Why are normies put off by rankings/rating systems?

[Deleted member 1209]

title

 

[FailedNormieManlet]

High IQ question, the answer is because normies don't like categorising things as superior or inferior, it goes against their prevailing belief that everyone is equal - when in reality this just isn't true.

 

[Kingcel32]

Because people overestimate their own attributes, especially their looks. Regular people are put off by a rating scale cause it usually puts them lower on the scale than they thought

 

[fauxfox]

It's because people view themselves as the main characters of life, someone who's either ungroupable or always at the top. So they don't want to be told they're subpar on a bunch of aspects. They want to remain an unknown and not shatter the main character feeling they have.

 

[Erik-Jón]

People overrate themselves then become self hating and loathing afterwards

 

[Deleted member 5467]

High IQ question, the answer is because normies don't like categorising things as superior or inferior, it goes against their prevailing belief that everyone is equal - when in reality this just isn't true.

that's not even true, people don't want to admit how low on the totem pole they are.

 

[FailedNormieManlet]

that's not even true, people don't want to admit how low on the totem pole they are.

not true in the slightest, people legit believe we're all equal. If you started spouting about superior people existing and how inferior people exist, they'd get mad at you. Why do you think normies hate it if you say things like "men and women aren't equal"?

 

[Kingcel32]

not true in the slightest, people legit believe we're all equal. If you started spouting about superior people existing and how inferior people exist, they'd get mad at you. Why do you think normies hate it if you say things like "men and women aren't equal"?

That implies that they shouldn’t be treated equal. That’s what regular people have problems with.

 

[Prettyboy]

Because people overestimate their own attributes, especially their looks. Regular people are put off by a rating scale cause it usually puts them lower on the scale than they thought

Being just a data entry in statistics is deeply unsettling unless you are a positive outlier. Normies hate the idea they are disposable and nothing is remarkable about them, they don’t want to face that

 

[FailedNormieManlet]

That implies that they shouldn’t be treated equal. That’s what regular people have problems with.

well yeah that's the point, how is it fair that the inferior are to be treated the same as the superior?

 

[Kingcel32]

well yeah that's the point, how is it fair that the inferior are to be treated the same as the superior?

Because everyone deserves equal opportunity to show their potential. Keeping people out of something based on things they can’t change is morally wrong. Everyone deserves a fair shot. Equal opportunity is what matters to people, not equal outcomes.

 

[FailedNormieManlet]

Because everyone deserves equal opportunity to show their potential. Keeping people out of something based on things they can’t change is morally wrong. Everyone deserves a fair shot. Equal opportunity is what matters to people, not equal outcomes.

morals aren't objective firstly. Secondly inferior and superior isn't based on birth but on character which you can develop.

 

[Kingcel32]

morals aren't objective firstly. Secondly inferior and superior isn't based on birth but on character which you can develop.

For the average person this is what their morals are, at least in the west. And it depends on the so called superior and inferior qualities. People don’t really care if someone is excluded based on physical ability, intellect, or other shit that you can change. But they do care when people are excluded based on factors they can’t change. Exclusion based on Race, sex, sexuality, etc is where people have a problem.

So when you say that “women and men aren’t equal” that is true, but the problem isn’t the statement it is the context behind it. For regular people that statement comes off as that because they aren’t biologically equal, they should be excluded because of that. This is because of the hyper offended culture that we live in, people automatically assume this stuff, even if subconsciously

 

[Deleted member 17430]

Because everyone deserves equal opportunity to show their potential.

True, everyone deserves a fair shot. But once they've had their chance and it turns out they don't have potential, they should step away and accept their place below in the hierarchy.

Keeping people out of something based on things they can’t change is morally wrong.

No, it's not morally wrong.

If you were a CEO, would you hire an autist to be your company's spokesperson?
Would you hire a manlet to be your bodyguard?
Or an ugly dude to be a model representing your company?

It doesn't matter if they can control it or not. You just need the best suited for the job. It's only natural keep someone out of a job that they aren't cut out for. If you put idealism before pragmatism, your company will just collapse and be outcompeted and replaced by smarter companies.

Equal opportunity is what matters to people, not equal outcomes.

We pretty much already have equal opportunity in the west. But normies aren't satisfied with that. They want equal outcome.

No matter who you are, man, woman, black, white, you have the freedom to pursue what you want in life. But just because all have the freedom to go where they want, that doesn't mean we will all end up at the same place. People have inherent differences. Those blessed with talent and ambition are the ones who should stand at the top and take the helm.

We must accept that hierarchies are a natural part of group living that should be embraced instead of deluding ourselves that everyone is equal. This just holds back those at the top, which in turn slows everyone down. Just look at how eastern societies in which hierarchies are more dominant, are outcompeting bluepilled western societies nowadays.

 

[Kingcel32]

True, everyone deserves a fair shot. But once they've had their chance and it turns out they don't have potential, they should step away and accept their place below in the hierarchy.


No, it's not morally wrong.

If you were a CEO, would you hire an autist to be your company's spokesperson?
Would you hire a manlet to be your bodyguard?
Or an ugly dude to be a model representing your company?

It doesn't matter if they can control it or not. You just need the best suited for the job. It's only natural keep someone out of a job that they aren't cut out for. If you put idealism before pragmatism, your company will just collapse and be outcompeted and replaced by smarter companies.


We pretty much already have equal opportunity in the west. But normies aren't satisfied with that. They want equal outcome.

No matter who you are, man, woman, black, white, you have the freedom to pursue what you want in life. But just because all have the freedom to go where they want, that doesn't mean we will all end up at the same place. People have inherent differences. Those blessed with talent and ambition are the ones who should stand at the top and take the helm.

We must accept that hierarchies are a natural part of group living that should be embraced instead of deluding ourselves that everyone is equal. This just holds back those at the top, and it slows everyone down. Just look at how eastern societies in which hierarchies are more dominant, are outcompeting bluepilled western societies nowadays.

No don’t confuse what you see on social media with what the average person thinks. The retards on social media are a small minority, the average person thinks exactly like this. As I explained above, people accept that not everyone is equal and that the most qualified person will usually be selected. But the problem comes when people are excluded in things such as race, sex, sexuality, etc. that is what I am trying to explain.

The problem we are seeing right now is not a dramatic shift of belief in forced equality in the average person, it is the dramatic power and reach of those in the left due to the internet and social media, that makes it seem that their thoughts are the majority, even though they are not. This causes governments and corporations to pander to those people cause of their amplified voices. So now we have dumb shit like forced equality that is ruining our top levels in government and corporations, which trickles down to us in the lower totem lows.

The average person is not a problem, it is the false power of those on the left.

 

[Deleted member 16853]

In a rating system, it shows where people stand, and no one likes to think anyone is above them, even users here