Why are people so ugly even though attraction is so vital to mating?

B

BetterUnborn

Silver
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Posts
519
Reputation
773
Wouldn’t the ugly genes have faded by now? How often do you see a weak & fat tiger? Someone explain this shit.
 
its just u not accepting reality that looks is not as important as u think. U said it yourself, do u see weak tigers? Likewise, do you see only aesthetic people mating? Plus, its rng on how u look, or based on individual essence. 2 pretty people can have a child that looks nothing like them.
 
Last edited:
imagine thinking ur looks = ur genes

fetal health epigenetics enviornment diet proper breathing are all are greater factors to how someones face turns out
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StacyRepellent, cornerd nerd, Deleted member 29261 and 13 others
imagine thinking ur looks = ur genes

fetal health epigenetics enviornment diet proper breathing are all are greater factors to how someones face turns out
why don't you simp for vinnie hacker and simp for average mid frauding niels kielsmann
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18840
People settle, not everyone can be with Stacy/Chad
 
imagine thinking ur looks = ur genes

fetal health epigenetics enviornment diet proper breathing are all are greater factors to how someones face turns out
Bullshit. If you have the genes, you will make it.
It‘s like saying height is dependent on diet and other factors but in reality it is 90% genetic.
 
People settle, not everyone can be with Stacy/Chad
and the offsprings of chad and stacy only has 60% of becoming chads and stacys
 
Because people are as not as competitive / crazy / neurotic / autistic like us in this forum Lol.

We are here bc we would never fuck out looksmatch. We want the hottest bitches.

Well, most ppl know their place in the world and they settle.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadrapist
This has been discussed at length on this forum already but:
-arranged marriage
-enforced monogamy
-strict mate guarding by males, often using threats of violence to dissuade cheating.
-cultural shaming of promiscious women and even men to a degree
-female supression and hence their dependency on men for most of history so women chose men based on survival/provision rather than love or lust
-men being pressured very hard to marry reducing choice on their end aswell for most of history in most cultures.
-general phallocentric society
-much smaller partner pool historically than the modern era. So most women/men didn't even live in communities large enough to statistically be able to "produce" a stacy/chad since they are so rare. The best most people say historically was probably HTN.
-men having lower standards
-most people having lower standards than .org users in general espec for LTRs
-blond hair and blue eyes making nordics automatically gods to foreigners even if they are otherwise ugly or unremarkable so they automatically get handed a free asian wife pretty much (have seen many such cases and their hapa spawns in primary school here in the Netherlands
-If a guy is really good at sex and/or has a big dick he can somewhat offset uglyness since good sex releases lots of oxytocin in women and bond's them with the guy they are with hard (especially after vaginal orgasms)
 
  • +1
Reactions: gymmaxedhorse, Johnnybegood, klip11 and 2 others
fat chicks = disgust
 
genes are farking random as fuck

a chad and a good looking woman can have an incel son at random and vice versa. ive seen chadlites with two ugly ass parents. you cant weed it out because its pretty random quite often

pretty sure jordan barrets parents are normie mfers. although usually one of the parents are good looking usually for good looking people
 
why don't you simp for vinnie hacker and simp for average mid frauding niels kielsmann
I dont like vinnie tbh but he utterly mog that normie upper range of chimp philtrum jaw chin cel of nils
 
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai
genes are farking random as fuck

a chad and a good looking woman can have an incel son at random and vice versa. ive seen chadlites with two ugly ass parents. you cant weed it out because its pretty random quite often

pretty sure jordan barrets parents are normie mfers. although usually one of the parents are good looking usually for good looking people
you are on the same looks level as Tyler Mahers brother
3097824 1664591747093

take it as a compliment
 
Bullshit. If you have the genes, you will make it.
It‘s like saying height is dependent on diet and other factors but in reality it is 90% genetic.
It's called epigenetics. Genes can and do change in response to environmental stimuli. For example, stress in early childhood is known to stunt growth so that males who experience a great amount of stress in early childhood end up shorter than their genetics would have otherwise dictated . Facial symmetry can also be thrown off by stress in early childhood. Stress releases cortisol and too much cortisol suppresses testosterone and other hormones. Facial symmetry doesn't just signal genetics but environmental stability in early life.
 
imagine thinking ur looks = ur genes

fetal health epigenetics enviornment diet proper breathing are all are greater factors to how someones face turns out
Yeah, very few people don't look above average if they workout, drop to low bf% and do the basic stuff
 
Female gaze wasn't that important historically. Ogrecels and wealthmaxxers had a lot of kids
 
  • +1
Reactions: Johnnybegood
This has been discussed at length on this forum already but:
-arranged marriage
-enforced monogamy
-strict mate guarding by males, often using threats of violence to dissuade cheating.
-cultural shaming of promiscious women and even men to a degree
-female supression and hence their dependency on men for most of history so women chose men based on survival/provision rather than love or lust
-men being pressured very hard to marry reducing choice on their end aswell for most of history in most cultures.
-general phallocentric society
-much smaller partner pool historically than the modern era. So most women/men didn't even live in communities large enough to statistically be able to "produce" a stacy/chad since they are so rare. The best most people say historically was probably HTN.
-men having lower standards
-most people having lower standards than .org users in general espec for LTRs
-blond hair and blue eyes making nordics automatically gods to foreigners even if they are otherwise ugly or unremarkable so they automatically get handed a free asian wife pretty much (have seen many such cases and their hapa spawns in primary school here in the Netherlands
-If a guy is really good at sex and/or has a big dick he can somewhat offset uglyness since good sex releases lots of oxytocin in women and bond's them with the guy they are with hard (especially after vaginal orgasms)
This is all anyone needs to know
 

Similar threads

LowTierBateman
Replies
18
Views
131
cattboy
cattboy
Adonis123
Replies
4
Views
16
jgrey080
jgrey080
panzerwaffen1488
Replies
7
Views
39
Gen1leman
Gen1leman
user83793
Replies
1
Views
17
𝔒𝔯𝔟𝔦𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔠𝔢𝔩
𝔒𝔯𝔟𝔦𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔠𝔢𝔩
TheImmortalBeauty
Replies
3
Views
29
SoundnVision
SoundnVision

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top