Whites are the most feminine race

My A10 eyes are staring at the screen with rage of my viking ancestors
IMG 20250227 111422
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 103094 and Deleted member 67738
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: aladdinmaxxer, LTNUser, JeanneDArcAlter and 2 others
Gooks are more feminine but theyre ugly so white women are still on top
you're trans, no asian woman would ever look your away unless yo xhamstermaxx
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67738 and JeanneDArcAlter
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: etherwake, StacyRepellent, seanonigger and 5 others
you're trans, no asian woman would ever look your away unless yo xhamstermaxx
Asian women look like their eyes are drawn on
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 125888 and Deleted member 67738
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: etherwake, StacyRepellent, seanonigger and 3 others
@๕ඞChick3ncu1ry could you do my face
most curries would unironically look good with ‘white people coloring’ because of our caucasoid skull. won’t even look uncanny like albino blacks do, the abo in us made us shit skinned, so i guess you could say we’re just shit skinned whites :lul:
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
Fuck man, mirin Gandy hard, Aryan classic.
Aryan
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: aladdinmaxxer, softman, 160cmcurry and 1 other person
Had he been alive today, he would've been rotting on this thread with us given that he's 5'5
He would've been a true Aryan vegan neet.
Although I don't think he was actually 5'5.
Most Indian Brahmins like me are 6ft 5 at least.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter and softman
most curries would unironically look good with ‘white people coloring’ because of our caucasoid skull. won’t even look uncanny like albino blacks do, the abo in us made us shit skinned, so i guess you could say we’re just shit skinned whites :lul:


No Indian skulls don't look white we have rounder filler faces with thicker lips and a squared jaw line and properly developed Indian face looks Indian it's just light skin lets you see the traits more clearly
 
  • JFL
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
  • Hmm...
Reactions: JeanneDArcAlter
No Indian skulls don't look white we have rounder filler faces with thicker lips and a squared jaw line and properly developed Indian face looks Indian it's just light skin lets you see the traits more clearly
the caucasoid skull is very diverse, what you’re referring to isn’t ‘indian exclusive.’ whites can have these ‘indian features’ too, and the whole ‘indian pheno’ is a meme. it’s really just a high body fat curry where the fat is hiding the underlying bone structure. when body fat is lowered, the bone structure becomes more prominent, showing that it’s not about the ethnicity, but more about how much fat is on the body. the features associated with ‘ethnic’ looks are often just exaggerated based on fat distribution and skin tone, rather than inherent differences in bone structure. many ethnics that possess a caucasoid skull are just shades of a ‘white person’


2090946 F16B4148 714E 4105 AA04 7F4B1FB945D9
IMG 7291
28A74EC1 7850 4639 8740 830B887B3D72
4AA1F5D3 DF6A 4862 B4DC 74FA850E3DED
IMG 7641
IMG 7644



IMG 5502
IMG 5501
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, Deleted member 125888 and JeanneDArcAlter
the caucasoid skull is very diverse, what you’re referring to isn’t ‘indian exclusive.’ whites can have these ‘indian features’ too, and the whole ‘indian pheno’ is a meme. it’s really just a high body fat curry where the fat is hiding the underlying bone structure. when body fat is lowered, the bone structure becomes more prominent, showing that it’s not about the ethnicity, but more about how much fat is on the body. the features associated with ‘ethnic’ looks are often just exaggerated based on fat distribution and skin tone, rather than inherent differences in bone structure. many ethnics that possess a caucasoid skull are just shades of a ‘white person’


View attachment 3527897View attachment 3527898View attachment 3527899View attachment 3527900View attachment 3527901View attachment 3527902


View attachment 3527903View attachment 3527904
That indian nigga looks exactly like that white nigga
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, Toad, Deleted member 125888 and 1 other person
the caucasoid skull is very diverse, what you’re referring to isn’t ‘indian exclusive.’ whites can have these ‘indian features’ too, and the whole ‘indian pheno’ is a meme. it’s really just a high body fat curry where the fat is hiding the underlying bone structure. when body fat is lowered, the bone structure becomes more prominent, showing that it’s not about the ethnicity, but more about how much fat is on the body. the features associated with ‘ethnic’ looks are often just exaggerated based on fat distribution and skin tone, rather than inherent differences in bone structure. many ethnics that possess a caucasoid skull are just shades of a ‘white person’


View attachment 3527897View attachment 3527898View attachment 3527899View attachment 3527900View attachment 3527901View attachment 3527902


View attachment 3527903View attachment 3527904


Similar feautres yeah off course we have western Eurasian what I'm saying is the skulls look Indian still you can compare east Asians and African's they won't have any similar bone structure unless Somalian but that makes sense they have Arab DNA like we have ancient Persian DNA but our skulls are still Indian
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738 and JeanneDArcAlter
Similar feautres yeah off course we have western Eurasian what I'm saying is the skulls look Indian still you can compare east Asians and African's they won't have any similar bone structure unless Somalian but that makes sense they have Arab DNA like we have ancient Persian DNA but our skulls are still Indian
the whole idea that “our skulls are still indian” doesn’t really hold up when you compare them to the full range of caucasoid features. sure, there’s overlap in some areas, but to say the skulls are exclusively “indian” isn’t really accurate. i mean, east asians and africans are way more different in bone structure, but that’s due to a mix of genetic isolation and adaptation over time. just because we have some shared ancient dna doesn’t automatically mean we all have the same skull shape. it’s more about regional variations within the broader caucasoid group, and it’s way more diverse than just ‘indian’ or ‘persian.'
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738
the whole idea that “our skulls are still indian” doesn’t really hold up when you compare them to the full range of caucasoid features. sure, there’s overlap in some areas, but to say the skulls are exclusively “indian” isn’t really accurate. i mean, east asians and africans are way more different in bone structure, but that’s due to a mix of genetic isolation and adaptation over time. just because we have some shared ancient dna doesn’t automatically mean we all have the same skull shape. it’s more about regional variations within the broader caucasoid group, and it’s way more diverse than just ‘indian’ or ‘persian.'


Bro skull wise there are differences between even Turks and Europeans and they are way whiter than us you know there is a skull difference even if there is broad over lap because as you said shared ancestry
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738 and JeanneDArcAlter
Bro skull wise there are differences between even Turks and Europeans and they are way whiter than us you know there is a skull difference even if there is broad over lap because as you said shared ancestry
Turks arent that much whiter than indians no joke
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, Deleted member 117288 and JeanneDArcAlter
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67738 and Deleted member 117288
Aside from gooks but gooks are ugly
So thats why white women fog all other races of women
Makes sense their skin is bright and light

Bright light == woman
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, Deleted member 117288 and JeanneDArcAlter
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, aladdinmaxxer and Deleted member 117288
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, aladdinmaxxer, Deleted member 117288 and 1 other person
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, Deleted member 117288, Deleted member 125888 and 1 other person
Bro skull wise there are differences between even Turks and Europeans and they are way whiter than us you know there is a skull difference even if there is broad over lap because as you said shared ancestry
you’re still missing the point. even if turks and europeans have some differences, they’re still part of the same broad caucasoid category. there’s definitely variation, but it doesn’t mean we’re drastically different. the shared ancestry thing means a lot when it comes to bone structure. you’re focusing on the small differences, but the bigger picture is that we’re all in the same category of human variation
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 125888, Deleted member 67738 and JeanneDArcAlter
Alright buddy aren’t you a tranny
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, softman and JeanneDArcAlter
you’re still missing the point. even if turks and europeans have some differences, they’re still part of the same broad caucasoid category. there’s definitely variation, but it doesn’t mean we’re drastically different. the shared ancestry thing means a lot when it comes to bone structure. you’re focusing on the small differences, but the bigger picture is that we’re all in the same category of human variation

I never said drastically drastically would mean there is way to much difference but just look at an albino you can see vague similarities but the skull looks and feels breathes indian
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 67738 and JeanneDArcAlter
I never said drastically drastically would mean there is way to much difference but just look at an albino you can see vague similarities but the skull looks and feels breathes indian
even with albinos, it’s not as simple as you think. the features might look a little different on the surface, but when you break down the skull structure, it’s still within that broad caucasoid framework. i get it, there’s a “look” that stands out, but at the end of the day, we’re still closer to europeans and turks skull wise than you’d think. the bone structure can have variations, sure, but it doesn’t change the fact that it’s all within the same human category
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 125888, Deleted member 67738 and JeanneDArcAlter
even with albinos, it’s not as simple as you think. the features might look a little different on the surface, but when you break down the skull structure, it’s still within that broad caucasoid framework. i get it, there’s a “look” that stands out, but at the end of the day, we’re still closer to europeans and turks skull wise than you’d think. the bone structure can have variations, sure, but it doesn’t change the fact that it’s all within the same human category

We're not that close I don't see the connection even Turks aren't close to whites
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738
We're not that close I don't see the connection even Turks aren't close to whites
When you compare whites turks and indians skulls they look like brothers compared to east asians or sub saharan africans
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, PrinceLuenLeoncur and 160cmcurry
We're not that close I don't see the connection even Turks aren't close to whites
When you compare whites turks and indians skulls they look like brothers compared to east asians or sub saharan africans
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738 and 160cmcurry
When you compare whites turks and indians skulls they look like brothers compared to east asians or sub saharan africans

Yeah but those 2 have no west Asian ancestry
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, Deleted member 117288 and JeanneDArcAlter
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, PrinceLuenLeoncur and Deleted member 117288
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, JeanneDArcAlter and Deleted member 117288
Racebait threads get insane attention
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, softman, Deleted member 103094 and 1 other person
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 67738 and JeanneDArcAlter
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 67738, JeanneDArcAlter and Deleted member 117288
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 67738 and Deleted member 117288

Similar threads

foidrepeller271
Replies
20
Views
142
foidrepeller271
foidrepeller271
Alton
Replies
17
Views
242
thickbitch
thickbitch
donald joe
Replies
11
Views
52
donald joe
donald joe
F
Replies
50
Views
270
jertbaksto
jertbaksto

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top