G
Geneticist
Gold
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
- Posts
- 954
- Reputation
- 988
They fought the fringes of Europe fucktard
No fucking dumbass, all the Asian conqueror groups I mentioned conquered deep into Europe, not the fringes
Europeans don't need to rape asians cause there girls beg for white cock
Asians don't need to rape Europeans because their girls cry and beg for Asian cock, AMWF in Eastern Europe outnumbers the other way around by tens of times
Since the Europeans conquered more of Asia its likely Europeans raped more asians sorry bro
EUROPEANS DIDN'T EVEN FULLY CONQUER A SINGLE EAST ASIAN COUNTRY ONCE YOU FUCKING RETARD
More evidence on the recent arrival of haplogroup N and gradual replacement of R1a lineages in North-Eastern Europe | Indo-European.eu
A new article (in Russian), Kinship Analysis of Human Remains from the Sargat Mounds, Baraba forest-steppe, Western Siberia, by Pilipenko et al. Археология, этнография и антропология Евразии Том 45 № 4 2017, downloadable at ResearchGate. Abstract: We present the results of a paleogenetic...
indo-european.eu
Omg fucktard that's a weak argument that helps to facilitate your bias the most feared is a subjective claim that is accommodated by opinion not necessarily fact some romans would have feared Goth more some fearing the vandals more or the germans and celts more and some the Huns fear is subjective a stronger argument would be who did more killing and infrastructure damage to the romans and it wasn't the huns
Evidence: absolutely zero. Stop coping so hard nigga, literally EVERYONE knows the Huns did by far the most damage to Europe and were the most feared invaders, they were literally the leaders of the invaders and scared the few invader groups who they didn't subjugate deep into Rome. The only reason a lot of these invading tribes even WENT into Rome is because they were so scared of the Huns that they ran away in complete fear and would rather fight the Romans than them. The Roman Empire literally paid tribute to them. Objectively, the Huns did by far the most damage to Western Europe and the Roman Empire, and every reliable source completely agrees with this fact.
Name an East Asian army that had conquered Europe the Huns didn't conquer they plundered and got away with it from European roman infighting but the Huns were still defeated pound for pound Europeans have conquered more Asia than other way around both in population and square kilometres the british took india the Dutch indonesia France Indochina that is an area bigger probably than Europe jfl
Mongol Empire, Hunnic Empire, Avar Khaganate, and MULTIPLE Turkic empires all conquered and raped and dominated Europe. My guy, literally SEARCH UP these empires and you'll see what I'm talking about. India is South Asian, Indonesia and Indochina are Southeast Asian, I'm talking about East Asians here. Meanwhile the Mongol conquest of Russia ALONE in terms of area outnumbers all those conquests you mentioned combined (which aren't even of East Asia lmao) and when you consider the other conquests of Asians by Europeans, it's dwarfed even harder. Face it, the simple fact is that East Asians conquered, raped, slaughtered, and dominated Europeans much more than the other way around for all of human history, and East Asians will quickly surpass Europeans today.
The Huns weren't defeated pound for pound, they were a tiny minority yet dominated all the majority population Germanic tribes. They absolutely obliterated Europeans pound for pound. They became a minority ruling class over a much, much bigger population, even made the Roman Empire pay tribute. You are also lying extremely hard about the Huns not conquering anything, they literally conquered most of the European tribes outside the Roman Empire and had an extremely huge empire spanning vast swathes of Europe on any map you can find
Who were the Huns, the nomadic horse warriors who invaded ancient Europe?
The Huns, fearsome nomads, helped destroy the Roman Empire.
www.livescience.com
Huns
The Huns were a nomadic tribe prominent in the 4th and 5th century whose origin is unknown but, most likely, they came from "somewhere between the eastern edge of the Altai Mountains and the Caspian...
For fuck sakes I'm dealing with one of those race coping subhumans
Copium, you're the retarded race coping subhuman rat who keeps arguing when you're completely wrong, plus you're the one who replied to me in the first place
Romans and greeks are Europeans there based in Europe there tanned olive there still white there European just cause there not Scandinavian doesn't mean there not Europeans
Cunt your retarded lucius Septimius severus was a roman living and from Libya cause the romans conquered it retard that's why he was there plus north Africans at that time were actually Europeans anyway cause those places were coloniesd by Mediterraneans, Carthaginian were decendants of phonecians who were descended from tyre a med colony cyrene in libya a greek colony etc
Any proof for this? Exactly, absolutely zero. I showed you genetic evidence of ancient Mediterraneans like the Romans and Greeks being genetically much closer to MENA than white. They even look much more like MENA than white people and have the same skin tones, coloring, and facial features. Even today the vast majority of Greeks are genetically much closer to MENA than they are to white, it was even more of the case back then. You don't have to be Scandinavian to be white, but if you're not Germanic, Celtic, or Slavic, you're very likely not white. The vast majority of ancient Greeks and Romans definitely weren't white according to all genetic evidence. Lucius Septimius Severus was always 100% drawn or reconstructed with North African features, not white features. You're spouting out all this random BS with absolutely zero evidence, which proves that I'm right on everything and you're wrong on everything
the funniest thing is he most likely ISNT mongol
its extremely hilarious to say "muh AMWF cause mongols " since literally they killed waaay more asians than europeans and disregarded their "fellow" asians the most - his ancestors, most likely
+ if genghis khan vs. europeans of the past would be ALIVE today, he most likely would have been killed by genghis khan and his female family members raped
muh "fellow asians"![]()
The Mongols actually killed way more Caucasoids than Mongoloids and this is an undeniable fact, brutal genocides occurred throughout all of Central Asia and the Middle East and Eastern Europe. They were much more chill during their conquests of East
Asian countries, even though they obviously weren't chill in general. But regardless East Asians cucked Mongols back while Europeans didn't do the same. Chinese, Japanese, and Manchus all cucked and genocided and conquered Mongols at one point. The most recent ones are the Chinese annexation of Inner Mongolia, Inner Mongolia Incident genocide, and Jindandao Incident genocide. No European race has done the same to the Mongols back. Only East Asians could beat other East Asians for the vast majority of history and no other race could beat them, while East Asians literally conquered and raped and dominated literally all other races, especially Europeans. And Genghis Khan didn't even come close to my part of Asia by the time he died, but regardless, the Mongols would have treated the people who sided with them well (which I would have, nothing my ancestors would've enjoyed more than high T genocide and grape and conquest)
Ukrainian casualties are 5x the Russian. It’s only a matter of time until the lines break