who invented/popularized this thing where you create a million kinds of normie ratings (lmhtn, hmlfjfdkvnntn etc)?

Big Daddy

Big Daddy

reckless prettyboy
Joined
Dec 5, 2025
Posts
1,174
Reputation
1,254
not sure if a genius or a literal retard, because it's beyond meaningless, but allows sheltered imbeciles dwelling here to endlessly ruminate about which category they belong to at a certain time of the day, while being invisible to women the entire time
 
  • +1
Reactions: 1exposed, pubert123, TaperBoi808 and 2 others
> while being invisible to women the entire time

thread saved from mediocrity
 
So we have something to do in our lifes because our lifes are boring asf
 
  • +1
Reactions: pubert123 and Big Daddy
but really this is more accurate than numbers, since when rating with numbers the majority believes 7 is average, when it actually is 5
 
same jew that created incelswiki i think
 
but really this is more accurate than numbers, since when rating with numbers the majority believes 7 is average, when it actually is 5

numbers are garbage, meaningless, random, autistic, cringe and low iq too, but this is just taking that garbage to the next level, tbh

some people are so gl that they and everyone else around them know it
vast majority of people are in between, so a million other factors come into play (preferences/"type", pheno, behavior, status, money, fucking confidence, aura, you name it)*
some people are so subhuman that they and everyone else around them know it

that's it
. any looks-isolated analysis deeper than that is moronic. but obsession with categorizing and numbers is a major incel trait, so i get why it's rampant here.

the "community" isn't wrong about any individual features being good or bad, but the thing is (1) humans have a shit ton of individual features and (2) the whole is greater than the sum of its parts (read: harmony)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: taai and MouthBreathingElite
* that's why users who deflect any possible discussion in this direction with "but muh chad" should be permabanned, imo.** it contributes nothing and is just parroting basic stuff npc-style. specially considering those same guys somehow forget applying that same axiom for themselves every single time they make a thread.
 
  • +1
Reactions: taai
** i get that this can lead to turning the "blackpilled" mindset you guys like to think you adopted into bluepill/redpill bs, but a lot of you are already there, so it creates an absurd situation where way too many users are simultaneously rambling about "chad only" and talking about their "htn" looks/potential, which is commonly accepted on this forum as the entry barrier for getting attractive women
 
It's a glimmer of hope for them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big Daddy
The OGs were just Chad, Normie and Subhuman. Then it became Chad, Chadlite, HTN, MTN, LTN, Subhuman. The High Chad, Mid Chad, Low Chad etc thing is fairly new.

I personally like it since it's specific but anything more specific than that is retarded and useless
 
  • +1
Reactions: taai, MouthBreathingElite and Big Daddy
The OGs were just Chad, Normie and Subhuman. Then it became Chad, Chadlite, HTN, MTN, LTN, Subhuman. The High Chad, Mid Chad, Low Chad etc thing is fairly new.

I personally like it since it's specific but anything more specific than that is retarded and useless

yep. exactly what i bolded in post #6. agree with the rest too. good post.
 
  • +1
Reactions: taai and IHATEINDIANS
yep. exactly what i bolded in post #6. agree with the rest too. good post.
My bad, I have a bad habit of not checking the posts under threads before posting myself.
 
  • +1
Reactions: taai, MouthBreathingElite and Big Daddy
My bad, I have a bad habit of not checking the posts under threads before posting myself.

it's high t high iq, dont fret it

on lookism, i used to reply to people's threads without even checking the title. my eyes were on the fragment of the screen that showed the op alone, and i d go from that
 
  • +1
Reactions: IHATEINDIANS
I just need 0.5 more PSL bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: Miki and Big Daddy
Numbers are too vague imo, I think the rating system is good
 

Similar threads

Nodesbitch
Replies
30
Views
2K
aabb123
aabb123
Sloppyseconds
Replies
22
Views
4K
teenagelovepilldnr
teenagelovepilldnr
D
Replies
122
Views
48K
seven?
seven?
thecel
Replies
80
Views
26K
Deleted member 153421
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top