Ravenfaust
Bangs loyalist
- Joined
- May 12, 2026
- Posts
- 1,430
- Reputation
- 1,855
This take should be quite obvious,but I'd like to share it nonetheless. People in this "community" for whatever reason, seem to have forgotten or willfully choose to ignore the fact that ,in the eyes of the world, only things and beings that are pleasant to the eye have a right to exist. This does not only apply to people ,but to everything else. There are no massive conservation attempts for near extinct animals if they are ugly, take pandas for example, by all means, they should've been extinct by now, they are essentially predetermined to perish in nature, the fact that they have to be coerced into mating tells you this, but because they are very cute, the world has decided to allocate massive resources into the fight for their survival, countless animals have gone and are going extinct and no one cares because they are either boring to look at or are ugly, the only ones who genuinely care for their existence are the autists. Same goes for animal rights groups or nature conservationists, no one would care for pigs and cows and chickens and their atrocious living conditions and slaughter if they all looked like Nurgle from Warhammer, no one would care about deforestation if forests looked like sewers. I understand that this is pretty watery ,but still, I wanted to share my thoughts, feel free to discuss below.
TLDR: People don't view aestheticly boring or ugly things to be worthy of existence.
TLDR: People don't view aestheticly boring or ugly things to be worthy of existence.
Last edited:
