Which user would win a debate? (Hard mode)

Title


  • Total voters
    20
Klasik616

Klasik616

Things are how they are, you can't change it
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Posts
30,710
Reputation
67,031
Choose between:
@asdvek
@anthony111553
@The Grinch
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 155024, Insomnia and Tigermoggerlol
depends what we're debating on, i'll slam every faggot here in a diet argument.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: kiing_ronk, Latinolooksmaxxer, Gaygymmaxx and 3 others
i've never lost a debate btw
 
  • JFL
Reactions: kiing_ronk, Gaygymmaxx and Insomnia
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx, LegendaryKennen and Never Get Up
None of these have ever been in a debate by the way, and I think I would win any debate, and If you don't think otherwise try.
 
Cracking Up Lol GIF
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
None of these have ever been in a debate by the way, and I think I would win any debate, and If you don't think otherwise try.
You have a low IQ.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: pfl and Klasik616
which exactly ?
 
You have a low IQ.
What objective metric are you using to measure my IQ, and what credentials do you have to interpret those results? obviously I know you don't understand English, so I'll make it simpler, prove i ''have'' a low iq.
 
What objective metric are you using to measure my IQ, and what credentials do you have to interpret those results? obviously I know you don't understand English, so I'll make it simpler, prove i ''have'' a low iq.
Remove the comma after IQ.

Obviously*

know that*

simpler.*

Prove that*

IQ.*
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
Remove the comma after IQ.

Obviously*

know that*

simpler.*

Prove that*

IQ.*
I asked you to prove your claim. IF grammar corrections are your only response, you’ve already conceded the point.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tigermoggerlol
Choose between:
@asdvek
@anthony111553
@The Grinch
@asdvek that nigga is the master larper he almost had me believing he acc ate raw meat. What a guy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
I asked you to prove your claim. IF grammar corrections are your only response, you’ve already conceded the point.
I was just correcting you for claiming that I do not understand English as your implication of me being an ethnic.

There was no point to be discussed.

You having a lack of knowledge is a fact.

You eat plants.
 
I asked you to prove your claim. IF grammar corrections are your only response, you’ve already conceded the point.
Nigga def in speech and debate
 
@asdvek
 
  • +1
Reactions: asdvek
I was just correcting you for claiming that I do not understand English as your implication of me being an ethnic.

There was no point to be discussed.

You having a lack of knowledge is a fact.

You eat plants.
I never brought up your ethnicity, and implying that I did is dishonest, my comment was about your inability to address a basic logical question, not your background, now, back to the point, what objective metric did you use to measure my IQ, and what credentials do you have to interpret those results?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
I never brought up your ethnicity, and implying that I did is dishonest, my comment was about your inability to address a basic logical question, not your background, now, back to the point, what objective metric did you use to measure my IQ, and what credentials do you have to interpret those results?
Answer this question.

Are you a 100% raw carnivore?
 
@whiteegyptian

You failed to answer my question.

I win.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Never Get Up
Do one for me. People irl tell me I'm impossible to debate with
 
@whiteegyptian you couldn't win the debate
Completely unrelated question, and he seemed to distance himself from the main point, so by logic he conceded, nevertheless I WON.
 
What objective metric are you using to measure my IQ, and what credentials do you have to interpret those results? obviously I know you don't understand English, so I'll make it simpler, prove i ''have'' a low iq.
He's right you're a low iq dog

Not only is this grammatically incorrect, but also needless verbal diarrhea to feign intelligence.

Reminds me of the faggot asians in class who answered the teachers questions and thought it made them more intellegent than everyone else, when really nobody else wanted to talk.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan and Never Get Up
He's right you're low iq dog

Not only is this grammatically incorrect, but also needless verbal diarrhea.
What credentials did you use to also interpret these results buddy, what objective metric did you use to determine he was RIGHT?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Klasik616
What credentials did you use to also interpret these results buddy, what objective metric did you use to determine he was RIGHT? :soy:
You are non NT
 
What credentials did you use to also interpret these results buddy, what objective metric did you use to determine he was RIGHT?
Obviously there can be no objective metrics and there's no "results" as you didn't take a IQ test publicly retard. What are you talking about.

It should go without saying (but I have to say it due to your low sentience) this is an intuitive distinction that I gathered from your behavior.

Jfl at this retarded fake intellectual way of talking

I was just ragebaiting at first but if he speaks like this unironically he really is a midwit @Never Get Up
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan and Never Get Up
Obviously there can be no objective metrics and there's no "results" as you didn't take a IQ test publicly retard. What are you talking about.

It should go without saying (but I have to say it due to your low sentience) this is an intuitive distinction that I gathered from your behavior.

Jfl at this retarded fake intellectual way of talking

I was just ragebaiting at first but if he speaks like this unironically he really is a midwit @Never Get Up
Thanks for conceding, you've admitted there's no objective metric, no IQ test, and that your or his claim was based on ''intuition'' AKA a feeling or bias, and also mirin your ad hominem, now I actually won the debate JFL.
 
Thanks for conceding, you've admitted there's no objective metric, no IQ test, and that your or his claim was based on ''intuition'' AKA a feeling or bias, and also mirin your ad hominem, now I actually won the debate JFL.
"You can't call me dumb because you never saw my IQ test" is beyond retarded.

You've never heard a person talk and concluded they are a midwit?
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan, Never Get Up and Deleted member 155024
"You can't call me dumb because you never saw my IQ test" is beyond retarded.
Makes more sense to me than intuition arguments, I'm not the one going around making baseless claims based on feelings.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan and Gaygymmaxx
Stalemate tbh
 
Makes more sense to me than intuition arguments, I'm not the one going around making baseless claims based on feelings.
Not based on feelings, based upon the way you conduct yourself and feign intelligence.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Never Get Up
Jeremy meeks
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Never Get Up
depends what we're debating on, i'll slam every faggot here in a diet argument.
not @Never Get Up he's the Diet GOAT
 
  • +1
Reactions: Never Get Up
Not based on feelings, based upon the way you conduct yourself and feign intelligence.
When someone confuses confidence and coherence and actual rhetoric literacy with ''faking intelligence'' it says a lot more about them than the person they are judging, you are just projecting right now.
 

Similar threads

RXnd
Replies
17
Views
358
Vermilioncore
Vermilioncore
Jason Voorhees
Replies
24
Views
384
pope
pope
KKamikaze
Replies
65
Views
768
Minuskul
Minuskul
normal boy
Replies
14
Views
218
Deleted member 145648
D
wishIwasSalludon
Replies
55
Views
887
xzv
xzv

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top