Why are humans the only species that make you commit so fucking much just to get sex ?

[reptiles]

We have people going to hell and back to get women and this is what women expect as a standard from men you notice other animals in nature don't do this just humans. Other animals just fuck and move on but humans we have to commit it's why every fucking time you go onto a dating app half the whores are always asking for dates or this other crap it's like why sex is a biological positive yet they don't want it most the time unless it's with some 1 that is really good looking.

 

[Harold O'brien]

other animals literally fight to the death

 

[patrician]

dravidian iq

 

[reptiles]

other animals literally fight to the death

Such as ? also were closest to the bonobos so in our context the type of reproduction I mentioned is the norm

 

[Harold O'brien]

Such as ? also were closest to the bonobos so in our context the type of reproduction I mentioned is the norm

humans barely commit anything

the people around you are getting laid 24/7 with minimal investment. just because you aren't getting any doesn't mean you can project it onto the entire species

 

[Prettyboy]

The higher iq a species the longer time the offspring needs to develop into an adult during that time needs parents beside them and humans happen to be the highest iq animals

 

[Deleted member 9670]

humans have highest investment in offspring

 

[reptiles]

humans barely commit anything

the people around you are getting laid 24/7 with minimal investment. just because you aren't getting any doesn't mean you can project it onto the entire species

The people getting consistent sex is the top 20 percent oviously there getting the sex retard i'm talking about those left behind the bottom 80 percent ?

 

[reptiles]

humans barely commit anything

the people around you are getting laid 24/7 with minimal investment. just because you aren't getting any doesn't mean you can project it onto the entire species

Dudes like this if they tried could get away with what I was suggesting. Dudes like this can't my entire point is why can't both of them have an equal amount of sex.

Meanwhile Both of the women below can get an equal amount of sex they never commit they ghost and they move on. It's fucking stupid only males having to be the ones that invest meanwhile they don't.

 

[Deleted member 14918]

The people getting consistent sex is the top 20 percent oviously there getting the sex retard i'm talking about those left behind the bottom 80 percent ?

Ur coping, 98% of 15-70 year old males get regular sex and habe active social life, ur just missing out cause society iscagainst u

 

[eduardkoopman]

We have people going to hell and back to get women and this is what women expect as a standard from men you notice other animals in nature don't do this just humans. Other animals just fuck and move on but humans we have to commit it's why every fucking time you go onto a dating app half the whores are always asking for dates or this other crap it's like why sex is a biological positive yet they don't want it most the time unless it's with some 1 that is really good looking.

Because women decided so.
This part, starting at 30 seconds, answers your question

 

[reptiles]

Because women decided so.
This part, starting at 30 seconds, answers your question

There are x2 as many female ancestors as male ancestors due to war and famine the ratios have always had more males to females historically.

Were not even related to chimpanzees persay as much as bonobos and even then they split millions of years ago our oldest common ancestor wasnt even like this.

They had harems but the women were never valued any where near as much much they bred and they moved on.

Its humans who are willing to go through 9 circles of hell and back for some whore no other animal will br this invested in an ideal concept such as love.

 

[eduardkoopman]

There are x2 as many female ancestors as male ancestors due to war and famine the ratios have always had more males to females historically.

Were not even related to chimpanzees persay as much as bonobos and even then they split millions of years ago our oldest common ancestor wasnt even like this.

They had harems but the women were never valued any where near as much much they bred and they moved on.

Its humans who are willing to go through 9 circles of hell and back for some whore no other animal will br this invested in an ideal concept such as love.

Peterson, and historical bilogist/sociologist; have a good answer and reasons why things are as they are.

And than?
you come up with a total defferent reasoning, based on no proof. imo.

There are x2 as many female ancestors as male ancestors due to war

Which reason sounds more true?
1. people studying this field, saying its due to: female pickiness/female selection
2. you saying it's due to war/male deaths

and famine the ratios have always had more males to females historically.

I dunno what this sentence means. But it's true, that more males are born than females.

Were not even related to chimpanzees persay as much as bonobos and even then they split millions of years ago our oldest common ancestor wasnt even like this.

That's the split happening. where the oldest common ancestor, was not: female pickiness and female choice prefails. And than a mutation/change happened, of female pickiness and female choice prefails. And efter this random change, it cuased that mutation to evolve into better and better (skill wise) humans, resulting in humans dominating the entering planet basically. To such an extend, that we evolved, due to female picky seection, into something that can destroy almost all animal if we want to. domination.

They had harems but the women were never valued any where

cope. fathers, brothers and family members have in general always been protective of their daughters/females.

near as much much they bred and they moved on.

Its humans who are willing to go through 9 circles of hell and back for some whore no other animal will br this invested in an ideal concept such as love.

that's true. because humans are different in that sense.
We also evolved alot, and become very dominant due to this.
Females being very picky; due to wich over many years, causing evolution of humans into smart and so on beings

 

[reptiles]

Peterson, and historical biologist/sociologist; have a good answer and reasons why things are as they are.

And than?
you come up with totally different reasoning, based on no proof. IMO.


Which reason sounds more true?
1. people studying this field, saying it is due to female pickiness/female selection
2. you say it's due to war/male deaths

I dunno what this sentence means. But it's true, that more males are born than females.

That's the split happening. where the oldest common ancestor, was not: female pickiness and female choice prevail. And then a mutation/change happened, of female pickiness and female choice prevails. And after this random chance, it caused that mutation to evolve into better and better (skill-wise) humans, resulting in humans dominating the entering planet. To such an extend, thextentevolved, due to female picky selection, into something that can destroy almost all animals if we want to. domination.

cope. fathers, brothers, and family members have in general always been protective of their daughters/females.



that's true. because humans are different in that sense.
We also evolved a lot, and become very dominant due to this.
Females being very picky; due to which over many years, caused the evolution of humans into smart and so on beings

Peterson is a sociologist don't overpush his credibility the man is incredibly gifted in his field but when he interprets certain data but when he steps out of his field to the ancient past he fails the majority of the scholars disagree with him btw on the thesis female pickiness is the cause in the mating differentials in the long distant past it was due to an overabundance of war that leads to fewer males sticking around historically more males are always born than females but the ratio equals out due to war.

The thing is the mutations for modern intelligence is very recent and put more down to natural selection human beings lost their fur and their massive brute strength the only option of resistance was the mind but the mind is a complex organism so to make sure it grows properly and it functions properly people administered monogamy that's how that spread and that's why humans the most efficient species.

It wasn't just monogamy it was also the fact we were innately a species more fragile so to cope nature gave us bigger brains somewhere down the line however males started to get over-invested in the female and it has led to the modern-day man but this shift has been happening for like 10 thousand years.

Artificial wombs will cure this I mean seriously all you would need is the egg of a beautiful woman your sperm and an artificial womb to raise your kids for 18 years think about that in a society where children are all lab-grown to have the genes of the most beautiful person.


Essentially I agree with you that there was a mutation that lead to a change in humans but I argue it's more recent however I don't think the over the investment of the modern age is due to genes that seem more environmental.

 

[Deleted member 16134]

Female humans are different then animals

 

[eduardkoopman]

Artificial wombs will cure this

I mean seriously all you would need is the egg of a beautiful woman your sperm and an artificial womb to raise your kids for 18 years

think about that in a society where children are all lab-grown to have the genes of the most beautiful person.

sounds depressing as fuck.

 

[Primordial]

weee waa

write essays on incel website and fail in life

 

[eduardkoopman]

weee waa

write essays on incel website and fail in life

essays are good, for people in power or scientists.
because people in power, can atually implement shit.
and scientists, get payed to write essays.

For all the rest of us.
Better not waist to much time on matters, when we don't make money with it or when we have no (future) power/influence on it.

Life is over, before we know it.

I personally like reading or "podcasts', and gathering info/knowledge. but I also know that most fo them, is a waiste of time. But I see it as hobby, so I can allow myself some time waisting when doing hobby.

 

[reptiles]

sounds depressing as fuck.

It solves simping it improves the genetic stock of the society at hand and to add to that every 1 is mutally better of women might not be but who gives a shit about them

 

[mulattomaxxer]

Social constructs (marriage, slut shaming, 100% pure monogamy etc). If there were no social constructs it would become alot easier to get sex.

Apart from this humans are high IQ and require extremely high investment. Humans are basically useless for the first 10 years of their life.