ZenithZXV
ꁝꋬ꒒꒒ꇙ꓄ꋬ꓄꓄
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2026
- Posts
- 2,171
- Reputation
- 3,465
is something that most anti-white BBC glazers on .org say all the time, mostly to conclude that race does not matter at all, which is just pathetic and they made themselves look like idiots afterwards.
The statement itself is correct, but the issue is the conclusion these orangutans make is laughable, "Ohhh brothaaa white chads are liberal and not racist because they have better lives on average and they do not take pride on their own race"
These liberal white chads are the cause of their genetics, which proves eugenics even more, imagine some white chad wakes up, looks at the mirror and all he sees is a pajeet, if the conclusion you are thinking is that he will turn into racist and takes pride of his pajeet race, it just tells me "Oh what if we genetically engineer every man into a white chad to make them not racist anymore" because these anti-whites actually implies "only genetically lower class ethnics and slavs take pride of their own race" if that statement is true then we should eradicate every genetically lower class whites, slavs and all ethnics and we should only clone/produce white chads and stacies because both of them are less likely to be racist, according to them.
Their statement proves my point that we should manipulate reality and turn the average human into attractive whites by using technology in the future, now that there are no ethnicities other than whites, they are less likely to compare themselves making them not racist because they all look the same, in a positive way.
"Oohhhh if everyone is white chad and stacy, no one is" there is always a limitation to everything, there is a reason why it is called looksmaxxing, not looks increasement because there is a maximum limit in terms of looks. Have you ever seen a lighter skin than the typical pale caucasian skin that is not a fraud? Have you ever seen an eye lighter than A10 that is not a disease or contacts? there will be always a difference even if every one is the same because history can still be used as a focal point, humans can compare themselves to other non-human animals even if every human looks 100% the same, gender still exists and humans cannot perform asexual reproduction, a place when every human is a nigger is different from a place when every human is a white chad, color charts and line measurements still exist so that means even if everyone looks the same, we still know why everyone looks the same because we can pinpoint the reason in the first place.
The statement itself is correct, but the issue is the conclusion these orangutans make is laughable, "Ohhh brothaaa white chads are liberal and not racist because they have better lives on average and they do not take pride on their own race"
These liberal white chads are the cause of their genetics, which proves eugenics even more, imagine some white chad wakes up, looks at the mirror and all he sees is a pajeet, if the conclusion you are thinking is that he will turn into racist and takes pride of his pajeet race, it just tells me "Oh what if we genetically engineer every man into a white chad to make them not racist anymore" because these anti-whites actually implies "only genetically lower class ethnics and slavs take pride of their own race" if that statement is true then we should eradicate every genetically lower class whites, slavs and all ethnics and we should only clone/produce white chads and stacies because both of them are less likely to be racist, according to them.
Their statement proves my point that we should manipulate reality and turn the average human into attractive whites by using technology in the future, now that there are no ethnicities other than whites, they are less likely to compare themselves making them not racist because they all look the same, in a positive way.
"Oohhhh if everyone is white chad and stacy, no one is" there is always a limitation to everything, there is a reason why it is called looksmaxxing, not looks increasement because there is a maximum limit in terms of looks. Have you ever seen a lighter skin than the typical pale caucasian skin that is not a fraud? Have you ever seen an eye lighter than A10 that is not a disease or contacts? there will be always a difference even if every one is the same because history can still be used as a focal point, humans can compare themselves to other non-human animals even if every human looks 100% the same, gender still exists and humans cannot perform asexual reproduction, a place when every human is a nigger is different from a place when every human is a white chad, color charts and line measurements still exist so that means even if everyone looks the same, we still know why everyone looks the same because we can pinpoint the reason in the first place.
