Why are European people so superior, any explanation for this?

[TsarTsar444]

Denmark and Romania arent exactly economic superpowers either lol

Thats the poin, Romania has the same gdp as Pakistan with 12 times less population

 

[Deleted member 13367]

Thats the poin, Romania has the same gdp as Pakistan with 12 times less population

Both of these countries are shitholes at the end of the day though

 

[TsarTsar444]

Both of these countries are shitholes at the end of the day though

Romania clearly isnt tho, it is 12 tikes wealthier then Pakistan for its citizens, they are the second fastest growing economy in Europe

 

[Spierdolony]

Yea and cold climate adaptation is huge
It's the harshest environment

Reason why India is so subhuman is because of hot climate
Easy life
Zero wars

India started to be subhuman when they become vegan. Low protein income killed their manliness.
Anyway this country have long and rich history. Brits had their influence on this country too.

Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938. It's a staggering sum

 

[TsarTsar444]

India started to be subhuman when they become vegan. Low protein income killed their manliness.
Anyway this country have long and rich history. Brits had their influence on this country too.

Indians are meant to be cucked, they legit got cucked by small high T armies of arabs, euros, greeks, turks

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Wars filtered out shit genes
+ cold climate evolution

Europeans are the most mixed race.

Meaning their mixed with non Homo Sapiens such as Neanderthals

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Indians are meant to be cucked, they legit got cucked by small high T armies of arabs, euros, greeks, turks

India is only a shit country because of their overpopulation

 

[Deleted member 6128]

All places were in perma wars before 1945

Not true Europe had constant wars not to mention certain European ethnicities have been literally wiped out of Europe

 

[TsarTsar444]

India is only a shit country because of their overpopulation

They got conquered by small band of soldiers time and time again jfl

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Nigeria will be richest country in the world soon when they start selling their population as slaves again like they used to

220million niggerslaves should go for quite some money

Nigeria number one

Unironically they don’t even need to sell slaves

They already sit on a shit ton of oil it’s just dogshit corruption plagued the country

 

[TsarTsar444]

Not true Europe had constant wars not to mention certain European ethnicities have been literally wiped out of Europe

No, 1763-1790, 1815-1853 a time of no wars, 1871-1912 also no wars.

 

[TsarTsar444]

Unironically they don’t even need to sell slaves

They already sit on a shit ton of oil it’s just dogshit corruption plagued the country

Nigeria will collapse anyways, too many ethnic groups

 

[Deleted member 6128]

They got conquered by small band of soldiers time and time again jfl

India was never unified place until the 1900s they were just little kingdoms with their own leaders

 

[Spierdolony]

Indians are meant to be cucked, they legit got cucked by small high T armies of arabs, euros, greeks, turks

Btw. one of the reasons why western europe is rich because they drained their colonies.
And why they started to colonise other lands in the first place? The reason is prosaic - grain. It was easy to seed and harvest, it not required much people. So other citizens would start to conquer lands.

China was in oposite. They had rice, which required a lot of work and human resources. They didnt had occasion to colonise other countries.

I heard about this years ago.

 

[TsarTsar444]

India was never unified place until the 1900s they were just little kingdoms with their own leaders

"Little", those little kingdoms were still one of the wealthiest and most populous on the planet, yet got conquered by 10k horsemen

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Nigeria will collapse anyways, too many ethnic groups

There’s only like 4 major ethnic group overall there’s 200

Tribalism and Tribalistic mentalities will die within the newer generations

 

[Deleted member 6128]

"Little", those little kingdoms were still one of the wealthiest and most populous on the planet, yet got conquered by 10k horsemen

Nigga Indians beat Alexander

 

[TsarTsar444]

Btw. one of the reasons why western europe is rich because they drained their colonies.
And why they started to colonise other lands in the first place? The reason is prosaic - grain. It was easy to seed and harvest, it not required much people. So other citizens would start to conquer lands.

China was in oposite. They had rice, which required a lot of work and human resources. They didnt had occasion to colonise other countries.

I heard about this years ago.

Western Europe was already advanced and rich even before they started colonization if you look at 1600ad France, Netherlands, England, German states, Poland etc. I don't know exactly the reason for this why

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Why does Japan and China have a big work culture? I feel like it’s warm over there too

No it’s giga cold over there

 

[TsarTsar444]

There’s only like 4 major ethnic group overall there’s 200

Tribalism and Tribalistic mentalities will die within the newer generations

Lol at dying out , tell that to Yugoslavians

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Pakistan isn't in a war, same for Egypt. Denmark and Romania didn't have colonies and Romania was a colony of the Ottomans themselves , while Pakistan is a successor of the Mughals

Pakistan and Egypt have constant terrorist attacks

 

[TsarTsar444]

Nigga Indians beat Alexander

Alex never lost a battle, he beat Indians in the battle but it was a phyric victory so he had to go because of no manpower. And greeks under Seleucids later conquered Punjab and had a short lived greek kingdom there

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Lol at dying out , tell that to Yugoslavians

Who the fuck cares about Yugonobodies

That’s a nation not an ethnic group

 

[TsarTsar444]

Pakistan and Egypt have constant terrorist attacks

No they don't, on average one big terror attack per year, at least for Pakistan. You are just coping

 

[TsarTsar444]

Who the fuck cares about Yugonobodies

That’s a nation not an ethnic group

If Serbs, Croats and the rest couldn't let go off their differences despite being 100 years together in a country, and having a much more advanced enlightened idea of a Nation State, then lol at Nigeria being able to survive better

 

[Deleted member 6128]

No they don't, on average one big terror attack per year, at least for Pakistan. You are just coping

How? I’m not even Pakistani keep in mind they had one last month

 

[TsarTsar444]

How? I’m not even Pakistani keep in mind they had one last month

Yes and? What does that have to do with the atrocities GDP? There are weekly mafia attacks and killings in Romania as well

 

[Deleted member 6128]

If Serbs, Croats and the rest couldn't let go off their differences despite being 100 years together in a country, and having a much more advanced enlightened idea of a Nation State, then lol at Nigeria being able to survive better

Nigga what are you talking about.


Why are you comparing multiple old countries to one which was created 60 years ago by foreigners

Unlike Croatia and Serbia Nigeria was created by those who aren’t native to the land

It’s like ottomans creating borders in Eastern Europe it’s fucking retarded

 

[TsarTsar444]

Nigga what are you talking about.


Why are you comparing multiple old countries to one which was created 60 years ago by foreigners

Unlike Croatia and Serbia Nigeria was created by those who aren’t native to the land

It’s like ottomans creating borders in Eastern Europe it’s fucking retarded

Yugoslavia was created by France and England as well

 

[Deleted member 13367]

Romania clearly isnt tho, it is 12 tikes wealthier then Pakistan for its citizens, they are the second fastest growing economy in Europe

Youre coping man, I grew up in a very wealthy part of Russia, which has miles better QoL than any city in Romania and I still consider it a shithole. Not a single former eastern bloc country is in any way comparable to wealthy states or developed asian countries.

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Yes and? What does that have to do with the atrocities GDP? There are weekly mafia attacks and killings in Romania as well

GDP doesn’t mean shit Nigeria has a higher GDP than half of Europe

But it’s still a dog shit country

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Yugoslavia was created by France and England as well

Atleast they were white

Like I said imagine Ottomans doing it the people who oppressed you for years decide how you country will be planned out



Just look at Sudan and South Sudan

 

[CursedOne]

Europeans are genetically superior, thats a fact. And in addition to that ideal climate plus the density of ethnic groups living in a relatively small continent (compared to asia and america) made it possible for europeans to interact with each other which lead to exchange of ideas, knowledge etc.

 

[hebbewem]

Africa sold slaves to the europeans and it was profiiting so it was no reason to create industrier or innovate. and europenas wanted slaves cheap so they made the countries not stable. So when slavery ended africa economy died .

And europenas drawed the african border to benefit themself. but it did hurt the africans so it will create instability and conflict. And etc

 

[lutte]

Btw. one of the reasons why western europe is rich because they drained their colonies.
And why they started to colonise other lands in the first place? The reason is prosaic - grain. It was easy to seed and harvest, it not required much people. So other citizens would start to conquer lands.

China was in oposite. They had rice, which required a lot of work and human resources. They didnt had occasion to colonise other countries.

I heard about this years ago.

Colonies didn't rly make europe rich, non colonial nations like the scandinavian are just as rich if not more, compare portugal which had a huge empire but is poor by european standards. Africa was a net loss for the british and french

 

[Caesercel]

No no no, you don't understand really. Europeans were always superior in a way. You say 1000 years ago they were inferior, well that isn't true if you consider that Europe is a cold/temperate continent, small, with no resources, spices, natural gold or anything. It had beautiful nature to look at but thats it. The rest of the world had very fertile lands, big rivers, good climate, very valuable resources and because of all these things they made great civilizations but they were lazy. Euros by being poor were forced to adapt and invent all the time since along time ago like thousands of years (good example is the taming of the horse by indo euros who cucked everyone after).

The riding of the horse was invented by Europeans, which was massive and led to the cucking of middle eastern Empires at the time even though they were much more civil on paper. Then you have the roman and greek revolutionary war tactics (again shaped from genetic filtration of the weak from perma war in Europe, which led to highly stoic men and women and a disciplined work ethnic). The Romans called non European people feminine for this reason, you can read their description on the Egyptians and others for this.

There are so many of these adaptedations that i could talk about whole day but you get the point

What a load of crap. If this thesis worked then sub saharan africans should've been the most successful peoples on this planet. Sure europe has trash climate compared to say south asia or china or Meditterenean. But that's exactly why europeans were so far behind all these places in early millenia of civilization.

 

[lutte]

What a load of crap. If this thesis worked then sub saharan africans should've been the most successful peoples on this planet. Sure europe has trash climate compared to say south asia or china or Meditterenean. But that's exactly why europeans were so far behind all these places in early millenia of civilization.

sub saharan africa is super fertile and easy to survive in

 

[TsarTsar444]

GDP doesn’t mean shit Nigeria has a higher GDP than half of Europe

But it’s still a dog shit country

Nigeria gdp is the same as Austria

Atleast they were white

Like I said imagine Ottomans doing it the people who oppressed you for years decide how you country will be planned out



Just look at Sudan and South Sudan

The Ottomans did do it ,they moved around ethnicities from one place to another and created arteficial borders after that still makes this place a shithole. Its just that England and France finilazed the project

 

[Deleted member 8853]

Yea and cold climate adaptation is huge
It's the harshest environment

Reason why India is so subhuman is because of hot climate
Easy life
Zero wars

Yeah and nope it's not only about looks adaptation. They had to adapt in every aspect of their lives.

 

[TsarTsar444]

What a load of crap. If this thesis worked then sub saharan africans should've been the most successful peoples on this planet. Sure europe has trash climate compared to say south asia or china or Meditterenean. But that's exactly why europeans were so far behind all these places in early millenia of civilization.

Hahahah i see you are clueless, sub saharan africa is a very good place with an ideal climate and big rivers like the Niger, it had civilizations there.

You clearly didn't understand my point, civilization causes laziness and low iq, cause it doesn't force the people to addapt, doesn't filter out weak genes, doesn't make the people high T and thirsty for war. All of this shaped Europeans

And i gave you a example of that, how the Europeans out of desperation to find resources faster in the European shithole steppes, invented horsemen who then went on to sack big Messapotamian and Egyptian cities

 

[Caesercel]

You clearly didn't understand my point, civilization causes laziness and low iq, cause it doesn't force the people to addapt, doesn't filter out weak genes, doesn't make the people high T and thirsty for war. All of this shaped Europeans

So europeans became more civilized than everyone else because they were less civilized than everyone else? 
All I see are a lot of unsubstantiated claims and sweeping generalizations.

 

[TsarTsar444]

So europeans became more civilized than everyone else because they were less civilized than everyone else? 

Yes, they never stopped inventing. For example all those African, Asian civilizations had the same technology for hundreds of years after invention because they had no reason to adapt anymore

 

[Cali Yuga]

finno ugric supremacy

 

[GigaChaddam]

Europeans are genetically superior, thats a fact. And in addition to that ideal climate plus the density of ethnic groups living in a relatively small continent (compared to asia and america) made it possible for europeans to interact with each other which lead to exchange of ideas, knowledge etc.

 

[TsarTsar444]

View attachment 1299205

Low iq

 

[GigaChaddam]

Low iq

One of the fundamental reasons that Europe became so advanced was the Black Death. The Black Death created religious, social and economic upheavals, with profound effects on the course of European history. The black death effectively destroyed the previous European feudal system and drastically reduced the power of Lords and Sovereigns.

According to medieval historian Philip Daileader, it is likely that over four years, 45–50% of the European population died of plague. Norwegian historian Ole Benedictow suggests it could have been as much as 60% of the European population. With such a large population decline from the pandemic, wages soared in response to a labour shortage

The Black Death wiped out much of the European peasantry, which had provided the labor force for Lords and Monarchs. In the aftermath of the Black Death, peasants were able to demand higher wages or even leave their Lord to set up business elsewhere, thereby eroding the power and wealth of Lords and Sovereign. In both cases, many earned higher incomes which accumulated into capital. These were the forerunners of capitalist.

The social Impacts of the Black Plague were tremendous and led to the Renaissance in Italy in the 14th century. The devastation in Florence caused by the Black Death, which hit Europe between 1348 and 1350, resulted in a shift in the world view of people in 14th-century Italy and led to the Renaissance. Italy was particularly badly hit by the pandemic, and it has been speculated that the resulting familiarity with death caused thinkers to dwell more on their lives on Earth, rather than on spirituality and the afterlife. As a result of the drastic reduction in the populace the value of the working class increased, and commoners came to enjoy more freedom. To answer the increased need for labour, workers travelled in search of the most favourable position economically. Prior to the emergence of the Black Death, the workings of Europe were run by the Catholic Church and the continent was considered a feudalistic society, composed of fiefs and city-states. The pandemic completely restructured both religion and political forces; survivors began to turn to other forms of spirituality and the power dynamics of the fiefs and city-states crumbled. Cairo's population, partly owing to the numerous plague epidemics, was in the early 18th century half of what it was in 1347.


one of the only reasons got adanced was that

• The Black Death wiped out much of the European peasantry, which had provided the labor force for Lords and Monarchs. In the aftermath of the Black Death, peasants were able to demand higher wages or even leave their Lord to set up business elsewhere, thereby eroding the power and wealth of Lords and Sovereign. In both cases, many earned higher incomes which accumulated into capital. These were the forerunners of capitalist.
• Much of post-medieval European History was a struggle to achieve superiority in military technology between warring states. This military technology was used to conqueror population with inferior military technology.
• The European empires ‘discovered’ by pure geographical luck and colonized resources-rich areas of north and south America, South Aisa and East Aisa, and Africa.

 

[TsarTsar444]

One of the fundamental reasons that Europe became so advanced was the Black Death. The Black Death created religious, social and economic upheavals, with profound effects on the course of European history. The black death effectively destroyed the previous European feudal system and drastically reduced the power of Lords and Sovereigns.

According to medieval historian Philip Daileader, it is likely that over four years, 45–50% of the European population died of plague. Norwegian historian Ole Benedictow suggests it could have been as much as 60% of the European population. With such a large population decline from the pandemic, wages soared in response to a labour shortage

The Black Death wiped out much of the European peasantry, which had provided the labor force for Lords and Monarchs. In the aftermath of the Black Death, peasants were able to demand higher wages or even leave their Lord to set up business elsewhere, thereby eroding the power and wealth of Lords and Sovereign. In both cases, many earned higher incomes which accumulated into capital. These were the forerunners of capitalist.

The social Impacts of the Black Plague were tremendous and led to the Renaissance in Italy in the 14th century. The devastation in Florence caused by the Black Death, which hit Europe between 1348 and 1350, resulted in a shift in the world view of people in 14th-century Italy and led to the Renaissance. Italy was particularly badly hit by the pandemic, and it has been speculated that the resulting familiarity with death caused thinkers to dwell more on their lives on Earth, rather than on spirituality and the afterlife. As a result of the drastic reduction in the populace the value of the working class increased, and commoners came to enjoy more freedom. To answer the increased need for labour, workers travelled in search of the most favourable position economically. Prior to the emergence of the Black Death, the workings of Europe were run by the Catholic Church and the continent was considered a feudalistic society, composed of fiefs and city-states. The pandemic completely restructured both religion and political forces; survivors began to turn to other forms of spirituality and the power dynamics of the fiefs and city-states crumbled. Cairo's population, partly owing to the numerous plague epidemics, was in the early 18th century half of what it was in 1347.


one of the only reasons got adanced was that

• The Black Death wiped out much of the European peasantry, which had provided the labor force for Lords and Monarchs. In the aftermath of the Black Death, peasants were able to demand higher wages or even leave their Lord to set up business elsewhere, thereby eroding the power and wealth of Lords and Sovereign. In both cases, many earned higher incomes which accumulated into capital. These were the forerunners of capitalist.
• Much of post-medieval European History was a struggle to achieve superiority in military technology between warring states. This military technology was used to conqueror population with inferior military technology.
• The European empires ‘discovered’ by pure geographical luck and colonized resources-rich areas of north and south America, South Aisa and East Aisa, and Africa.

Yes it did genetic filtration, and the best survived

 

[GigaChaddam]

Yes it did genetic filtration, and the best survived

No surviving the plague just wiped out the peasantry, if you meant by genetic filitration wiping out people of lower socio-economic class, then your right, if you meant eugenically improving the iq then you are a retard, iq has no say in how much you survive the plague

 

[TsarTsar444]

No surviving the plague just wiped out the peasantry, if you meant by genetic filitration wiping out people of lower socio-economic class, then your right, if you meant eugenically improving the iq then you are a retard, iq has no say in how much you survive the plague

Yes but it removed the lower iq people aka peasants

 

[GigaChaddam]

Yes but it removed the lower iq people aka peasants

Peasants dont have lower iq, they have the same iq as other people except no acess to education unless you think that peasants are genetically diffrent or some retarded cope