Why are caucasoids legitimately the only human looking race?

[Deleted member 131140]

you got hard from that?

Powerful is a very poor word. Wider would be better since it is perfectly descriptive. What do you mean by powerful ? It is abstract and it leaves the interpretation to the reader. Not used in studies like that

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

Powerful is a very poor word. Wider would be better since it is perfectly descriptive. What do you mean by powerful ? It is abstract and it leaves the interpretation to the reader. Not used in studies like that

@2025cel s student

 

[Deleted member 30845]

According to complex statistical measurements of the skull, there is a western gap between Homo Sapiens and a closely related species, the Neanderthals. This gap significantly exceeds the gap between the races of Homo Sapiens. The latter always achieve "intersection" of features. Thus, according to the feature of the brow ridges, the Caucasoids take second place after the Australoids and Papuans, who are among the most "archaic". Australoids are characterized by a wide nose, large jaws, a large brow ridge, which can be called "archaic" facial features. However, their limb proportions are further from "archaic" than those of Caucasoids. Recently, the proportions of the hands have become closer to Neanderthals. Caucasoids also have a number of other "archaic" features - a powerful chest, and correspondingly a massive brow ridge. Negroids are characterized by a wide nose, protruding jaws, but at the same time a weak brow ridge and other "non-archaic" features. There are no “primitive” and “progressive” races, but any race has both conditionally “primitive” and conditionally “progressive” characteristics[61].

 

[Deleted member 131140]

View attachment 3632479

Drawing lines around skulls is science now. Why is ugly Gandhi in Neanderthal hybrid ? Both sides slinging dogshit at each other

 

[Deleted member 126897]

View attachment 3632479

so ugly white=neanderthan hybrid
gl white=the real human?

Powerful is a very poor word. Wider would be better since it is perfectly descriptive. What do you mean by powerful ? It is abstract and it leaves the interpretation to the reader. Not used in studies like that

for me one word does not undermine trust much

 

[Deleted member 131140]

so ugly white=neanderthan hybrid
gl white=the real human?

for me one word does not undermine trust much

Buddy forget the word, both of you are arguing nonsense theory. And more confidently than geneticists themselves who dont get a crumb of recognition

 

[Deleted member 126897]

Buddy forget the word, both of you are arguing nonsense theory. And more confidently than geneticists themselves who dont get a crumb of recognition

i don't argue though

 

[Deleted member 131140]

i don't argue though

Yeah I forgot. Keep going, my popcorn's ready

 

[Deleted member 30845]

so ugly white=neanderthan hybrid
gl white=the real human?

What makes those gl is what makes them human/white, what makes the others bl is nonwhite features. So what you say is wrong. Because the ugly ones are not white.

 

[Deleted member 126897]

What makes those gl is what makes them human/white, what makes the others bl is nonwhite features. So what you say is wrong. Because the ugly ones are not white.

you just have your own idea about the white race, it is subjective and therefore I'm not wrong

 

[Deleted member 126897]

What makes those gl is what makes them human/white, what makes the others bl is nonwhite features. So what you say is wrong. Because the ugly ones are not white.

in which category ashkenazis in on average? neanderthal hybrids or the real humasn?