Whitecels are skullcels and dickcels

[RetardSubhuman]

They have the weakest and smallest skulls

Huge skulled forward growth chang vs short skull recessed british rat

and they have dwarfism in their dick

Spoiler: comparison between a BLACK MAN and a white "man"

@TeraCope54 thoughts?

 

[Deleted member 15338]

If we were in same room i would crush your gook skull

 

[WontStopNorwooding]

why are you so insecure?

 

[Deleted member 15338]

why are you so insecure?

>insecure

 

[TeraCope54]

Cope white skulls aren't smaller

 

[MrGlutton]

BIGGER BRAIN/SKULLS

@Blackeycel

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

idk why white people skull vary so much
i never saw a peanut skull on black or asian. maybe black but if they are peanut its their pheno. white people have some big phenotypic variability

 

[Deleted member 15338]

idk why white people skull vary so much
i never saw a peanut skull on black or asian. maybe black but if they are peanut its their pheno. white people have some big phenotypic variability

All Asians look same tho

 

[Gengar]

If we were in same room i would crush your gook skull

keep barking for him

 

[Deleted member 15338]

keep barking for him

Yeah this is what i am gonna do

 

[Gengar]

Yeah this is what i am gonna do

good dog

 

[TeraCope54]

never saw a peanut skull on black or asian

 

[n0rthface]

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

View attachment 1388820

look at how poor his cranial development and he still has a decent forward growth/no recession. on a white skull you would see arteries under his eyes
jfl at you for saving these pics tbh

 

[Gengar]

look at how poor his cranial development and he still has a decent forward growth/no recession. on a white skull you would see arteries under his eyes
jfl at you for saving these pics tbh

sfcels save pics like these because they like to pick outliers

 

[TeraCope54]

look at how poor his cranial development and he still has a decent forward growth/no recession. on a white skull you would see arteries under his eyes
jfl at you for saving these pics tbh

Ricecel cope

 

[TeraCope54]

sfcels save pics like these because they like to pick outliers

Did I create the cherrypick thread you're on rn?

 

[WontStopNorwooding]

Ricecel cope
View attachment 1388823

The BBC posting gang

 

[Gengar]

Did I create the cherrypick thread you're on rn?

probably

 

[Deleted member 7725]

 

[reptiles]

BIGGER BRAIN/SKULLS

View attachment 1388799 View attachment 1388801

@Blackeycel

From what im aware there wasnt just 1 class of archaic human you have older samples like the peking man in china.

The qufzeh skulls in isreal its possible homo erectus was originally from africa who later spread out seperately and bred with different archaic humans to which eventually evolved into modern humans.

How does this differ from the out of africa model? Well it ultimately claims that humans descend from. Multiple disperals out of africa around 1.8 million years ago which slowly evolved in to modern races we see today.

So this model says the first homo erectus came from africa but sepreated after that the reason why dark skin and facial traits occur in india sea and australia is the enviroment no genetic connection.

Tldr.

1 there are multiple sources of origins for humanity.

2 human beings are not all closely realted to each other.

That's just a hypothsis though.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

From what im aware there wasnt just 1 class of archaic human you have older samples like the peking man in china.

The qufzeh skulls in isreal its possible homo erectus was originally from africa who later spread out seperately and bred with different archaic humans to which eventually evolved into modern humans.

How does this differ from the out of africa model? Well it ultimately claims that humans descend from. Multiple disperals out of africa around 1.8 million years ago which slowly evolved in to modern races we see today.

So this model says the first homo erectus came from africa but sepreated after that the reason why dark skin and facial traits occur in india sea and australia is the enviroment no genetic connection.

Tldr.

1 there are multiple sources of origins for humanity.

2 human beings are not all closely realted to each other.

That's just a hypothsis though.

It’s obvious that we are the same species though and that we are closely related enough to intermingle with no genetic issues we’ve been doing it for centuries. Compared to other animal species humans are very closely related

 

[khvirgin]

REMINDER THAT IF YOU HAVE DICK PICS SAVED INTO YOUR HD YOU AUTOMATICALLY LOSE ANY ARGUMENT

 

[MrGlutton]

It’s obvious that we are the same species though and that we are closely related enough to intermingle with no genetic issues we’ve been doing it for centuries. Compared to other animal species humans are very closely related

lol at that moron btw if he thought i read any of that

 

[reptiles]

It’s obvious that we are the same species though and that we are closely related enough to intermingle with no genetic issues we’ve been doing it for centuries. Compared to other animal species humans are very closely related

Species is the wrong term here as humans can interbreed subspecies is a better term humans are a subspecies of the genus homo and within that genus different races are different sub species they can still inbreed but there very differen't east Eurasians west Eurasians and south Eurasians obviously Indian's are the rear case of south and west Eurasian hybrids same with hazaras there east and west Eurasian and central Asian's there the only pure races which are hybrids.

Middle easterners, Iranians, afghans,georgians and turks are west Eurasians.

East Eurasians=Onge , sea , native Americans, east Asian, pacific islanders and Australian aboringals. They place on the opposite end of west Eurasians and very far from Africans.

South Eurasian=Irula, vedda , Toda, paniya basically tribal Indians these are exactly half way between West Eurasians and east Eurasians it's more than fair to call there there own racial clade.

Eurasian wise there are 3 clades east Eurasian south Eurasian and west Eurasian. All Eurasians are very different and the only truly unique population is Indian cause it's a mix of a genetic component no longer found today and west Eurasian.

 

[0Ace0]

Species is the wrong term here as humans can interbreed subspecies is a better term humans are a subspecies of the genus homo and within that genus different races are different sub species they can still inbreed but there very differen't east Eurasians west Eurasians and south Eurasians obviously Indian's are the rear case of south and west Eurasian hybrids same with hazaras there east and west Eurasian and central Asian's there the only pure races which are hybrids.

Middle easterners, Iranians, afghans,georgians and turks are west Eurasians.

East Eurasians=Onge , sea , native Americans, east Asian, pacific islanders and Australian aboringals. They place on the opposite end of west Eurasians and very far from Africans.

South Eurasian=Irula, vedda , Toda, paniya basically tribal Indians these are exactly half way between West Eurasians and east Eurasians it's more than fair to call there there own racial clade.

Eurasian wise there are 3 clades east Eurasian south Eurasian and west Eurasian. All Eurasians are very different and the only truly unique population is Indian cause it's a mix of a genetic component no longer found today and west Eurasian.

lol
Ever heard of basal Eurasian buddy? the only genotype with minimal non-sapien ancestry

 

[reptiles]

lol
Ever heard of basal Eurasian buddy? the only genotype with minimal non-sapien ancestry

I don't see how this disproves my point ? basal Eurasian still had minimum Neanderthal at 1 percent from what I remember and the neantherhtals weren't 1 species there were multiple variations many looked European and many looked Asian We haven't found a south Asian looking 1 yet but Indian climates are hot as fuck so the chances of bone corrosion because such heat is more than likely.

Regardless most Humans are hybrids of ghost species with homo sapien that is the thing which makes us different well that and gene drift Africans have the lowest Neantherthal and no Denisovan so it's fair to call them a separate sub species.

 

[0Ace0]

I don't see how this disproves my point ? basal Eurasian still had minimum Neanderthal at 1 percent from what I remember and the neantherhtals weren't 1 species there were multiple variations many looked European and many looked Asian We haven't found a south Asian looking 1 yet but Indian climates are hot as fuck so the chances of bone corrosion because such heat is more than likely.

Regardless most Humans are hybrids of ghost species with homo sapien that is the thing which makes us different well that and gene drift Africans have the lowest Neantherthal and no Denisovan so it's fair to call them a separate sub species.

The point is that basal eurasians are the purest sapien "race" not the Indians

 

[reptiles]

The point is that basal eurasians are the purest sapien "race" not the Indians

I didn't say Indians are the purest race I said Indians are the most Unique race because there hybrids of an unique race that is extinct in the modern form and west Eurasian's there is no other population that has this BTW all West Eurasians still exist in the modern format all east Eurasians still exist in the modern format.

The purest race are actually Most Africans they have 0 non Human Admixture