White people are truly a blessing upon Earth.

@RealLooksmaxxer and @fag112 (fitting name i must to say) in this thread

Lo
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 9003 and Deleted member 9072
this is delusional, history has shown that ethnics are capable of building great civilization just like whites
 
Nope thats cope, as stated in my post, the previous empires dwarf the british in the massacres they did, like severely dwarf, almost all british massacres ended in 1000 dead people at most, ant tier compared to indian empires. How did 1000 massacres people make you migrate do anglo countries while millions slaughtered by your country men didn't?
I know you will say muh british robbed us thats why, giga cope, hindus were 5th class citizens before british came there, if it wasn't for the british your family would be even poorer. Mughal sultans frequently went and destroyed and slaughtered thousands for sport while the british stopped that
1611701997562


Imagine if the Germans took over India under Hitler's rule lol. The British were far more lenient than the Japanese/Germans would have been had they occupied it.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: goat2x, lutte and TsarTsar444
the collective creates those individuals

they are tied together

i always laugh at people like JP saying ''how can u be proud of something that you havent been part of, just because hes the same race''

its beyond retarded, because you need individuals that create a functioning society that creates the collective which makes it possible to achieve those innovations/inventions/cultural achievements etc. on a grand scale.

they are tied together.

men need a reason to do great stuff. their collective (family, nation etc) are the reason, motivation that they will actively try to do great stuff.

without the collective you would have never had those individuals creating and innovating.
Agreed, Jordan Peterson doesn't even believe that individualistic bullshit he spouted honestly, he just said that to distance himself from the alt right because he was being increasingly associated with them.

I strongly doubt the founding fathers of the U.S for example would have been fine with their country being flooded with Indian/Asian/Hispanic engineers etc, they would have rather preferred agrarian whites tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
The White People Have A Great Combination Of Looks, Height & IQ

Ofcourse geography and luck also played a role
 
Just wanna cum inside white pussy tbh.
 
View attachment 947911

Imagine if the Germans took over India under Hitler's rule lol. The British were far more lenient than the Japanese/Germans would have been had they occupied it.
reminder that guy who is somehow the one of the biggest Nazi hitler worshipping posters on this forum looks like this
1611703018191
1611703338409

and is named bharat. im sure hitler wouldve been very fond of these kinda supporters :forcedsmile:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: The Moggee, Deleted member 9344, Copeful and 3 others
Why would I blame the average white kid for slavery or colonisation. I'm speaking of white people here hypothetically as a group.

Same way people can blame crime rates on black communities in the US but blaming a random black guy who isn't involved in it is ridiculous
Fair enough, was just curious since some people have a tendency of not blaming the community as a whole and rather attack individuals
YEAH BRO I DONT HATE ETHNICS. THATS WHY I CALL THEM NIGGERS AND SHITSKINS WHILE POSTING ABOUT HOW WE SHOULD GENOCIDE THEM AND REPLACE THEM WITH OUR SUPERIOR WHITE CULTURES (OFC YOU ETHNIK PEASANTS WOULDNT KNOW).

OH YEA BTW, I HAVE A HIGH CASTE PUNJABI FRIEND (WHO BTW WORSHIPS ME FOR BEING WHITE) AND I LOVE FUCKING (GIFTING MY WHITE SPERM TO*) ASIAN GIRLS, SO OFC IM NOT RACIST. YOURE ACTUALLY RACIST AGAINST WHITES FOR DEFENDING YOURSELF.
Hes the perfect example of a LARP. Claims to be some slayer and gigachad yet feels the urge to be defensive and cause tension online because hes proud over his skin color.
 
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing and curryslayerordeath
Fair enough, was just curious since some people have a tendency of not blaming the community as a whole and rather attack individuals

Hes the perfect example of a LARP. Claims to be some slayer and gigachad yet feels the urge to be defensive and cause tension online because hes proud over his skin color.
tbh who knows if its larp, he could be some crazy 'gigachad'

but its def telling how socially excluded, low iq, and mentally ill youd have to be to hold some giant god complex like that (inb4 he calls me some anti-white racist, its applied to all those crazy ethnic supremacists too). almost every chill, normal person irl gets along very well, only utter losers have all this delusional pride.
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Moggee, Deleted member 9344 and Deleted member 685
@curryslayerordeath you are a retard jfl, british people wrecked the "peace in India"? :lul: :forcedsmile:
View attachment 947764View attachment 947773View attachment 947774

500k massacred in muuyyyyhhhhhhh peaceful hindu dindu shithole.

Meanwhile the massive massacres committed by evil Britisheerssss
View attachment 947778

10k at most jfl, kys
Your stupidity never fails to surprise me, obviously socio economic factors can be ruined by colonization regardless of mass killings happening or not when 1 group has a monopoly over an entire country. I doubt those numbers are that accurate anyways
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: TsarTsar444
T. Cumcel cope.
 
Your stupidity never fails to surprise me, obviously socio economic factors can be ruined by colonization regardless of mass killings happening or not when 1 group has a monopoly over an entire country. I doubt those numbers are that accurate anyways
You are the one who is retarded, how is killing milions of people worse the colonization you retard? You do understand that the Mughals also looted hindus, destroyed thousands of their temples and made their aristocracy rich through that right? Kys you faggot, a poor indian farmer didn't feel any worse from colonization while he certainly felt threatened every day from being enslaved and raped by the mughal armies
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 685
Does anyone actually think ethnics won't catch up to whites in say 1000 years time?

Lets not forget the modern western world is only 200 years old.

USA 1800
View attachment 947660
Africa hasn't changed in thousands of years. They're a more primitive species.
 
You are the one who is retarded, how is killing milions of people worse the colonization you retard? You do understand that the Mughals also looted hindus, destroyed thousands of their temples and made their aristocracy rich through that right? Kys you faggot, a poor indian farmer didn't feel any worse from colonization while he certainly felt threatened every day from being enslaved and raped by the mughal armies
Because of all the reasons people have previously mentioned. Also, you dont get to call anyone a faggot when youre from the poorest place of europe and hate on other underdeveloped places.

The estimated numbers of deaths during colonization are extremely varried so you just looking up some quick pages doesnt tell me anything, especially considering i already mentioned countries can still be ruined socio economically despite of wether millions of people are killed since exploitation can't just be measured by death rates. I still fail to see how previous regional empires fighting somehow justifies complete exploitation and abuse, but you obviously don't know what youre talking about and act toxic cause you think itll help your argument :feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing
You are the one who is retarded, how is killing milions of people worse the colonization you retard? You do understand that the Mughals also looted hindus, destroyed thousands of their temples and made their aristocracy rich through that right? Kys you faggot, a poor indian farmer didn't feel any worse from colonization while he certainly felt threatened every day from being enslaved and raped by the mughal armies
Your logic: Previous empires have always fought each other since their understanding of the world wasn't as good, therefore complete exploitation and abuse across the globe (which is well documented) by 1 of the most violent european empires is justifiable or unimportant :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing
Because of all the reasons people have previously mentioned. Also, you dont get to call anyone a faggot when youre from the poorest place of europe and hate on other underdeveloped places.

The estimated numbers of deaths during colonization are extremely varried so you just looking up some quick pages doesnt tell me anything, especially considering i already mentioned countries can still be ruined socio economically despite of wether millions of people are killed since exploitation can't just be measured by death rates. I still fail to see how previous regional empires fighting somehow justifies complete exploitation and abuse, but you obviously don't know what youre talking about and act toxic cause you think itll help your argument :feelskek:
Kys you homosexual dog, i never said i hate underdeveloped countries, i just hate it when everyone blames the west for their problems even though their countries were warring shitholes in the first place. You are the most ignorant retarded person on this whole forum, your country is getting overrun by based morrocans while you sit here and whine for western colonialism. Go suck on some bbc. And keep crying for poor balkan countries, imagine thinking i give a shit, im planning on moving to your country in the future and not giving a shit about your culture or society, and you will be ok with thay cause you can't do shit

How did the British abuse India? They ended slavery there, calmed down the caste system, eradicated opression based on religion, ended some disgusting practices like wife burning together with their husbands etc. They are the reason India is one country now and not still a shithole place with different entities fighting eachother, they introduced capitalism and destroyed the unjust aristocratic rule in the country
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: goat2x, Deleted member 10104 and Deleted member 685
Kys you homosexual dog, i never said i hate underdeveloped countries, i just hate it when everyone blames the west for their problems even though their countries were warring shitholes in the first place. You are the most ignorant retarded person on this whole forum, your country is getting overrun by based morrocans while you sit here and whine for western colonialism. Go suck on some bbc. And keep crying for poor balkan countries, imagine thinking i give a shit, im planning on moving to your country in the future and not giving a shit about your culture or society, and you will be ok with thay cause you can't do shit

How did the British abuse India? They ended slavery there, calmed down the caste system, eradicated opression based on religion, ended some disgusting practices like wife burning together with their husbands etc. They are the reason India is one country now and not still a shithole place with different entities fighting eachother, they introduced capitalism and destroyed the unjust aristocratic rule in the country
LMAOOO you literally start your entire paragraph by insulting cause youre a low iq balkan faggot 🤣🤣 you will literally not do shit you gayfaced ugly bitch you look like yoh just evolved from homo neanderthalis. Keep crying for dutch people as a whole, moroccans dont give a shit about you and the issues are heavily overrated anyways.

You obvously have no idea what you're talking about and have never learned of the huge amount of debt the uk still owes india, and need to look up some non substantial wikipedia statistics to enjoy your cringy pol induced ideology. You're the perfect example of just how pathetic balkans can be.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing and TsarTsar444
How did the British abuse India? They ended slavery there, calmed down the caste system, eradicated opression based on religion, ended some disgusting practices like wife burning together with their husbands etc. They are the reason India is one country now and not still a shithole place with different entities fighting eachother, they introduced capitalism and destroyed the unjust aristocratic rule in the country
Just throw a dozen of claims and act like you've made a counterargument to my previous response theory :feelskek: go insult me some more you emotional crybaby
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: TsarTsar444
LMAOOO you literally start your entire paragraph by insulting cause youre a low iq balkan faggot 🤣🤣 you will literally not do shit you gayfaced ugly bitch you look like yoh just evolved from homo neanderthalis. Keep crying for dutch people as a whole, moroccans dont give a shit about you and the issues are heavily overrated anyways.

You obvously have no idea what you're talking about and have never learned of the huge amount of debt the uk still owes india, and need to look up some non substantial wikipedia statistics to enjoy your cringy pol induced ideology. You're the perfect example of just how pathetic balkans can be.
I've been to Germany few times where my cousin lives. All of his friends are north african, and im friends with some of them and we talk infrequently. We plan to visit Amsterdam in the summer, you are extremely mistaken if you think someone who grew up in a shithole like myself won't act on my impulses and knife you to death if i saw you. I don't understand just how do you westerners cope knowing that people like myself go to your countries and live however we want while your family pays for my lifestyle there, eternally cucked
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10104
I've been to Germany few times where my cousin lives. All of his friends are north african, and im friends with some of them and we talk infrequently. We plan to visit Amsterdam in the summer, you are extremely mistaken if you think someone who grew up in a shithole like myself won't act on my impulses and knife you to death if i saw you. I don't understand just how do you westerners cope knowing that people like myself go to your countries and live however we want while your family pays for my lifestyle there, eternally cucked
Absolutely 0, idgaf about how tough you think you are faggot
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing and TsarTsar444
Absolutely 0, idgaf about how tough you think you are faggot
You have to be trolling tbh, no way you are such a leftist progressive cuck
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10104
You have to be trolling tbh, no way you are such a leftist progressive cuck
Just lose any rational argument ever made and resort to namecalling and tough guy acting theory, imagine feeling prideful over being a low iq violent poor kid who threatens others on incel forums :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing
Just lose any rational argument ever made and resort to namecalling and tough guy acting theory, imagine feeling prideful over being a low iq violent poor kid who threatens others on incel forums :forcedsmile:
What argument exactly? You didn't present any argument except some opinion like socio economic factors changed by colonization being worse then religious discrimination and genocides. Would you personally chose to be slightly poorer or to be enslaved and see your mother raped by armies from a different religion. We all know what would be chosen by 99% of people
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10104
Kys you homosexual dog, i never said i hate underdeveloped countries, i just hate it when everyone blames the west for their problems even though their countries were warring shitholes in the first place. You are the most ignorant retarded person on this whole forum, your country is getting overrun by based morrocans while you sit here and whine for western colonialism. Go suck on some bbc. And keep crying for poor balkan countries, imagine thinking i give a shit, im planning on moving to your country in the future and not giving a shit about your culture or society, and you will be ok with thay cause you can't do shit

How did the British abuse India? They ended slavery there, calmed down the caste system, eradicated opression based on religion, ended some disgusting practices like wife burning together with their husbands etc. They are the reason India is one country now and not still a shithole place with different entities fighting eachother, they introduced capitalism and destroyed the unjust aristocratic rule in the country
Britian drew a line in India and created modern day Pakistan and India. They did this to seperate Indians and create in state conflict. India prior to 1947 included Pakistan and Bangladesh as well. Because of these arbitrary line Britian created there is still conflict going on in those areas.

Although Britian brought benefits to India these benefits werent to help the native population. It was to get more resources out of India and because they looked down on dark-skinned people. Overall they left India in a worse state.
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Moggee, Deleted member 685 and curryslayerordeath
What argument exactly? You didn't present any argument except some opinion like socio economic factors changed by colonization being worse then religious discrimination and genocides. Would you personally chose to be slightly poorer or to be enslaved and see your mother raped by armies from a different religion. We all know what would be chosen by 99% of people
Absolutely 0 honestly, you've already proven yourself to not be worthy of debate by how toxic and emotional you are.
 
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing
Absolutely 0 honestly, you've already proven yourself to not be worthy of debate by how toxic and emotional you are.
You are the only person who makes me angry on this forum like no other, your arguments are completely non sensible, i still can't see how the british were worse then the Mughals for Hindus
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 685
Britian drew a line in India and created modern day Pakistan and India. They did this to seperate Indians and create in state conflict. India prior to 1947 included Pakistan and Bangladesh as well. Because of these arbitrary line Britian created there is still conflict going on in those areas.

Although Britian brought benefits to India these benefits werent to help the native population. It was to get more resources out of India and because they looked down on dark-skinned people. Overall they left India in a worse state.
Thats cope, Pakistanis wanted to be free from Hindus cause they don't like to live in a state that is majority non muslim. And again if it wasn't for fhe Brits there would be much bigger division on the subcontinent then just Pakistan
 
  • +1
Reactions: goat2x
Kys you homosexual dog, i never said i hate underdeveloped countries, i just hate it when everyone blames the west for their problems even though their countries were warring shitholes in the first place. You are the most ignorant retarded person on this whole forum, your country is getting overrun by based morrocans while you sit here and whine for western colonialism. Go suck on some bbc. And keep crying for poor balkan countries, imagine thinking i give a shit, im planning on moving to your country in the future and not giving a shit about your culture or society, and you will be ok with thay cause you can't do shit
How do you not see the irony in writing this and trashing ethnics who contribute heavily to western countries??? you're bragging abt doing what your ideology considers despicable if u want to degenerate Netherlands jfl

How did the British abuse India? They ended slavery there, calmed down the caste system, eradicated opression based on religion, ended some disgusting practices like wife burning together with their husbands etc. They are the reason India is one country now and not still a shithole place with different entities fighting eachother, they introduced capitalism and destroyed the unjust aristocratic rule in the country
None of this is true. Slavery was never truly there, the caste system was replaced with an invisible more separated class system, those practices still continue where they did before. There's MUCH MORE religious conflict, it literally turned from fairly unified empires to a bunch of different shithole entities fighting each other. Capitalism was never 'installed', it always existed and the aristocratic rule still persists lol.

The only change was introducing more identity and group based conflicts, nothing changed (if anything, it receded).
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Moggee, Deleted member 2100 and Deleted member 685
How do you not see the irony in writing this and trashing ethnics who contribute heavily to western countries??? you're bragging abt doing what your ideology considers despicable if u want to degenerate Netherlands jfl


None of this is true. Slavery was never truly there, the caste system was replaced with an invisible more separated class system, those practices still continue where they did before. There's MUCH MORE religious conflict, it literally turned from fairly unified empires to a bunch of different shithole entities fighting each other. Capitalism was never 'installed', it always existed and the aristocratic rule still persists lol.

The only change was introducing more identity and group based conflicts, nothing changed (if anything, it receded).
Dnrd
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 685
You are the only person who makes me angry on this forum like no other, your arguments are completely non sensible, i still can't see how the british were worse then the Mughals for Hindus
Yeah and you obviously won't anytime soon either, my initial argument wasnt even how the british were supposedly worse than some group, you just made that up, my point was other regional empires fighting each other which often happens doesn't justify therefore other empires exploiting and abusing other places in the world. Besides i already mentioned deaths during colonization tend to be estimated quite varrying so you just throwing random statements and numbers doesnt tell me anything.

Oh and by the way alot of the murders etc thanks to the mughals were already happening centuries before, and as we all know recent history gets alot more attention since it's easier to actually trace back. You just talking about "millions of slaughters" (never even provided a source btw) between regional empires which were constantly at war with each other tells me nothing about wether british imperialism was justifiable or not.
 
  • +1
Reactions: WadlowMaxxing
u read every word

ur just obviously wrong and have no response
You have no proof for any of the things you said, this was probably feed on your brain by hindu nationalism. Brits should have honestly slaughtered millions of hindus cause it is very obvious that humans are illogical, still don't understand how you think it was peaceful before the british even though hindus were persecuted heavily by the Mughals, especially under Akbar, it honestly boggles my mind. Anything to hate on the west just like retarded balkan shitholes do on Turkey
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: goat2x, Deleted member 10104 and Deleted member 685
Yeah and you obviously won't anytime soon either, my initial argument wasnt even how the british were supposedly worse than some group, you just made that up, my point was other regional empires fighting each other which often happens doesn't justify therefore other empires exploiting and abusing other places in the world. Besides i already mentioned deaths during colonization tend to be estimated quite varrying so you just throwing random statements and numbers doesnt tell me anything.

Oh and by the way alot of the murders etc thanks to the mughals were already happening centuries before, and as we all know recent history gets alot more attention since it's easier to actually trace back. You just talking about "millions of slaughters" (never even provided a source btw) between regional empires which were constantly at war with each other tells me nothing about wether british imperialism was justifiable or not.
Wikipedia has all the sources listed bellow, this isn't 2009 anymore and not anyone can just edit an article, it has to be approved before being officially changed. The whole Wikipedia is not a good guide is just an old argument and its dumb. I never said that the British were good in India, my initial thought is that they were the least worse out of anyone there
 
You have no proof for any of the things you said, this was probably feed on your brain by hindu nationalism. Brits should have honestly slaughtered millions of hindus cause it is very obvious that humans are illogical, still don't understand how you think it was peaceful before the british even though hindus were persecuted heavily by the Mughals, especially under Akbar, it honestly boggles my mind. Anything to hate on the west just like retarded balkan shitholes do on Turkey
I love how you call others illogical and how they hate on the west and then continue on succesful western countries and talk about stabbing people
 
  • JFL
Reactions: curryslayerordeath and TsarTsar444
I love how you call others illogical and how they hate on the west and then continue on succesful western countries and talk about stabbing people
Im just trying to show how illogical the west has become by this point, it has become too tolerant, not that im a mindless ape like the rest of ethnics, but the OP was right in his stance that the west is the greatest, i seriously don't think i should explain why given that you are dutch and already know that
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 685
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 9003, curryslayerordeath and TsarTsar444
Wikipedia has all the sources listed bellow, this isn't 2009 anymore and not anyone can just edit an article, it has to be approved before being officially changed. The whole Wikipedia is not a good guide is just an old argument and its dumb. I never said that the British were good in India, my initial thought is that they were the least worse out of anyone there
Yeah but that means very little since like i already said sources tend to varry on death rates and harm to other countries cant just be measured by death rates. I guess if that was your initial thought either way this debate holds no value
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043
Sad tier thread.
Whites are no different than non whites.
It's funny that it comes from an alienated individual.
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Moggee, Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 9003 and 1 other person
Im just trying to show how illogical the west has become by this point, it has become too tolerant, not that im a mindless ape like the rest of ethnics, but the OP was right in his stance that the west is the greatest, i seriously don't think i should explain why given that you are dutch and already know that
No you were completely nonsensical and emotional by talking about stabbing others lmao, obviously the west is currently the greatest but i don't feel pride over it since i never accomplished anything substantial myself and being prideful over things that arent related to me or my family I consider stupid
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2100 and Deleted member 3043
Sad tier thread.
Whites are no different than non whites.
It's funny that it comes from an alienated individual.
Whites are more civilized taller higher iq and higher sentience on average

There is significant differences between different ethnicities.
 
Sad tier thread.
Whites are no different than non whites.
It's funny that it comes from an alienated individual.
That what is human should not be considered alien in 2021
 
Good thing im med passing caucasian North Indian Aryan
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 9003 and 2 others
Sad tier thread.
Whites are no different than non whites.
It's funny that it comes from an alienated individual.
Fellow ethnic, submit to the white man. They gave me light eyes.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 3043
You have no proof for any of the things you said, this was probably feed on your brain by hindu nationalism. Brits should have honestly slaughtered millions of hindus cause it is very obvious that humans are illogical, still don't understand how you think it was peaceful before the british even though hindus were persecuted heavily by the Mughals, especially under Akbar, it honestly boggles my mind. Anything to hate on the west just like retarded balkan shitholes do on Turkey
I'm agnostic and don't live in India, I have zero hindu nationalism or w/e. I don't even remotely hate on the west, all I did was defend against the retarded stormfront shit posted. From a theoretical selfish perspective being from upper caste technically noble heritage, I'd literally benefit from what you're talking about lol, yet I have the sentience to not be some retarded nationalist.

Literally everyone; Indians, Pakis, Bangladeshis, etc all agree upon the consequences no matter the religion or social class lol. No offense, but being from the Balkans you legitimately don't know anything about the situation, the same way I can't really comment on Turkish-Balkan conflicts.

lol nigga is crazy i mean @TsarTsar444, the "least" worst in india was aurangzeb. Made India a real country, civilized, and the richest one, its GDP was superior to France and GB in their prime of colonialism.
GB only destructed those countries.
Ignoring all the shitposting I do with you, this is true. There are more Muslims in India rn than either Pakistan or any central Asian country, none of those tensions got even remotely better after that stage lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, The Moggee, Deleted member 685 and 1 other person
Whites are more civilized taller higher iq and higher sentience on average

There is significant differences between different ethnicities.
Civilized according to who?
Is it civilized to not wash your ass, or to let your grand parents rot in "house" for old people, or to not care about your kids, or to fuck left and right, and cuck your wife/husband, and to take it up the ass etc?
This is what is the West at least partly today.

Taller, maybe, but not the sole who are taller.
Higher IQ, for what? Not the sole, and if we go by that does that mean it says anything about how good an individual is?
Because you know well who have the highest IQ and it's not the whites...

Everything there is cope. Whites are whites, non whites are non whites. The sole difference, really, is in how they act, behave, their virtue and piety.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: GolemRot, turkproducer, Deleted member 2100 and 6 others
lol nigga is crazy i mean @TsarTsar444, the "least" worst in india was aurangzeb. Made India a real country, civilized, and the richest one, its GDP was superior to France and GB in their prime of colonialism.
GB only destructed those countries.
His son destroyed India, Akbar
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: goat2x and Deleted member 3043
Civilized according to who?
Is it civilized to not wash your ass, or to let your grand parents rot in "house" for old people, or to not care about your kids, or to fuck left and right, and cuck your wife/husband, and to take it up the ass etc?
This is what is the West at least partly today.

Taller, maybe, but not the sole who are taller.
Higher IQ, for what? Not the sole, and if we go by that does that mean it says anything about how good an individual is?
Because you know well who have the highest IQ and it's not the whites...

Everything there is cope. Whites are whites, non whites are non whites. The sole difference, really, is in how they act, behave, their virtue and piety.
Civilized as in way lower crime rates and behavioural patterns. Whites do wash their ass what kinda stereotype is this jfl. If anything certain ethnics are known as smelly.

Not accepting there is differnces is leftist cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043
jfl who is this nigga? which poster?
its @Gosick @ZUZZCEL

the same nigga worshipping Hitler across thousands of posts. He larped as a white guy before until he got exposed jfl :lul:
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 9003 and 5 others
His son destroyed India, Akbar
so?
One was a faithful who followed his faith sincerely, the other most likely not. What should we conclude upon that?
Omar was a really faithful guy and aimed for justice, and helping all those in need without distinction, because of his belief, and created a real society, but Bin salman is an absed dog, because he doesn't follow it.
So what should we conclude? Meanwhile GB only cucked every country they were in.
 
its @Gosick @ZUZZCEL

the same nigga worshipping Hitler across thousands of posts. He larped as a white guy before until he got exposed jfl :lul:
just jfl at you @Gosick
you look like a disgusting favela dwelling mutt that needs to be put down
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: thickdickdaddy27, The Moggee, Deleted member 9344 and 7 others

Similar threads

GenerationalAutism
Replies
4
Views
44
iamnotaracist
iamnotaracist
AryanTrvecel
Replies
6
Views
64
AryanTrvecel
AryanTrvecel
jbw777
Replies
15
Views
97
jozsef316@gmail
jozsef316@gmail
supergoat972
Replies
13
Views
101
supergoat972
supergoat972
J
Replies
8
Views
58
inyerta
inyerta

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →