Who has the best hairline? What hairline shape is ideal?

19357
maesthetic
image-w856.jpg
pretty boy
 
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: ripcordgod1, zharupodrugu and jojoyou
images
this or its never even started
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: SoberAndRetarded, RAMU KAKA, forevermirin and 2 others
Andrew Gray
97187204_1944795358989297_3622317972258816000_n.jpg
86459934_1853480744787426_535983537396908032_n.jpg
61960868_1585149348287235_3606975391299796992_n.jpg
97501065_1944795408989292_6422701327163326464_n.jpg


Norwood 0 with prominent temples that almost reach the eyebrows in side profile, hairline height 90-95% of the midface. Youthfull widow's peak (usually seen only in teenagers) despite being 35 years old and irregular hairline pattern despite appearing almost straight at first sight. That's a god tier hairline IMO.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: AscendingHero, nobodyspecial369, MaxxedOut and 5 others
Andrew Gray
97187204_1944795358989297_3622317972258816000_n.jpg
86459934_1853480744787426_535983537396908032_n.jpg
61960868_1585149348287235_3606975391299796992_n.jpg
97501065_1944795408989292_6422701327163326464_n.jpg


Norwood 0 with prominent temples that almost reach the eyebrows in side profile, hairline height 90-95% of the midface. Youthfull widow's peak (usually seen only in teenagers) despite being 35 years old and irregular hairline pattern despite appearing almost straight at first sight. That's a god tier hairline IMO.
Thats a great hairline, thanks for the good reply
 
  • +1
Reactions: NegativeNorwood
Tyson ballou hairline is ideal
1676709815522
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: AscendingHero, Kroker, Deleted member 17872 and 3 others
I think the temple peaks are bit too much tbh, looks low class and low iq
Brad Pitt also has a great hairline. Might be a bit less extreme than ballous but honestly at this point I am so hairlinepilled that I’d still rather want to habe ballous hairline

F32D4145 6CF6 46A0 9153 16C8B73D6361
B0D32F17 E630 463C A4EA 65127C26B179
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and callisto
Brad Pitt also has a great hairline. Might be a bit less extreme than ballous but honestly at this point I am so hairlinepilled that I’d still rather want to habe ballous hairline

View attachment 2082692View attachment 2082694
Again, is too much, i have literally had chicks tell me that brad pitt looks trailer trash, I'm telling you these temple peaks are not ideal. I was wondering more about whether or not the hairline should be straight or curved back a little bit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Again, is too much, i have literally had chicks tell me that brad pitt looks trailer trash, I'm telling you these temple peaks are not ideal. I was wondering more about whether or not the hairline should be straight or curved back a little bit.
gigacope. Temple peaks are an insane halo on white men because they frame the face in a masculine way.
And jfl if you believe these virtue signaling whores who would sell their souls just to spend one night with Brad Pitt
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and PURE ARYAN GENETICS
Brad Pitt also has a great hairline. Might be a bit less extreme than ballous but honestly at this point I am so hairlinepilled that I’d still rather want to habe ballous hairline

View attachment 2082692View attachment 2082694
Their height is ideal. But their temple is too narrow. Makes them look retarded. Better than huge forehead and big hairline like Tom Brady's though. This is ideal hairline.

1676713776130
1676713883697
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: germanlooks, Physiocrat33 and Deleted member 25667
Another 10/10 hairline is Jake Gyllenhall's IMO, also god tier hair density.
347a612fe5343e1302540fb5929173d0.jpg
28th+Annual+Lucille+Lortel+Awards+Arrivals+rWLVeFwefqsx.jpg

0418de6df34aaab9e401e872867b8a9c.jpg
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and SoberAndRetarded
What's the general looksmax consensus on Zayn's hairline. I've always thought it haloed him to an extent
463870647034
32432432434587342
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS and buflek
It's better than having a high hairline. But it's not a good hairline. It affects him less because it's harmonizes with his facial thirds but would look retarded on a lot of people.
I somewhat agree, it works well on him because he has a relatively short neotenous face. Slap his hairline on someone like brad pitt and it'd make him look like an ancient pre hominid.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS
Andrew Gray
97187204_1944795358989297_3622317972258816000_n.jpg
86459934_1853480744787426_535983537396908032_n.jpg
61960868_1585149348287235_3606975391299796992_n.jpg
97501065_1944795408989292_6422701327163326464_n.jpg


Norwood 0 with prominent temples that almost reach the eyebrows in side profile, hairline height 90-95% of the midface. Youthfull widow's peak (usually seen only in teenagers) despite being 35 years old and irregular hairline pattern despite appearing almost straight at first sight. That's a god tier hairline IMO.
wdym temples that almost reach the eyebrows? I dont get it could you explain
 
actually realized that this is the best
 

Attachments

  • tomcruise.jpeg
    tomcruise.jpeg
    5.8 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS
Their height is ideal. But their temple is too narrow. Makes them look retarded. Better than huge forehead and big hairline like Tom Brady's though. This is ideal hairline.

View attachment 2082712View attachment 2082713
After all it’s all about harmony. Morph Brad Pitt with more narrow temples and he descends
335EB713 99AD 4C4A 95D1 28AB939B786E
BF355FE7 93BB 4913 8138 13986EB5AF50

Also narrow temples rarley make you look retarded if you are white. Most of the time it only makes ethnics look low iq.
And both Ballous and Pitts hairline are more safe from the Norwood reaper than the ones you posted which is important.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall and Deleted member 17872
After all it’s all about harmony. Morph Brad Pitt with more narrow temples and he descends
View attachment 2082749View attachment 2082750
Also narrow temples rarley make you look retarded if you are white. Most of the time it only makes ethnics look low iq.
You morphed it too wide. But even then it barely made any difference.
And both Ballous and Pitts hairline are more safe from the Norwood reaper than the ones you posted which is important.
No. Justin Bieber had zayn tier hairline and still got visited by the reaper. Idk if there is any correlation but if there is any it's minor.

1676718086825
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: germanlooks
You morphed it too wide. But even then it barely made any difference
I didn’t morph it too wide. It just looks too wide because as I said it doesn’t suit his face. He needs the temple peaks the same way he needs the negative tilted eyebrows. It’s all about harmony.
No. Justin Bieber had zayn tier hairline and still got visited by the reaper. Idk if there is any correlation but if there is any it's minor.
He doesn’t have temple peaks tho. I legit have never seen someone with a Brad Pitt or ballou hairline who noticeably norwooded
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
15961-1579984830.jpg
 
  • +1
Reactions: chasing aesthetics and PURE ARYAN GENETICS
He doesn’t have temple peaks tho. I legit have never seen someone with a Brad Pitt or ballou hairline who noticeably norwooded
Maybe it's true. But it's better to have Tom Cruise hairline and not bald.

There are many guys with wideish temples who don't bald.

Ofcourse harmony is better in the end and individual features are not that important.
 
  • +1
Reactions: germanlooks
Maybe it's true. But it's better to have Tom Cruise hairline and not bald.

There are many guys with wideish temples who don't bald.

Ofcourse harmony is better in the end and individual features are not that important.
It also depends on how wide your temple bones are. The wider they are the more narrow your hairline needs to be in order to not end up looking like megamind
 
wdym temples that almost reach the eyebrows? I dont get it could you explain

A good hairline depends also of the width of the cheekbones, not just on the hairline's height and temple prominence.
Andrew Gray's hairline is perfect because it's low set, yet the width of temples is proportional to his cheekbones. The more pronounced and closer the temples are to the eyebrow in side profile, the narrower the hairline is from the front:

Image 17
Image 18


Brad Pitt has more prominent temples that reach his eyebrow in side profile, but they look good on him because his hairline is higher set than Andrew's and his cheekbones are narrower, making the very prominent temples proportional:

Image 20
Image 19


That's the reason why I also like the widow's peak, it makes the hairline lower set without making the face look stupid like a straight, very low set hairline would.
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
Reactions: AscendingHero
A good hairline depends also of the width of the cheekbones, not just on the hairline's height and temple prominence.
Andrew Gray's hairline is perfect because it's low set, yet the width of temples is proportional to his cheekbones. The more pronounced and closer the temples are to the eyebrow in side profile, the narrower the hairline is from the front:

View attachment 2082780View attachment 2082781

Brad Pitt has more prominent temples that reach his eyebrow in side profile, but they look good on him because his hairline is higher set than Andrew's and his cheekbones are narrower, making the very prominent temples proportional:

View attachment 2082785View attachment 2082784

That's the reason why I also like the widow's peak, it makes the hairline lower set without making the face look stupid like a straight, very low set hairline would.
Thoughts on this hairline?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230218-170048_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230218-170048_Chrome.jpg
    340.5 KB · Views: 0
Andrew Gray
97187204_1944795358989297_3622317972258816000_n.jpg
86459934_1853480744787426_535983537396908032_n.jpg
61960868_1585149348287235_3606975391299796992_n.jpg
97501065_1944795408989292_6422701327163326464_n.jpg


Norwood 0 with prominent temples that almost reach the eyebrows in side profile, hairline height 90-95% of the midface. Youthfull widow's peak (usually seen only in teenagers) despite being 35 years old and irregular hairline pattern despite appearing almost straight at first sight. That's a god tier hairline IMO.
Hello skin cancer.
 
  • WTF
Reactions: NegativeNorwood
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, Phillybeard1996 and Physiocrat33
Ronald Reagen
 
on this note, who are some hair transplant surgeons with good hairline results?
 
on this note, who are some hair transplant surgeons with good hairline results?

Couto, Pradeep Sethi, Feriduni, Konior, Bloxham.
Those have very blackpilled results that also include temples.
 
Couto, Pradeep Sethi, Feriduni, Konior, Bloxham.
Those have very blackpilled results that also include temples.
anymore US based ones? Couto is not accepting consults for years atm lol.
 
anymore US based ones? Couto is not accepting consults for years atm lol.

Yeah Couto is almost impossible to book AFAIK, he reportedly goes for months without accepting patients. If he accepts the consult request, the wait list is 3 years (2 for just a consult, and 1 for surgery after the consult).

I'm not well informed on US surgeons due to living in EU. I know that Konior is one of the GOATs and has giga blackpilled results, but he charges 3x as Couto (and Couto charges 4,5€ per FUE graft, VAT included). For that amount of money is better to travel to EU tbh, I wouldn't look too much into US surgeons. Feriduni is one of the best in the world and charges 4 to 5 euros per FUE graft, paying more than that makes no sense IMO.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero
A good hairline depends also of the width of the cheekbones, not just on the hairline's height and temple prominence.
Andrew Gray's hairline is perfect because it's low set, yet the width of temples is proportional to his cheekbones. The more pronounced and closer the temples are to the eyebrow in side profile, the narrower the hairline is from the front:

View attachment 2082780View attachment 2082781

Brad Pitt has more prominent temples that reach his eyebrow in side profile, but they look good on him because his hairline is higher set than Andrew's and his cheekbones are narrower, making the very prominent temples proportional:

View attachment 2082785View attachment 2082784

That's the reason why I also like the widow's peak, it makes the hairline lower set without making the face look stupid like a straight, very low set hairline would.
Fantastic post mate 👏👏

Brad Pitt has more prominent temples that reach his eyebrow in side profile, but they look good on him because his hairline is higher set than Andrew's and his cheekbones are narrower, making the very prominent temples proportional:

Image 20
Image 19
Are there any specific ideal ratios for this?
 

Similar threads

guilty
Replies
25
Views
522
Davidproton
Davidproton
Imretarded?
LifeFuel Hairline growth
Replies
2
Views
287
Imretarded?
Imretarded?
Zeta
Replies
7
Views
237
Dbeyduvudhs
D
thebuffdon690
Replies
95
Views
1K
Awan
Awan
researcher888
Replies
23
Views
888
ScramFranklin
ScramFranklin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top