"White privilege" is bullhit.

SpearOfOrion

SpearOfOrion

Retired
Joined
Dec 8, 2019
Posts
2,243
Reputation
4,707
Whites supposedly benefit from the “privilege” of being white, which consists of being able to live in safe, white neighborhoods, go to safe, white schools, have white friends, etc., in other words, enjoying and participating in the civilization that they themselves created.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: BrettyBoy, Deleted member 6789, Patriot and 8 others
white privilege is a thing.

whitepill = privilege

years of slavery and colonization accumulated as wealth in west = privilage

I don't care about what you feel to be honest. The western has the best life quality and that's a fact.
 
  • +1
Reactions: johncruz12345, Krezo, Jagged0 and 10 others
Everyone knows whites are privileged/superior, the question is whether the differences between minorities and whites in the west is due to environment (systematic racism etc.) or genetics (IQ etc.) or both
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6ft8InTheNetherlands, Gazzamogga, BigBiceps and 9 others
white privilege is a thing.

whitepill = privilege

years of slavery and colonization accumulated as wealth in west = privilage

I don't care about what you feel to be honest. The western has the best life quality and that's a fact.
Imagine me being called out by ethnic for having privilege in West cause of my skin when i come from a poor country that was occupied by people from Asia until late 19th century who kidnapped young children to turn them into soldiers, concubines or slaves.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: BigBiceps, Chadeep, BigBoy and 2 others
minorities are privileged in canada tbh.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Krezo, BigBiceps, Chadeep and 3 others
White privilege isnt a thing but pretty privilege is, so white people are more privileged than african nigger baboons, hindu dindu asians etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBiceps, Chadeep, Deleted member 7776 and 3 others
White privilege is to have the biggest smv
 
  • +1
Reactions: ToursOverBoyo2020, Chadeep and Deleted member 6095
White privilege is real, and it's pretty much 100% the results of centuries of racism persisting into the present day. Vast majority of western whites have a leg up on life, due to racism.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: BigBiceps, Chadeep, Deleted member 5187 and 4 others
White privilege is real, and it's pretty much 100% the results of centuries of racism persisting into the present day. Vast majority of western whites have a leg up on life, due to racism.
Good
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Deleted member 6475 and Aesthetics_III
21B4D2DB 871F 41A4 8194 2924968BBB25
 
Make your jokes all you want, deep down you know it's morally wrong.
Wow god forbid White People have some sort of privilege in White countries, all you do is cry cry cry

If I went to China I would EXPECT the native Chinese to have some sort of fucking privilege cos I'm in China.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3832, Deleted member 7776 and Hades
If I went to China I would EXPECT the native Chinese to have some sort of fucking privilege cos I'm in China.

China didn't gain it's wealth by colonizing 85% of the planet for 300 years
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, Chadeep, BigBoy and 1 other person
China didn't gain it's wealth by colonizing 85% of the planet for 300 years
Neither Did Europe

wanna throw in some sources to backup your ridiculous statement? I'm waiting
 
  • +1
Reactions: umzazi, Deleted member 7776, Hades and 1 other person
Wow god forbid White People have some sort of privilege in White countries, all you do is cry cry cry

If I went to China I would EXPECT the native Chinese to have some sort of fucking privilege cos I'm in China.
Some dumb imigrant thinking he will come to western country and will be put above native resident whose ancestry was building this country so people can live good life now. More than that, some expect they will be kissed in ass by white people. Good that EU is closing borders now, sink in your shit phaggots.
 
  • +1
Reactions: umzazi and Deleted member 6475
Neither Did Europe

wanna throw in some sources to backup your ridiculous statement? I'm waiting


I know its all from wikipedia but I could literally spend several hours linking other pages from different Euro empire atrocities across the planet. There are many, you could literally do an undergraduate degree on it.

Some of these are only 50 years ago and yet it has nothing to do with the present day world according to you. Whites built their wealth from nothing in 50 years after the World Wars with no help from ethnics or ethnic peoples money. Also, ethnic countries are not the way they are today because of these events, this has nothing to do with any of this at all.

Some dumb imigrant thinking he will come to western country and will be put above native resident whose ancestry was building this country so people can live good life now. More than that, some expect they will be kissed in ass by white people. Good that EU is closing borders now, sink in your shit phaggots.

This was an argument about whether white privilege was real. You guys said it wasn't real, then when I say it is real, you say whites deserve it. You people constantly contradict yourself.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and BigBoy
If you’re male, you’re not privileged, regardless of race.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2756, Deleted member 7776 and Rabbi

I know its all from wikipedia but I could literally spend several hours linking other pages from different Euro empire atrocities across the planet. There are many, you could literally do an undergraduate degree on it. Some of these are only 50 years ago and yet it has nothing to do with the present day world according to you.
Nice strawman posting some Wikipedia sources, I'm looking for actual evidence of Europe getting most of it's wealth from the rest of the world, not some 1000 page story about some wars. You've literally just posted some irrelevant wars and conquests that every state of the world partook in, and famines that benefited Europe how exactly?

Atrocities= Seizure of wealth according to you, ok buddy
 
  • +1
Reactions: umzazi, Deleted member 3832 and Hades
Nice strawman posting some Wikipedia sources, I'm looking for actual evidence of Europe getting most of it's wealth from the rest of the world, not some 1000 page story about some wars. You've literally just posted some irrelevant wars and conquests that every state of the world partook in, and famines that benefited Europe how exactly?

Atrocities= Seizure of wealth according to you, ok buddy

All of those atrocities were commted with the intent of extracting wealth. The Congo Free State was about getting wealth to the Belgians. The Bengal Famine was directing Indian crops, Peru was about extracting minerals. If you read any of the articles for like 10 seconds it would show this. Even wiki articles can show this, look the same events up anywhere on the net it will show you the same thing.

These weren't random atrocities and only involved Euro countries and the places they were stealing from. Countries don't colonise just to commit atrocities, they do it to steal wealth and resources.

Again, how did these events have nothing to do with certain countries becoming poor and others becoming rich?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
Imagine me being called out by ethnic for having privilege in West cause of my skin when i come from a poor country that was occupied by people from Asia until late 19th century who kidnapped young children to turn them into soldiers, concubines or slaves.
Pa imas i ti, nije to samo istorija, nego ako licis na belca onda bolje si tretiran u te drzave ko Amerika i Australija
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
Low IQ thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, BigBoy and DharkDC
whites actually get 1-2psl higher ratings just for being white, no matter how average they look
 
Imagine me being called out by ethnic for having privilege in West cause of my skin when i come from a poor country that was occupied by people from Asia until late 19th century who kidnapped young children to turn them into soldiers, concubines or slaves.
these kidnapped young children became the most powerfull people in the most powerfull empire of the time also meanwhile your ancestor were poor farmer
 
Pa imas i ti, nije to samo istorija, nego ako licis na belca onda bolje si tretiran u te drzave ko Amerika i Australija
Ne verujem bas pogotovu jer vecina manjina zive u krajevima gde vladaju Demokrate, white privilege mi vise zvuci kao cope onih crnaca sto su vekovima u Americi. I Azijati su bili pod segregacijom pa su se izdigli kao najbogatija rasa u Americi, Indijci isto pocinju po svakakvim getoima i siromasnim krajevima pa se izdignu, cak i imigranti iz Nigerije u Americi su jedni od najbogatijih i edukovanih tamo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3573
All of those atrocities were commted with the intent of extracting wealth. The Congo Free State was about getting wealth to the Belgians. The Bengal Famine was directing Indian crops, Peru was about extracting minerals. If you read any of the articles for like 10 seconds it would show this. Even wiki articles can show this, look the same events up anywhere on the net it will show you the same thing.

These weren't random atrocities and only involved Euro countries and the places they were stealing from. Countries don't colonise just to commit atrocities, they do it to steal wealth and resources.

Again, how did these events have nothing to do with certain countries becoming poor and others becoming rich?
Jfl at Europe getting wealthy because of colonialism, thats the shitiest lie in all of modern history. Majority of the average citizens in the west were poor until the 20th century after ww2 ended and the European Union started. Norway, Denmark and Sweden and Finland never colonized or it was extremely minor, so why are they one of the wealthiest nations in the world in terms of living conditions compared to middle east and Afria? Muuh colonialism again? Jfl, ethnics coping hard. The reason the west and north Europe are so wealthy is because Europeans are resourceful people and have revolutionary spirit, they are not people easily subdued like African boot lickers, they worked very smartly and hard to make the west that it is today.

The muh colonies you talk about, only capitalist corporations and nobility profited from it, not the common person. Congo was the personal colony of Leopold and not of the Belgian people. About French Algeria hugeeee jflll, do you have any idea how barbaric the north Africans were? They enslaved almost 2 million Europeans in 400 years
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787, umzazi and penis3
All of those atrocities were commted with the intent of extracting wealth. The Congo Free State was about getting wealth to the Belgians. The Bengal Famine was directing Indian crops, Peru was about extracting minerals. If you read any of the articles for like 10 seconds it would show this. Even wiki articles can show this, look the same events up anywhere on the net it will show you the same thing.

These weren't random atrocities and only involved Euro countries and the places they were stealing from. Countries don't colonise just to commit atrocities, they do it to steal wealth and resources.

Again, how did these events have nothing to do with certain countries becoming poor and others becoming rich?
I don't dispute that colonisation was a way to establishing business relations and trade, that benefited the occupier more than the occupied.

Show me a source with a direct quote that shows that the Bengal famine was instigated to take crops from the Indians, and send them to Britain.

These countries were already rich beyond belief when the first expedition to the New World started, your claim that the wealth taken from the rest of the world is the direct reason for Europe's wealth is utter nonsense.

Did some of the natural resources and labour help Europe? Indeed but it wasn't like the European economy was dependent by colonised places and relied on them.

And you make it a one way street, which is never how it goes. A colonised country isn't just taken bare and left naked, it benefits from investment from the overlord, with things such as infastructure, trade and public works.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Feminineboi and Arkantos
The reason you "benefit" from "white privilege" is because if someone who isnt white takes the place of a white man he will be looked down upon in these white spaces.

Take a look at what happened to a mexican who moneymaxxed, statusmaxxed and thugmaxxed.


If youre white you dont see the privilege, but anyone who is anything other than white would be able to see it. Our iq's are rising, and we will take over rest assured.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
Ne verujem bas pogotovu jer vecina manjina zive u krajevima gde vladaju Demokrate, white privilege mi vise zvuci kao cope onih crnaca sto su vekovima u Americi. I Azijati su bili pod segregacijom pa su se izdigli kao najbogatija rasa u Americi, Indijci isto pocinju po svakakvim getoima i siromasnim krajevima pa se izdignu, cak i imigranti iz Nigerije u Americi su jedni od najbogatijih i edukovanih tamo.
Razlika je to sto crnci su bili robovi i nisu smeli da se educiraju, i zapoceli su svi od nulu bez nikakve kulture, skroz su izgubili zbog robovanje, a azijci su zacuvali etike radenja i stvaranja civilizacije od njihovi roditelja
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
Jfl at Europe getting wealthy because of colonialism, thats the shitiest lie in all of modern history. Majority of the average citizens in the west were poor until the 20th century after ww2 ended and the European Union started. Norway, Denmark and Sweden and Finland never colonized or it was extremely minor, so why are they one of the wealthiest nations in the world in terms of living conditions compared to middle east and Afria? Muuh colonialism again? Jfl, ethnics coping hard. The reason the west and north Europe are so wealthy is because Europeans are resourceful people and have revolutionary spirit, they are not people easily subdued like African boot lickers, they worked very smartly and hard to make the west that it is today.

The muh colonies you talk about, only capitalist corporations and nobility profited from it, not the common person. Congo was the personal colony of Leopold and not of the Belgian people. About French Algeria hugeeee jflll, do you have any idea how barbaric the north Africans were? They enslaved almost 2 million Europeans in 400 years
Funny how he mentions China also,

And doesn't mention the fact that the Chinese Emperors relied on a tributary system, that forced others to bend the knee and send personal wealth to China. China essentially bullied other neighbouring states for centuries but this is just completely ignored.
 
  • +1
Reactions: umzazi
Funny how he mentions China also,

And doesn't mention the fact that the Chinese Emperors relied on a tributary system, that forced others to bend the knee and send personal wealth to China. China essentially bullied other neighbouring states for centuries but this is just completely ignored.
He mentioned China? Bruh...

 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and umzazi
Razlika je to sto crnci su bili robovi i nisu smeli da se educiraju, i zapoceli su svi od nulu bez nikakve kulture, skroz su izgubili zbog robovanje, a azijci su zacuvali etike radenja i stvaranja civilizacije od njihovi roditelja
I ako se slazem donekle ipak moram dodati da Bantu Afrikanci kulturu nisu imali gde Arapin ili Evropljanin nije krocio. Ti bivsi robovi dolaze iz Zapadne Afrike gde su crna plemena oduvek ratovala izmedju sebe isto drzeci robove, mocni crnci po tim krajevima su su prodavali robove Amerikancima a kasnije su ih transportovali Jevrejski brodovi. Haiti je slobodna crna drzava vec 200 godina pa je najsiromasnija na planeti gde jedu blato i ubijaju se, Amerika je kupila parce Afrike i napravila zemlju Liberiju gde su se vracali edukovani crnci pa su na kraju opet oni tretirali crnce tamo nizom rasom i drzali robove, cak su bili jedna od poslednjih drzava koji su ukinuli robovanje a sada su ja mislim najsiromasnija zemlja u Africi gde se i dalje praktikuje kanibalizam.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
Water is wet and no one (on this forum) claims that whites are privileged in that respect
 

I know its all from wikipedia but I could literally spend several hours linking other pages from different Euro empire atrocities across the planet. There are many, you could literally do an undergraduate degree on it.

Some of these are only 50 years ago and yet it has nothing to do with the present day world according to you. Whites built their wealth from nothing in 50 years after the World Wars with no help from ethnics or ethnic peoples money. Also, ethnic countries are not the way they are today because of these events, this has nothing to do with any of this at all.



This was an argument about whether white privilege was real. You guys said it wasn't real, then when I say it is real, you say whites deserve it. You people constantly contradict yourself.
Lmao normal thing i expect my country to put me above some imigrants from 3rd world country.
 
white privilege is a thing.

whitepill = privilege

years of slavery and colonization accumulated as wealth in west = privilage

I don't care about what you feel to be honest. The western has the best life quality and that's a fact.

Niggers are drowning in precious metals in Africa and practicing slavery today, and not wagecucking slavery, rather slave breeding and working for existence and yet they can't learn how to use a wheel and live in huts made of shit.
White privilege is being the most godlike race on earth, and that was a hard earned privilege and nothing to be sorry about, unless you are a soyboy betamale of course, then you better apologize to all the subhumans and womyn.
 
Last edited:
I ako se slazem donekle ipak moram dodati da Bantu Afrikanci kulturu nisu imali gde Arapin ili Evropljanin nije krocio. Ti bivsi robovi dolaze iz Zapadne Afrike gde su crna plemena oduvek ratovala izmedju sebe isto drzeci robove, mocni crnci po tim krajevima su su prodavali robove Amerikancima a kasnije su ih transportovali Jevrejski brodovi. Haiti je slobodna crna drzava vec 200 godina pa je najsiromasnija na planeti gde jedu blato i ubijaju se, Amerika je kupila parce Afrike i napravila zemlju Liberiju gde su se vracali edukovani crnci pa su na kraju opet oni tretirali crnce tamo nizom rasom i drzali robove, cak su bili jedna od poslednjih drzava koji su ukinuli robovanje a sada su ja mislim najsiromasnija zemlja u Africi gde se i dalje praktikuje kanibalizam.

Razlika je to sto crnci su bili robovi i nisu smeli da se educiraju, i zapoceli su svi od nulu bez nikakve kulture, skroz su izgubili zbog robovanje, a azijci su zacuvali etike radenja i stvaranja civilizacije od njihovi roditelja

Ash nazg u durb ul uluk.
STOP with the black mordor speech already.
 
Jfl this forum shits on minorities 24/7 and says whites are above ethnics in smv. Yet also claim white privilege doesn't exist?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6402, Seppukucel, Shrek2OnDvD and 1 other person
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787

I know its all from wikipedia but I could literally spend several hours linking other pages from different Euro empire atrocities across the planet. There are many, you could literally do an undergraduate degree on it.

Some of these are only 50 years ago and yet it has nothing to do with the present day world according to you. Whites built their wealth from nothing in 50 years after the World Wars with no help from ethnics or ethnic peoples money. Also, ethnic countries are not the way they are today because of these events, this has nothing to do with any of this at all.



This was an argument about whether white privilege was real. You guys said it wasn't real, then when I say it is real, you say whites deserve it. You people constantly contradict yourself.

Look you subhuman monkey, when some mongrel or soycuck talks about the "genocide of the indians" during the reconquista i first answer that there seem to be plenty of indianos around and second that even if all the genocide and black legend was truth, the only thing that saddens me the most is that I WASN'T THERE TO GENOCIDE ALL THE SUBHUMANS LIKE YOURSELF.

All races/countries/civilizations do plenty of genocide and pillage when they can, the difference is that we do it better and that we use it to build advanced civilization (like computers or going to the moon) with the resources we get, instead of breeding 700 million streetshitters, a billion ethnic bugs or hoarding gold and diamonds in underground vaults. So say "thanks white man" for all the inventions that allowed you to type in this forum. Nigger.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SpearOfOrion
The reason you "benefit" from "white privilege" is because if someone who isnt white takes the place of a white man he will be looked down upon in these white spaces.

Take a look at what happened to a mexican who moneymaxxed, statusmaxxed and thugmaxxed.


If youre white you dont see the privilege, but anyone who is anything other than white would be able to see it. Our iq's are rising, and we will take over rest assured.

How double digits can you be not to understand that a foreigner is supposed to be a second class citizen and is a second class citizen everywhere besides the degenerate judaiced western world. You are given protected status so the jew parasite can keep sucking dry the US tit.
America was created by north european mostly and the constitution states that only european whites are citizens, enjoy the jewish ride while you can, because next time we are conquering continents we are going to do it biblical style " Now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.’” A mistery meat tranny like yourself also gets the flamethrower.

PS: Your IQ is not rising fast enough.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: SpearOfOrion
Whites supposedly benefit from the “privilege” of being white, which consists of being able to live in safe, white neighborhoods, go to safe, white schools, have white friends, etc., in other words, enjoying and participating in the civilization that they themselves created.
Speaking of safe I ran to the box at theme park to grab my iPhone cuz a group of degenerate inconsiderate loud mouth blacks were in a flock
 
Look you subhuman monkey, when some mongrel or soycuck talks about the "genocide of the indians" during the reconquista i first answer that there seem to be plenty of indianos around and second that even if all the genocide and black legend was truth, the only thing that saddens me the most is that I WASN'T THERE TO GENOCIDE ALL THE SUBHUMANS LIKE YOURSELF.

All races/countries/civilizations do plenty of genocide and pillage when they can, the difference is that we do it better and that we use it to build advanced civilization (like computers or going to the moon) with the resources we get, instead of breeding 700 million streetshitters, a billion ethnic bugs or hoarding gold and diamonds in underground vaults. So say "thanks white man" for all the inventions that allowed you to type in this forum. Nigger.

Damn didn't realise Croatians were this racist, most Eastern Euros i've met have been pretty cool tbh. Guess it's Central Europeans I should be a bit more cautious about. Although I shouldn't make generalisations based on people on this site, a lot of racism goes on here.
 
Whites supposedly benefit from the “privilege” of being white, which consists of being able to live in safe, white neighborhoods, go to safe, white schools, have white friends, etc., in other words, enjoying and participating in the civilization that they themselves created.
cope, thats not what it means.
 
Niggers need to be oppressed
@Nubhuman Siggers
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Aesthetics_III
cope, thats not what it means.

It seems like you can never really argue this stuff, white people gonna always either deny that racism exists (racist) or say that they deserve it cus they are better (also racist). Plus they always get so emotional too, whilst calling us crybabies. Look how mad these people get.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD and Gengar
its benefitting from society in a way that places ethnics at a disadvantage, like where im from if your name sounds non white they will throw your application letter in the bin without reading it whereas if you have a white sounding name youll get a job interview
 
It seems like you can never really argue this stuff, white people gonna always either deny that racism exists (racist) or say that they deserve it cus they are better (also racist). Plus they always get so emotional too, whilst calling us crybabies. Look how mad these people get.
yeah the fact they have to question how it even is a thing speaks volumes lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD
its benefitting from society in a way that places ethnics at a disadvantage, like where im from if your name sounds non white they will throw your application letter in the bin without reading it whereas if you have a white sounding name youll get a job interview

cope tbh. Blacks perform have worse job performance than whites. As well as (generally) a lower IQ
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD

Similar threads

kurd
Replies
50
Views
1K
Rothschild
Rothschild
small_solomon
Replies
73
Views
561
Blue Steel
Blue Steel
F
Replies
55
Views
366
BlueWhale50
B
kurd
Replies
30
Views
602
Gengar
Gengar
FutureExoticChad
Replies
42
Views
203
hunnidrounds
H

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top