Who would win on Photofeeler?

Photofeeler is a stupid site to base attractiveness in, just go outside or use dating apps that will tell you if you're really attractive or not
Tinder isn't just about being attractive it's about having good photos. that's why its called photofeeler and not attractivnessfeeler. You can be handsome af and have shit photos and you wont get swipes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackgymmax
Even if I was lying. Just the fact that I’m 6’3 and white would automatically make me mog him.
Doesn’t matter really.
No lol white and 6'3 white normies just get fat landwhales here
 
  • +1
Reactions: eyelidcel
Tinder isn't just about being attractive it's about having good photos. that's why its called photofeeler and not attractivnessfeeler. You can be handsome af and have shit photos and you wont get swipes.
Having bad photos on Tinder is like having bad grooming and style irl. People can’t recognize you’re attractive that easily.
 
Yeah right.
Who’s more attractive, you or nick bateman?
Mogs me into the next reality. Even if he lost 1psl I'd get giga ultra mogged
 
Mogs me into the next reality. Even if he lost 1psl I'd get giga ultra mogged
And he’s been rated a HTN here. What are you then…?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Blackgymmax
And he’s been rated a HTN here. What are you then…?
He's not htn he's low chad lol. You think you're nick Bateman tier?
No one on this entire forum is Bateman tier. Literally NO ONE has his appeal on this forum.
 
He's not htn he's low chad lol. You think you're nick Bateman tier?
No one on this entire forum is Bateman tier. Literally NO ONE has his appeal on this forum.
Well, if Bateman had 23% body fat, never worked out, don’t shave and took care of his looks, and posted selfies with bad lightning and weird facial expression (like the majority do here), you would probably write “soooo fucking this ugly”. And the more “serious” face rater would write MTN.

I actually did an experiment way back. I sneaked in 1 photo of Bateman in my Tinder profile. Like 4 of me, and 1 if Bateman. The photo of him was from side angle and a bit distances.
I also asked girls about my photos, what they thought and so on. NO ONE saw it wasn’t me in the photo..
I’m not saying I’m a look a line, but still we are the same phenotype, height, beard and a lot of similarities.
 
Well, if Bateman had 23% body fat, never worked out, don’t shave and took care of his looks, and posted selfies with bad lightning and weird facial expression (like the majority do here), you would probably write “soooo fucking this ugly”. And the more “serious” face rater would write MTN.

I actually did an experiment way back. I sneaked in 1 photo of Bateman in my Tinder profile. Like 4 of me, and 1 if Bateman. The photo of him was from side angle and a bit distances.
I also asked girls about my photos, what they thought and so on. NO ONE saw it wasn’t me in the photo..
I’m not saying I’m a look a line, but still we are the same phenotype, height, beard and a lot of similarities.
Yea bro you look like bateman
 
Having bad photos on Tinder is like having bad grooming and style irl. People can’t recognize you’re attractive that easily.
exactly. I can be the same person with better grooming then instantly be better received.
 
Even if I was lying. Just the fact that I’m 6’3 and white would automatically make me mog him.
Doesn’t matter really.
height doesn't mean shit without an attractive face. i'm 6'3" and know for a fact I would get no attention from women if I had an ugly face. Because I've tried getting >20% bf on purpose, and I was nearly invisible to women on the street.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 89153

Similar threads

RICHCELDOM
Replies
23
Views
176
incel-at-heart
I
Jiaxi
Replies
13
Views
541
iblamericky
iblamericky
E
Replies
111
Views
2K
itzyaboyJJ
itzyaboyJJ
NebulaExplorer
Replies
11
Views
225
swt
swt

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top