U
uglysub8male
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2023
- Posts
- 2,594
- Reputation
- 2,043
How does that make her mid “bruv”?That’s a Becky bruv lol, I can easily find 10 of her if I walk outside
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How does that make her mid “bruv”?That’s a Becky bruv lol, I can easily find 10 of her if I walk outside
Cuz she’s a Becky?How does that make her mid “bruv”?
Cuz she’s a Becky?![]()
He’s 6’8 and in the NBA, easily Chad SMVWhy is he such an ugly narrow face cuck
View attachment 2570400 also
View attachment 2570403.
View attachment 2570404
are u retartedWhy is he such an ugly narrow face cuck
View attachment 2570400
damn, he is ugly. Framelet too. I guess height and status halo is stronger than I thought.Why is he such an ugly narrow face cuck
View attachment 2570400
fucked up his million dollar career for some young white pussy...smhBlame the zogs for making it so that if you fuck a fully developed pubescent foid you’re on the same tier as a nigga that wants to pipe actual underaged children, this nigga is fucked for the rest of his career cuz of this shit probably lmao
Young white pussy is one of the most valuable thing to acquire on the planet, ethnics literally kill each other to obtain the mythical snow bunny pawg combo…fucked up his million dollar career for some young white pussy...smh
Ehhhh, 15 is too youngIf she's at least 15 it's acceptable in my opinion. This fake internet outrage over age gaps has always been hilarious to me.
That’s not a middle schooler soy clowncouldve had any girl but he went for a middle schooler wtf
Ehhhh, 15 is too young
17+ is a better marker, people shouldn't be having sex below 17 imo
Lack of sexual maturation, most finish puberty at 17Also what soy logic and pseudo science are you gonna use to explain why people shouldn’t have sex specifically before the age of 17?
If she's younger than 17 she hasn't reached sexual maturation/finished puberty, plus she'll have major issues giving birthAlso what soy logic and pseudo science are you gonna use to explain why people shouldn’t have sex specifically before the age of 17?
It's a grey area, but imo if you're old enough to be driving then you're old enough to decide who you want to bang (with exceptions ofc, like teachers or anyone who has authority over said teen).Ehhhh, 15 is too young
17+ is a better marker, people shouldn't be having sex below 17 imo
Most females finish puberty by 16 or earlier. It varies. There are plenty of studies that show that. To think that every female finishes puberty exactly at one age and as late as 17 specifically is fucking retardedLack of sexual maturation, most finish puberty at 17
You are actually retarded. The definition of sexual maturation is being capable of reproducing and major issues giving birth my ass. You’re a soytard who thinks of a 16 year old the same as a 6 year old. You reach sexual maturation long before 17If she's younger than 17 she hasn't reached sexual maturation/finished puberty, plus she'll have major issues giving birth
I never got why being a teacher or an authority figure makes a difference. It’s the same in European countries. Their age of consent could be 15 and any random 40 year old dude off the street could legally fuck her but her 20 year old teacher couldn’t? I know you’re gonna probably say the possibility of coercion but I think that’s irrelevant and not to mention isn‘t the case most of the time. Anyone of any age can be coerced by someone who has authority over them, so why not make it illegal in all cases?It's a grey area, but imo if you're old enough to be driving then you're old enough to decide who you want to bang (with exceptions ofc, like teachers or anyone who has authority over said teen).
Some reach it earlier, but 17 is a good marker because that's when the overwhelming majority reach it.Most females finish puberty by 16 or earlier. It varies. There are plenty of studies that show that. To think that every female finishes puberty exactly at one age and as late as 17 specifically is fucking retarded
You are actually retarded. The definition of sexual maturation is being capable of reproducing and major issues giving birth my ass. You’re a soytard who thinks of a 16 year old the same as a 6 year old. You reach sexual maturation long before 17
I get your point. But I think teachers and similar authority figures are held to a higher moral standard because of the nature of their professions; looking after the safety of the kids. And obviously there would also be the messy allegations of grooming, showing favoritism, etc. On the other hand you wouldn't necessarily expect a random 40 year old man to act properly to begin with.I never got why being a teacher or an authority figure makes a difference. It’s the same in European countries. Their age of consent could be 15 and any random 40 year old dude off the street could legally fuck her but her 20 year old teacher couldn’t? I know you’re gonna probably say the possibility of coercion but I think that’s irrelevant and not to mention isn‘t the case most of the time. Anyone of any age can be coerced by someone who has authority over them, so why not make it illegal in all cases?
The overwhelming majority reach it by 16Some reach it earlier, but 17 is a good marker because that's when the overwhelming majority reach it.
Does the proof show that exactly 17 is the age where there’s no issues? What exactly changes at 17 that wasn’t the case at 16 for example that makes it easier for them to give birth? I don’t really give a shit about the whole birth issue anyway as it’s irrelevant to my point but it simply doesn’t make senseAnd there are statistical proof of under 17's having major miscarriage, etc. problems because they're too young, and the entire point of sexuality is reproduction.
That’s my whole point here. Most of them DO look older than their age. Scroll through TikTok for 5 minutes. You can‘t tell the difference between a 16 and 17 year old. There’s no physical difference. Quit the bullshit. You can’t tell the difference unless they’re prepubescent or very early teensGirls under 17 don't even look attractive anyway (unless they look older than their age), they don't look mature enough
That still shouldn’t make it illegal. You’re also basing your argument off the premise that it’s somehow immoral for an older man to sleep with a younger woman even though you know that they’re old enough to be able to decide who they have sex withI get your point. But I think teachers and similar authority figures are held to a higher moral standard because of the nature of their professions; looking after the safety of the kids. And obviously there would also be the messy allegations of grooming, showing favoritism, etc. On the other hand you wouldn't necessarily expect a random 40 year old man to act properly to begin with.
The reason why I chose 17 is because that's the average age of virginity loss, having sex too early can cause emotional damage to someone, btw I'm not just talking about age gaps, people under 17 shouldn't be having sex even with each other.The overwhelming majority reach it by 16
And the proof shows that exactly 17 is the age where there’s no issues? What exactly changes at 17 that wasn’t the case at 16 for example that makes it easier for them to give birth? I don’t really give a shit about the whole birth issue anyway as it’s irrelevant to my point but it simply doesn’t make sense
That’s my whole point here. Most of them DO look older than their age. Scroll through TikTok for 5 minutes. You can‘t tell the difference between a 16 and 17 year old. There’s no physical difference. Quit the bullshit. You can’t tell the difference unless they’re prepubescent or very early teens
having sex too early can cause emotional damage to someone.
14 year olds shouldn't be giving birth lmao dude I don't know what to say, it has the same issues a 35+ woman is going to have.
Read the edit14 year olds shouldn't be giving birth lmao dude I don't know what to say, it has the same issues a 35+ woman is going to have.
Me choosing 17 is kinda random yeah I guess but I think you gotta draw a line somehwere.Read the edit![]()
![]()
Girls under 17 don't look attractive unless they LOOK 17+Read the edit![]()
![]()
Okay, yes, we’ve already established that teen girls are attractive when they look older. My point is that most do look older and 17 year olds don’t have a specific look from most under 17 year olds if they’re at least mid teens. You can’t tell the difference between a 16 and 17 year old. It’s ridiculous that you think so. You’re talking out of your ass. 17 may just be the most common age you’ve seen hot teens at or they could’ve been younger for all you know because they “looked 17” to you. Like I said, scroll through TikTok for a few minutes and you’ll see countless under 17 JBs with Stacey faces and nice tits and asses. Do you think what makes a girl attractive to you at 17 just suddenly developed only when she turned 17 and she didn’t have those same features at 16? That’s absolutely retarded. The literal girl in this story is 15 and she’s already Staceylite. Females typically physically mature earlier than 17 and that’s a well established scientific fact. We can also go into the fact of how ages of consent vary around the world typically between 14-18 and why that is but you’d just argue against that fact tooGirls under 17 don't look attractive unless they LOOK 17+
Like just compare any female celebrity from 17-23 versus under 17, she's going to be way more attractive in the former than the latter.