migrations outside from Africa however they did not all come from the same hominid for instance this model would say Europeans evolved from European homo Erectus which later evolved into the Neanderthals and cro magnons essentially Europeans are Cro-Magnon + neantheral hybrids with the Asians they evolved from Asian homo erectus to the peking man to modern Asians. This model essentially says the hybridization of archaic humans and early distinct homo erectuses lead to each modern race forming today.

The out of Africa model essentially says all modern humans descend from a single migration out of Africa which then branched out into all the Eurasian populations we see today the supports for this model is the fact that most of the genetic diversity found in humans is within Africa and all genetic diversity between eurasians is just a a subset of the diversity in Africa.

Both of these models are very bloody similar the only difference is in this model blacks Asians indian europeans and middle easterners are essentially differen't breeds of hybrids.



@africancel
@curryslayerordeath
@Maesthetic

i heard some time ago that science suggested the actual human origin was closer to Bulgaria

 

[reptiles]

i heard some time ago that science suggested the actual human origin was closer to Bulgaria

I heard that as well it was a stupid post tbqh they were working with a hominid fossil which is realted distantly to homo sapiens and then inferred from that to say humans came from bulgaria it doesn't make sense in my opinion

 

[RODEBLUR]

I heard that as well it was a stupid post tbqh they were working with a hominid fossil which is realted distantly to homo sapiens and then inferred from that to say humans came from bulgaria it doesn't make sense in my opinion

ok

 

[TUSSELEIF]

Multiregional hypotethis makes the most sense after reading this tbh

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Can I get sources onnthis?

 

[reptiles]

Can I get sources onnthis?

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

All the evidence shows that, there were a few migrations of different humans at different times out of africa, which led to a few different subspecies or species of hominids evolving like neanderthals in west asia and europe and the denisovans and others. Cro magnon was an earlier direct ancestor of modern europeans, while neanderthals were a separate branch, although they did intermix, most europeans only have around 2% identifiable neanderthal dna. All hominids came out of africa and spread just about everywhere, at different times and with different levels of mixture depending on what people you look at. But most dna from anyone in europe or australia or china, or anywhere at all, shows its almost 100% from homo sapiens that had already evolved in africa before they left. So most people come from a single but genetically diverse homo sapien population in africa, with mixture with other human/hominid populations as they spread, but the mixture is pretty small usually only 5% or less.

 

[delusionalretard]

All the evidence shows that, there were a few migrations of different humans at different times out of africa, which led to a few different subspecies or species of hominids evolving like neanderthals in west asia and europe and the denisovans and others. Cro magnon was an earlier direct ancestor of modern europeans, while neanderthals were a separate branch, although they did intermix, most europeans only have around 2% identifiable neanderthal dna. All hominids came out of africa and spread just about everywhere, at different times and with different levels of mixture depending on what people you look at. But most dna from anyone in europe or australia or china, or anywhere at all, shows its almost 100% from homo sapiens that had already evolved in africa before they left. So most people come from a single but genetically diverse homo sapien population in africa, with mixture with other human/hominid populations as their spread, but the mixture is pretty small usually only 5% or less.

Then how come SSA Africans have about 19% admixture from an archaic ghost species?
Modern European are Neanderthals still, we share 99.64% of our genome

 

[Deleted member 6273]

All the evidence shows that, there were a few migrations of different humans at different times out of africa, which led to a few different subspecies or species of hominids evolving like neanderthals in west asia and europe and the denisovans and others. Cro magnon was an earlier direct ancestor of modern europeans, while neanderthals were a separate branch, although they did intermix, most europeans only have around 2% identifiable neanderthal dna. All hominids came out of africa and spread just about everywhere, at different times and with different levels of mixture depending on what people you look at. But most dna from anyone in europe or australia or china, or anywhere at all, shows its almost 100% from homo sapiens that had already evolved in africa before they left. So most people come from a single but genetically diverse homo sapien population in africa, with mixture with other human/hominid populations as they spread, but the mixture is pretty small usually only 5% or less.

This tbh, couldn't have worded it better

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

Then how come SSA Africans have about 19% admixture from an archaic ghost species?
Modern European are Neanderthals still, we share 99.64% of our genome

That fits in fine with the evidence because there were already many different species of hominids in africa before any of them ever left, and they had presumably been interbreeding some. Modern humans and Neanderthals are like you say 99.64% similar or a bit more or less depending exactly which humans, that also makes sense because they had not been separated and independently evolving for very long. Modern africans and neandarthals also share more than 99% dna but they have no signs in their dna of breeding with each other.

 

[delusionalretard]

That fits in fine with the evidence because there were already many different species of hominids in africa before any of them ever left, and they had presumably been interbreeding some. Modern humans and Neanderthals are like you say 99.64% similar or a bit more or less depending exactly which humans, that also makes sense because they had not been separated and independently evolving for very long. Modern africans and neandarthals also share more than 99% dna but they have no signs in their dna of breeding with each other.

I've seen many different theories being presented about the origins of the first hominids etc and new bones are being discovered that refute/question certain hypothesis. I guess we just have to wait and speculate for the time being. Incredibly fascinating though nonetheless.

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

I've seen many different theories being presented about the origins of the first hominids etc and new bones are being discovered that refute/question certain hypothesis. I guess we just have to wait and speculate for the time being. Incredibly fascinating though nonetheless.

Yeah its definitely not something with a whole lot of evidence, especially in africa because the fossils and dna never last too long in that climate. It seems that in the coming years there will be a lot of new findings as the tools for analyzing dna get better and better

 

[goat2x]

my genetic linage came up after the roman empire was built we evolved from the ground

i aint no fucking homo erectus

 

[TITUS]

Multi regional, the out of Africa at this point is a political tool to fill western countries with nigger and nigger mongrel slaves.