Why are foids evil

[o.sub5]

I was talking about males being more attractive in general in any species and when it could debunk my point it started sayin I look chopped and got it’s friends to say that too I really hate foids

 

[hitthebong]

They like to be the center of attention

 

[afroheadluke]

 

[hypernormie]

Nonchalantly referring to foids as it is peak

But to answer your question it's because they aren't selected for their ability to acquire resources. Basically everything admirable in man stems from this basic difference in their criterion for sexual success

 

[Chungus]

Nonchalantly referring to foids as it is peak

But to answer your question it's because they aren't selected for their ability to acquire resources. Basically everything admirable in man stems from this basic difference in their criterion for sexual success

I don’t think this is true really
What about polygamous tribes with absent fathers?

 

[hypernormie]

I don’t think this is true really
What about polygamous tribes with absent fathers?

It is true. But what about them? Can you be more specific?

Sexual selection is a biological phenomenon so the mechanisms are going to be broadly the same from culture to culture

 

[Chungus]

It is true. But what about them? Can you be more specific?

Sexual selection is a biological phenomenon so the mechanisms are going to be broadly the same from culture to culture

Fathers being absence suggests men aren’t primarily selected for their ability to acquire resources

 

[hypernormie]

Fathers being absence suggests men aren’t primarily selected for their ability to acquire resources

In that case they are selecting for dominant genes which is a proxy for ability to acquire resources. Higher testosterone men are more likely to win competitions and secure more mates and reproductive opportunities but higher testosterone also increases the probability you will abandon your kids so it's a bit of a trade-off. Like everything else in evolution, there's some gambling going on.

 

[Chungus]

In that case they are selecting for dominant genes which is a proxy for ability to acquire resources.

Not a strong connection

Higher testosterone men are more likely to win competitions and secure more mates and reproductive opportunities but higher testosterone also increases the probability you will abandon your kids so it's a bit of a trade-off. Like everything else in evolution, there's some gambling going on.

Muh evolution

 

[Chungus]

In that case they are selecting for dominant genes which is a proxy for ability to acquire resources. Higher testosterone men are more likely to win competitions and secure more mates and reproductive opportunities but higher testosterone also increases the probability you will abandon your kids so it's a bit of a trade-off. Like everything else in evolution, there's some gambling going on.

Sorry you thumbs uped me and I jfled you my bad for not engaging in civil discussion

 

[clock]

I was talking about males being more attractive in general in any species and when it could debunk my point it started sayin I look chopped and got it’s friends to say that too I really hate foids

because they want to be whores but are too ugly to get the desired chadlite attention

 

[支那man]

I was talking about males being more attractive in general in any species and when it could debunk my point it started sayin I look chopped and got it’s friends to say that too I really hate foids

Their biological instinct

 

[retarted]

The only thing worse than a foid is her sorry ass best friends

 

[retarted]

Their biological instinct

64 posts and 19 rep bro what the fuck are you posting

 

[支那man]

64 posts and 19 rep bro what the fuck are you posting

I rarely comment

 

[hypernormie]

Not a strong connection

You're a retard. Throughout the majority of evolutionary history testosterone was connected to resource accrual.

This is also true in practically every other mammal, it's not human specific.

Even today where the connection has been less direct, it still is not zero. Military men, police, firemen, athletes, etc. all receive special attention from women.

Even in abstract spheres like finance, testosterone plays a massive role. This is in fact accepted as so cliche I'm culture that there are some very famous movies playing up this exact dynamic (The Big Short, Wolf of Wall Street, ect.)

Low T scrawny autistic tech bros are the exception to the historical rule.

Despite all of that, outside of direct resource acquisition, testosterone expression is also still a valid proxy for health and genetic fitness, which is obviously reproductively valuable.

Muh evolution

Ignore reality at your own risk

 

[Chungus]

You're a retard. Throughout the majority of evolutionary history testosterone was connected to resource accrual.

This is also true in practically every other mammal, it's not human specific.

Even today where the connection has been less direct, it still is not zero. Military men, police, firemen, athletes, etc. all receive special attention from women.

Even in abstract spheres like finance, testosterone plays a massive role. This is in fact accepted as so cliche I'm culture that there are some very famous movies playing up this exact dynamic (The Big Short, Wolf of Wall Street, ect.)

Low T scrawny autistic tech bros are the exception to the historical rule.

Despite all of that, outside of direct resource acquisition, testosterone expression is also still a valid proxy for health and genetic fitness, which is obviously reproductively valuable.

You’re twisting the benefits of high testosterone to fit your argument of “resource accural” which is literally a loose connection

 

[hypernormie]

You’re twisting the benefits of high testosterone to fit your argument of “resource accural” which is literally a loose connection

No, you are just not understanding what it is.

The value of high testosterone was historically the ability to out compete other males for resources in simpler environments. This is also still true for humans in simpler or more chaotic environments and is still true for other animals which still exist in primitive states. Everything attractive about high testosterone signalling is dependent on this fact.

Larger bone mass? More resistant to damage

Wide clavicles? Easier time generating force to throw punches or weapons

Large jaw? More robust skull structure can withstand greater forces

Higher facial width to height ratio? Compact skull structure allows can absorb greater force

Strong brow bones? Protects the eyes from the sun, sweat and debris, as well as punches

Larger nose? Larger airway

Greater muscle mass? Better ability to win confrontations

Faster reaction times? Better ability to win confrontations or hunt by faster processing of movement

Better visuo spatial manipulation? Same as above

Faster to aggression over status? Better ability to defend resources

Less fear? Greater risk taking and dominance behavior

Deep voice? Signals current testosterone level and body size to competitors to ward off competition

The list literally goes on and on. Basically every high testosterone trait is directly related to either hunting, so combat with other animals, or fighting, so combat with other men

Dimorphism did not appear in a vacuum. I'm not sure why you think it would, or what your explanation for dimorphism even would be if you disregard this explanation

The modern environment places less emphasis on testosterone when it comes to acquiring resources, but the modern environment is extremely novel on an evolutionary time scale and also still even with this fact, testosterones evolutionary influence is still showing up prominently in many areas of life and still has utility in many areas as well

It's interesting you are on a blackpill website but don't seem to have the most basic understanding of why women find tall, jacked, handsome, men with strong facial bones, large penises and deep voices, who take risks and stand their ground, attractive. It's genuinely almost laughable but I know this community has gained a lot of traction recently so there must be all sorts of grifters out there pedaling nonsense

 

[Chungus]

No, you are just not understanding what it is.

The value of high testosterone was historically the ability to out compete other males for resources in simpler environments. This is also still true for humans in simpler or more chaotic environments and is still true for other animals which still exist in primitive states. Everything attractive about high testosterone signalling is dependent on this fact.

Larger bone mass? More resistant to damage

Wide clavicles? Easier time generating force to throw punches or weapons

Large jaw? More robust skull structure can withstand greater forces

Higher facial width to height ratio? Compact skull structure allows can absorb greater force

Strong brow bones? Protects the eyes from the sun, sweat and debris, as well as punches

Larger nose? Larger airway

Greater muscle mass? Better ability to win confrontations

Faster reaction times? Better ability to win confrontations or hunt by faster processing of movement

Better visuo spatial manipulation? Same as above

Faster to aggression over status? Better ability to defend resources

Less fear? Greater risk taking and dominance behavior

Deep voice? Signals current testosterone level and body size to competitors to ward off competition

The list literally goes on and on. Basically every high testosterone trait is directly related to either hunting, so combat with other animals, or fighting, so combat with other men

Dimorphism did not appear in a vacuum. I'm not sure why you think it would, or what your explanation for dimorphism even would be if you disregard this explanation

The modern environment places less emphasis on testosterone when it comes to acquiring resources, but the modern environment is extremely novel on an evolutionary time scale and also still even with this fact, testosterones evolutionary influence is still showing up prominently in many areas of life and still has utility in many areas as well

It's interesting you are on a blackpill website but don't seem to have the most basic understanding of why women find tall, jacked, handsome, men with strong facial bones, large penises and deep voices, who take risks and stand their ground, attractive. It's genuinely almost laughable but I know this community has gained a lot of traction recently so there must be all sorts of grifters out there pedaling nonsense

Most of your examples aren’t about resource accural or testosterone which was your original point nigga you are just listing the benefits of proper development

 

[Chungus]

Most of your examples aren’t about resource accural or testosterone which was your original point nigga you are just listing the benefits of proper development

Also not all trait selection is for reproductive success, deers are literally selected for antler length which is debilitating and also indicative of low testosterone which lowers their offsprings chance of survival

 

[hypernormie]

Most of your examples aren’t about resource accural or testosterone which was your original point nigga you are just listing the benefits of proper development

You're actually retarded

 

[nolonger_human]

Their full belief system and world view was given to them by satanic globalists

 

[o.sub5]

Nonchalantly referring to foids as it is peak

But to answer your question it's because they aren't selected for their ability to acquire resources. Basically everything admirable in man stems from this basic difference in their criterion for sexual success

No, you are just not understanding what it is.

The value of high testosterone was historically the ability to out compete other males for resources in simpler environments. This is also still true for humans in simpler or more chaotic environments and is still true for other animals which still exist in primitive states. Everything attractive about high testosterone signalling is dependent on this fact.

Larger bone mass? More resistant to damage

Wide clavicles? Easier time generating force to throw punches or weapons

Large jaw? More robust skull structure can withstand greater forces

Higher facial width to height ratio? Compact skull structure allows can absorb greater force

Strong brow bones? Protects the eyes from the sun, sweat and debris, as well as punches

Larger nose? Larger airway

Greater muscle mass? Better ability to win confrontations

Faster reaction times? Better ability to win confrontations or hunt by faster processing of movement

Better visuo spatial manipulation? Same as above

Faster to aggression over status? Better ability to defend resources

Less fear? Greater risk taking and dominance behavior

Deep voice? Signals current testosterone level and body size to competitors to ward off competition

The list literally goes on and on. Basically every high testosterone trait is directly related to either hunting, so combat with other animals, or fighting, so combat with other men

Dimorphism did not appear in a vacuum. I'm not sure why you think it would, or what your explanation for dimorphism even would be if you disregard this explanation

The modern environment places less emphasis on testosterone when it comes to acquiring resources, but the modern environment is extremely novel on an evolutionary time scale and also still even with this fact, testosterones evolutionary influence is still showing up prominently in many areas of life and still has utility in many areas as well

It's interesting you are on a blackpill website but don't seem to have the most basic understanding of why women find tall, jacked, handsome, men with strong facial bones, large penises and deep voices, who take risks and stand their ground, attractive. It's genuinely almost laughable but I know this community has gained a lot of traction recently so there must be all sorts of grifters out there pedaling nonsense

It is true high test men are more desirable by default not only in humans but almost every living species on earth males are dominant and better at almost everything

 

[seif1xz]

Most of the shit you mentioned are literal myths.

Larger bone mass? More resistant to damage

Large jaw? More robust skull structure can withstand greater forces

Higher facial width to height ratio? Compact skull structure allows can absorb greater force

Strong brow bones? Protects the eyes from the sun, sweat and debris, as well as punches

Not true, not a single study proves. There’s no correlation between large bone mass or facial masculinity like robust jaws, brows, etc and reproductive or fighting success. This idea was disproven by this study:

A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans - PMC

Humans are sexually dimorphic: men and women differ in body build and composition, craniofacial structure, and voice pitch, likely mediated in part by developmental testosterone. Sexual selection hypotheses posit that, ancestrally, more ‘masculine’ ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Wide clavicles? Easier time generating force to throw punches or weapons

Not gonna argue with this, it’s not wrong

Larger nose? Larger airway

More related to climate adaptation

Greater muscle mass? Better ability to win confrontations

Confrontations in prehistoric times heavily depended on many things like intelligence/endurance and ability to adapt in an environment rather just physical strength. There’s a reason why the high T ogre neanderthals went extinct, homo sapiens were physically weaker than them yet still outcompeted them.

Faster reaction times

Not always a good trait, leads to high impulsivity thus more errors and low IQ decisions

You seem to be completely forgetting the fact that high T is associated with many negative unattractive ogre traits like early balding, acne, more body hair, etc. Women do not even find high T men attractive, high dimorphism is not ideal and there’s a reason why it decreased during evolution due to pair bonding, paternal investment, tool/weapon use, cooperation etc reducing the need for raw physical strength. More evolved humans are moderately or slightly above moderately dimorphic (i.e prettyboys with high harmony, swimmer bodies, good facial angularity and soft features).

look at these two faces, which one looks more attractive? If you pick the first one you are just coping and lying to yourself, the second less dimorphic one has better facial harmony and more appeal, looks more evolved , has an ideal mix of feminine and masculine features. Any foid would pick the second one without a second thought.

High t copers still can’t explain why a faggot twink philtrumcel like zario had this insane amount of females lusting over him during his prime:

Just open tiktok and see what foids actually find attractive

More high class examples of what foids prefer:

They prefer the above more than this highly dimorphic chad archetype:

The highest appeal psl gods are prettyboy leaning like chico. And I’m not saying that every single prettyboy is attractive or every single high T male is unattractive, there are outliers due to facial harmony but on average and historically the highest appeal males are not highly dimorphic (i.e prime justin Bieber, zayn malik, etc). Ideal male is anywhere between strong mtn to chadlite with good soft features/coloring, above chadlite is where things start to look uncanny and highly dimorphic, and less evolved.

Also I forgot to mention that high T is correlated with shorter height.

Short Adult Height After Rapid-tempo Puberty: When is it too Late to Treat? - Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology

Short Adult Height After Rapid-tempo Puberty: When is it too Late to Treat? - Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology

www.jcrpe.org

 

[hypernormie]

Most of the shit you mentioned are literal myths.








Not true, not a single study proves. There’s no correlation between large bone mass or facial masculinity like robust jaws, brows, etc and reproductive or fighting success. This idea was disproven by this study:

View attachment 4663849

A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans - PMC

Humans are sexually dimorphic: men and women differ in body build and composition, craniofacial structure, and voice pitch, likely mediated in part by developmental testosterone. Sexual selection hypotheses posit that, ancestrally, more ‘masculine’ ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Not gonna argue with this, it’s not wrong


More related to climate adaptation


Confrontations in prehistoric times heavily depended on many things like intelligence/endurance and ability to adapt in an environment rather just physical strength. There’s a reason why the high T ogre neanderthals went extinct, homo sapiens were physically weaker than them yet still outcompeted them.


Not always a good trait, leads to high impulsivity thus more errors and low IQ decisions

View attachment 4664344

You seem to be completely forgetting the fact that high T is associated with many negative unattractive ogre traits like early balding, acne, more body hair, etc. Women do not even find high T men attractive, high dimorphism is not ideal and there’s a reason why it decreased during evolution due to pair bonding, paternal investment, tool/weapon use, cooperation etc reducing the need for raw physical strength. More evolved humans are moderately or slightly above moderately dimorphic (i.e prettyboys with high harmony, swimmer bodies, good facial angularity and soft features).

look at these two faces, which one looks more attractive? If you pick the first one you are just coping and lying to yourself, the second less dimorphic one has better facial harmony and more appeal, looks more evolved , has an ideal mix of feminine and masculine features. Any foid would pick the second one without a second thought.

View attachment 4664039View attachment 4664040

High t copers still can’t explain why a faggot twink philtrumcel like zario had this insane amount of females lusting over him during his prime:

View attachment 4664091

Just open tiktok and see what foids actually find attractive

View attachment 4664114View attachment 4664115View attachment 4664113View attachment 4664112View attachment 4664111View attachment 4664108View attachment 4664107View attachment 4664163
View attachment 4664106

More high class examples of what foids prefer:
View attachment 4664244View attachment 4664245View attachment 4664252
View attachment 4664267

They prefer the above more than this highly dimorphic chad archetype:

View attachment 4664152View attachment 4664150View attachment 4664153View attachment 4664147View attachment 4664211View attachment 4664210

The highest appeal psl gods are prettyboy leaning like chico. And I’m not saying that every single prettyboy is attractive or every single high T male is unattractive, there are outliers due to facial harmony but on average and historically the highest appeal males are not highly dimorphic (i.e prime justin Bieber, zayn malik, etc). Ideal male is anywhere between strong mtn to chadlite with good soft features/coloring, above chadlite is where things start to look uncanny and highly dimorphic, and less evolved.

Also I forgot to mention that high T is correlated with shorter height.

View attachment 4664326

Short Adult Height After Rapid-tempo Puberty: When is it too Late to Treat? - Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology

Short Adult Height After Rapid-tempo Puberty: When is it too Late to Treat? - Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology

www.jcrpe.org

What's really unfortunate for you is I no longer care enough about this site to sit here and debate every retarded newgen with their "novel" theory that women actually prefer boneless twinks.

You're right. It's all a psyop, masculinity is unattractive to women. I was actually just gatekeeping the fact that newgen looksmaxxing is puberty blockers and estrogen.

 

[SteeringWheel77]

foids will call you an incel for simply disagreeing with you, it doesnt make any sense.

 

[o.sub5]

foids will call you an incel for simply disagreeing with you, it doesnt make any sense.

So real bro and they’ll LARP bp and say they invented it

 

[layovv]

They like to be the center of attention

an foid