why are 17% of the users on this website from West Africa?

[Deleted member 17791]

@8PSLcel when i think a user here is a girl i start to get nervous whenever i see their posts

you told me before

 

[isis_Bleach]

was always gay

nahbro just go outside in los angles on the bus near a school and listen to the latino black and whitecels and even asiancels conversations they say and do some wild gay shit

 

[Deleted member 17791]

nahbro just go outside in los angles on the bus near a school and listen to the latino black and whitecels and even asiancels conversations they say and do some wild gay shit

I live in non degenerate area. We don't make gay jokes here.

 

[Deleted member 1901]

Not true at all. Most Africans don’t have any neadethal dna this has even been tested. Only Sahelian and coastal East African blacks do. North Africans are “African” sure but they are not black and thus scientists using them as the basis of this point is fucked up

I am not talking of north africans they aren't even black for the most part. But what if sapiens evolved in Eurasia? Anyway I think that all humans would have a least 1 neanderthaler gene variant because all human ethnic groups have bred with near-by groups and they have bred with near groups.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I am not talking of north africans they aren't even black for the most part. But what if sapiens evolved in Eurasia? Anyway I think that all humans would have a least 1 neanderthaler gene variant because all human ethnic groups have bred with near-by groups and they have bred with near groups.

Yes but some groups are naturally isolated. Most of SSA was isolated only exception being parts of west Africa Sahel and east Africa. Asians and Abos/polys migrated to the Americas so they are part Neanderthal despite being isolated but Abos have none and only Denisovan due to being isolated

Only Eurasians have had easy trade with eachother

 

[Deleted member 17791]

I am not talking of north africans they aren't even black for the most part. But what if sapiens evolved in Eurasia? Anyway I think that all humans would have a least 1 neanderthaler gene variant because all human ethnic groups have bred with near-by groups and they have bred with near groups.

It would depend if you think only whites and asians are human or not. It's basically semantics on what you categorise as human.

All modern humans came from ethiopia or whatever like 500,000 years ago and spread out. They looked kinda modern then but looked really ogre, so not really. It was only like 100'000 years ago where you start to find skulls that actually look like people off the street. Genetically, not much changed over that period, because it was not very long at all.

I think the change was mostly to do with the ice ages that made humans get less robust.

 

[Deleted member 19499]

eh who cares? Whites are like 5% neanderthal on average, it would depend if you inherit their shitty brain dna.

Neanderthals were empaths which might explain why whites have the highest empathy out of all races.

 

[Deleted member 1901]

Yes but some groups are naturally isolated. Most of SSA was isolated only exception being parts of west Africa Sahel and east Africa. Asians and Abos/polys migrated to the Americas so they are part Neanderthal despite being isolated but Abos have none and only Denisovan due to being isolated

Only Eurasians have had easy trade with eachother

One foreigner who interbred with a "pure" ethnic group would introduce neandertahler DNA, which would eventually spread to the whole group. That is all it takes. Maybe you are correct but I personally doubt it. Aboriginals do have neanderthaler DNA according to this:

Neanderthal blood genetically linked to Aboriginal Aussies

Neanderthal blood genetically linked to Aboriginal Aussies International scientists analysed the blood types of some ancient human ancestors, the Denisovans and the Neanderthals, by looking at their DNA, and say their genes for blood type suggest both groups originated in Africa. They also

www.scimex.org

 

[Deleted member 1901]

Neanderthals were empaths which might explain why whites have the highest empathy out of all races.

reasoning? the skulls suggest a less developed ore-frontal cortex, indicating the opposite.

 

[Deleted member 19499]

reasoning? the skulls suggest a less developed ore-frontal cortex, indicating the opposite.

I remember learning about it in my anthropology class that Neanderthals weren't these savages depicted in the media. They enjoyed art and made burials for their dead ones. They even tried befriending homo sapiens who were around at the time, but ended up intermixing with them or dying by them.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Neanderthals were empaths which might explain why whites have the highest empathy out of all races.

reasoning? the skulls suggest a less developed ore-frontal cortex, indicating the opposite.

I think they buried their dead. probably lower empathy than most modern humans but higher than most of their competition back in the day

 

[Deleted member 1901]

It would depend if you think only whites and asians are human or not. It's basically semantics on what you categorise as human.

All modern humans came from ethiopia or whatever like 500,000 years ago and spread out. They looked kinda modern then but looked really ogre, so not really. It was only like 100'000 years ago where you start to find skulls that actually look like people off the street. Genetically, not much changed over that period, because it was not very long at all.

I think the change was mostly to do with the ice ages that made humans get less robust.

I would think the ice ages would make them more robust. (I haven't though about that much but it seems logical to me.) It isn't a fact that AMH evolved in africa, there is theries that they evolved in eurasia or even china. We don't know as much as we like to think, there are a lot of possibilies.

 

[Darkthrone]

Is that like homo erectus or something?

Negroid race is only 13000 years old

 

[Deleted member 1901]

I remember learning about it in my anthropology class that Neanderthals weren't these savages depicted in the media. They enjoyed art and made burials for their dead ones. They even tried befriending homo sapiens who were around at the time, but ended up intermixing with them or dying by them.

We don't know that much. So it is wrong and even racist to assume they were more savage. But I think all humans were savage back then, in terms of lifestyle not necessarily genetics

 

[Deleted member 19499]

We don't know that much. So it is wrong and even racist to assume they were more savage. But I think all humans were savage back then, in terms of lifestyle not necessarily genetics

True, humans were more based and dark-triad back then. Imagine being able to kill people and rape women and not having to worry about the law.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

I would think the ice ages would make them more robust. (I haven't though about that much but it seems logical to me.) It isn't a fact that AMH evolved in africa, there is theries that they evolved in eurasia or even china. We don't know as much as we like to think, there are a lot of possibilies.

my idea is that the colder climate made them more caring oriented in raising children, ie. they have fewer kids but care for them more.

That would make sense because there would be less food.

They would get less robust because neoteny is positively correlated with getting treated better. So the cuter hominids would be more cohesive and could last the cold better.

 

[Deleted member 1901]

True, humans were more based and dark-triad back then. Imagine being able to kill people and rape women and not having to worry about the law.

I wish I was born then. Even though I would be lucky to survive as old as I am now.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Negroid race is only 13000 years old

sounds incorrect

 

[Deleted member 17791]

True, humans were more based and dark-triad back then. Imagine being able to kill people and rape women and not having to worry about the law.

sounds horrible

 

[Deleted member 19499]

sounds incorrect

Legit. Homo sapiens were around since 250K-300K years ago.

 

[Deleted member 19499]

sounds horrible

 

[Darkthrone]

sounds incorrect

Iho Eleru - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Legit. Homo sapiens were around since 250K-300K years ago.

I don't get the 13 thousand years claim

 

[Deleted member 1901]

sounds incorrect

I think the question is what is the negroid race. Like modern negroid or dark skinned early modern humans?

 

[Deleted member 19499]

Iho Eleru - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Prolly a Jew claim to make negroes not seem that far behind from the rest of the races.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Iho Eleru - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

How does this prove anything?

 

[Deleted member 17791]

I think the question is what is the negroid race. Like modern negroid or dark skinned early modern humans?

 

[Darkthrone]

I think the question is what is the negroid race. Like modern negroid or dark skinned early modern humans?

Black people not dark skinned people

 

[Deleted member 19499]

How does this prove anything?

People were catching on that negros were primitive beings so the Jews had to make some shit up about them being recent and not old.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Black people not dark skinned people

Didn't the congo type people only expand to cover most of sub saharen Africa like two thousand years ago?

 

[Deleted member 1901]

How does this prove anything?

Asselar man - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

maybe this

 

[Darkthrone]

How does this prove anything?

That is the oldest negroid skull meaning the black race is a recent progression in adaptation to African climate

 

[Deleted member 17791]

People were catching on that negros were primitive beings so the Jews had to make some shit up about them being recent and not old.

Modern west africans are probably not that old. They have features that don't appear in older remains like their rounded neotenous forehead.

 

[Deleted member 1901]

Black people not dark skinned people

Asselar man - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I agree modern ethnic groups are pretty recent. But "black people" is very general. There are a lot of ethnic groups, some may be very recent.

 

[Deleted member 19499]

Modern west africans are probably not that old. They have features that don't appear in older remains like their rounded neotenous forehead.

True, Abos are the true primitive subhumans and maybe pygmies.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Asselar man - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

maybe this

That is the oldest negroid skull meaning the black race is a recent progression in adaptation to African climate

It is? That would mean euros are like 30 thousand years older minimum.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Asselar man - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I agree modern ethnic groups are pretty recent. But "black people" is very general. There are a lot of ethnic groups, some may be very recent.

Euros (cro magnon) are like 50 thousand years old. How old are the east asian type?

 

[Deleted member 1901]

Euros (cro magnon) are like 50 thousand years old. How old are the east asian type?

Origin of the Mongoloid Peoples - Metamorphosis - Fossil Hunters

Mongoloid, a term from physical anthropology, refers to the skull shape typically found among East Asians and many American Indians. Skull shape figured

www.fossilhunters.xyz

Modern europeans are genetically distinct from cro-magnon man tho. They were early european modern humans who may be ancestral but distinct.

<cro magnon man skull

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Origin of the Mongoloid Peoples - Metamorphosis - Fossil Hunters

Mongoloid, a term from physical anthropology, refers to the skull shape typically found among East Asians and many American Indians. Skull shape figured

www.fossilhunters.xyz

Modern europeans are genetically distinct from cro-magnon man tho. They were early european modern humans who may be ancestral but distinct.

<cro magnon man skull

Of course they're not identical but it's very close. You also have a few actual cro magnons like Arnold swarzenegger. They still exist, something like maybe 5% of Euros are basically just cro nagnons.

 

[Deleted member 1901]

Of course they're not identical but it's very close. You also have a few actual cro magnons like Arnold swarzenegger. They still exist, something like maybe 5% of Euros are basically just cro nagnons.

cro-magnons were most likely darkskinned and their eyes sockets were rectangular. Arnold swarznegger ain't cro magnon man he just just has typical austrian DNA

 

[Deleted member 17791]

cro-magnons were most likely darkskinned and their eyes sockets were rectangular. Arnold swarznegger ain't cro magnon man he just just has typical austrian DNA

Their colouring were like central asians most likely, they most certainly were't black.

Whites usually have rectangle eye sockets though. The biggest difference between cro magnon and some euro from the street is zygo size and jaw size.

I'm probably very close to cro magnons phenotypically, big zygos, heavy brow, somewhat central asian colouring.

 

[Alexanderr]

I don’t think so.

 

[Deleted member 1901]

They weren't black but were pretty dark. Also no european skull I have seen had orbitals as square. They were pretty close but they are not the same ethnicity at all.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

They weren't black but were pretty dark. Also no european skull I have seen had orbitals as square. They were pretty close but they are not the same ethnicity at all.

That looks south med colouring.

Also, how are they calculating this? Last time I checked, they were like 99.9% identical to germans or russians.

I would expect them to have similar skin to this, give or take some darkness. I'm pretty sure they had dark eyes, blue eyes only made up like 5% of yamnaya peoples and they were far later, like ten thousand years ago, blue eyes are very recent.

 

[Deleted member 1901]

That looks south med colouring.

Also, how are they calculating this? Last time I checked, they were like 99.9% identical to germans or russians.

I would expect them to have similar skin to this, give or take some darkness. I'm pretty sure they had dark eyes, blue eyes only made up like 5% of yamnaya peoples and they were far later, like ten thousand years ago, blue eyes are very recent.
View attachment 1737080

really bad website but https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/reconstruction-exhibition-0011411
I am pretty sure they have DNA evidence. It makes sense considering light-skin is very recent in sapiens

 

[Deleted member 17791]

really bad website but https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/reconstruction-exhibition-0011411
I am pretty sure they have DNA evidence. It makes sense considering light-skin is very recent in sapiens

Typical european skin is definitely very modern too. Lol, no one had pink skin till very very recently. They were probably brownish like gandy in that ad but dark is kinda ridiculous, they would get vitimin D deficiency like how african americans suffer from it when living in places like new york.

It doesn't really make sense that trait wouldn't become more asian like very quickly after entering Eurasia, the selective pressure is there. They also had like 150 thousand years to evolve lower melanin concentration before the first cro magnons came about.

 

[gamma]

Interesting finding.

This forum is indeed full of niggers posting baby black carrot cope, but they larp as indian to be undercover.

 

[bedes]

Because they want to travel to fuck and behead some argentinian sluts