Who Ends Up Posting 1,000+ Times?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Over for the 1000+ posters ngl.. :catJAM:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Anamnesis, Buckh0rn, MouthBreathingElite and 6 others
I'm only a new user, but I possess the attributes of a 1000+ poster?!:feelsahh::feelsahh::feelsahh: ( I'm cooked )
 
  • +1
Reactions: ¿Nero and fazehamster
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Blue Steel, fazehamster and Deleted member 293638
I was intrested in what GPT thinks we look like based on the info of this thread

1k+ Posts

1766700827815


​
Create a realistic portrait of a male Internet forum user in his early to mid-20s with an aesthetic style that reflects long-term forum engagement. He is slightly socially isolated, spends many hours online, and has a neutral to slightly introspective expression. Visual cues: casual indoor lighting, a desktop background with forum threads visible on a monitor, subtle signs of personal care but not overly polished, slightly tired eyes, plain t-shirt, mild stubble. He should appear average to slightly attractive, not a model, with a grounded everyday look. Add a small overlay badge showing “1000+ posts” like a forum achievement icon. Realistic photo style.​


Below 1k Posts

1766700983065


​
Create a realistic portrait of a male Internet forum user in his late teens to early 20s who is a low-to-moderate activity member of an online self-improvement forum. He has under 1,000 posts and appears more casual, less entrenched in forum culture. His expression is neutral or slightly uncertain, with less intensity or obsession. Visual cues: clean but basic appearance, hoodie or casual streetwear, brighter lighting than a basement setting, phone or laptop open casually with a forum page visible but not dominant. Eyes appear more relaxed, less fatigued. Grooming is average, no extreme aesthetic focus. Add a small, understated overlay badge reading “<1000 posts” similar to a forum stat indicator. Photorealistic style, candid and natural.​


​
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Atman, fazehamster, Orka and 2 others
This nigga
 
wow fascinating:feelsthink:
 
  • +1
Reactions: fazehamster
Reading will do more than posting btw, im mostly here to maxx, not to jester. do that irl after you achieve the goals
Alexanderr said:
Introduction

In feedback on earlier surveys, several users asked whether high-activity posters differ from newer or less active users. To check this, I ran two identical surveys: one sent to users with <1K posts and one to users with >1K posts.

This thread shows only the differences between those two groups, where they’re meaningful. I’m not doing a separate write-up of the >1K results here.

For transparency, the full >1K survey results will be posted below via Google Forms, so anyone can inspect the raw distributions themselves.

1. Age​

Significant difference
  • <1K posts: ~90% under 21, heavily under 18
  • >1K posts:Older skew
    • Under 18 drops sharply
    • 18–25 dominates
    • Noticeable 26–30 presence
👉 High-posters are older on average, especially concentrated in 18–25.

2. Sex​

No difference
  • Both groups: ~100% male

3. Height​

Moderate but real difference
  • <1K: Balanced 170–189 cm distribution
  • >1K: Heavily concentrated in 180–189 cm
    • Taller on average
    • Fewer short respondents proportionally
👉 High-posters are taller on average.

4. Region​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Strong North America + Western Europe
  • >1K: More Europe-heavy, especially:
    • Northern Europe
    • Eastern Europe
    • Southern Europe
👉 High-posters are less North-American, more European.

5. Ethnicity​

No major difference
  • Both: ~60–67% White
  • Similar minority distributions

6. Education​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly secondary / high school
  • >1K:Much higher:
    • Some college ↑
    • Bachelor’s / Master’s ↑
👉 High-posters are more educated.

7. Work / Study Status​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly students
  • >1K:
    • More “study + work”
    • More unemployed / NEET
    • Fewer pure students
👉 High-posters are less institutionally anchored.

8. Sexual Orientation​

No meaningful difference
  • ~90% heterosexual in both

9. Religion​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Christianity plurality
  • >1K:
    • Atheism + agnosticism dominate
    • Christianity lower
👉 High-posters are more secular / anti-religious.

10. Income​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Many “prefer not to say”
  • >1K:
    • More “below average”
    • Fewer “about average”
    • Slightly more “well below”
👉 High-posters are poorer relative to peers.

11. Financial Independence​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly “no”
  • >1K: Overwhelmingly not independent
    • “Partially” ↑
    • “Yes” still low
👉 High-posters are more financially dependent.

12. Social Class (Self-Perceived)​

Major inversion
  • <1K: Mostly middle class
  • >1K:
    • Middle class drops
    • Upper class ↑
    • Lower class ↑
👉 High-posters show class polarization.

13. Exercise​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Majority exercise several times/week
  • >1K:
    • “Practically never” ↑
    • “Almost daily” ↓
👉 High-posters are less physically active.

14. Disabilities​

No difference
  • ~93–95% no disabilities

15. Hair Loss​

No major difference
  • Similar rates of loss / uncertainty

16. Plastic Surgery (Past)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: ~3% yes
  • >1K: 8.5% yes
👉 High-posters are more likely to have had surgery.

17. Plastic Surgery (Future)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly yes / maybe
  • >1K:
    • “Yes” ↑
    • “Maybe” still high
    • Fewer outright “no”
👉 High-posters are more committed, less ambivalent.

18. Body Weight​

No major difference
  • Both center on “about average”

19. Physical Conditions Affecting Interaction​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~14% yes
  • >1K: 17% yes
👉 Slightly higher impairment among high-posters.

20. Leaving Home Frequency​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly daily / weekly
  • >1K:
    • Slightly fewer daily outings
    • More respondents in monthly / rare categories
👉 High-posters leave home somewhat less often overall.

21. Mocked for Appearance​

Slight difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~30%
  • >1K: “Never” ~31%
  • The breakdown is very similar between groups.
👉 Differences are small and not clearly directional.

22. Appearance Meds / Supplements​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Supplements dominant
  • >1K:
    • Prescription meds ↑
    • Total intervention ↑
👉 High-posters are more aggressive medically.

23. Substance Use​

No difference
  • ~15% yes in both

24. Upbringing​

No meaningful difference
  • ~75–78% two-parent households

25. Compliments​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~17%
  • >1K: “Never” 25%
👉 High-posters are more likely to report never receiving compliments.

26. Friends​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~82% yes
  • >1K: 69% yes
    • “No” + “online only” ↑
👉 High-posters are more likely to report no or online-only friendships.

27. Desire for Children​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: 84% yes
  • >1K: ~75% yes
👉 High-posters are slightly less likely to want children.

28. Seeking Relationships Abroad​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~49% yes
  • >1K: 54% yes
👉 High-posters are more willing to exit local dating markets.

29. Happiness​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Peaks at 5–6
  • >1K:Shifts downward
    • More 1–3
    • Fewer 7–8
👉 High-posters are less happy overall.

30. Sexual Partners​

Very large difference (distributional)
  • <1K: 63% zero
  • >1K: 64% zero BUT:
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Very high counts exist
👉 Same virginity rate, but polarization increases.

31. Romantic / Sexual Experience​

Moderate difference
  • >1K:
    • “No experience” ↑
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Rejection ↑
👉 High-posters skew more extreme at both ends.

32. Voice Satisfaction​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Neutral dominant
  • >1K: “Dislike (high-pitched)” ↑ sharply
👉 High-posters are more self-critical.

33. Interaction With Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: Daily / weekly dominant
  • >1K:
    • Rarely + never: ~42%
👉 High-posters report noticeably less frequent interaction with women.

34. Time Spent on Forum​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly non-daily
  • >1K:
    • 3–6h + 6h ↑
👉 High-posters spend more time on the forum overall, with a heavier tail of very high-use users.

35. Posting Frequency​

Obvious difference (by definition)
  • >1K: 26% post 50+ times/week

36. Sentiment Toward Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: 22% negative
  • >1K: 32% negative
👉 High-posters express more negative sentiment toward women.

37. Penis Size Satisfaction​

Slight difference
  • <1K: 63% satisfied
  • >1K: 59% satisfied
👉 High-posters report lower satisfaction than <1K, but a majority (~59%) are still satisfied.

38. Autism Spectrum​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~9% diagnosed
  • >1K: 13% diagnosed
  • Unsure ↑ strongly
👉 Neurodivergence more common or more suspected.

39. Appearance Improvement​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly “a little bit”
  • >1K: Higher reports of improvement overall
👉 High-posters report greater appearance improvement overall, with more respondents reporting large gains.

40. Treated Better After Improvement​

Opposite perception
  • <1K: 86% say yes
  • >1K: 82% say yes but:
    • More skepticism
    • Higher “no”
👉 High-posters are less convinced improvement pays off.

41. Bullying​

Moderate difference
  • Both high childhood bullying
  • >1K: Teen bullying ↑
  • Adult bullying slightly ↑

42. Anger / Hostility​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Often + always” ~35%
  • >1K: “Often + always” ~40%
👉 High-posters are slightly angrier.

43. Self-Rating (1–10)​

Shift upward paradox
  • >1K: More 6s and 7s
  • Fewer 1–2s
👉 High-posters are more confident cognitively, not emotionally.

44. Forum Sentiment​

Very large difference
  • <1K: 53% say declining
  • >1K: 70% say declining
👉 High-posters are deeply disillusioned.

45. Recommendation​

Major inversion
  • <1K: 26% yes
  • >1K: 19% yes
  • “No” ↑ sharply

46. Discovery Source​

Significant difference
  • <1K: TikTok dominant
  • >1K:
    • TikTok ↓
    • YouTube, search, legacy forums ↑
👉 High-posters entered earlier, slower pipelines.



View attachment 4450713
What the data actually shows about >1K posters

Not here to moralize, just looking at what actually separates people here. The question is: what kind of selection process produces someone who hits 1000+ posts?

The data suggests high-posters aren't just "more engaged normies"; they're a functionally different population. Here's what separates them:

Social isolation is way more pronounced.
High-posters are older, spend more time here, interact with women less, and are less socially connected. Classic substitution pattern: the forum isn't supplementing their social life, it's increasingly becoming it.

Mental state is noticeably darker.
Lower happiness, higher anger/hostility, more frequent mockery of others, and more negative sentiment toward women But here's the twist: self-ratings don't tank. Most still rate themselves average-to-above. Translation: the bitterness is outward-facing, not just self-hatred spiraling.

Looksmaxxing effort goes up, faith in it goes down.
More prescriptions, more surgeries considered/done, bigger reported improvements. But also way more skepticism that any of it actually changes how people treat them. Diminishing returns in action-- the more you invest, the less each gain seems to matter.

Romantic outcomes don't improve, they polarize.
Virgin rates stay similar, but high-posters show more extremes: more escortcelling, more rejection stories, more complete isolation, and a small minority with unusually high counts. It's not a linear progression upward, it's forking into opposite ends.

Long-term users are blackpilled on the forum itself.
Despite being the most active, they're more likely to say it's declining and less likely to recommend it. They're not here because it's working-- they're here because everything else feels worse or nonexistent.

The model that fits best: selection + reinforcement loop
  • Guys who are reasonably integrated socially or see early wins tend to leave
  • Guys who are isolated, stuck, or frustrated stay and post heavily
  • Over time, high activity becomes less a success metric and more a marker of being trapped
Causation probably runs both ways. Posting a lot may make things worse, but these traits also predict who becomes a high-poster in the first place. Either way, post count ends up being one of the strongest dividing lines in our userbase.


TLDR: >1K posters are more isolated, more bitter, looksmax harder while believing in it less, and have worse outcomes. Post count tracks who's trapped here, not who's making it.

Complete survey results (>1K users) are available here:
docs.google.com

Looksmax.org 2025 Survey

Welcome to our annual Looksmax.org Survey! Share your honest thoughts—it's anonymous and only takes a few minutes. We promise! We'll reveal the results to the community soon.
docs.google.com docs.google.com
Click to expand...
 
  • +1
Reactions: staton and fazehamster
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Atman, Blue Steel, MaxorDie and 4 others
1768754899474
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: o_Owtf, Blue Steel, fazehamster and 1 other person
Alexanderr said:

3. Height​

Moderate but real difference
  • <1K: Balanced 170–189 cm distribution
  • >1K: Heavily concentrated in 180–189 cm
    • Taller on average
    • Fewer short respondents proportionally
👉 High-posters are taller on average.

​

Click to expand...
is posting more optimal for heightmaxxing?!
 
  • +1
Reactions: fazehamster and adderallx
Alexanderr said:
This is the much more interesting thread, wonder when people start finding it
Click to expand...
Not sure if anyone else has mentioned this yet but thought its interested that more than 1000 post people are concentrated on the higher end of the heigh spectrum although staying the same weight as the sub 1000 posters. Meaning that more than1000 posters are slimmer on average
 
  • +1
Reactions: fazehamster
interesting thread, needs more attention, needs more surveyors.
 
Alexanderr said:
Introduction

In feedback on earlier surveys, several users asked whether high-activity posters differ from newer or less active users. To check this, I ran two identical surveys: one sent to users with <1K posts and one to users with >1K posts.

This thread shows only the differences between those two groups, where they’re meaningful. I’m not doing a separate write-up of the >1K results here.

For transparency, the full >1K survey results will be posted below via Google Forms, so anyone can inspect the raw distributions themselves.

1. Age​

Significant difference
  • <1K posts: ~90% under 21, heavily under 18
  • >1K posts:Older skew
    • Under 18 drops sharply
    • 18–25 dominates
    • Noticeable 26–30 presence
👉 High-posters are older on average, especially concentrated in 18–25.

2. Sex​

No difference
  • Both groups: ~100% male

3. Height​

Moderate but real difference
  • <1K: Balanced 170–189 cm distribution
  • >1K: Heavily concentrated in 180–189 cm
    • Taller on average
    • Fewer short respondents proportionally
👉 High-posters are taller on average.

4. Region​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Strong North America + Western Europe
  • >1K: More Europe-heavy, especially:
    • Northern Europe
    • Eastern Europe
    • Southern Europe
👉 High-posters are less North-American, more European.

5. Ethnicity​

No major difference
  • Both: ~60–67% White
  • Similar minority distributions

6. Education​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly secondary / high school
  • >1K:Much higher:
    • Some college ↑
    • Bachelor’s / Master’s ↑
👉 High-posters are more educated.

7. Work / Study Status​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly students
  • >1K:
    • More “study + work”
    • More unemployed / NEET
    • Fewer pure students
👉 High-posters are less institutionally anchored.

8. Sexual Orientation​

No meaningful difference
  • ~90% heterosexual in both

9. Religion​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Christianity plurality
  • >1K:
    • Atheism + agnosticism dominate
    • Christianity lower
👉 High-posters are more secular / anti-religious.

10. Income​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Many “prefer not to say”
  • >1K:
    • More “below average”
    • Fewer “about average”
    • Slightly more “well below”
👉 High-posters are poorer relative to peers.

11. Financial Independence​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly “no”
  • >1K: Overwhelmingly not independent
    • “Partially” ↑
    • “Yes” still low
👉 High-posters are more financially dependent.

12. Social Class (Self-Perceived)​

Major inversion
  • <1K: Mostly middle class
  • >1K:
    • Middle class drops
    • Upper class ↑
    • Lower class ↑
👉 High-posters show class polarization.

13. Exercise​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Majority exercise several times/week
  • >1K:
    • “Practically never” ↑
    • “Almost daily” ↓
👉 High-posters are less physically active.

14. Disabilities​

No difference
  • ~93–95% no disabilities

15. Hair Loss​

No major difference
  • Similar rates of loss / uncertainty

16. Plastic Surgery (Past)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: ~3% yes
  • >1K: 8.5% yes
👉 High-posters are more likely to have had surgery.

17. Plastic Surgery (Future)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly yes / maybe
  • >1K:
    • “Yes” ↑
    • “Maybe” still high
    • Fewer outright “no”
👉 High-posters are more committed, less ambivalent.

18. Body Weight​

No major difference
  • Both center on “about average”

19. Physical Conditions Affecting Interaction​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~14% yes
  • >1K: 17% yes
👉 Slightly higher impairment among high-posters.

20. Leaving Home Frequency​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly daily / weekly
  • >1K:
    • Slightly fewer daily outings
    • More respondents in monthly / rare categories
👉 High-posters leave home somewhat less often overall.

21. Mocked for Appearance​

Slight difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~30%
  • >1K: “Never” ~31%
  • The breakdown is very similar between groups.
👉 Differences are small and not clearly directional.

22. Appearance Meds / Supplements​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Supplements dominant
  • >1K:
    • Prescription meds ↑
    • Total intervention ↑
👉 High-posters are more aggressive medically.

23. Substance Use​

No difference
  • ~15% yes in both

24. Upbringing​

No meaningful difference
  • ~75–78% two-parent households

25. Compliments​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~17%
  • >1K: “Never” 25%
👉 High-posters are more likely to report never receiving compliments.

26. Friends​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~82% yes
  • >1K: 69% yes
    • “No” + “online only” ↑
👉 High-posters are more likely to report no or online-only friendships.

27. Desire for Children​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: 84% yes
  • >1K: ~75% yes
👉 High-posters are slightly less likely to want children.

28. Seeking Relationships Abroad​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~49% yes
  • >1K: 54% yes
👉 High-posters are more willing to exit local dating markets.

29. Happiness​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Peaks at 5–6
  • >1K:Shifts downward
    • More 1–3
    • Fewer 7–8
👉 High-posters are less happy overall.

30. Sexual Partners​

Very large difference (distributional)
  • <1K: 63% zero
  • >1K: 64% zero BUT:
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Very high counts exist
👉 Same virginity rate, but polarization increases.

31. Romantic / Sexual Experience​

Moderate difference
  • >1K:
    • “No experience” ↑
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Rejection ↑
👉 High-posters skew more extreme at both ends.

32. Voice Satisfaction​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Neutral dominant
  • >1K: “Dislike (high-pitched)” ↑ sharply
👉 High-posters are more self-critical.

33. Interaction With Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: Daily / weekly dominant
  • >1K:
    • Rarely + never: ~42%
👉 High-posters report noticeably less frequent interaction with women.

34. Time Spent on Forum​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly non-daily
  • >1K:
    • 3–6h + 6h ↑
👉 High-posters spend more time on the forum overall, with a heavier tail of very high-use users.

35. Posting Frequency​

Obvious difference (by definition)
  • >1K: 26% post 50+ times/week

36. Sentiment Toward Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: 22% negative
  • >1K: 32% negative
👉 High-posters express more negative sentiment toward women.

37. Penis Size Satisfaction​

Slight difference
  • <1K: 63% satisfied
  • >1K: 59% satisfied
👉 High-posters report lower satisfaction than <1K, but a majority (~59%) are still satisfied.

38. Autism Spectrum​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~9% diagnosed
  • >1K: 13% diagnosed
  • Unsure ↑ strongly
👉 Neurodivergence more common or more suspected.

39. Appearance Improvement​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly “a little bit”
  • >1K: Higher reports of improvement overall
👉 High-posters report greater appearance improvement overall, with more respondents reporting large gains.

40. Treated Better After Improvement​

Opposite perception
  • <1K: 86% say yes
  • >1K: 82% say yes but:
    • More skepticism
    • Higher “no”
👉 High-posters are less convinced improvement pays off.

41. Bullying​

Moderate difference
  • Both high childhood bullying
  • >1K: Teen bullying ↑
  • Adult bullying slightly ↑

42. Anger / Hostility​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Often + always” ~35%
  • >1K: “Often + always” ~40%
👉 High-posters are slightly angrier.

43. Self-Rating (1–10)​

Shift upward paradox
  • >1K: More 6s and 7s
  • Fewer 1–2s
👉 High-posters are more confident cognitively, not emotionally.

44. Forum Sentiment​

Very large difference
  • <1K: 53% say declining
  • >1K: 70% say declining
👉 High-posters are deeply disillusioned.

45. Recommendation​

Major inversion
  • <1K: 26% yes
  • >1K: 19% yes
  • “No” ↑ sharply

46. Discovery Source​

Significant difference
  • <1K: TikTok dominant
  • >1K:
    • TikTok ↓
    • YouTube, search, legacy forums ↑
👉 High-posters entered earlier, slower pipelines.



View attachment 4450713
What the data actually shows about >1K posters

Not here to moralize, just looking at what actually separates people here. The question is: what kind of selection process produces someone who hits 1000+ posts?

The data suggests high-posters aren't just "more engaged normies"; they're a functionally different population. Here's what separates them:

Social isolation is way more pronounced.
High-posters are older, spend more time here, interact with women less, and are less socially connected. Classic substitution pattern: the forum isn't supplementing their social life, it's increasingly becoming it.

Mental state is noticeably darker.
Lower happiness, higher anger/hostility, more frequent mockery of others, and more negative sentiment toward women But here's the twist: self-ratings don't tank. Most still rate themselves average-to-above. Translation: the bitterness is outward-facing, not just self-hatred spiraling.

Looksmaxxing effort goes up, faith in it goes down.
More prescriptions, more surgeries considered/done, bigger reported improvements. But also way more skepticism that any of it actually changes how people treat them. Diminishing returns in action-- the more you invest, the less each gain seems to matter.

Romantic outcomes don't improve, they polarize.
Virgin rates stay similar, but high-posters show more extremes: more escortcelling, more rejection stories, more complete isolation, and a small minority with unusually high counts. It's not a linear progression upward, it's forking into opposite ends.

Long-term users are blackpilled on the forum itself.
Despite being the most active, they're more likely to say it's declining and less likely to recommend it. They're not here because it's working-- they're here because everything else feels worse or nonexistent.

The model that fits best: selection + reinforcement loop
  • Guys who are reasonably integrated socially or see early wins tend to leave
  • Guys who are isolated, stuck, or frustrated stay and post heavily
  • Over time, high activity becomes less a success metric and more a marker of being trapped
Causation probably runs both ways. Posting a lot may make things worse, but these traits also predict who becomes a high-poster in the first place. Either way, post count ends up being one of the strongest dividing lines in our userbase.


TLDR: >1K posters are more isolated, more bitter, looksmax harder while believing in it less, and have worse outcomes. Post count tracks who's trapped here, not who's making it.

Complete survey results (>1K users) are available here:
docs.google.com

Looksmax.org 2025 Survey

Welcome to our annual Looksmax.org Survey! Share your honest thoughts—it's anonymous and only takes a few minutes. We promise! We'll reveal the results to the community soon.
docs.google.com docs.google.com
Click to expand...

fascinating
 
  • +1
Reactions: fazehamster
Alexanderr said:
Introduction

In feedback on earlier surveys, several users asked whether high-activity posters differ from newer or less active users. To check this, I ran two identical surveys: one sent to users with <1K posts and one to users with >1K posts.

This thread shows only the differences between those two groups, where they’re meaningful. I’m not doing a separate write-up of the >1K results here.

For transparency, the full >1K survey results will be posted below via Google Forms, so anyone can inspect the raw distributions themselves.

1. Age​

Significant difference
  • <1K posts: ~90% under 21, heavily under 18
  • >1K posts:Older skew
    • Under 18 drops sharply
    • 18–25 dominates
    • Noticeable 26–30 presence
👉 High-posters are older on average, especially concentrated in 18–25.

2. Sex​

No difference
  • Both groups: ~100% male

3. Height​

Moderate but real difference
  • <1K: Balanced 170–189 cm distribution
  • >1K: Heavily concentrated in 180–189 cm
    • Taller on average
    • Fewer short respondents proportionally
👉 High-posters are taller on average.

4. Region​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Strong North America + Western Europe
  • >1K: More Europe-heavy, especially:
    • Northern Europe
    • Eastern Europe
    • Southern Europe
👉 High-posters are less North-American, more European.

5. Ethnicity​

No major difference
  • Both: ~60–67% White
  • Similar minority distributions

6. Education​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly secondary / high school
  • >1K:Much higher:
    • Some college ↑
    • Bachelor’s / Master’s ↑
👉 High-posters are more educated.

7. Work / Study Status​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly students
  • >1K:
    • More “study + work”
    • More unemployed / NEET
    • Fewer pure students
👉 High-posters are less institutionally anchored.

8. Sexual Orientation​

No meaningful difference
  • ~90% heterosexual in both

9. Religion​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Christianity plurality
  • >1K:
    • Atheism + agnosticism dominate
    • Christianity lower
👉 High-posters are more secular / anti-religious.

10. Income​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Many “prefer not to say”
  • >1K:
    • More “below average”
    • Fewer “about average”
    • Slightly more “well below”
👉 High-posters are poorer relative to peers.

11. Financial Independence​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly “no”
  • >1K: Overwhelmingly not independent
    • “Partially” ↑
    • “Yes” still low
👉 High-posters are more financially dependent.

12. Social Class (Self-Perceived)​

Major inversion
  • <1K: Mostly middle class
  • >1K:
    • Middle class drops
    • Upper class ↑
    • Lower class ↑
👉 High-posters show class polarization.

13. Exercise​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Majority exercise several times/week
  • >1K:
    • “Practically never” ↑
    • “Almost daily” ↓
👉 High-posters are less physically active.

14. Disabilities​

No difference
  • ~93–95% no disabilities

15. Hair Loss​

No major difference
  • Similar rates of loss / uncertainty

16. Plastic Surgery (Past)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: ~3% yes
  • >1K: 8.5% yes
👉 High-posters are more likely to have had surgery.

17. Plastic Surgery (Future)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly yes / maybe
  • >1K:
    • “Yes” ↑
    • “Maybe” still high
    • Fewer outright “no”
👉 High-posters are more committed, less ambivalent.

18. Body Weight​

No major difference
  • Both center on “about average”

19. Physical Conditions Affecting Interaction​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~14% yes
  • >1K: 17% yes
👉 Slightly higher impairment among high-posters.

20. Leaving Home Frequency​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly daily / weekly
  • >1K:
    • Slightly fewer daily outings
    • More respondents in monthly / rare categories
👉 High-posters leave home somewhat less often overall.

21. Mocked for Appearance​

Slight difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~30%
  • >1K: “Never” ~31%
  • The breakdown is very similar between groups.
👉 Differences are small and not clearly directional.

22. Appearance Meds / Supplements​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Supplements dominant
  • >1K:
    • Prescription meds ↑
    • Total intervention ↑
👉 High-posters are more aggressive medically.

23. Substance Use​

No difference
  • ~15% yes in both

24. Upbringing​

No meaningful difference
  • ~75–78% two-parent households

25. Compliments​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~17%
  • >1K: “Never” 25%
👉 High-posters are more likely to report never receiving compliments.

26. Friends​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~82% yes
  • >1K: 69% yes
    • “No” + “online only” ↑
👉 High-posters are more likely to report no or online-only friendships.

27. Desire for Children​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: 84% yes
  • >1K: ~75% yes
👉 High-posters are slightly less likely to want children.

28. Seeking Relationships Abroad​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~49% yes
  • >1K: 54% yes
👉 High-posters are more willing to exit local dating markets.

29. Happiness​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Peaks at 5–6
  • >1K:Shifts downward
    • More 1–3
    • Fewer 7–8
👉 High-posters are less happy overall.

30. Sexual Partners​

Very large difference (distributional)
  • <1K: 63% zero
  • >1K: 64% zero BUT:
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Very high counts exist
👉 Same virginity rate, but polarization increases.

31. Romantic / Sexual Experience​

Moderate difference
  • >1K:
    • “No experience” ↑
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Rejection ↑
👉 High-posters skew more extreme at both ends.

32. Voice Satisfaction​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Neutral dominant
  • >1K: “Dislike (high-pitched)” ↑ sharply
👉 High-posters are more self-critical.

33. Interaction With Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: Daily / weekly dominant
  • >1K:
    • Rarely + never: ~42%
👉 High-posters report noticeably less frequent interaction with women.

34. Time Spent on Forum​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly non-daily
  • >1K:
    • 3–6h + 6h ↑
👉 High-posters spend more time on the forum overall, with a heavier tail of very high-use users.

35. Posting Frequency​

Obvious difference (by definition)
  • >1K: 26% post 50+ times/week

36. Sentiment Toward Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: 22% negative
  • >1K: 32% negative
👉 High-posters express more negative sentiment toward women.

37. Penis Size Satisfaction​

Slight difference
  • <1K: 63% satisfied
  • >1K: 59% satisfied
👉 High-posters report lower satisfaction than <1K, but a majority (~59%) are still satisfied.

38. Autism Spectrum​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~9% diagnosed
  • >1K: 13% diagnosed
  • Unsure ↑ strongly
👉 Neurodivergence more common or more suspected.

39. Appearance Improvement​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly “a little bit”
  • >1K: Higher reports of improvement overall
👉 High-posters report greater appearance improvement overall, with more respondents reporting large gains.

40. Treated Better After Improvement​

Opposite perception
  • <1K: 86% say yes
  • >1K: 82% say yes but:
    • More skepticism
    • Higher “no”
👉 High-posters are less convinced improvement pays off.

41. Bullying​

Moderate difference
  • Both high childhood bullying
  • >1K: Teen bullying ↑
  • Adult bullying slightly ↑

42. Anger / Hostility​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Often + always” ~35%
  • >1K: “Often + always” ~40%
👉 High-posters are slightly angrier.

43. Self-Rating (1–10)​

Shift upward paradox
  • >1K: More 6s and 7s
  • Fewer 1–2s
👉 High-posters are more confident cognitively, not emotionally.

44. Forum Sentiment​

Very large difference
  • <1K: 53% say declining
  • >1K: 70% say declining
👉 High-posters are deeply disillusioned.

45. Recommendation​

Major inversion
  • <1K: 26% yes
  • >1K: 19% yes
  • “No” ↑ sharply

46. Discovery Source​

Significant difference
  • <1K: TikTok dominant
  • >1K:
    • TikTok ↓
    • YouTube, search, legacy forums ↑
👉 High-posters entered earlier, slower pipelines.



View attachment 4450713
What the data actually shows about >1K posters

Not here to moralize, just looking at what actually separates people here. The question is: what kind of selection process produces someone who hits 1000+ posts?

The data suggests high-posters aren't just "more engaged normies"; they're a functionally different population. Here's what separates them:

Social isolation is way more pronounced.
High-posters are older, spend more time here, interact with women less, and are less socially connected. Classic substitution pattern: the forum isn't supplementing their social life, it's increasingly becoming it.

Mental state is noticeably darker.
Lower happiness, higher anger/hostility, more frequent mockery of others, and more negative sentiment toward women But here's the twist: self-ratings don't tank. Most still rate themselves average-to-above. Translation: the bitterness is outward-facing, not just self-hatred spiraling.

Looksmaxxing effort goes up, faith in it goes down.
More prescriptions, more surgeries considered/done, bigger reported improvements. But also way more skepticism that any of it actually changes how people treat them. Diminishing returns in action-- the more you invest, the less each gain seems to matter.

Romantic outcomes don't improve, they polarize.
Virgin rates stay similar, but high-posters show more extremes: more escortcelling, more rejection stories, more complete isolation, and a small minority with unusually high counts. It's not a linear progression upward, it's forking into opposite ends.

Long-term users are blackpilled on the forum itself.
Despite being the most active, they're more likely to say it's declining and less likely to recommend it. They're not here because it's working-- they're here because everything else feels worse or nonexistent.

The model that fits best: selection + reinforcement loop
  • Guys who are reasonably integrated socially or see early wins tend to leave
  • Guys who are isolated, stuck, or frustrated stay and post heavily
  • Over time, high activity becomes less a success metric and more a marker of being trapped
Causation probably runs both ways. Posting a lot may make things worse, but these traits also predict who becomes a high-poster in the first place. Either way, post count ends up being one of the strongest dividing lines in our userbase.


TLDR: >1K posters are more isolated, more bitter, looksmax harder while believing in it less, and have worse outcomes. Post count tracks who's trapped here, not who's making it.

Complete survey results (>1K users) are available here:
docs.google.com

Looksmax.org 2025 Survey

Welcome to our annual Looksmax.org Survey! Share your honest thoughts—it's anonymous and only takes a few minutes. We promise! We'll reveal the results to the community soon.
docs.google.com docs.google.com
Click to expand...

Oke
 
  • +1
Reactions: fazehamster
Wow
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blue Steel and fazehamster

Height​

Moderate but real difference
  • <1K: Balanced 170–189 cm distribution
  • >1K: Heavily concentrated in 180–189 cm
    • Taller on average
    • Fewer short respondents proportionally
👉 High-posters are taller on average.
 
joao said:

Height​

Moderate but real difference
  • <1K: Balanced 170–189 cm distribution
  • >1K: Heavily concentrated in 180–189 cm
    • Taller on average
    • Fewer short respondents proportionally
👉 High-posters are taller on average.
Click to expand...
Is this proof height is not that important
 
High count users are more likely to lie
 
Thank you, I wonder my reason for posting now, I will now analyze it everyday with this post. I like women
 
  • +1
Reactions: 0ogrpostcel
good thread
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 0ogrpostcel
Alexanderr said:
Introduction

In feedback on earlier surveys, several users asked whether high-activity posters differ from newer or less active users. To check this, I ran two identical surveys: one sent to users with <1K posts and one to users with >1K posts.

This thread shows only the differences between those two groups, where they’re meaningful. I’m not doing a separate write-up of the >1K results here.

For transparency, the full >1K survey results will be posted below via Google Forms, so anyone can inspect the raw distributions themselves.

1. Age​

Significant difference
  • <1K posts: ~90% under 21, heavily under 18
  • >1K posts:Older skew
    • Under 18 drops sharply
    • 18–25 dominates
    • Noticeable 26–30 presence
👉 High-posters are older on average, especially concentrated in 18–25.

2. Sex​

No difference
  • Both groups: ~100% male

3. Height​

Moderate but real difference
  • <1K: Balanced 170–189 cm distribution
  • >1K: Heavily concentrated in 180–189 cm
    • Taller on average
    • Fewer short respondents proportionally
👉 High-posters are taller on average.

4. Region​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Strong North America + Western Europe
  • >1K: More Europe-heavy, especially:
    • Northern Europe
    • Eastern Europe
    • Southern Europe
👉 High-posters are less North-American, more European.

5. Ethnicity​

No major difference
  • Both: ~60–67% White
  • Similar minority distributions

6. Education​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly secondary / high school
  • >1K:Much higher:
    • Some college ↑
    • Bachelor’s / Master’s ↑
👉 High-posters are more educated.

7. Work / Study Status​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly students
  • >1K:
    • More “study + work”
    • More unemployed / NEET
    • Fewer pure students
👉 High-posters are less institutionally anchored.

8. Sexual Orientation​

No meaningful difference
  • ~90% heterosexual in both

9. Religion​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Christianity plurality
  • >1K:
    • Atheism + agnosticism dominate
    • Christianity lower
👉 High-posters are more secular / anti-religious.

10. Income​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Many “prefer not to say”
  • >1K:
    • More “below average”
    • Fewer “about average”
    • Slightly more “well below”
👉 High-posters are poorer relative to peers.

11. Financial Independence​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly “no”
  • >1K: Overwhelmingly not independent
    • “Partially” ↑
    • “Yes” still low
👉 High-posters are more financially dependent.

12. Social Class (Self-Perceived)​

Major inversion
  • <1K: Mostly middle class
  • >1K:
    • Middle class drops
    • Upper class ↑
    • Lower class ↑
👉 High-posters show class polarization.

13. Exercise​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Majority exercise several times/week
  • >1K:
    • “Practically never” ↑
    • “Almost daily” ↓
👉 High-posters are less physically active.

14. Disabilities​

No difference
  • ~93–95% no disabilities

15. Hair Loss​

No major difference
  • Similar rates of loss / uncertainty

16. Plastic Surgery (Past)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: ~3% yes
  • >1K: 8.5% yes
👉 High-posters are more likely to have had surgery.

17. Plastic Surgery (Future)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly yes / maybe
  • >1K:
    • “Yes” ↑
    • “Maybe” still high
    • Fewer outright “no”
👉 High-posters are more committed, less ambivalent.

18. Body Weight​

No major difference
  • Both center on “about average”

19. Physical Conditions Affecting Interaction​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~14% yes
  • >1K: 17% yes
👉 Slightly higher impairment among high-posters.

20. Leaving Home Frequency​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly daily / weekly
  • >1K:
    • Slightly fewer daily outings
    • More respondents in monthly / rare categories
👉 High-posters leave home somewhat less often overall.

21. Mocked for Appearance​

Slight difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~30%
  • >1K: “Never” ~31%
  • The breakdown is very similar between groups.
👉 Differences are small and not clearly directional.

22. Appearance Meds / Supplements​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Supplements dominant
  • >1K:
    • Prescription meds ↑
    • Total intervention ↑
👉 High-posters are more aggressive medically.

23. Substance Use​

No difference
  • ~15% yes in both

24. Upbringing​

No meaningful difference
  • ~75–78% two-parent households

25. Compliments​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~17%
  • >1K: “Never” 25%
👉 High-posters are more likely to report never receiving compliments.

26. Friends​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~82% yes
  • >1K: 69% yes
    • “No” + “online only” ↑
👉 High-posters are more likely to report no or online-only friendships.

27. Desire for Children​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: 84% yes
  • >1K: ~75% yes
👉 High-posters are slightly less likely to want children.

28. Seeking Relationships Abroad​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~49% yes
  • >1K: 54% yes
👉 High-posters are more willing to exit local dating markets.

29. Happiness​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Peaks at 5–6
  • >1K:Shifts downward
    • More 1–3
    • Fewer 7–8
👉 High-posters are less happy overall.

30. Sexual Partners​

Very large difference (distributional)
  • <1K: 63% zero
  • >1K: 64% zero BUT:
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Very high counts exist
👉 Same virginity rate, but polarization increases.

31. Romantic / Sexual Experience​

Moderate difference
  • >1K:
    • “No experience” ↑
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Rejection ↑
👉 High-posters skew more extreme at both ends.

32. Voice Satisfaction​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Neutral dominant
  • >1K: “Dislike (high-pitched)” ↑ sharply
👉 High-posters are more self-critical.

33. Interaction With Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: Daily / weekly dominant
  • >1K:
    • Rarely + never: ~42%
👉 High-posters report noticeably less frequent interaction with women.

34. Time Spent on Forum​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly non-daily
  • >1K:
    • 3–6h + 6h ↑
👉 High-posters spend more time on the forum overall, with a heavier tail of very high-use users.

35. Posting Frequency​

Obvious difference (by definition)
  • >1K: 26% post 50+ times/week

36. Sentiment Toward Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: 22% negative
  • >1K: 32% negative
👉 High-posters express more negative sentiment toward women.

37. Penis Size Satisfaction​

Slight difference
  • <1K: 63% satisfied
  • >1K: 59% satisfied
👉 High-posters report lower satisfaction than <1K, but a majority (~59%) are still satisfied.

38. Autism Spectrum​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~9% diagnosed
  • >1K: 13% diagnosed
  • Unsure ↑ strongly
👉 Neurodivergence more common or more suspected.

39. Appearance Improvement​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly “a little bit”
  • >1K: Higher reports of improvement overall
👉 High-posters report greater appearance improvement overall, with more respondents reporting large gains.

40. Treated Better After Improvement​

Opposite perception
  • <1K: 86% say yes
  • >1K: 82% say yes but:
    • More skepticism
    • Higher “no”
👉 High-posters are less convinced improvement pays off.

41. Bullying​

Moderate difference
  • Both high childhood bullying
  • >1K: Teen bullying ↑
  • Adult bullying slightly ↑

42. Anger / Hostility​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Often + always” ~35%
  • >1K: “Often + always” ~40%
👉 High-posters are slightly angrier.

43. Self-Rating (1–10)​

Shift upward paradox
  • >1K: More 6s and 7s
  • Fewer 1–2s
👉 High-posters are more confident cognitively, not emotionally.

44. Forum Sentiment​

Very large difference
  • <1K: 53% say declining
  • >1K: 70% say declining
👉 High-posters are deeply disillusioned.

45. Recommendation​

Major inversion
  • <1K: 26% yes
  • >1K: 19% yes
  • “No” ↑ sharply

46. Discovery Source​

Significant difference
  • <1K: TikTok dominant
  • >1K:
    • TikTok ↓
    • YouTube, search, legacy forums ↑
👉 High-posters entered earlier, slower pipelines.



View attachment 4450713
What the data actually shows about >1K posters

Not here to moralize, just looking at what actually separates people here. The question is: what kind of selection process produces someone who hits 1000+ posts?

The data suggests high-posters aren't just "more engaged normies"; they're a functionally different population. Here's what separates them:

Social isolation is way more pronounced.
High-posters are older, spend more time here, interact with women less, and are less socially connected. Classic substitution pattern: the forum isn't supplementing their social life, it's increasingly becoming it.

Mental state is noticeably darker.
Lower happiness, higher anger/hostility, more frequent mockery of others, and more negative sentiment toward women But here's the twist: self-ratings don't tank. Most still rate themselves average-to-above. Translation: the bitterness is outward-facing, not just self-hatred spiraling.

Looksmaxxing effort goes up, faith in it goes down.
More prescriptions, more surgeries considered/done, bigger reported improvements. But also way more skepticism that any of it actually changes how people treat them. Diminishing returns in action-- the more you invest, the less each gain seems to matter.

Romantic outcomes don't improve, they polarize.
Virgin rates stay similar, but high-posters show more extremes: more escortcelling, more rejection stories, more complete isolation, and a small minority with unusually high counts. It's not a linear progression upward, it's forking into opposite ends.

Long-term users are blackpilled on the forum itself.
Despite being the most active, they're more likely to say it's declining and less likely to recommend it. They're not here because it's working-- they're here because everything else feels worse or nonexistent.

The model that fits best: selection + reinforcement loop
  • Guys who are reasonably integrated socially or see early wins tend to leave
  • Guys who are isolated, stuck, or frustrated stay and post heavily
  • Over time, high activity becomes less a success metric and more a marker of being trapped
Causation probably runs both ways. Posting a lot may make things worse, but these traits also predict who becomes a high-poster in the first place. Either way, post count ends up being one of the strongest dividing lines in our userbase.


TLDR: >1K posters are more isolated, more bitter, looksmax harder while believing in it less, and have worse outcomes. Post count tracks who's trapped here, not who's making it.

Complete survey results (>1K users) are available here:
docs.google.com

Looksmax.org 2025 Survey

Welcome to our annual Looksmax.org Survey! Share your honest thoughts—it's anonymous and only takes a few minutes. We promise! We'll reveal the results to the community soon.
docs.google.com docs.google.com
Click to expand...

dnrd chatgpt
 
Did you control for posting frequency rather than just total posts? I have over 1k but I hardly spend any time on here and never made a thread. You would see the greatest personality deviations in people who post very frequently I think.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
kalefartbomb said:
Did you control for posting frequency rather than just total posts? I have over 1k but I hardly spend any time on here and never made a thread. You would see the greatest personality deviations in people who post very frequently I think.
Click to expand...
yo terry
 
it's so over
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
Alexanderr said:
Introduction

In feedback on earlier surveys, several users asked whether high-activity posters differ from newer or less active users. To check this, I ran two identical surveys: one sent to users with <1K posts and one to users with >1K posts.

This thread shows only the differences between those two groups, where they’re meaningful. I’m not doing a separate write-up of the >1K results here.

For transparency, the full >1K survey results will be posted below via Google Forms, so anyone can inspect the raw distributions themselves.

1. Age​

Significant difference
  • <1K posts: ~90% under 21, heavily under 18
  • >1K posts:Older skew
    • Under 18 drops sharply
    • 18–25 dominates
    • Noticeable 26–30 presence
👉 High-posters are older on average, especially concentrated in 18–25.

2. Sex​

No difference
  • Both groups: ~100% male

3. Height​

Moderate but real difference
  • <1K: Balanced 170–189 cm distribution
  • >1K: Heavily concentrated in 180–189 cm
    • Taller on average
    • Fewer short respondents proportionally
👉 High-posters are taller on average.

4. Region​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Strong North America + Western Europe
  • >1K: More Europe-heavy, especially:
    • Northern Europe
    • Eastern Europe
    • Southern Europe
👉 High-posters are less North-American, more European.

5. Ethnicity​

No major difference
  • Both: ~60–67% White
  • Similar minority distributions

6. Education​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly secondary / high school
  • >1K:Much higher:
    • Some college ↑
    • Bachelor’s / Master’s ↑
👉 High-posters are more educated.

7. Work / Study Status​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly students
  • >1K:
    • More “study + work”
    • More unemployed / NEET
    • Fewer pure students
👉 High-posters are less institutionally anchored.

8. Sexual Orientation​

No meaningful difference
  • ~90% heterosexual in both

9. Religion​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Christianity plurality
  • >1K:
    • Atheism + agnosticism dominate
    • Christianity lower
👉 High-posters are more secular / anti-religious.

10. Income​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Many “prefer not to say”
  • >1K:
    • More “below average”
    • Fewer “about average”
    • Slightly more “well below”
👉 High-posters are poorer relative to peers.

11. Financial Independence​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly “no”
  • >1K: Overwhelmingly not independent
    • “Partially” ↑
    • “Yes” still low
👉 High-posters are more financially dependent.

12. Social Class (Self-Perceived)​

Major inversion
  • <1K: Mostly middle class
  • >1K:
    • Middle class drops
    • Upper class ↑
    • Lower class ↑
👉 High-posters show class polarization.

13. Exercise​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Majority exercise several times/week
  • >1K:
    • “Practically never” ↑
    • “Almost daily” ↓
👉 High-posters are less physically active.

14. Disabilities​

No difference
  • ~93–95% no disabilities

15. Hair Loss​

No major difference
  • Similar rates of loss / uncertainty

16. Plastic Surgery (Past)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: ~3% yes
  • >1K: 8.5% yes
👉 High-posters are more likely to have had surgery.

17. Plastic Surgery (Future)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly yes / maybe
  • >1K:
    • “Yes” ↑
    • “Maybe” still high
    • Fewer outright “no”
👉 High-posters are more committed, less ambivalent.

18. Body Weight​

No major difference
  • Both center on “about average”

19. Physical Conditions Affecting Interaction​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~14% yes
  • >1K: 17% yes
👉 Slightly higher impairment among high-posters.

20. Leaving Home Frequency​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly daily / weekly
  • >1K:
    • Slightly fewer daily outings
    • More respondents in monthly / rare categories
👉 High-posters leave home somewhat less often overall.

21. Mocked for Appearance​

Slight difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~30%
  • >1K: “Never” ~31%
  • The breakdown is very similar between groups.
👉 Differences are small and not clearly directional.

22. Appearance Meds / Supplements​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Supplements dominant
  • >1K:
    • Prescription meds ↑
    • Total intervention ↑
👉 High-posters are more aggressive medically.

23. Substance Use​

No difference
  • ~15% yes in both

24. Upbringing​

No meaningful difference
  • ~75–78% two-parent households

25. Compliments​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~17%
  • >1K: “Never” 25%
👉 High-posters are more likely to report never receiving compliments.

26. Friends​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~82% yes
  • >1K: 69% yes
    • “No” + “online only” ↑
👉 High-posters are more likely to report no or online-only friendships.

27. Desire for Children​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: 84% yes
  • >1K: ~75% yes
👉 High-posters are slightly less likely to want children.

28. Seeking Relationships Abroad​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~49% yes
  • >1K: 54% yes
👉 High-posters are more willing to exit local dating markets.

29. Happiness​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Peaks at 5–6
  • >1K:Shifts downward
    • More 1–3
    • Fewer 7–8
👉 High-posters are less happy overall.

30. Sexual Partners​

Very large difference (distributional)
  • <1K: 63% zero
  • >1K: 64% zero BUT:
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Very high counts exist
👉 Same virginity rate, but polarization increases.

31. Romantic / Sexual Experience​

Moderate difference
  • >1K:
    • “No experience” ↑
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Rejection ↑
👉 High-posters skew more extreme at both ends.

32. Voice Satisfaction​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Neutral dominant
  • >1K: “Dislike (high-pitched)” ↑ sharply
👉 High-posters are more self-critical.

33. Interaction With Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: Daily / weekly dominant
  • >1K:
    • Rarely + never: ~42%
👉 High-posters report noticeably less frequent interaction with women.

34. Time Spent on Forum​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly non-daily
  • >1K:
    • 3–6h + 6h ↑
👉 High-posters spend more time on the forum overall, with a heavier tail of very high-use users.

35. Posting Frequency​

Obvious difference (by definition)
  • >1K: 26% post 50+ times/week

36. Sentiment Toward Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: 22% negative
  • >1K: 32% negative
👉 High-posters express more negative sentiment toward women.

37. Penis Size Satisfaction​

Slight difference
  • <1K: 63% satisfied
  • >1K: 59% satisfied
👉 High-posters report lower satisfaction than <1K, but a majority (~59%) are still satisfied.

38. Autism Spectrum​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~9% diagnosed
  • >1K: 13% diagnosed
  • Unsure ↑ strongly
👉 Neurodivergence more common or more suspected.

39. Appearance Improvement​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly “a little bit”
  • >1K: Higher reports of improvement overall
👉 High-posters report greater appearance improvement overall, with more respondents reporting large gains.

40. Treated Better After Improvement​

Opposite perception
  • <1K: 86% say yes
  • >1K: 82% say yes but:
    • More skepticism
    • Higher “no”
👉 High-posters are less convinced improvement pays off.

41. Bullying​

Moderate difference
  • Both high childhood bullying
  • >1K: Teen bullying ↑
  • Adult bullying slightly ↑

42. Anger / Hostility​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Often + always” ~35%
  • >1K: “Often + always” ~40%
👉 High-posters are slightly angrier.

43. Self-Rating (1–10)​

Shift upward paradox
  • >1K: More 6s and 7s
  • Fewer 1–2s
👉 High-posters are more confident cognitively, not emotionally.

44. Forum Sentiment​

Very large difference
  • <1K: 53% say declining
  • >1K: 70% say declining
👉 High-posters are deeply disillusioned.

45. Recommendation​

Major inversion
  • <1K: 26% yes
  • >1K: 19% yes
  • “No” ↑ sharply

46. Discovery Source​

Significant difference
  • <1K: TikTok dominant
  • >1K:
    • TikTok ↓
    • YouTube, search, legacy forums ↑
👉 High-posters entered earlier, slower pipelines.



View attachment 4450713
What the data actually shows about >1K posters

Not here to moralize, just looking at what actually separates people here. The question is: what kind of selection process produces someone who hits 1000+ posts?

The data suggests high-posters aren't just "more engaged normies"; they're a functionally different population. Here's what separates them:

Social isolation is way more pronounced.
High-posters are older, spend more time here, interact with women less, and are less socially connected. Classic substitution pattern: the forum isn't supplementing their social life, it's increasingly becoming it.

Mental state is noticeably darker.
Lower happiness, higher anger/hostility, more frequent mockery of others, and more negative sentiment toward women But here's the twist: self-ratings don't tank. Most still rate themselves average-to-above. Translation: the bitterness is outward-facing, not just self-hatred spiraling.

Looksmaxxing effort goes up, faith in it goes down.
More prescriptions, more surgeries considered/done, bigger reported improvements. But also way more skepticism that any of it actually changes how people treat them. Diminishing returns in action-- the more you invest, the less each gain seems to matter.

Romantic outcomes don't improve, they polarize.
Virgin rates stay similar, but high-posters show more extremes: more escortcelling, more rejection stories, more complete isolation, and a small minority with unusually high counts. It's not a linear progression upward, it's forking into opposite ends.

Long-term users are blackpilled on the forum itself.
Despite being the most active, they're more likely to say it's declining and less likely to recommend it. They're not here because it's working-- they're here because everything else feels worse or nonexistent.

The model that fits best: selection + reinforcement loop
  • Guys who are reasonably integrated socially or see early wins tend to leave
  • Guys who are isolated, stuck, or frustrated stay and post heavily
  • Over time, high activity becomes less a success metric and more a marker of being trapped
Causation probably runs both ways. Posting a lot may make things worse, but these traits also predict who becomes a high-poster in the first place. Either way, post count ends up being one of the strongest dividing lines in our userbase.


TLDR: >1K posters are more isolated, more bitter, looksmax harder while believing in it less, and have worse outcomes. Post count tracks who's trapped here, not who's making it.

Complete survey results (>1K users) are available here:
docs.google.com

Looksmax.org 2025 Survey

Welcome to our annual Looksmax.org Survey! Share your honest thoughts—it's anonymous and only takes a few minutes. We promise! We'll reveal the results to the community soon.
docs.google.com docs.google.com
Click to expand...

ok
 
ok
 
Very interesting, seen this thread a few times but never bothered to read. I'm glad I finally did.
 
@Alexanderr could you provide data for the <1K users as well? I'd like to generate some confidence intervals for the difference between the <1K and >1K users because the margins are quite slim for some of the questions.
 
:feelswhy:
 
Insomnia said:
Honestly, I’m surprised only 319 people took the survey. I was expecting a way bigger number.
Click to expand...
where do you even find these surveys
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
  • +1
Reactions: Scandi.
Alexanderr said:
Introduction

In feedback on earlier surveys, several users asked whether high-activity posters differ from newer or less active users. To check this, I ran two identical surveys: one sent to users with <1K posts and one to users with >1K posts.

This thread shows only the differences between those two groups, where they’re meaningful. I’m not doing a separate write-up of the >1K results here.

For transparency, the full >1K survey results will be posted below via Google Forms, so anyone can inspect the raw distributions themselves.

1. Age​

Significant difference
  • <1K posts: ~90% under 21, heavily under 18
  • >1K posts:Older skew
    • Under 18 drops sharply
    • 18–25 dominates
    • Noticeable 26–30 presence
👉 High-posters are older on average, especially concentrated in 18–25.

2. Sex​

No difference
  • Both groups: ~100% male

3. Height​

Moderate but real difference
  • <1K: Balanced 170–189 cm distribution
  • >1K: Heavily concentrated in 180–189 cm
    • Taller on average
    • Fewer short respondents proportionally
👉 High-posters are taller on average.

4. Region​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Strong North America + Western Europe
  • >1K: More Europe-heavy, especially:
    • Northern Europe
    • Eastern Europe
    • Southern Europe
👉 High-posters are less North-American, more European.

5. Ethnicity​

No major difference
  • Both: ~60–67% White
  • Similar minority distributions

6. Education​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly secondary / high school
  • >1K:Much higher:
    • Some college ↑
    • Bachelor’s / Master’s ↑
👉 High-posters are more educated.

7. Work / Study Status​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly students
  • >1K:
    • More “study + work”
    • More unemployed / NEET
    • Fewer pure students
👉 High-posters are less institutionally anchored.

8. Sexual Orientation​

No meaningful difference
  • ~90% heterosexual in both

9. Religion​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Christianity plurality
  • >1K:
    • Atheism + agnosticism dominate
    • Christianity lower
👉 High-posters are more secular / anti-religious.

10. Income​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Many “prefer not to say”
  • >1K:
    • More “below average”
    • Fewer “about average”
    • Slightly more “well below”
👉 High-posters are poorer relative to peers.

11. Financial Independence​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly “no”
  • >1K: Overwhelmingly not independent
    • “Partially” ↑
    • “Yes” still low
👉 High-posters are more financially dependent.

12. Social Class (Self-Perceived)​

Major inversion
  • <1K: Mostly middle class
  • >1K:
    • Middle class drops
    • Upper class ↑
    • Lower class ↑
👉 High-posters show class polarization.

13. Exercise​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Majority exercise several times/week
  • >1K:
    • “Practically never” ↑
    • “Almost daily” ↓
👉 High-posters are less physically active.

14. Disabilities​

No difference
  • ~93–95% no disabilities

15. Hair Loss​

No major difference
  • Similar rates of loss / uncertainty

16. Plastic Surgery (Past)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: ~3% yes
  • >1K: 8.5% yes
👉 High-posters are more likely to have had surgery.

17. Plastic Surgery (Future)​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Mostly yes / maybe
  • >1K:
    • “Yes” ↑
    • “Maybe” still high
    • Fewer outright “no”
👉 High-posters are more committed, less ambivalent.

18. Body Weight​

No major difference
  • Both center on “about average”

19. Physical Conditions Affecting Interaction​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~14% yes
  • >1K: 17% yes
👉 Slightly higher impairment among high-posters.

20. Leaving Home Frequency​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly daily / weekly
  • >1K:
    • Slightly fewer daily outings
    • More respondents in monthly / rare categories
👉 High-posters leave home somewhat less often overall.

21. Mocked for Appearance​

Slight difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~30%
  • >1K: “Never” ~31%
  • The breakdown is very similar between groups.
👉 Differences are small and not clearly directional.

22. Appearance Meds / Supplements​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Supplements dominant
  • >1K:
    • Prescription meds ↑
    • Total intervention ↑
👉 High-posters are more aggressive medically.

23. Substance Use​

No difference
  • ~15% yes in both

24. Upbringing​

No meaningful difference
  • ~75–78% two-parent households

25. Compliments​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Never” ~17%
  • >1K: “Never” 25%
👉 High-posters are more likely to report never receiving compliments.

26. Friends​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~82% yes
  • >1K: 69% yes
    • “No” + “online only” ↑
👉 High-posters are more likely to report no or online-only friendships.

27. Desire for Children​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: 84% yes
  • >1K: ~75% yes
👉 High-posters are slightly less likely to want children.

28. Seeking Relationships Abroad​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~49% yes
  • >1K: 54% yes
👉 High-posters are more willing to exit local dating markets.

29. Happiness​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Peaks at 5–6
  • >1K:Shifts downward
    • More 1–3
    • Fewer 7–8
👉 High-posters are less happy overall.

30. Sexual Partners​

Very large difference (distributional)
  • <1K: 63% zero
  • >1K: 64% zero BUT:
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Very high counts exist
👉 Same virginity rate, but polarization increases.

31. Romantic / Sexual Experience​

Moderate difference
  • >1K:
    • “No experience” ↑
    • Paid sex ↑
    • Rejection ↑
👉 High-posters skew more extreme at both ends.

32. Voice Satisfaction​

Significant difference
  • <1K: Neutral dominant
  • >1K: “Dislike (high-pitched)” ↑ sharply
👉 High-posters are more self-critical.

33. Interaction With Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: Daily / weekly dominant
  • >1K:
    • Rarely + never: ~42%
👉 High-posters report noticeably less frequent interaction with women.

34. Time Spent on Forum​

Large difference
  • <1K: Mostly non-daily
  • >1K:
    • 3–6h + 6h ↑
👉 High-posters spend more time on the forum overall, with a heavier tail of very high-use users.

35. Posting Frequency​

Obvious difference (by definition)
  • >1K: 26% post 50+ times/week

36. Sentiment Toward Women​

Large difference
  • <1K: 22% negative
  • >1K: 32% negative
👉 High-posters express more negative sentiment toward women.

37. Penis Size Satisfaction​

Slight difference
  • <1K: 63% satisfied
  • >1K: 59% satisfied
👉 High-posters report lower satisfaction than <1K, but a majority (~59%) are still satisfied.

38. Autism Spectrum​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: ~9% diagnosed
  • >1K: 13% diagnosed
  • Unsure ↑ strongly
👉 Neurodivergence more common or more suspected.

39. Appearance Improvement​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: Mostly “a little bit”
  • >1K: Higher reports of improvement overall
👉 High-posters report greater appearance improvement overall, with more respondents reporting large gains.

40. Treated Better After Improvement​

Opposite perception
  • <1K: 86% say yes
  • >1K: 82% say yes but:
    • More skepticism
    • Higher “no”
👉 High-posters are less convinced improvement pays off.

41. Bullying​

Moderate difference
  • Both high childhood bullying
  • >1K: Teen bullying ↑
  • Adult bullying slightly ↑

42. Anger / Hostility​

Moderate difference
  • <1K: “Often + always” ~35%
  • >1K: “Often + always” ~40%
👉 High-posters are slightly angrier.

43. Self-Rating (1–10)​

Shift upward paradox
  • >1K: More 6s and 7s
  • Fewer 1–2s
👉 High-posters are more confident cognitively, not emotionally.

44. Forum Sentiment​

Very large difference
  • <1K: 53% say declining
  • >1K: 70% say declining
👉 High-posters are deeply disillusioned.

45. Recommendation​

Major inversion
  • <1K: 26% yes
  • >1K: 19% yes
  • “No” ↑ sharply

46. Discovery Source​

Significant difference
  • <1K: TikTok dominant
  • >1K:
    • TikTok ↓
    • YouTube, search, legacy forums ↑
👉 High-posters entered earlier, slower pipelines.



View attachment 4450713
What the data actually shows about >1K posters

Not here to moralize, just looking at what actually separates people here. The question is: what kind of selection process produces someone who hits 1000+ posts?

The data suggests high-posters aren't just "more engaged normies"; they're a functionally different population. Here's what separates them:

Social isolation is way more pronounced.
High-posters are older, spend more time here, interact with women less, and are less socially connected. Classic substitution pattern: the forum isn't supplementing their social life, it's increasingly becoming it.

Mental state is noticeably darker.
Lower happiness, higher anger/hostility, more frequent mockery of others, and more negative sentiment toward women But here's the twist: self-ratings don't tank. Most still rate themselves average-to-above. Translation: the bitterness is outward-facing, not just self-hatred spiraling.

Looksmaxxing effort goes up, faith in it goes down.
More prescriptions, more surgeries considered/done, bigger reported improvements. But also way more skepticism that any of it actually changes how people treat them. Diminishing returns in action-- the more you invest, the less each gain seems to matter.

Romantic outcomes don't improve, they polarize.
Virgin rates stay similar, but high-posters show more extremes: more escortcelling, more rejection stories, more complete isolation, and a small minority with unusually high counts. It's not a linear progression upward, it's forking into opposite ends.

Long-term users are blackpilled on the forum itself.
Despite being the most active, they're more likely to say it's declining and less likely to recommend it. They're not here because it's working-- they're here because everything else feels worse or nonexistent.

The model that fits best: selection + reinforcement loop
  • Guys who are reasonably integrated socially or see early wins tend to leave
  • Guys who are isolated, stuck, or frustrated stay and post heavily
  • Over time, high activity becomes less a success metric and more a marker of being trapped
Causation probably runs both ways. Posting a lot may make things worse, but these traits also predict who becomes a high-poster in the first place. Either way, post count ends up being one of the strongest dividing lines in our userbase.


TLDR: >1K posters are more isolated, more bitter, looksmax harder while believing in it less, and have worse outcomes. Post count tracks who's trapped here, not who's making it.

Complete survey results (>1K users) are available here:
docs.google.com

Looksmax.org 2025 Survey

Welcome to our annual Looksmax.org Survey! Share your honest thoughts—it's anonymous and only takes a few minutes. We promise! We'll reveal the results to the community soon.
docs.google.com docs.google.com
Click to expand...

i then open tiktok to see a post by "iblameclav" that states posting on org increases height
 
yay i posted 1000 times
 
Orka said:
Every year the @Looksmax bot sends everybody a private message with the survey link

It's sent out to every user
Click to expand...
private message to where? email?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Orka
  • +1
Reactions: starborn3995
Orka said:
the screenshot was edited

or do you mean the message regarding the survey?
Click to expand...
oh mb, nigga why are u online 24/7 true org member
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Orka
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Looksmax
  • Sticky
Advertise with us! Reach the largest looksmax and incel audiences on the internet!
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
La Vita
La Vita
NumbThePain
News Six New Animated VIP Color's Dropped - Exclusive For VIP Members!
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
Canthus23
Canthus23
Master
News $LOOKSMAX - Official Community Token
2 3
Replies
105
Views
11K
khhvcelmoid
khhvcelmoid
Looksmax
  • Locked
The New Looksmax.org Official Tiktok Account
Replies
0
Views
1K
Looksmax
Looksmax
Master
  • Locked
Master X Dillon Latham - Interview at 6PM EST Today!
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
277
Views
24K
ft4L
ft4L

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 1)
Back
Top