Why are girls born with ideal body proportions, while guys almost never have a good frame?

[william2605]

Almost all the girls I see have the same proportions, while almost all the guys I see lack broad shoulders and stuff like that.

0,5% vs the rest of the ppl.
And some guys have broad shoulders thanks to the amount of muscle and fat they have in their bi-deltoids.

 

[greycel]

Xenoestrogens from birth

 

[Vermilioncore]

Because men were hardwired to lose and women were hardwired to win. Think about it; there’s only so much eggs on this planet and an abundance of sperm. Most men were created as caveman cannon fodder for the real men out there who are meant to fuck and pummel their way through history.

 

[TechnoBoss]

Almost all the girls I see have the same proportions, while almost all the guys I see lack broad shoulders and stuff like that.

View attachment 3641469
0,5% vs the rest of the ppl.
And some guys have broad shoulders thanks to the amount of muscle and fat they have in their bi-deltoids.

Most women aren’t born with a good frame/body. The standards for women are just so low that simply having any body whatsoever gives them infinite SMV.

There’s so much estrogen & microplastics in our water that it’s harder for men to develop properly nowadays anyway. Women would benefit from all the estrogen in our food & water.

 

[william2605]

Xenoestrogens from birth

The guy on the left is an example of wide frame ?

 

[Alias!]

Almost all the girls I see have the same proportions, while almost all the guys I see lack broad shoulders and stuff like that.

View attachment 3641469
0,5% vs the rest of the ppl.
And some guys have broad shoulders thanks to the amount of muscle and fat they have in their bi-deltoids.

Because nature is gynocentric

 

[william2605]

Most women aren’t born with a good frame/body. The standards for women are just so low that simply having any body whatsoever gives them infinite SMV.

There’s so much estrogen & microplastics in our water that it’s harder for men to develop properly nowadays anyway. Women would benefit from all the estrogen in our food & water.

Can you explain why some men are broad due to their bone structure, while others manage to look just as broad by building muscle?

 

[acertyxx_]

Almost all the girls I see have the same proportions, while almost all the guys I see lack broad shoulders and stuff like that.

View attachment 3641469
0,5% vs the rest of the ppl.
And some guys have broad shoulders thanks to the amount of muscle and fat they have in their bi-deltoids.

The pic attached is brutal

 

[william2605]

The pic attached is brutal

It’s flawed imo , most here used for ideal but they have the same width lol idk

 

[TechnoBoss]

Can you explain why some men are broad due to their bone structure, while others manage to look just as broad by building muscle?

It’s just frame/bones. You can fraud having a bigger frame (atleast to some extent) by getting bigger muscles but the guy with a naturally big frame will always look bigger with the same amount of muscle.

 

[acertyxx_]

View attachment 3641494
It’s flawed imo , most here used for ideal but they have the same width lol idk

I'm looking at more than frame but the flaw of the image is that the manlet is leaning forward (I think?)

 

[william2605]

It’s just frame/bones. You can fraud having a bigger frame (atleast to some extent) by getting bigger muscles but the guy with a naturally big frame will always look bigger with the same amount of muscle.

The width is the same visually

 

[Phantasm]

You're just overrating foids bodies

 

[TheLightOfMyLife]

View attachment 3641494
It’s flawed imo , most here used for ideal but they have the same width lol idk

The bulky musculature/ribcage/waist width is probably what leads to the low rating.

I’ve noticed people here tend to strongly favor thinner ribcages, even if the absolute bideltoid width is the exact same. It leads to a more noticeable V-taper sure, but I feel like it’s better to have a wide ribcage irl

 

[william2605]

The bulky musculature/ribcage/waist width is probably what leads to the low rating.

I’ve noticed people here tend to strongly favor thinner ribcages, even if the absolute bideltoid width is the exact same. It leads to a more noticeable V-taper sure, but I feel like it’s better to have a wide ribcage irl

The thing is, they use this example to represent a better frame.

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

Western processed food is 90% soy = average foid is nowadays Gigastacy

just look at how good the average zoomer becky looks compared to old photos and paintings of previous generations/centuries foids they look subhuman and tranny/high T compared to modern ltbs

 

[NoaA99]

The bulky musculature/ribcage/waist width is probably what leads to the low rating.

I’ve noticed people here tend to strongly favor thinner ribcages, even if the absolute bideltoid width is the exact same. It leads to a more noticeable V-taper sure, but I feel like it’s better to have a wide ribcage irl

A wide rib cage is definitely better, since it’s dimorphic.
A wider rib cage should also support greater lung volume

 

[BonesmashFinalBoss]

View attachment 3641499
The width is the same visually

Retard

 

[greycel]

The bulky musculature/ribcage/waist width is probably what leads to the low rating.

I’ve noticed people here tend to strongly favor thinner ribcages, even if the absolute bideltoid width is the exact same. It leads to a more noticeable V-taper sure, but I feel like it’s better to have a wide ribcage irl

It is for sure
So is having a wider waist

I explained why here:

SALLUDON MOGS DRAGO TO LAHORE HEAVEN

Side profile : Nonexistent ramus vs tall ramus :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::lul: ' FRAME : :lul::lul: Facially mogs him to death too :lul: :lul::lul::lul:

looksmax.org

 

[imabetanumale]

Almost all the girls I see have the same proportions, while almost all the guys I see lack broad shoulders and stuff like that.

View attachment 3641469
0,5% vs the rest of the ppl.
And some guys have broad shoulders thanks to the amount of muscle and fat they have in their bi-deltoids.

maybe just by randomness of nature (and hate from God) genetically is too hard for men to fit in natures requirments, that is why women are hypergamous, while barely any woman can survive on nature because of coincidences on how nature and this species developed

 

[NoReedemingFeature]

Men didn't have this development, but they were slaughtered off and replaced by females with cocks. Which is what all men today are.
They'd have very similar proportion, they'd have a bigger upper body, ribcage, straight and wide frames and a big skull among other dimorphisms

 

[william2605]

Retard

Why?

 

[rrm_ss2]

Almost all the girls I see have the same proportions, while almost all the guys I see lack broad shoulders and stuff like that.

View attachment 3641469
0,5% vs the rest of the ppl.
And some guys have broad shoulders thanks to the amount of muscle and fat they have in their bi-deltoids.

DNR males date every girl they see so the ideal is anything with a pussy

 

[anthony111553]

It’s just frame/bones. You can fraud having a bigger frame (atleast to some extent) by getting bigger muscles but the guy with a naturally big frame will always look bigger with the same amount of muscle.

kill niggers

 

[JohnnyRamone]

You're just overrating foids bodies

The simping is out of hand. Women look like shit. So do men a lot of the times, but at least we don’t have to cover it up with lies.

 

[Delusion]

View attachment 3641494
It’s flawed imo , most here used for ideal but they have the same width lol idk

The bulky musculature/ribcage/waist width is probably what leads to the low rating.

I’ve noticed people here tend to strongly favor thinner ribcages, even if the absolute bideltoid width is the exact same. It leads to a more noticeable V-taper sure, but I feel like it’s better to have a wide ribcage irl

Both of you are totally missing the point of what that image is trying to convey.

Right represents a typical gymcel with a shorter stature and a smaller frame compensating to the extreme with a grotesque amount of muscle tissue.

Left is a chad with a sprinter/swimmers skeletal structure, with naturally broad shoulders due to long clavicles and tapering down to a small aesthetic waist which gives him an athletic look instead of a bloated meatball look.

Focusing purely on 1 measurement is just autistic, bideltoid is just one measurement - an important one but not the end all be all this site would have you believe. Instead you need to see the entire physique as a whole from skeletal structure to muscle insertion to leanness/conditioning etc. that is what differentiates a mogger physique from a incel trying to cheat genetics by thinking he could out mog a natural born chad by accruing muscle mass

 

[TheLightOfMyLife]

Both of you are totally missing the point of what that image is trying to convey.

Right represents a typical gymcel with a shorter stature and a smaller frame compensating to the extreme with a grotesque amount of muscle tissue.

Left is a chad with a sprinter/swimmers skeletal structure, with naturally broad shoulders due to long clavicles and tapering down to a small aesthetic waist which gives him an athletic look instead of a bloated meatball look.

Focusing purely on 1 measurement is just autistic, bideltoid is just one measurement - an important one but not the end all be all this site would have you believe. Instead you need to see the entire physique as a whole from skeletal structure to muscle insertion to leanness/conditioning etc. that is what differentiates a mogger physique from a incel trying to cheat genetics by thinking he could out mog a natural born chad by accruing muscle mass

I was just going on a tangent. Yes obviously the two pictures are different.

 

[william2605]

Both of you are totally missing the point of what that image is trying to convey.

Right represents a typical gymcel with a shorter stature and a smaller frame compensating to the extreme with a grotesque amount of muscle tissue.

Left is a chad with a sprinter/swimmers skeletal structure, with naturally broad shoulders due to long clavicles and tapering down to a small aesthetic waist which gives him an athletic look instead of a bloated meatball look.

Focusing purely on 1 measurement is just autistic, bideltoid is just one measurement - an important one but not the end all be all this site would have you believe. Instead you need to see the entire physique as a whole from skeletal structure to muscle insertion to leanness/conditioning etc. that is what differentiates a mogger physique from a incel trying to cheat genetics by thinking he could out mog a natural born chad by accruing muscle mass

Very good take. Can I ask you if the one on the left is considered the ideal physique? Many say he looks muscleless.

And frame too?

 

[william2605]

Both of you are totally missing the point of what that image is trying to convey.

Right represents a typical gymcel with a shorter stature and a smaller frame compensating to the extreme with a grotesque amount of muscle tissue.

Left is a chad with a sprinter/swimmers skeletal structure, with naturally broad shoulders due to long clavicles and tapering down to a small aesthetic waist which gives him an athletic look instead of a bloated meatball look.

Focusing purely on 1 measurement is just autistic, bideltoid is just one measurement - an important one but not the end all be all this site would have you believe. Instead you need to see the entire physique as a whole from skeletal structure to muscle insertion to leanness/conditioning etc. that is what differentiates a mogger physique from a incel trying to cheat genetics by thinking he could out mog a natural born chad by accruing muscle mass

Underrated comment