who has the shortest midface on this site

Also daily reminder that slighty long midface is ideal.
Ian Somerhalder
MV5BOWVkMTEzMTEtY2JjNC00MzhhLWE0ZmEtODVjNTkzMmYxOWRjXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMzM4MjM0Nzg V1  1

IMG 0312

Jon Kortajarena
Tyson Ballou3
2369488875 e3e12b13d3 z
440dfbcacef83a82b58768f36aeb704f


Literally 64-65mm midface lenght is ideal, no matter if ur ratio is fucked due to smaller IPD.
 
  • +1
Reactions: inceletto, thickdickdaddy27, draco and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 656
Also daily reminder that slighty long midface is ideal.
View attachment 262351View attachment 262352
View attachment 262353
View attachment 262355View attachment 262356View attachment 262358View attachment 262359

Literally 64-65mm midface lenght is ideal, no matter if ur ratio is fucked due to smaller IPD.
Most of these are more or less average or slightly more compact than average.

But yes 63 - 65 mm is probably about right. Average would be more like 65 mm - 66 mm.
 
Most of these are more or less average or slightly more compact than average.

But yes 63 - 65 mm is probably about right. Average would be more like 65 mm - 66 mm.
I will make thread on this anyways because copers will still believe that some of these guys i posted would look better with shorter midface. Literally morph any of these and they will look way worse. Chico looks like fucking bulldog with 2-3mm shorter midface.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Golden Glass and Deleted member 656
I will make thread on this anyways because copers will still believe that some of these guys i posted would look better with shorter midface. Literally morph any of these and they will look way worse. Chico looks like fucking bulldog with 2-3mm shorter midface.
Take quiet consolation in the fact that you're right

People that believe the ideal is uber-compact won't be converted.
 
This is extreme case. Also this guy has no good features. Morph him with shorter midface and he will look even fucking worse, like block head.
He has decent zygos. And an exception to an absolute rule like yours is used to disprove it being absolute. That wasn’t even the best example just an easy one.

He looks bad in both, but the one with a more compact midface suits his eyes better. Doesn’t matter if he looks more like a “blockhead” in the after. Better to be a blockhead than a horse face in most people’s’ books.
5D9E329A 6A15 485E 8834 96212E44D6CF


I will make thread on this anyways because copers will still believe that some of these guys i posted would look better with shorter midface. Literally morph any of these and they will look way worse. Chico looks like fucking bulldog with 2-3mm shorter midface.
Would be super curious how Chico looks with a 2-3mm shorter midface.


Take quiet consolation in the fact that you're right

People that believe the ideal is uber-compact won't be converted.
Agreed. Maybe compact can be more “striking” in a way, but definitely not highest SMV. Same with above average IPD (think someone like the Jenkins twins—they look like very aesthetic aliens, but more general-population-friendly facial ratios is best for the real world).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 656 and needsolution
He has decent zygos. And an exception to an absolute rule like yours is used to disprove it being absolute. That wasn’t even the best example just an easy one.

He looks bad in both, but the one with a more compact midface suits his eyes better. Doesn’t matter if he looks more like a “blockhead” in the after. Better to be a blockhead than a horse face in most people’s’ books.
View attachment 262363


Would be super curious how Chico looks with a 2-3mm shorter midface.



Agreed. Maybe compact can be more “striking” in a way, but definitely not highest SMV. Same with above average IPD (think someone like the Jenkins twins—they look like very aesthetic aliens, but more general-population-friendly facial ratios is best for the real world).
I will make thread in 48 hours and post some examples.

Also this guy isnt looking any better with shorter face. His eyes are main problem, not only close-set position.
Invisible medial canthus, mediocore eye shape, brown eyes, small pfl, weak definition, lashes, not good brows.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Golden Glass
I will make thread in 48 hours and post some examples.

Also this guy isnt looking any better with shorter face. His eyes are main problem, not only close-set position.
Invisible medial canthus, mediocore eye shape, brown eyes, small pfl, weak definition, lashes, not good brows.
Him still looking bad doesn’t mean he can’t look less bad—which he does in all honesty.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: needsolution, Deleted member 2933 and Golden Glass
I actually measured it wrong, it’s 28mm. Just measured it again.

So u have a distance of 2,8 cm between your pupil and top of the mouth?
 
So u have a distance of 2,8 cm between your pupil and top of the mouth?
That’s barely over an inch. Obviously a troll
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2933 and needsolution
Mine is legit around 53-54mm. Ipd is around 58-59mm.
 
Can someone measure my IPD and nasion-to-upper lip for midface measurement? I have no idea. I’ve attached three pictures. If all three or at least two of them can be checked for consistency, that’d be great.

@Golden Glass
 

Attachments

  • 0968E443-9FEB-47EC-87FD-3265F0E72574.jpeg
    0968E443-9FEB-47EC-87FD-3265F0E72574.jpeg
    45.5 KB · Views: 9
  • AA72ED76-AD54-4E38-ABAB-F7C0B91B9864.jpeg
    AA72ED76-AD54-4E38-ABAB-F7C0B91B9864.jpeg
    36 KB · Views: 6
  • 5C19CDF4-6E44-4765-8AF3-66DB0180E2CF.jpeg
    5C19CDF4-6E44-4765-8AF3-66DB0180E2CF.jpeg
    34.3 KB · Views: 5
Can someone measure my IPD and nasion-to-upper lip for midface measurement? I have no idea. I’ve attached three pictures. If all three or at least two of them can be checked for consistency, that’d be great.

@Golden Glass
Why nasion and not pupil?
 
Why nasion and not upper lip?

Sorry I mean the distance from the nasion to the upper lip which is the other measurement besides IPD required for the midface measurement.
 
Sorry I mean the distance from the nasion to the upper lip which is the other measurement besides IPD required for the midface measurement.
No i typed wrong, see the edit
 
No i typed wrong, see the edit

I see now. Thanks. Though I don’t think I understand what you’re saying. I was just basically wondering if someone can check my two measurements for me, the two that are required for midface.
@Golden Glass i understand what you’re asking now. The only reason I said nasion to upper lip was because when I looked up how to measure midface on this forum it said the two measurement’s required are: IPD and nasion to upper lip.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Golden Glass
I do
img_2019-11-06_12-54-19-jpg.157297
KOLX4C9

It's such a damn curse. Not just keeps me from being good enough but I have to be also very careful to keep myself away from getting even just a little bit fat,unless it goes so much worse
 
Last edited:
Anyone with below 58mm is either gigaskullcell ot deformed
 
  • +1
Reactions: inceletto

Similar threads

V
Discussion Delusion
Replies
3
Views
70
jordanbarett122
jordanbarett122
J
Replies
37
Views
1K
Pop23
P
Sodoku
Replies
7
Views
215
lurking truecel
lurking truecel
L
Replies
4
Views
265
STR3X
STR3X

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top