Which religion makes the most sense?

[LTNUser]

Hinduism/Christianity/Islam/Buddhism and why?

 

[Deleted member 117288]

You left the best one out lad.

 

[LTNUser]

You left the best one out lad.

Jew?

 

[Deleted member 117288]

Jew?

Jew is not a religion, Jew is a Jew!

 

[Deleted member 122979]

traditional satanism b/c it provides the most worldly benefits

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Hinduism/Christianity/Islam/Buddhism and why?

Islam

 

[Ultimate Subhuman™]

Christianity

 

[Raja Porus]

The one which works for you

 

[Deleted member 91099]

None of them make sense

 

[Deleted member 117288]

traditional satanism b/c it provides the most worldly benefits

In a worldly pov, I can understand satanism.

 

[davidlaidisme67]

Islam/Christianity. I swear if my future son ever says shalom I’m going to circumcise his entire penis off

 

[Ultimate Subhuman™]

traditional satanism b/c it provides the most worldly benefits

Trad Satanism comes from Christianity wouldnt be possible if no belief in Christianity

 

[Raja Porus]

Islam

I can't pray to Allah anymore. I prefer silent meditation instead

 

[Deleted member 122979]

Trad Satanism comes from Christianity wouldnt be possible if no belief in Christianity

doesnt matter

 

[Ultimate Subhuman™]

doesnt matter

Low Sentience

 

[Deleted member 116824]

Israelites.

 

[Deleted member 117288]

I cannot tell you which one makes the most sense, as religion has supernatural beginnings we cannot make sense of it.
However I can tell you which one is the most retarded, paganism.

 

[Deleted member 122979]

Low Sentience

how so

 

[Deleted member 122469]

Islam/Christianity

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Islam/Christianity

100%

 

[Ultimate Subhuman™]

how so

Your response lacked Awareness or Reasoning

 

[Raja Porus]

I cannot tell you which one makes the most sense, as religion has supernatural beginnings we cannot make sense of it.
However I can tell you which one is the most retarded, paganism.

Neoplatonic paganism is based though

Read this book

 

[the_machinist_786]

Native Polytheism for every ethnolinguistic group, Deism, Buddhism (without crap), Neoplatonism, Manichaeism

 

[Ultimate Subhuman™]

Islam/Christianity

Islam/Christianity. I swear if my future son ever says shalom I’m going to circumcise his entire penis off

If Islam/Christianity is the choice (Abrahamic Religon) you must believe in Abraham. Being the father of Judaism
Your choices would also must include Judaism

 

[Ur fav sub 5]

Hinduism/Christianity/Islam/Buddhism and why?

Islam simply because only 1 god and he's all powerful and all knowing

 

[overtier1011]

Hinduism/Christianity/Islam/Buddhism and why?

Religions are man made about god

 

[Deleted member 122979]

Your response lacked Awareness or Reasoning

if god exists, then people exist for, by and from successesion

all that god creates must be perfect by definition

the motive of success is evolutionarily engrained

satanism most aligns with the motive of evolutionary success

traditional satanism instead of atheistic satanism bc religion is evolutionarily beneficial

all my beliefs are for worldly experience

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

If Islam/Christianity is the choice (Abrahamic Religon) you must believe in Abraham. Being the father of Judaism
Your choices would also must include Judaism

No

 

[Donquixote]

Hinduism/Christianity/Islam/Buddhism and why?

Hinduism and Buddhism ofcourse
All the other relegion says you will go to hell if you don't follow them and these ones say every type of worship is the worship of the supreme lord
Jai hind!

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Hinduism/Christianity/Islam/Buddhism and why?

Christianity.

PROPHECIES AND CONTINUITY

that Christianity, especially through Jesus, fulfills over 300 Old Testament prophecies. This is one of the cornerstone claims of Christian apologetics. Examples include:


• Isaiah 53: The Suffering Servant, interpreted by Christians as a prophecy of Jesus’ crucifixion.


• Micah 5:2: The prophecy of the Messiah being born in Bethlehem.


• Psalm 22: The description of a crucifixion-like death long before crucifixion existed.

2. Philosophical Strength of the Trinity

the Trinity provides the best resolution to metaphysical questions, particularly the “problem of the One and the Many.” This is a philosophical problem about how unity and diversity coexist:


• In Christian theology, the Trinity (one God in three persons) reflects both unity (God is one in essence) and diversity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in relationship). This is seen as a model for how creation reflects its Creator—diverse yet unified.


• In Islam (Tawhid) and Judaism, God is understood as absolutely singular. Critics argue this makes it difficult to explain how unity and diversity coexist in creation if the Creator is exclusively singular without internal relationality.


• Hinduism and polytheism, as you pointed out, often lead to fragmentation. A multiplicity of gods, each with their own conflicting wills, risks reflecting chaos rather than order.

3. Immanence vs. Transcendence

Christianity uniquely presents God as both immanent and transcendent, something you find lacking in Islam and Judaism. Here’s the distinction:


• Christianity: Through the Incarnation (Jesus Christ), God enters creation as both fully God and fully man, making God deeply personal and relatable. The Holy Spirit indwells believers, furthering this immanence.


• Judaism and Islam: God is strictly transcendent. While God interacts with creation through revelation and prophets, He is not thought to enter into creation or take on a human nature. Critics argue that this creates an insurmountable gap between Creator and creation, making God less relational or knowable.

For many, Christianity’s doctrine of the Incarnation makes God uniquely accessible without compromising His transcendence, fulfilling humanity’s longing for both relationship and awe.

Christian theology’s balance between immanence (God involved in creation) and transcendence (God beyond creation) gives it a unique philosophical coherence. The Trinity resolves these tensions, making God relational (through love within the Trinity) and knowable while remaining transcendent.



4. The Problem of Polytheism

The critique of polytheistic systems like Hinduism for leading to chaos or entropy, as they involve multiple gods with conflicting wills and limitations. Philosophically, this raises issues such as:


• Ultimate Authority: If there are many gods, which one is supreme? The lack of a unified source of authority undermines coherence in the universe.


• Unity in Creation: The observable unity and order in nature (e.g., consistent laws of physics) suggest a single, unified source rather than competing deities.

Christian monotheism, particularly with its Trinitarian understanding, resolves these issues by positing one ultimate God who is relational within Himself, allowing for both order and diversity in creation.



CONCLUSION
My issue with Islam and Judaism

The strictly singular God of Islam and Judaism cannot resolve metaphysical questions or provide a relational framework. Some additional points:


• Judaism: While God is singular, the Hebrew Bible often uses relational language, such as God being a “Father” to Israel. However, Jewish theology lacks the concept of God entering creation as a person (e.g., the Incarnation), which limits relationality.


• Islam: Tawhid emphasizes God’s absolute oneness and dissimilarity to creation (Qur’an 112:4, “There is nothing like unto Him”). While this highlights God’s transcendence, critics argue it makes Him distant and unknowable, reducing the possibility of a personal relationship.

Christianity’s relational God bridges this gap through Jesus, offering both intimacy and transcendence in ways these systems cannot





TLDR:

• Christianity’s fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies demonstrates continuity with the past.


• The Trinity provides a robust framework for metaphysical unity and diversity something Judaism and Islam god cannot do.


• The Incarnation (Jesus Christ) uniquely bridges the gap between the transcendent and immanent.


• Polytheism fails due to its inherent disunity, while strict monotheism risks making God too distant. Only Christianity solves this problem

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Hinduism and Buddhism ofcourse
All the other relegion says you will go to hell if you don't follow them and these ones say every type of worship is the worship of the supreme lord
Jai hind!

This so it’s better in your eyes because it lets you be a degenerate

 

[Tusseleif]

Native Polytheism for every ethnolinguistic group,

Yeah it also allows you to feel a sense of community and spiritual connection with your native country and your ancestors. The Norse gods and Norse culture never really left Scandinavia, even today there's still traces of it in culture, like for example when it's thunderous weather, sometimes we say it's Tor beating his hammer. Even kings like Cnut the Great and Harald Hardrada endorsed Norse gods even though they were Christian:

A story told in both the Heimskringla and Flateyjarbók sagas of Harald Hardrada tells how the king and Þjóðólfr were walking in Trondheim one day and heard a tanner and a smith having a dispute; the king challenged the skáld to make a verse about the incident, but Þjóðólfr at first declined, since it would be inappropriate to his station, "seeing that I am called your Chief Skald".[1] The king then specified that he was to make the verses with the combatants being Sigurðr and Fafnir and then Thor and Geirröðr, but using kennings suited to the men's actual professions, both of which Þjóðólfr did, in a "playful tour de force".[3][4]

In Norway I regularly see people wearing Thor's hammers. I admire Finns who endorse Ukko, or Balts Perkunas, or Greeks who endorse Zeus, or Slavs Perun, and etc

 

[Deleted member 117288]

All religions have supernatural origins,
you cannot make sense out of the nonsensical.
The mere act of thinking these thoughts through is demonic in it's nature.
You cannot give a robust framework for a creator whose simulation you're living upon.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Islam/Christianity. I swear if my future son ever says shalom I’m going to circumcise his entire penis off

Islam/Christianity

No

I suggest you guys become black pilled by reading my original reply. Any critiques I’ll take but just read it (or read the TLDR if you’re lazy)

 

[Deleted member 122469]

I suggest you guys become black pilled by reading my original reply. Any critiques I’ll take but just read it (or read the TLDR if you’re lazy)

I will read it when I have time

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

I suggest you guys become black pilled by reading my original reply. Any critiques I’ll take but just read it (or read the TLDR if you’re lazy)

We believe Jesus is the messiah and also that line about Allah swt doesnt mean hes totally unrelatable, he has infinite power so he can make people relate to him

 

[betrayed by 5‘8]

for low iq low impulse control populations islam, for the rest christianity

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

We believe Jesus is the messiah and also that line about Allah swt doesnt mean hes totally unrelatable, he has infinite power so he can make people relate to him

Doesn’t matter what you believe if your belief is false and built upon a lie (no offence).

Islamic Tanzih states that Allah is unlike anything in creation in anyway this is even supported in your Quran. Your God is so distant that he cannot and will not even enter into creation

 

[我需要阴部]

honestly I'll say Buddhism

 

[Deleted member 117288]

for low iq low impulse control populations islam, for the rest christianity

This opinion is shared by the majority.

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Doesn’t matter what you believe if your belief is false and built upon a lie (no offence).

Islamic Tanzih states that Allah is unlike anything in creation in anyway this is even supported in your Quran. Your God is so distant that he cannot and will not even enter into creation

Nobody can “relate” to the Islamic god, my gid is relatable yours isn’t

Someone being unlike all other relation does not mean he cannot relate with other creations, its describing his power/characteristics
If someone is all powerful and just on a whole different level from everyone else they can still make themselves relate with others because they are all powerful

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Someone being unlike all other relation does not mean he cannot relate with other creations, its describing his power/characteristics
If someone is all powerful and just on a whole different level from everyone else they can still make themselves relate with others because they are all powerful

Learn philosophy before you write again. If there is no simlitude then there is no WAY for you to interact or know of the things existence.

Everything humans experience see smell hear etc etc is based upon a casual chain of similarity based on created things and effects this is often called “phenomena”. Your god is completely REMOVED from this in EVERY SINGLE WAY this is why your Islamic philosophers can’t even answer this. Even the 99 attributes of Allah anthropomorphises him inaccurately because Allah is not like ANYTHING IN CREATION so saying Allah is the most merciful is attributing an created definition and thing to your god therefore it isn’t one of his “attributes” even the word attributes gives the same image . This is a big issue for your philosophers and scholars

Nobody can “relate” to the Islamic god, my God is relatable yours isn’t. You can’t even know your god that’s the sad thing because to know him implies he’s got an similitude to creation which isn’t the case in Islam therefore even the word “Allah” cannot reference him, the Quran literally cannot even be his words. Philosophically Islam is even easier to refute than GAYthiesm

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Learn philosophy before you write again. If there is no simlitude then there is no WAY for you to interact or know of the things existence.

Everything humans experience see smell hear etc etc is based upon a casual chain of similarity based on created things and effects this is often called “phenomena”. Your god is completely REMOVED from this in EVERY SINGLE WAY this is why your Islamic philosophers can’t even answer this. Even the 99 attributes of Allah anthropomorphises him innnaxufatgelt because Allah is not like ANYTHING IN CREATION so saying Allah is the most merciful is attributing an created definition and thing to your god therefore it isn’t one of his “attributes” even the word attributes gives the same image . This is a big issue for your philosophers and scholars

Nobody can “relate” to the Islamic god, my God is relatable yours isn’t. You can’t even know your god that’s the sad thing because to know him implies he’s got an similitude to creation which isn’t the case in Islam therefore even the word “Allah” cannot reference him, the Quran literally cannot even be his words. Philosophically Islam is even easier to refute than GAYthiesm

Your essentially bringing up a version of the rock paradox which if you accept you have to accept God isnt real

 

[Ultimate Subhuman™]

if god exists, then people exist for, by and from successesion

all that god creates must be perfect by definition

the motive of success is evolutionarily engrained

satanism most aligns with the motive of evolutionary success

traditional satanism instead of atheistic satanism bc religion is evolutionarily beneficial

all my beliefs are for worldly experience

You arguing that Traditional Satanism aligns well with evolutionary drives?

Christianity emphasizes communal values such as love, forgiveness, and altruism, which foster cooperation and group cohesion.
In contrast, traditional Satanism's focus on individualism prioritize personal success but risks compromising group cohesion, which is crucial for long-term evolutionary success. Christian teachings encourage family structures, marital fidelity, and raising children within a stable environment. This supports evolutionary success. Satanism, with its emphasis on personal freedom, dosent not prioritize these familial and reproductive strategies.

While Satanism alligns with individualistic evolutionary strategies, Christianity’s emphasis on community, family, morality, and cultural longevity better supports the collective survival and flourishing of human societies. These traits, in turn, make Christianity more aligned with evolutionary success, as it facilitates both the survival of individuals and the propagation of groups across generations.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Your essentially bringing up a version of the rock paradox which if you accept you have to accept God isnt real

No. My god don’t have the same problem that’s one of the critiques I made of YOUR and the JEWISH god you lot have

The Father is unknowable rhays true but we have the trinity the Son is the Icon the Image of the invisible God (the father) through the Son you can know the fathers revelation, the Son comes into space and time numerous timeout he Bible and is the “angel of the Lord” in genesis. 16-22 who speak to Abraham and who Abraham worships and who Hagar calls the God who sees and hears all.

This God is the ultimate revelation the Trinity is God and the Son is the way God chooses to reveal himself and the Spirit is the way god Guides us. It’s that simple

 

[Bl0odKn1ght]

Christianity.

PROPHECIES AND CONTINUITY

that Christianity, especially through Jesus, fulfills over 300 Old Testament prophecies. This is one of the cornerstone claims of Christian apologetics. Examples include:


• Isaiah 53: The Suffering Servant, interpreted by Christians as a prophecy of Jesus’ crucifixion.


• Micah 5:2: The prophecy of the Messiah being born in Bethlehem.


• Psalm 22: The description of a crucifixion-like death long before crucifixion existed.

2. Philosophical Strength of the Trinity

the Trinity provides the best resolution to metaphysical questions, particularly the “problem of the One and the Many.” This is a philosophical problem about how unity and diversity coexist:


• In Christian theology, the Trinity (one God in three persons) reflects both unity (God is one in essence) and diversity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in relationship). This is seen as a model for how creation reflects its Creator—diverse yet unified.


• In Islam (Tawhid) and Judaism, God is understood as absolutely singular. Critics argue this makes it difficult to explain how unity and diversity coexist in creation if the Creator is exclusively singular without internal relationality.


• Hinduism and polytheism, as you pointed out, often lead to fragmentation. A multiplicity of gods, each with their own conflicting wills, risks reflecting chaos rather than order.

3. Immanence vs. Transcendence

Christianity uniquely presents God as both immanent and transcendent, something you find lacking in Islam and Judaism. Here’s the distinction:


• Christianity: Through the Incarnation (Jesus Christ), God enters creation as both fully God and fully man, making God deeply personal and relatable. The Holy Spirit indwells believers, furthering this immanence.


• Judaism and Islam: God is strictly transcendent. While God interacts with creation through revelation and prophets, He is not thought to enter into creation or take on a human nature. Critics argue that this creates an insurmountable gap between Creator and creation, making God less relational or knowable.

For many, Christianity’s doctrine of the Incarnation makes God uniquely accessible without compromising His transcendence, fulfilling humanity’s longing for both relationship and awe.

Christian theology’s balance between immanence (God involved in creation) and transcendence (God beyond creation) gives it a unique philosophical coherence. The Trinity resolves these tensions, making God relational (through love within the Trinity) and knowable while remaining transcendent.



4. The Problem of Polytheism

The critique of polytheistic systems like Hinduism for leading to chaos or entropy, as they involve multiple gods with conflicting wills and limitations. Philosophically, this raises issues such as:


• Ultimate Authority: If there are many gods, which one is supreme? The lack of a unified source of authority undermines coherence in the universe.


• Unity in Creation: The observable unity and order in nature (e.g., consistent laws of physics) suggest a single, unified source rather than competing deities.

Christian monotheism, particularly with its Trinitarian understanding, resolves these issues by positing one ultimate God who is relational within Himself, allowing for both order and diversity in creation.



CONCLUSION
My issue with Islam and Judaism

The strictly singular God of Islam and Judaism cannot resolve metaphysical questions or provide a relational framework. Some additional points:


• Judaism: While God is singular, the Hebrew Bible often uses relational language, such as God being a “Father” to Israel. However, Jewish theology lacks the concept of God entering creation as a person (e.g., the Incarnation), which limits relationality.


• Islam: Tawhid emphasizes God’s absolute oneness and dissimilarity to creation (Qur’an 112:4, “There is nothing like unto Him”). While this highlights God’s transcendence, critics argue it makes Him distant and unknowable, reducing the possibility of a personal relationship.

Christianity’s relational God bridges this gap through Jesus, offering both intimacy and transcendence in ways these systems cannot





TLDR:

• Christianity’s fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies demonstrates continuity with the past.


• The Trinity provides a robust framework for metaphysical unity and diversity something Judaism and Islam god cannot do.


• The Incarnation (Jesus Christ) uniquely bridges the gap between the transcendent and immanent.


• Polytheism fails due to its inherent disunity, while strict monotheism risks making God too distant. Only Christianity solves this problem

Knew id find u here brother

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Knew id find u here brother

Ofc bro I gotta let these niggaz know wassup. I myself almost converted to Islam tbh

At face value Islam makes the most sense (key word at face value as in no research)

But in deeper inspection Christianity is the only sensible religion one you research world religions like I have you laugh at how pathetically clueless and false all other beliefs are

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

No. My god don’t have the same problem that’s one of the critiques I made of YOUR and the JEWISH god you lot have

The Father is unknowable rhays true but we have the trinity the Son is the Icon the Image of the invisible God (the father) through the Son you can know the fathers revelation, the Son comes into space and time numerous timeout he Bible and is the “angel of the Lord” in genesis. 16-22 who speak to Abraham and who Abraham worships and who Hagar calls the God who sees and hears all.

This God is the ultimate revelation the Trinity is God and the Son is the way God chooses to reveal himself and the Spirit is the way god Guides us. It’s that simple

You missed my point.

 

[Deleted member 117288]

You aren't meant to relate to the creator of the simulation who programmed you.
The relationship is only one-sided,
Greek translations are prone to be inaccurate, this is something to keep in mind also.

Attributing certain characteristics to the creator is also very low sentience behaviour.
As this means you believe your frequency matches to that of someone outside your realm who operates it.

About the Holy texts being written by the creator himself, this is not really arguable.
The sane idea is that God talks to man through synchronicities and whispers.
This therefore makes it possible for the selected individual to spread the message to the selected population, a prophecy.
The old testament was not written by a normal human, rather a projection of Godly words towards text by the means of humanoidals.
This however does not mean that God came in his mighty idolatry-like pagan form and wrote it himself!

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

You missed my point.

I get your point. It’s that Allah can do whatever he wants. I get that but this isn’t a matter of him doing “what he wants” this is an brutal internal critique and brutalises your philosophy and theology

Allah unlike anything in creation. He cannot be compared to anything and he doesn’t condescend to anything.

This means as I said your Quran being the LITERAL uncreated ETERNAL word of Allah cannot be because Allahs word being intrinsic to Allah cannot be understood by humans because it has no similarity to creation and yet you have a book (creation) with ink and lapsed (creation) and leather or plastic (creation) to explain the uncreated whilst saying that that created booklet explained the ineffable uncreated eternal completely dissimilar God’s will.

It’s just ludicrous.

This also destroys the Islamic belief of occasionalism and Atomism which also requires your GOD TO BE IN CAUSAL CHAINS TO IMPACT CREATION AND YET HE ISNT IF YOU ASK ANY AQEEDAH. So Islamic atomism is literally IMPOSSIBLE


Islam is philosophically impossible to follow.