Why are normies unable to understand statistics?

Prøphet

Prøphet

𝕲𝕰𝕹𝕰𝕿𝕴𝕮 𝕱𝕬𝕿𝕬𝕷𝕴𝕾𝕿 -- ᛏᚱᚢᛏᚺ
Joined
Dec 28, 2024
Posts
9,001
Reputation
12,780
Why are normies fundamentally unable to comprehend statistics? Something funny I’ve noticed is if a study or data goes against their brainwashing, the first thing they do is look for outliers to tell you about as if that somehow disproved the numbers. Then they call you names. Then finally, the more advanced ones moan about “Muh correlation ≠ causation”, as if correlation never equals causation. It’s truly hilarious how dumb they are 😂
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Nerd
Reactions: kahi, sayonara, callard and 3 others
Another funny one is when they try to throw in factors that have already been accounted for in the design, they go through so much effort and lying just to prove the narrative they were fed, ngl goatis was right about brainwashing 90% of people just don’t have the capacity to truly think
 
I don't know, but this triggers me to the core

thats why I hate blackpillers and bluepillers, when you're redpilled and show stats for people they simply ignore it with an outlier or an incomplete story

for example saying that brad pit only slayed angelina jolie cause he was chad and chads always win, but alwasy forget to mention the divorce rape and losing the kids.

or saying that men are not going mgtow when 63% of guys are single and not looking for a relationship, if ths is not mgtow I don't know what is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: callard and Prøphet
I don't know, but this triggers me to the core

thats why I hate blackpillers and bluepillers, when you're redpilled and show stats for people they simply ignore it with an outlier or an incomplete story

for example saying that brad pit only slayed angelina jolie cause he was chad and chads always win, but alwasy forget to mention the divorce rape and losing the kids.

or saying that men are not going mgtow when 63% of guys are single and not looking for a relationship, if ths is not mgtow I don't know what is.
True even blackpillers do this too sometimes

Ig it’s human nature to try and make the data work for you instead of working with the data, people who already have their minds 100% set on anything are literally brainwashed and will manipulate logic just to keep up their illusions, they forget that you can almost always be wrong in some way about something
 
  • +1
Reactions: Regular Doomer
  • +1
Reactions: Regular Doomer, callard and shngstaaaa107
My point is they take “correlation doesn’t always equal causation” to mean “correlation never equals causation”
What point do u refer to/what factors or data?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Prøphet
What point do u refer to/what factors or data?
IMG 3033


From jmp.com
 
Why are normies fundamentally unable to comprehend statistics? Something funny I’ve noticed is if a study or data goes against their brainwashing, the first thing they do is look for outliers to tell you about as if that somehow disproved the numbers. Then they call you names. Then finally, the more advanced ones moan about “Muh correlation ≠ causation”, as if correlation never equals causation. It’s truly hilarious how dumb they are 😂
It’s called cope and all groups do it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Prøphet
Mix of the egalitarian norms in most Western societies, and average IQ.
 
It’s called cope and all groups do it
Yes ofc but seeing the strongest form of evidence we have in this day and trying to find flaws in it that aren’t there is just hilarious
 
No, i knew this one, like what examples or what cases
Don’t have a specific example, just in general. Like that looks vs perceived personality chart from okcupid for example or crime rates by demographics
 
  • +1
Reactions: shngstaaaa107
Don’t have a specific example, just in general. Like that looks vs perceived personality chart from okcupid for example
That one doesn't even need data, there are studies on how facial features represent or can make people infer traits and just obvious logi and real life examples. I feel like some people choose to be ignorant on THAT topic
 
  • +1
Reactions: Prøphet
Why are normies fundamentally unable to comprehend statistics? Something funny I’ve noticed is if a study or data goes against their brainwashing, the first thing they do is look for outliers to tell you about as if that somehow disproved the numbers. Then they call you names. Then finally, the more advanced ones moan about “Muh correlation ≠ causation”, as if correlation never equals causation. It’s truly hilarious how dumb they are 😂
I wanted to kill my friend when I showed him the height stats :forcedsmile: but I decided to js leave the arguement
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Regular Doomer
Don’t have a specific example, just in general. Like that looks vs perceived personality chart from okcupid for example or crime rates by demographics
Crime rate and demographics i feel like is a different story but thats just me
 
  • +1
Reactions: Prøphet
That one doesn't even need data, there are studies on how facial features represent or can make people infer traits and just obvious logi and real life examples. I feel like some people choose to be ignorant on THAT topic
Yea because the truth of our nature makes us uncomfortable

People don’t want to believe how superficial and aesthetic oriented we subconsciously are by nature, and how deeply it’s ingrained in us

It’s just still crazy how many people will instantly bring up the 5’3 balding Indian janitor and comically low iq
 
  • +1
Reactions: shngstaaaa107
Crime rate and demographics i feel like is a different story but thats just me
I’m talking about the ones that account for wealth btw, like why aren’t Asians nearly as violent as African-Americans of the same income? In fact Asians are even less violent than whites of the same income iirc. It’s just interesting to me. Also take iq by demographic as another example.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: shngstaaaa107
I’m talking about the ones that account for wealth btw, like why aren’t Asians nearly as violent as African-Americans of the same income? In fact Asians are even less violent than whites of the same income iirc. It’s just interesting to me. Also take iq by demographic as another example.
Interesting, I really wanna see data on this one, u got link?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Prøphet
Yes ofc but seeing the strongest form of evidence we have in this day and trying to find flaws in it that aren’t there is just hilarious
Not all statistics are true

50% of all science papers are made with an agenda in mind by their backers.

Point is whilst it’s reliable it’s not 100% accurate and to be taken as god
 
  • +1
Reactions: shngstaaaa107 and Prøphet
Interesting, I really wanna see data on this one, u got link?
See he’s now bringing up invaded statistics.

The IQA STATS FOR THE WORLD ARE LITERALLY CONDUCTED BY SFcels

Richard Lynn who is a publisher of extreme far right news articles went out and did those iq things and they used faulty subjects samples etc and don’t give explanations as to how they conducted the IQA TESTS

for example for Guinea IQ they used cognitively impaired children to determined the nations IQ :lul::lul::lul: literal disabled kids. You cannot make this shit up

And these are the “stats” people like OP love to spout like fucking dumbass bitches

That’s why people QUESTION it and don’t belive it which is smart
 
  • Love it
Reactions: shngstaaaa107
Interesting, I really wanna see data on this one, u got link?
Here’s another interesting one, when I reverse image searched and looked for the data it came from it was taken down

IMG 3035
 
  • Woah
Reactions: shngstaaaa107

Similar threads

Aryan Incel
Replies
25
Views
1K
Latinus
Latinus
omnis
Replies
59
Views
2K
omnis
omnis
Aryan Incel
Replies
114
Views
7K
Racepill
Racepill
Nodesbitch
Replies
86
Views
4K
noobkiller999
noobkiller999
Sloppyseconds
Replies
20
Views
4K
irrumator praetor
irrumator praetor

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top