Which of these 3d plans looks better for chin advancement

[RandomGREY]

I am also getting infras

Tags
@VenatorLuparius
@anticel

 

[RandomGREY]

Its a 2mm difference (yes im autistic)

 

[anticel]

imo 2 is better

 

[HarrierDuBois]

You need to include brow ridge to measure the convexity angle.

Total facial convexity angle

A useful way to evaluate side profile. It is the angle created by the relationship between the glabella, nose, and chin. Ideal angle in males is 141 degrees. Examples: This is a big determinant in how attractive one is, especially with regard to protruding features. When this angle is ideal...

looksmax.org

 

[RandomGREY]

You need to include brow ridge to measure the convexity angle.

Total facial convexity angle

A useful way to evaluate side profile. It is the angle created by the relationship between the glabella, nose, and chin. Ideal angle in males is 141 degrees. Examples: This is a big determinant in how attractive one is, especially with regard to protruding features. When this angle is ideal...

looksmax.org

Thx but it’s not in the cbct. Have a protruded brown ridge tho.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Thx but it’s not in the cbct. Have a protruded brown ridge tho.

Brutal you should have the entirety of the face to get as proportionate of a side as possible.

 

[VenatorLuparius]

Bigger is better but it's not like 2mm is going to make a drastic difference anyway, the plates are probably as thick.