Which physique or frame looks better and more aesthetic?

[william2605]

 

[first snow]

2nd

 

[william2605]

2nd

Why?he is skinny

 

[first snow]

Why?he is skinny

this is not considered skinny at all

 

[Lies oF nature]

Why?he is skinny

thats not skinny thats lean and hes got waist and hips insertions leaner and better ratios and clavicle shape

 

[davidlaidisme67]

Right due to wider clavicles

 

[Lies oF nature]

this is not considered skinny at all

stole words from my mouth lil bro

 

[william2605]

Right due to wider clavicles

Yeah that’s is true has very wide clavicles

 

[Surfsup]

Right due to wider clavicles

Left has about the same clavicle length the only difference is right has a small waist

 

[william2605]

Left has about the same clavicle length the only difference is right has a small waist

No lol left has a lot of fat on his shoulders ,

 

[Surfsup]

No lol left has a lot of fat on his shoulders ,

Oh ur right
But the bideltoid is similar no?

 

[william2605]

Oh ur right
But the bideltoid is similar no?

Idk but , right is a lot wider despite wai lesss fat ,it’s strange maybe he has huge clavicles

 

[It'snotover]

Right but he needs to put on more mass then he will look amazing at this leanness tbh

 

[william2605]

Right but he needs to put on more mass then he will look amazing at this leanness tbh

Yeah I agree it’s a bit skinny but his instertions look amazing imo also frame ?

 

[It'snotover]

Yeah I agree it’s a bit skinny but his instertions look amazing imo also frame ?

Yeah that's why I said he should put on more mass he has very aesthetic insertions that would stand out more with more mass. His frame is obviously good, his scapula and clavicles are wide and waist is narrow.

 

[e1488shciozl]

View attachment 3675560

Posted 2 bad physiques and asked which is better. First one has really big arms which ruin the harmony, also a fat ass waist. Second one has a small chest and isnt muscular enough to be aeshtetic imo

 

[Deleted member 71543]

1 looks better imo

 

[william2605]

Posted 2 bad physiques and asked which is better. First one has really big arms which ruin the harmony, also a fat ass waist. Second one has a small chest and isnt muscular enough to be aeshtetic imo

Bad physique the guy on the right ?are you crazy?

 

[e1488shciozl]

Bad physique the guy on the right ?are you crazy?

If i was a foid and given the choice of those two bodies i wouldn't choose any. Second is pale btw big turn off

 

[Chinacurry]

Left by far

 

[william2605]

Left by far

Why

 

[Deleted member 104030]

pretty much same SMV just depends if the girl likes skinny twigs or fat muscular fucks

 

[william2605]

pretty much same SMV just depends if the girl likes skinny twigs or fat muscular fucks

Aesthetic wise?

 

[Deleted member 104030]

Aesthetic wise?

taller guy mogs i guess

 

[william2605]

taller guy mogs i guess

Right.?

 

[KJ7]

Right has a better frame, smaller waist and is leaner. Overall he's more aesthetic than the guy on the left but only slightly. Also his shorts are lower down making his torso look longer. The left guy has a higher muscle mass and looks a lot more physically powerful and stronger. He's also tanned which isn't helping his physique but generally looks better. Both great physiques and frames tbh

 

[cytoplasm]

Left is way better

 

[lowinhibcel]

View attachment 3675560

2 because better frame and leaner

 

[Chinacurry]

pretty much same SMV just depends if the girl likes skinny twigs or fat muscular fucks

Yeah basically that

 

[william2605]

2 because better frame and leaner

And insertions ?clsvicles?

 

[cytoplasm]

2 because better frame and leaner

Its not a better frame. And its not aesthetic

 

[william2605]

Its not a better frame. And its not aesthetic

He has wider clavicles

 

[JohnnyRamone]

View attachment 3675560

The first has a fuller look. I’m pretty confident that most women would choose it over the other one. Most people around here would say the leaner guy, but I’d be shocked if that had more appeal to women.

 

[lowinhibcel]

And insertions ?clsvicles?

Yeah thats what i mean by frame basically. And narrower waist

 

[william2605]

Yeah thats what i mean by frame basically. And narrower waist

I mean in absolute terms ,his clavicles looks way elongated

 

[Deleted member 142629]

2 for me, broader appeal and way easier to maintain cuz i hate gymceling

 

[Manchild_v2]

left is woman's gaze right is fag gaze

 

[william2605]

2 for me, broader appeal and way easier to maintain cuz i hate gymceling

Aesthetic wise

 

[Deleted member 142629]

Aesthetic wise

still 2

 

[Lefty Rankin]

View attachment 3675560

Are you asking us to compare the two different guys you like imagining yourself wrestling naked with?

 

[cytoplasm]

He has wider clavicles

How you know that? Did you measure them

 

[william2605]

How you know that? Did you measure them

Visually , the left has Ihuge fat and still look less wide

 

[william2605]

still 2

Why

 

[cytoplasm]

Visually , the left has Ihuge fat and still look less wide

No he doesnt

 

[Lies oF nature]

Oh ur right
But the bideltoid is similar no?

thats why i said shape only having bidelt dosent matter you need an aesthetic shape

 

[william2605]

thats why i said shape only having bidelt dosent matter you need an aesthetic shape

In width who mogs ?

 

[Lies oF nature]

In width who mogs ?

stupid question thats like saying in subhumanity who mogs

 

[d3m4g5]

View attachment 3675560

Honestly something in between these 2 would be optimal. Left is a bit too bulky, right is a little skinny.

 

[Deleted member 134910]

Why?he is skinny

Bc second wont cheat with a twink body like that

 

[william2605]

stupid question thats like saying in subhumanity who mogs

Why?sorry