who is the most intelligent person youve ever met

nice nice what do you think of time? time imo seems to be ultimate thing that guides the Universe to where it needs to go and thus is the force of everything that is
Time is what orients us temporally, it is correspondent with space and is necessary in order to maintain symbolic (conscious, societal) coherence. I dont believe it exists objectively, but it might as well under the given framework.
Theres a lot more to say here but thats a basic introduction
 
My good friend has an IQ of around 150. Extremely good pattern recognition and insane memory. But he lacks the ability to adequately say what he wants to say which is brutal asf and makes him sound extremely autistic sometimes. But yeah he's smart asf, and is extremely emotionally intelegnet, kinda bluepilled tho
 
Time is what orients us temporally, it is correspondent with space and is necessary in order to maintain symbolic (conscious, societal) coherence. I dont believe it exists objectively, but it might as well under the given framework.
Theres a lot more to say here but thats a basic introduction
so what about physics and time being the fourth dimension? it can only move in one direction so it must have a purpose for getting us to a final product
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: registerfasterusing
My good friend has an IQ of around 150. Extremely good pattern recognition and insane memory. But he lacks the ability to adequately say what he wants to say which is brutal asf and makes him sound extremely autistic sometimes. But yeah he's smart asf, and is extremely emotionally intelegnet, kinda bluepilled tho
has he found success in anything mainstream?
 
so what about physics and time being the fourth dimension? it can only move in one direction so it must have a purpose for getting us to a final product
I disagree. Time is necessary in order to produce linear meaning and structural cohesion, so under that arrangement this is valid. However, claiming that time is of itself linear and objectively targeted reduces it to an order of purpose and value, only through which its existence is validated
 
what made you feel like they were intelligent?
this guy dacoslav, he doesn’t seem to have any amazing thoughts on the world around him, at least unique ones, but he shows signs of high functioning autism which is linked to high iq
 
I disagree. Time is necessary in order to produce linear meaning and structural cohesion, so under that arrangement this is valid. However, claiming that time is of itself linear and objectively targeted reduces it to an order of purpose and value, only through which its existence is validated
do you think other dimensions exist? where time breaks down? if so what do you think determines outcomes there like what will happen first second and what consequences do these have on the Universe?
 
do you think other dimensions exist? where time breaks down? if so what do you think determines outcomes there like what will happen first second and what consequences do these have on the Universe?
Im not sure, I think consciousness itself could be categorized as a dimension. Its instance the product of a division of time and space
 
Im not sure, I think consciousness itself could be categorized as a dimension. Its instance the product of a division of time and space
wow i like that so what hierarchy is there for the mind in terms of what is real and what is not like imagination or problem solving or what other things define the mind as it is and how it reacts to the world.

well first of all is the world is reacting to us or are reacting to it.
 
wow i like that so what hierarchy is there for the mind in terms of what is real and what is not like imagination or problem solving or what other things define the mind as it is and how it reacts to the world.

well first of all is the world is reacting to us or are reacting to it.
The subject is split between imagery, social structure, and impossibility (death).
The ‘mind’ (although not a unified, but fragmented, amalgamation) doesn’t respond to the world as it is but filters it through these constructions of consciousness
 
The subject is split between imagery, social structure, and impossibility (death).
The ‘mind’ (although not a unified, but fragmented, amalgamation) doesn’t respond to the world as it is but filters it through these constructions of consciousness
do you think there's inherent truth? like the mind wants answers or do you think there's no one like that?
 
I didn't inherit their enthusiasm about either of those though.
at least you inherited their sense of burden you must carry for success to be fulfilled you got big shoes kid big shoes
 
at least you inherited their sense of burden you must carry for success to be fulfilled you got big shoes kid big shoes
Hard to do better than what they've done.
 
do you think there's inherent truth? like the mind wants answers or do you think there's no one like that?
Yes the mind desires truth but it is impossible to find objectively. Any truth is a mediation of the lack through which it is determined
 
Hard to do better than what they've done.
nah you can always outshine them money wise or produce kids even smarter than them and raise them well and make sure theyre well protected and loved
 
  • +1
Reactions: Quncho
Yes the mind desires truth but it is impossible to find objectively. Any truth is a mediation of the lack through which it is determined
right so if truth is impossible to find is there anything else in this world that can be objective?
 
@greycel is up there
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
i judge intellect by the ability for one to think for themselves, not their predisposed knowledge on random topics such as visual-spatial pattern recognition or their talent in mathematics

one who can think for themselves can generally form viewpoints such as this, for example …

there is nothing you can do to change the outcome of any political event (president election, passage of a bill, etc) as there is nothing that truthfully validates your “vote” or “poll” or whatever, in fact, these actions a nation’s population is supposed to care about are not only minuscule in comparsion to what’s truthfully “going on” behind the scenes, but where already predispositioned to occur.

in fact, politics are used to divide the already overwhelming proportion of non-sentient drones, further ensuring no “revolt” of sorts can ever occur

in summary, one who is truly sentient and intelligent wouldn’t bother concerning himself with the likes of “politics”
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
nah not even. think abt it this way - were they amazing migos enthusiasts? nah. but there son is. already better than them cmon now
my dad was gang. He introduced me.
 
Clearly most users here have not met individuals who are much smarter than they are.

If they did, they wouldn't have such big egos because dealing with people who are a lot smarter than you is a very humbling experience.
 
  • +1
Reactions: chicolate131 and Thief
has he becoming anything worth mentioning to others about has he used any of his skillsets to become successful
No he bedrots all day and is depressed. Brutal truth man what happens when your really smart with no ambhition
 
what made you feel like they were intelligent?
Intellectual larpers on social medias aside, it was probably a girl i was in class with in middle school.
Her parents were pharmacists and she was the best in the class by far, she was also very beautiful
 
My dad or some professors, ig. Had a friend who won a medal at an IMO as well.

Good at problem solving, being creative, etc.
 
wdym ‘some other level’
well theres the archetypes i mentioned so is reality transcendent beyond the physical realm or is even the physical realm above a realm of chaos and confusion that we occupy?
 
wdym ‘some other level’
i guess i wanna know what you think of the levels of human perception as well. we fundamentally apply perception to the physical but is there the mental or something above or below our understanding of the physical.
 
obvious answer would be @_MVP_
 
well theres the archetypes i mentioned so is reality transcendent beyond the physical realm or is even the physical realm above a realm of chaos and confusion that we occupy?
i guess i wanna know what you think of the levels of human perception as well. we fundamentally apply perception to the physical but is there the mental or something above or below our understanding of the physical.
I suppose i dont really ascribe to this realm worldview. I view death as physical, and as a finality, in and of itself
 
I suppose i dont really ascribe to this realm worldview. I view death as physical, and as a finality, in and of itself
do you think the mental and physical occupy the same trajectory to where consciousness is leading us? like if i get an understanding of something and fail to act on it did it never happen or did it just not happen to anyone else but me.
 
do you think the mental and physical occupy the same trajectory to where consciousness is leading us? like if i get an understanding of something and fail to act on it did it never happen or did it just not happen to anyone else but me.
I think if it happens in ur mind, but u dont act on it, it doesnt necessarily make it socially real as u failed to present its value symbolically. Therefore, structurally, it may as well not have happened
 
I think if it happens in ur mind, but u dont act on it, it doesnt necessarily make it socially real as u failed to present its value symbolically. Therefore, structurally, it may as well not have happened
okay makes sense
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing

Similar threads

itssooverformebped
Replies
22
Views
113
superpsycho
superpsycho
Copercel
Replies
32
Views
244
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
kuiff
Replies
2
Views
20
kuiff
kuiff
choppedshyt
Replies
8
Views
74
choppedshyt
choppedshyt
Coeus
Replies
10
Views
90
asdvek
asdvek

Users who are viewing this thread

  • degenblondie
Back
Top