who unironically believes in romantic love here?

thickdickdaddy27

thickdickdaddy27

mental asylum escapee
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Posts
19,873
Reputation
30,595
i suggest therapy ironically
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Gaia262, Deleted member 4231, Deleted member 1627 and 1 other person
its just a chemical reaction in the body. It's not spiritual in any sense or personally fulfilling. plenty of degenerates are addicted to "love", they think, while in reality theyre just addicted to that reaction in the body
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9467, Deleted member 2403 and thickdickdaddy27
it exists, but not for anyone who has had 3+ romantic/sexual partners
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaia262, germanlooks, sub6manletnozygos and 2 others
it exists, but not for anyone who has had 3+ romantic/sexual partners
200 3
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Clark69 and Deleted member 4231
sadly, it doesn't. Which is why I'll never get into a relationship again, it's not for me
 
  • +1
Reactions: thickdickdaddy27
Me, but it exists only for 6PSL +
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot, Gaia262 and thickdickdaddy27
I do
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7509
This is one thing redpillers get right. She loves how you make her feel
 
  • +1
Reactions: ochinchin, Deleted member 4231 and thickdickdaddy27
its just a chemical reaction in the body. It's not spiritual in any sense or personally fulfilling. plenty of degenerates are addicted to "love", they think, while in reality theyre just addicted to that reaction in the body
This reductionist reasoning doesn't get you anywhere. Everything is just a chemical reaction
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, Offensive Bias, Deleted member 15338 and 1 other person
This is one thing redpillers get right. She loves how you make her feel
yeh no shit, but its still romantic love
 
This reductionist reasoning doesn't get you anywhere. Everything is just a chemical reaction
fr that shit put me into 2 month depression
 
This reductionist reasoning doesn't get you anywhere. Everything is just a chemical reaction
maybe, where do you want to go then? if your goal is to just fuck some foid, what do you need "love" for?
 
yeh no shit, but its still romantic love
If Romantic love for you is that a woman can be in love w you (how you make her feel) then sure but if you mean she loves you how you love her.. you can forget it.

Men are *conditioned* to love her *conditionally* how you feel or not. That’s the difference.
 
maybe, where do you want to go then? if your goal is to just fuck some foid, what do you need "love" for?
I think everyone's ultimate goal is to merge with the soul of another via long lasting love. I achieved it but it slipped due to life circumstances.

Casually fucking foids is to just satiate your urges but everyone seeks meaningful love at the end of the day.
 
exists for 100+ iq

below 100 iq = lust
 
If Romantic love for you is that a woman can be in love w you (how you make her feel) then sure but if you mean she loves you how you love her.. you can forget it.

Men are *conditioned* to love her *conditionally* how you feel or not. That’s the difference.
Whats the difference between men and woman love?
 
its just a chemical reaction in the body. It's not spiritual in any sense or personally fulfilling. plenty of degenerates are addicted to "love", they think, while in reality theyre just addicted to that reaction in the body
Like everything else ? Muh chemical reaction in the body rants are always pseudo intellectualism. I dont defend romantic love btw
 
I think everyone's ultimate goal is to merge with the soul of another via long lasting love. I achieved it but it slipped due to life circumstances.

Casually fucking foids is to just satiate your urges but everyone seeks meaningful love at the end of the day.
right, my point is that "love" isnt that thing, because love "fades". Normies always talk about "not loving" someone anymore. If love was this mystical connection, then why the fuck would it ever end? "Love" is just a common word for those degenerate urges and chemical reactions. That meaningful stuff youre talking about is spiritual, which i think shouldn't be called "Love". But, i also don't know what it SHOULD be called. "soul mates" doesn't quite capture it and is too watered down by normie-think.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15338
right, my point is that "love" isnt that thing, because love "fades". Normies always talk about "not loving" someone anymore. If love was this mystical connection, then why the fuck would it ever end? "Love" is just a common word for those degenerate urges and chemical reactions. That meaningful stuff youre talking about is spiritual, which i think shouldn't be called "Love". But, i also don't know what it SHOULD be called. "soul mates" doesn't quite capture it and is too watered down by normie-think.
When you cope with being a virgin on metaphysical levels
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15305, Offensive Bias, aZero and 2 others
right, my point is that "love" isnt that thing, because love "fades". Normies always talk about "not loving" someone anymore. If love was this mystical connection, then why the fuck would it ever end? "Love" is just a common word for those degenerate urges and chemical reactions. That meaningful stuff youre talking about is spiritual, which i think shouldn't be called "Love". But, i also don't know what it SHOULD be called. "soul mates" doesn't quite capture it and is too watered down by normie-think.
You can love someone while not being in love with them. Being in love is oxytocin, loving transcends evolutionary mechanisms.
 
woman to man love is highly conditional to the point one should question if you could even consider it love
 
  • +1
Reactions: aZero
Whats the difference between men and woman love?
Sound bluepilled. At the core I think there is no difference. Because I believe all love is conditional. This means both men and woman only ever love under condition. Therefore they’re the same love in that respect.But that’s not to say one couldn’t be conditioned to love unconditionally it’s not against anything I’ve said.
 
Sound bluepilled. At the core I think there is no difference. Because I believe all love is conditional. This means both men and woman only ever love under condition. Therefore they’re the same love in that respect.But that’s not to say one couldn’t be conditioned to love unconditionally it’s not against anything I’ve said.
bro every love is conditional. thats what romantic love is. unconditional doesnt exist
 
  • +1
Reactions: hebbewem and Deleted member 15338
bro every love is conditional. thats what romantic love is. unconditional doesnt exist
We aren’t really disagreeing on anything. In a perfect world romantic love would be unconditional love. Such world does not exist.

I’m not arguing romantic love under condition doesn’t exist.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7509
It exists but its only for people who are 7psl + and are virgins/few sex partners.
I will never experience love because i am an ugly subhuman 6'1 manlet retard.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4231 and Deleted member 4430
I want to find an autistic girl in a wheelchair and care for her
 

Similar threads

Greypiller
Replies
32
Views
268
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist
LowInhibNiger
Replies
2
Views
34
newgenlm
newgenlm
pluto wdty''
Replies
14
Views
88
tesertrue
tesertrue
slaviccartfiend
Replies
7
Views
113
slaviccartfiend
slaviccartfiend
𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐫
Replies
22
Views
155
Juqss.
Juqss.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →