T
TheGreatWhite Cope
Bronze
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2026
- Posts
- 281
- Reputation
- 326
Last week on I discussed the Paradoxical Asian Masculinity Spectrum . In continuing my anthropological deep dive series of human ethnicities we arrive at Europeans, their lower face, and the misconceptions surrounding them.
We all know that what makes a good male face is in large part defined by the angularity and robustness of its lower two-thirds. It could make or break ones face.
Being one of the powerfully sexually dimorphic traits in humans, there are substantial differences in this part of the face between men and women, with some having little to no overlap(i.e ramus flexure).
So what exactly defines a masculinized jaw area, as opposed to a more feminine one(i.e. bad if you are male).
A few Key Characteristics:
1. The length and width of the Ramus( That Verticle part of the Jaw right under the ear)
2. The forward length of mandible body
3. The gonial angle( the angle of the jaw created where 1 & 2 meet)
Now if you were to ask the many users on this site which race of people have the most masculine jaw area, they would unsurprisingly assume it to Europeans, which for that I cannot fault them as their minds have been likely rotted by years of JBW propaganda. Today I will prove empirically how whites not only have the most feminine Jaws, but the most subhuman ones .
Ramus Length:
A common misconception here is that whites have the tallest jaws, so thus must have taller more masculine looking ramuses. This is false. Whites have been shown consistently to have shorter and narrower ramus measurement in comparison to other races, whereas it is greater in blacks, Natives, and Asians
The rami of some whites in particular are so short and narrow that the ear practically sits an the edge of the jaw line, giving a very rat like appearance
Compare the above to the properly developed and masculinized rami of men of other races
Whites with the ramus length of Henry Cavil are actually exceedingly race among the white race, most whitebois have very slanted, short, and narrow ramuses, like women, except worse because it actually looks decent on women due to it being a feminized trait
Mandible body length;
No jaw is complete without its mandible body. The body of the mandible is the lower part of the jaw beneath the ramus and above the underside of the chin. White males often have poor manibular length in comparison to men of other races. Part of this is due to the reccessive nature of their jaws. Where essentially the jaw doesn't come foward enough. It's often you will see whites shitting on non-European races such as blacks or East Asian for the presence of prognathism(or protruding jaws) in their population, without realizing the tradeoff for their lower rates of proganthy is that they have far more incidences of retrognathy or recessed jaws.
This in turn reduces the length of their mandible. Creating a very short of "chin-tucked" appearance. Whites are observed to have much shorter mandible body length relative to ethnics. This is also gives them a deformed and narrow palette arches and often contributes to a downward swung appearance to the mandible
Hell the difference in dental arch size between men and women, is about the same as the size difference between non whites and whites
I mean just ask yourself when the last time you ever saw a black guy with this subhuman jaw shape? You'll see about 200 whites with this shit before you see a single ethnic
Jfl. Whiteboys are the only race where this is a common racial trait
There is no doubt the progressive nature of the black maxilla helps "pull" their lower mandible forward alongside it. Forward growth on the individual below is just excellent
The Gonaial angle.
The gonial angle is the angle formed by the meeting juncton of the 2 aformentioned parts of the jaw. It is a highly dimorphic trait with men have more lower angles(more acute) than women who are more obtuse. This angle is what gives of the masculine or feminine appearance to someones lower third.
And it is a trait that varies considerably among the many populations of the world. But one thing is for certain, in this respect all races of man easily mog the white brutally. Whitebois have gonial angles almost more similar to females than to ethnic males.
What this means is that instead of a masculinized jaw that grows down vertically and grows forward horizontally, the jaws of white "men" are instead more moon creesent trait akin to women.
This is no exaggeration either, whitebois and women barely have a difference in their average gonial angle. Unlike in ethnics, where this trait is hugely dimorphic. With the greatest sexual dimorphism in the mandible being found in Africans, Natives and, Eskimos, and Polynesians
Addendum:
There is also something called Ramus Flexure. It is a highly dimorphic aspect of the Jaw. It is when the part of the ramus has an almost indent-esque appearance. This trait is highly dimorphic among sexes., with flexure of the mandible almost exclusive occurring in males, whereas nearly all women have no flex in their ramus, Ramus flexure varies considerable world wide. Most often in Europeans ans less in non Europeans. In a series of 116 male specimens from South Africa, not a single male had bilateral straightness of the mandible compare this too Europeans where in a series of 85 specimen, 3 had bilateral non-flexure
Brvtal. So much for "Muh highly Sexually dimorphic whites" Well there you have it, myth dispelled. Now Discuss.
Inb4 "DNR, a single molecule"
We all know that what makes a good male face is in large part defined by the angularity and robustness of its lower two-thirds. It could make or break ones face.
Being one of the powerfully sexually dimorphic traits in humans, there are substantial differences in this part of the face between men and women, with some having little to no overlap(i.e ramus flexure).
So what exactly defines a masculinized jaw area, as opposed to a more feminine one(i.e. bad if you are male).
A few Key Characteristics:
1. The length and width of the Ramus( That Verticle part of the Jaw right under the ear)
2. The forward length of mandible body
3. The gonial angle( the angle of the jaw created where 1 & 2 meet)
Now if you were to ask the many users on this site which race of people have the most masculine jaw area, they would unsurprisingly assume it to Europeans, which for that I cannot fault them as their minds have been likely rotted by years of JBW propaganda. Today I will prove empirically how whites not only have the most feminine Jaws, but the most subhuman ones .
Ramus Length:
A common misconception here is that whites have the tallest jaws, so thus must have taller more masculine looking ramuses. This is false. Whites have been shown consistently to have shorter and narrower ramus measurement in comparison to other races, whereas it is greater in blacks, Natives, and Asians
The rami of some whites in particular are so short and narrow that the ear practically sits an the edge of the jaw line, giving a very rat like appearance
Compare the above to the properly developed and masculinized rami of men of other races
Whites with the ramus length of Henry Cavil are actually exceedingly race among the white race, most whitebois have very slanted, short, and narrow ramuses, like women, except worse because it actually looks decent on women due to it being a feminized trait
Mandible body length;
No jaw is complete without its mandible body. The body of the mandible is the lower part of the jaw beneath the ramus and above the underside of the chin. White males often have poor manibular length in comparison to men of other races. Part of this is due to the reccessive nature of their jaws. Where essentially the jaw doesn't come foward enough. It's often you will see whites shitting on non-European races such as blacks or East Asian for the presence of prognathism(or protruding jaws) in their population, without realizing the tradeoff for their lower rates of proganthy is that they have far more incidences of retrognathy or recessed jaws.
This in turn reduces the length of their mandible. Creating a very short of "chin-tucked" appearance. Whites are observed to have much shorter mandible body length relative to ethnics. This is also gives them a deformed and narrow palette arches and often contributes to a downward swung appearance to the mandible
Hell the difference in dental arch size between men and women, is about the same as the size difference between non whites and whites
I mean just ask yourself when the last time you ever saw a black guy with this subhuman jaw shape? You'll see about 200 whites with this shit before you see a single ethnic
Jfl
. Whiteboys are the only race where this is a common racial traitThere is no doubt the progressive nature of the black maxilla helps "pull" their lower mandible forward alongside it. Forward growth on the individual below is just excellent
The Gonaial angle.
The gonial angle is the angle formed by the meeting juncton of the 2 aformentioned parts of the jaw. It is a highly dimorphic trait with men have more lower angles(more acute) than women who are more obtuse. This angle is what gives of the masculine or feminine appearance to someones lower third.
And it is a trait that varies considerably among the many populations of the world. But one thing is for certain, in this respect all races of man easily mog the white brutally. Whitebois have gonial angles almost more similar to females than to ethnic males.
What this means is that instead of a masculinized jaw that grows down vertically and grows forward horizontally, the jaws of white "men" are instead more moon creesent trait akin to women.
This is no exaggeration either, whitebois and women barely have a difference in their average gonial angle. Unlike in ethnics, where this trait is hugely dimorphic. With the greatest sexual dimorphism in the mandible being found in Africans, Natives and, Eskimos, and Polynesians
Addendum:
There is also something called Ramus Flexure. It is a highly dimorphic aspect of the Jaw. It is when the part of the ramus has an almost indent-esque appearance. This trait is highly dimorphic among sexes., with flexure of the mandible almost exclusive occurring in males, whereas nearly all women have no flex in their ramus, Ramus flexure varies considerable world wide. Most often in Europeans ans less in non Europeans. In a series of 116 male specimens from South Africa, not a single male had bilateral straightness of the mandible compare this too Europeans where in a series of 85 specimen, 3 had bilateral non-flexure
Brvtal. So much for "Muh highly Sexually dimorphic whites"
Well there you have it, myth dispelled. Now Discuss.Inb4 "DNR, a single molecule"
Attachments
Last edited:
