which ratio effects harmony the most

axttt_

axttt_

shortcel
Joined
Mar 3, 2024
Posts
7,451
Reputation
9,885
I'd say either midface , FWHR or ESR
 
ratios are cope, if ur good looking ur good looking retard dont overcomplicate it with these nerdy "ratios" shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent, cornerd nerd, nofap and 4 others
ratios are cope, if ur good looking ur good looking retard dont overcomplicate it with these nerdy "ratios" shit
how are ratios cope lmao you become good looking with good ratios a guy with 0.6 esr will never be good looking
 
ratios are cope, if ur good looking ur good looking retard dont overcomplicate it with these nerdy "ratios" shit
this is like saying features are cope tho, ig if your attractive your attractive. but its due to ratios n features
 
how are ratios cope lmao you become good looking with good ratios a guy with 0.6 esr will never be good looking
no retard, ur just overcomplicating it, ur a nerd :geek: . Like if a guy is GL then he is GL, you overcomplicate it with stupid nerdy ratios. Appeal is king, a guys 0.6 esr wont matter if he appeals to the opposite sex.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StacyRepellent, cornerd nerd, edodalic29 and 3 others
this is like saying features are cope tho, ig if your attractive your attractive. but its due to ratios n features
Stfu u dumb autist. If he has appeal then his features dont matter
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent, cornerd nerd and edodalic29
how are ratios cope lmao you become good looking with good ratios a guy with 0.6 esr will never be good looking
What he means is probably ratios are cope unless you have an obvious deformity in the face
 
no retard, ur just overcomplicating it, ur a nerd :geek: . Like if a guy is GL then he is GL, you overcomplicate it with stupid nerdy ratios. Appeal is king, a guys 0.6 esr wont matter if he appeals to the opposite sex.
this is real cope acting like ratios dont matter show me one guy with awful ratios who is objectively good looking
 
What he means is probably ratios are cope unless you have an obvious deformity in the face
im not saying u have to have ideal ratios to be good looking but subhuman ratios will ruin ur face
 
this is real cope acting like ratios dont matter show me one guy with awful ratios who is objectively good looking
retard, if a guy has appeal and he appeals to the opposite sex, his ratios don't matter.

if he's ugly then ofc ratios matter jfl, ur actually so stupid mods should ban you
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StacyRepellent, cornerd nerd and Deleted member 67655
he gets appeal from ratios n features retard
no jfl it can be something like fluffy hair or blue eyes, his coloring, or striking zygos eye area jaw etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent and cornerd nerd
my eyes 0.001 mm more apart from the ideal range it's over
 
retard, if a guy has appeal and he appeals to the opposite sex, his ratios don't matter.

if he's ugly then ofc ratios matter jfl, ur actually so stupid mods should ban you
he gets appeal from ratios n features retard
what ur saying makes no sense contradicting urself saying they don't matter then if they're ugly they do matter someone with god awful ratios will never be attractive no matter their features
 
im not saying u have to have ideal ratios to be good looking but subhuman ratios will ruin ur face
true but in that case wouldn't every ratio matter? I think esr is the worst failo to have if too wide set/ too close set
 
this is real cope acting like ratios dont matter show me one guy with awful ratios who is objectively good looking
1719159115665
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67655
what ur saying makes no sense contradicting urself saying they don't matter then if they're ugly they do matter someone with god awful ratios will never be attractive no matter their features
they can be attractive with bad ratios dumbass
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent, cornerd nerd, Deleted member 67655 and 1 other person
they can be attractive with bad ratios dumbass
they are coping with muh muh ratios
but ratios are useless shit, you don't need to measure it to say if someone good looking
they just think that ratios=harmony
but actually it's features and maxillomandibular development=harmony
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67655
they are coping with muh muh ratios
but ratios are useless shit, you don't need to measure it to say if someone good looking
they just think that ratios=harmony
but actually it's features and maxillomandibular development=harmony
ratios are def not most important but def matter
 
I think my ratios are decent ngl but mid face imo
 
ideal pfl
ideal esr
ideal jaw width
ideal neck to jaw
ideal midface range
ideal mouth to nose
almost ideal chin to philtrum
but shit ratios ig
shit fwhr
shit total fwhr
midface is too compact
mouth to nose is more than ideal
etc
 
shit fwhr
shit total fwhr
midface is too compact
mouth to nose is more than ideal
etc
yes so overall his ratios aren't bad like you said his harmony is still above average only thing that holds him back is his face is slightly too compact
 
yes so overall his ratios aren't bad like you said his harmony is still above average only thing that holds him back is his face is slightly too compact
harmony=/=ratios my bruder
 
Jaw frontal angle must be equal to or withing a 12 degree range of the eme angle and more stuff like this
 
Yeah psl seems cope anyways
idk about cope psl and appeal are correlated but i agree that it can be at times and there is a limit someone with 7.5 psl is probably less appealing than someone with 6
 
how are ratios cope lmao you become good looking with good ratios a guy with 0.6 esr will never be good looking
wouldnt be 0.6 esr considered as a disabled person or smth. People in replies mean that you can still be attractive even if you're not in the ideal range in one of the more important ratios
 
wouldnt be 0.6 esr considered as a disabled person or smth. People in replies mean that you can still be attractive even if you're not in the ideal range in one of the more important ratios
yeah ofc u dont have to be in the ideal range for every ratio no one is and even if important ratios like fwhr esr midface are not ideal there are still plenty of good looking people lacking those i never said other wise
 
yeah ofc u dont have to be in the ideal range for every ratio no one is and even if important ratios like fwhr esr midface are not ideal there are still plenty of good looking people lacking those i never said other wise
yeah so I think you agree with the OP cause I hope he doesnt think that having esr of 0.6 can still be attractive lmao
 

Similar threads

monecel
Replies
2
Views
96
Angutoid
Angutoid
trualive
Discussion ON FACIAL HARMONY
Replies
4
Views
133
ropemax
ropemax
redbulljaw
Replies
9
Views
140
redbulljaw
redbulljaw
trualive
Replies
1
Views
143
Alexander Sorgers
Alexander Sorgers

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top