Who has higher SMV?

[Deleted member 5522]

Black dude with a 8 inch dick and a car

Or Chico?

 

[The Bleach Pill]

how do u know chico doesn't have an 8incher

 

[Deleted member 5522]

how do u know chico doesn't have an 8incher

Lets say for educated guess he has a 5.5 incher, who slays more?

 

[The Bleach Pill]

Lets say for educated guess he has a 5.5 incher, who slays more?

obviously chico

 

[Deleted member 5522]

obviously chico

Wrong @personalityinkwell

 

[The Bleach Pill]

Wrong @personalityinkwell

u just tagged a paedophile to counter my point jfl

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

Black dude

 

[Deleted member 5522]

u just tagged a paedophile to counter my point jfl

The dick pill is everything

 

[The Bleach Pill]

The dick pill is everything

u cant use ur dick if ur face is subhuman.

 

[Deleted member 7863]

I CANT WITH THIS AVI FUCKING GOOD JOB OP WP

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

u cant use ur dick if ur face is subhuman.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

u cant use ur dick if ur face is subhuman.

^imagine thinking he couldn't slay with a huge cock

 

[Deleted member 5522]

View attachment 661658

^imagine thinking he couldn't slay with a huge cock

Unironically

 

[The Bleach Pill]

View attachment 661658

^imagine thinking he couldn't slay with a huge cock

chico mogs him to the african mudhuts in a different galaxy and back.

 

[Deleted member 5522]

chico mogs him to the african mudhuts in a different galaxy and back.

This is the biggest cope I have ever seen

 

[Deleted member 4612]

chico mogs him to the african mudhuts in a different galaxy and back.

face wise, yes.

but that dude can slay on tinder. chico would be called a catfish

 

[The Bleach Pill]

face wise, yes.

but that dude can slay on tinder. chico would be called a catfish

and how is being called a catfish a bad thing lol. its a compliment

 

[Deleted member 4612]

and how is being called a catfish a bad thing lol. its a compliment

no, they won't believe him and thus won't fuck him

 

[sytyl]

dickpill put me into a deep state of cope

 

[Deleted member 4612]

dickpill put me into a deep state of cope

you have a large dong?

 

[sytyl]

you have a large dong?

no

it is over

 

[The Bleach Pill]

no, they won't believe him and thus won't fuck him

pov:
when chico offers a female a ride she assumes he is a gentleman and dark triad badboy
when black man offers girl a ride she automatically assumes shes about to be raped and her organs are about to be harvested

 

[Deleted member 4612]

pov:
when chico offers a female a ride she assumes he is a gentleman and dark triad badboy
when black man offers girl a ride she automatically assumes shes about to be raped and her organs are about to be harvested

gentleman and dark triad are opposites. Elliot Rodger was the superme gentleman and incel as fuck. although he ended up being dark triad badboy

and women fantasize about being raped. jfl @ not knowing that

 

[The Bleach Pill]

gentleman and dark triad are opposites. Elliot Rodger was the superme gentleman and incel as fuck. although he ended up being dark triad badboy

and women fantasize about being raped. jfl @ not knowing that

stop coping man, u know what im implying. Go back to cooming to mega jb threads

 

[Deleted member 4612]

stop coping man, u know what im implying. Go back to cooming to mega jb threads

not coping. the nigger would have higher success rate on tinder

 

[malignant]

no, they won't believe him and thus won't fuck him

if he was real he could simply get verified
jfl @ dick pill cope if you think chico wouldnt slay 100x more on tinder than this homo erectus even if he had a 10 inch dick

 

[Deleted member 4612]

if he was real he could simply get verified
jfl @ dick pill cope if you think chico wouldnt slay 100x more on tinder than this homo erectus even if he had a 10 inch dick

they would get suspicious

 

[The Bleach Pill]

they would get suspicious

not if hes verified and has insta linked. End this cope

 

[Deleted member 4612]

not if hes verified and has insta linked. End this cope

they would think he's hacking

 

[The Bleach Pill]

they would think he's hacking

Holy fuck the amount of cope ur projecting is unbelievable. U simply cannot accept defeat, just admit its over for ur dickpill theory

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Holy fuck the amount of cope ur projecting is unbelievable. U simply cannot accept defeat, just admit its over for ur dickpill theory

jfl @ you

 

[The Bleach Pill]

jfl @ you

u literally have no copes left and had to resort to foids assuming he was hacked JFL. Over for u ngl

 

[Deleted member 4612]

u literally have no copes left and had to resort to foids assuming he was hacked JFL. Over for u ngl

 

[Good_Little_Goy]

stop with these goddamn schizo dick theories
the proof is dogshit

 

[The Bleach Pill]

View attachment 661701

this was the image used. Keep coping im mirin ur shit creativity ngl

 

[Deleted member 4612]

View attachment 661705 this was the image used. Keep coping im mirin ur shit creativity ngl

 

[Deleted member 6305]

Chico probably has 7+
he's tall af and brazilian

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

stop with these goddamn schizo dick theories
the proof is dogshit

cope
“Our study found no significant difference in the proportion of variance accounted for in our model by penis size and height (6.1% vs. 5.1%), indicating that both traits had equivalent effects on relative attractiveness. This finding is intriguing given that height is one of the most widely investigated and well-documented traits known to affect male reproductive success (15, 33–35, 37, 43, 44). The finding suggests that selection on penis size is potentially as strong as selection on stature. The shoulder-to-hip ratio, however, accounted for a much larger proportion of variance in attractiveness in our model (79.6%). This result might be because of our figures extending too far into the feminine range of body shapes (36), as those with a low shoulder-to-hip ratio were highly unattractive. However, given increasing waistlines (49), the values we used are well within the range now seen in many Western countries.”

Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness

Compelling evidence from many animal taxa indicates that male genitalia are often under postcopulatory sexual selection for characteristics that increase a male’s relative fertilization success. There could, however, also be direct precopulatory ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Good_Little_Goy]

cope
“Our study found no significant difference in the proportion of variance accounted for in our model by penis size and height (6.1% vs. 5.1%), indicating that both traits had equivalent effects on relative attractiveness. This finding is intriguing given that height is one of the most widely investigated and well-documented traits known to affect male reproductive success (15, 33–35, 37, 43, 44). The finding suggests that selection on penis size is potentially as strong as selection on stature. The shoulder-to-hip ratio, however, accounted for a much larger proportion of variance in attractiveness in our model (79.6%). This result might be because of our figures extending too far into the feminine range of body shapes (36), as those with a low shoulder-to-hip ratio were highly unattractive. However, given increasing waistlines (49), the values we used are well within the range now seen in many Western countries.”

Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness

Compelling evidence from many animal taxa indicates that male genitalia are often under postcopulatory sexual selection for characteristics that increase a male’s relative fertilization success. There could, however, also be direct precopulatory ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Did you even read what you copy pasted?
It directly proves my point.

First, they are using silhouette figures which have been shown to give false results for other aspects of male body attractiveness like leg to body ratio.

Second, the figures are already naked when women see them first so you can’t directly apply these results to real life, unless you’re walking around naked.

Third, penis size only accounts for 6.1% of the variance of attractiveness of the male body, with height having no significant difference in the proportion that it accounts for, and shoulder to hip ratio almost 80%.

This is what I mean when I say schizo dick theories and dog shit proof, there are no threads like, “who has higher smv, chico or a blackman with a 2.0 shoulder-to-waist ratio”. These guys are putting dick size above everything and blowing the importance way out, which this study directly goes against, showing it accounts for a modest proportion of the variance of the attractiveness of male bodies - in silhouettes at least.

I have seen OP saying he would be a 1/10 5ft 2 bald indian framelet if he could have a 10inch dick, where as if you read that study in full,

“First, females use multiple cues during the mate choice process (9). Overall male attractiveness is unlikely to be determined by individual traits (e.g., refs. 10 and 11), so manipulating traits in isolation can lead to faulty conclusions about net male attractiveness (but see also ref. 12). Second, traits within individuals are phenotypically and genetically correlated. These relationships can influence evolution via correlational selection (13). Third, there might be a size contrast effect such that female assessment of attractiveness varies if the trait of interest is viewed differently in relation to other traits, analogous to the Ebbinghaus–Titchener effect (14). For example, the same sized penis might be perceived differently on short and tall men. Finally, a female’s own phenotype might influence her mate choice decisions.”

You will see that it contradicts that thought process and shows it to be invalid.

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

Did you even read what you copy pasted?
It directly proves my point.

First, they are using silhouette figures which have been shown to give false results for other aspects of male body attractiveness like leg to body ratio.

Second, the figures are already naked when women see them first so you can’t directly apply these results to real life, unless you’re walking around naked.

Third, penis size only accounts for 6.1% of the variance of attractiveness of the male body, with height having no significant difference in the proportion that it accounts for, and shoulder to hip ratio almost 80%.

This is what I mean when I say schizo dick theories and dog shit proof, there are no threads like, “who has higher smv, chico or a blackman with a 2.0 shoulder-to-waist ratio”. These guys are putting dick size above everything and blowing the importance way out, which this study directly goes against, showing it accounts for a modest proportion of the variance of the attractiveness of male bodies - in silhouettes at least.

I have seen OP saying he would be a 1/10 5ft 2 bald indian framelet if he could have a 10inch dick, where as if you read that study in full,

“First, females use multiple cues during the mate choice process (9). Overall male attractiveness is unlikely to be determined by individual traits (e.g., refs. 10 and 11), so manipulating traits in isolation can lead to faulty conclusions about net male attractiveness (but see also ref. 12). Second, traits within individuals are phenotypically and genetically correlated. These relationships can influence evolution via correlational selection (13). Third, there might be a size contrast effect such that female assessment of attractiveness varies if the trait of interest is viewed differently in relation to other traits, analogous to the Ebbinghaus–Titchener effect (14). For example, the same sized penis might be perceived differently on short and tall men. Finally, a female’s own phenotype might influence her mate choice decisions.”

You will see that it contradicts that thought process and shows it to be invalid.

The 1/10 5’2 indian janitor is obviously hyperbole

 

[Deleted member 756]

Chico

 

[Good_Little_Goy]

The 1/10 5’2 indian janitor is obviously hyperbole

It’s not man and that’s besides the point, the 6.1% of variance of male body attractiveness gets dwarfed by the 79.6% accounted for by the shoulder to hip ratio and yet this forum values the former so much more and spends so much more time talking about the former and how to improve it and such.

It makes no sense given the evidence. These guys are actually the ones coping thinking they can triple their smv by dickmaxxing as opposed to improving all aspects of attractiveness like the study provides evidence for.