Why are slavs so faggy 🤏🏼

Skisquad your mother is a whore and Ur a Low iq faggot LOL stay mad
 
Numbers pulled from the deepest basements in the slums of east berlin
stats say 50,000 in total but actual KIA is around 14k to 16k, I don't have any vitrol against poles but its ludicrous to claim that they killed 3 million lol
2026 08 05 153817 hyprshot
 
stats say 50,000 in total but actual KIA is around 14k to 16k, I don't have any vitrol against poles but its ludicrous to claim that they killed 3 million lol
View attachment 5469298
The Numbers He was showing was German soldiers casualties throughout the whole war, what a Low iq fag
 
Translation: "I look at ancedotes and see 10 or so examples and think that is enough to explain differences in populations" this entire forum only knows how to argue through vague ancedotes jfl
You didn't even give an argument on your opinion. I can give more arguments why they differ if you want to. Language, skin tone, culture etc.
 
Polish army only killed around 14,000 to 16,000 germans though, whether the soviet union was involved or not they were bound to lose against the wehrmact as they were extremely competent and reformed
i think that nobody would win against wehrmacht
maybe usa could win after very long and exhaustive war
every other country would lose immediately/ maybe hang on for few weeks or something
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess
stats say 50,000 in total but actual KIA is around 14k to 16k, I don't have any vitrol against poles but its ludicrous to claim that they killed 3 million lol
View attachment 5469298
Also the ratio of casualties between german soldiers and polish soldiers killed in the invasion poland was 1 german soldier for 4 polish soldiers, the wehrmact was competent and would of won with or without russian help
 
  • +1
Reactions: iLdar and truep0lishguy
i think that nobody would win against wehrmacht
maybe usa could win after very long and exhaustive war
every other country would lose immediately/ maybe hang on for few weeks or something
I agree with that, the wehrmact very much punched above its weight for quite a while, britain and USA had the advantage of being maritime based global powers that were not connected to Germany by land which made it much easier to manage for them
 
  • +1
Reactions: truep0lishguy
You didn't even give an argument on your opinion. I can give more arguments why they differ if you want to. Language, skin tone, culture etc.
They barely differ because they are genetically the same and have been for the most part under one state for hundreds of years with ukraine nationhood only really being fully realized as a political ideal during ww1
 
  • +1
Reactions: truep0lishguy
Also the ratio of casualties between german soldiers and polish soldiers killed in the invasion poland was 1 german soldier for 4 polish soldiers, the wehrmact was competent and would of won with or without russian help
it wont happen again, not in this century for sure
current polish army is pretty strong and it will become even stronger, we are investing huge money for new tanks/missiles/aircraft
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess
it wont happen again, not in this century for sure
current polish army is pretty strong and it will become even stronger, we are investing huge money for new tanks/missiles/aircraft
So are other countries, your country is behind
 
@truep0lishguy I think @iLdar is some sort of Kebab he still hasn't answered what is his ethnicity even though he saw that I tagged him
 
  • +1
Reactions: truep0lishguy
@truep0lishguy I think @iLdar is some sort of Kebab he still hasn't answered what is his ethnicity even though he saw that I tagged him
I Said im German and italian
 
  • +1
Reactions: horseman.
it wont happen again, not in this century for sure
current polish army is pretty strong and it will become even stronger, we are investing huge money for new tanks/missiles/aircraft
It won't rly happen because German expansionism into the east since the kaiser has ceased to be a political ideal or goal for them due to europe as a whole becoming a NATO subject
 
  • +1
Reactions: truep0lishguy
So are other countries, your country is behind
our military is not behind compared to germany
we are pretty close, current german military wouldnt beat us
our economy is not bad too
 
@truep0lishguy It seems he's some sort of muzzie. He still hasn't posted any proof that he's German or Italian, even though he claims he is. Meanwhile, he has constantly mentioned ISIS in his previous posts.
 
  • +1
Reactions: truep0lishguy
They barely differ because they are genetically the same and have been for the most part under one state for hundreds of years with ukraine nationhood only really being fully realized as a political ideal during ww1
The one-state argument doesn't really mean anything. A state and an ethnic group aren't the same thing. Basques aren't ethnically Spanish, Tibetans aren't ethnically Han Chinese, Finns aren't ethnically Swedish, and Slovaks aren't ethnically Hungarian simply because they have been most of time apart of one state.

The genetic argument isn't good either. Genetic similarity doesn't determine ethnicity. If it did, a big chunk of Western Europe would be considered the same ethnicity. Ethnicity is shaped by things like language, culture, self-identification.
Slavs are slavs and thats the thing that connect all slavs.

Also if Russians and Ukrainians are the same in your opinion, would you agree that there are 185 milloin Ukrainians? The name slav is though to originate from the old name of river Dnipro.
 
Last edited:
@truep0lishguy It seems he's some sort of muzzie. He still hasn't posted any proof that he's German or Italian, even though he claims he is. Meanwhile, he has constantly mentioned ISIS in his previous posts.
You lose Argument and understand poland failed brutally = assume anything about me

Jfl at your iq + i own Ur whore mother+ scroll on my Profile to See face
 
  • JFL
Reactions: horseman.
Is there a scientific explanation?
My theory is that they deconstructed late because of communism so now theyre like super gay o algo
 
  • +1
Reactions: iLdar
The one-state argument doesn't really mean anything. A state and an ethnic group aren't the same thing. Basques aren't ethnically Spanish, Tibetans aren't ethnically Han Chinese, Finns aren't ethnically Swedish, and Slovaks aren't ethnically Hungarian simply because they have been most of time apart of one state.

The genetic argument isn't good either. Genetic similarity doesn't determine ethnicity. If it did, a big chunk of Western Europe would be considered the same ethnicity. Ethnicity is shaped by things like language, culture, self-identification.
Slavs are slavs and thats the thing that connect all slavs.

Also if Russians and Ukrainians are the same in your opinion, would you agree that there are 185 milloin Ukrainians? The name slav is though to originate from the old name of river Dnipro.
1785938880814

even genetically closer to polish than russian
 
Classic cope germans cant face their women are drawn to BPC :owo: Has your mom been raped by arabs yet or is she already married to an african? your women literally preffer deathnics to you :ogre: brootal
IMG 6634

“Classic cope germans cant face their women are drawn to BPC :owo: Has your mom been raped by arabs yet or is she already married to an african? your women literally preffer deathnics to you :ogre: brootal”
 
  • +1
Reactions: horseman.
The one-state argument doesn't really mean anything. A state and an ethnic group aren't the same thing. Basques aren't ethnically Spanish, Tibetans aren't ethnically Han Chinese, Finns aren't ethnically Swedish, and Slovaks aren't ethnically Hungarian simply because they have been most of time apart of one state.
Saying basques aren't spanish is like saying prussians and bavarians arent germans because they have differing regional cultural identities, ethnic identities are fluid and always evolving political identities that are shaped and influenced largely by their shared ancestry, these political ethnic identities form because of negation against far more different groups, a united italian identity didnt exist until the romans and etruscans negated against the celts and realized they were far more similar, making a united itallic identity extremely easy to form after that
The genetic argument isn't good either. Genetic similarity doesn't determine ethnicity. If it did, a big chunk of Western Europe would be considered the same ethnicity. Ethnicity is shaped by things like language, culture, self-identification.
Slavs are slavs and thats the thing that connect all slavs.
Yes it does, and no western europe is not genetically the same and there are far more bigger genetic differences between western euros than there is between ukrainians, russians and belurussians
 
You lose Argument and understand poland failed brutally = assume anything about me

Jfl at your iq + i own Ur whore mother+ scroll on my Profile to See face
You type soy and overcompensating ngl
If you want me to lose argument that much post proof that you are not pedslim,its that easy
 
You type soy and overcompensating ngl
If you want me to lose what you call argument post proof that you are not pedslim,its that easy.
Dnr a Single word + Ur Mad that u lost the Argument
 
View attachment 5469423
even genetically closer to polish than russian
No they are not, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0135820

"In their Y-chromosomal and autosomal variation, East Slavs—Russians from central-southern regions, Belarusians and Ukrainians—form a cluster on their own, though these populations do not overlap entirely with each other."

poles are in this same category of east slavs genetically but they are not more closer or smthing
 
Saying basques aren't spanish is like saying prussians and bavarians arent germans because they have differing regional cultural identities, ethnic identities are fluid and always evolving political identities that are shaped and influenced largely by their shared ancestry, these political ethnic identities form because of negation against far more different groups, a united italian identity didnt exist until the romans and etruscans negated against the celts and realized they were far more similar, making a united itallic identity extremely easy to form after that

Yes it does, and no western europe is not genetically the same and there are far more bigger genetic differences between western euros than there is between ukrainians, russians and belurussians
Prussians and Bavarians identify as German. Italics identify as Italic. Ukrainians do not identify as Russians. I don't know about Russians, maybe they identify as Ukrainians as they are ancient Ukraine's colony.
Ukrainian identity is old and distinct so it qualifies as an ethnicity.
 
Saying basques aren't spanish is like saying prussians and bavarians arent germans because they have differing regional cultural identities, ethnic identities are fluid and always evolving political identities that are shaped and influenced largely by their shared ancestry, these political ethnic identities form because of negation against far more different groups, a united italian identity didnt exist until the romans and etruscans negated against the celts and realized they were far more similar, making a united itallic identity extremely easy to form after that

Yes it does, and no western europe is not genetically the same and there are far more bigger genetic differences between western euros than there is between ukrainians, russians and belurussians
Also important to add here, Ukrainians under the Russian empire largely saw themselves as a regional branch of Russians calling themselves Malorossian (little russian), Ukrainian as an identity was largely a more modern invention @healthymaxxing
 
Prussians and Bavarians identify as German. Italics identify as Italic. Ukrainians do not identify as Russians. I don't know about Russians, maybe they identify as Ukrainians as they are ancient Ukraine's colony.
Ukrainian identity is old and distinct so it qualifies as an ethnicity.
Except that isnt true, ukrainians under the russian empire saw themselves as malorossian, a group that was part of the russian nation/identity and was just a regional variation, it was only in the 19th century that this separatism started, and it only ever became a strong identity because the USSR sided with them and actively helped set it up under the UKSSR and increase their identity
 
Last edited:
Except that isnt true, ukrainians under the russian empire saw themselves as malorossian, a group that was part of the russian nation/identity and was just a regional variation, it was only in the 19th century that this separatism started
In those times people mostly identified with their cities, religion, cossackry etc. Mostly only the intelligentsia identified with ethnicities. Malorussian is just an older name of Ukrainian that was changed to not be associated with Russians who took the Rus name from Kyivan Rus.
 
In those times people mostly identified with their cities, religion, cossackry etc. Mostly only the intelligentsia identified with ethnicities. Malorussian is just an older name of Ukrainian that was changed to not be associated with Russians who took the Rus name from Kyivan Rus.
Malorossian literally translates to little russia, it wasnt changed because it was associated with russians but because it was associated with the ukrainian identity that was loyal to the tsar/russian nation as a whole, also the cossacks easily intergrated into the russian nobility

malorossian very much was a regional identity that was explicitly seen as part of a triune russian nation of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus, ukraine seperatism and the distance created between the two only started in the 19th century and was worsened by bolsheviks
 
Malorossian literally translates to little russia, it wasnt changed because it was associated with russians but because it was associated with the ukrainian identity that was loyal to the tsar/russian nation as a whole, also the cossacks easily intergrated into the russian nobility

malorossian very much was a regional identity that was explicitly seen as part of a triune russian nation of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus, ukraine seperatism and the distance created between the two only started in the 19th century and was worsened by bolsheviks
Still nowadays you have to accept that Ukraine is out of the triad. Belarus has mostly assimilated to Russians but Ukraine is distinct. Ukrainians hate Russians and Russians hate Ukrainians. The relations won't get close in hundred years. Before 2014 most of Ukraine was Russia's friends, but its over. Russia took it all away from a small piece of land and angered the whole world in the meantime. Ukraine's change to a western society got boosted radically and the Russian speaking Ukrainians have started to learn Ukrainian better. And if Russia something annexes, there will be a fuckton of turmoil if they don't do a full genoside like to Finns.

Every day Ukraine floats farther from Russian identity.
 
Still nowadays you have to accept that Ukraine is out of the triad. Belarus has mostly assimilated to Russians but Ukraine is distinct. Ukrainians hate Russians and Russians hate Ukrainians. The relations won't get close in hundred years. Before 2014 most of Ukraine was Russia's friends, but its over. Russia took it all away from a small piece of land and angered the whole world in the meantime. Ukraine's change to a western society got boosted radically and the Russian speaking Ukrainians have started to learn Ukrainian better. And if Russia something annexes, there will be a fuckton of turmoil if they don't do a full genoside like to Finns.

Every day Ukraine floats farther from Russian identity.
Its not some inevitable outcome, only time will tell as masses are very easily swayed, Ukrainian identity was formed by minority groups of intellectuals, the same could very much start to happen with Ukrainians coming under the russian identity again
 
Its not some inevitable outcome, only time will tell as masses are very easily swayed, Ukrainian identity was formed by minority groups of intellectuals, the same could very much start to happen with Ukrainians coming under the russian identity again
You don't know the amount of nationalism Ukrainians have right now. Everything Russian perceived is frowned upon and removed. Ties to Russian friends are being cut off. Russia could assimilate Belarus easily but Ukraine would be very hard at this point and getting good relations would be even harder.

Russia as a whole is a mess. The central regions are well off but all the other regions are like hell. Putin's domestic policy is absolutely shit and now that they use budget to war they can't develop the country efficiently. Now Putin just wants to kill all the Russian ethnic minorities with the war, raise nationalism and in the process gain a bit of resources and land as Putin underestimated Ukrainian spirit and now can't backdown without losing prestige.

Ukraine's future is the democratic european western wealth and wellbeing while Russians will have a nationalistic autocratic regime with more isolated trade. Russia's best bet would be peace talks and putting someone in the place of Putin who could bring the chinese economic model as they ain't ever becoming western if we being honest.
 

Similar threads

MaksBobi
Replies
31
Views
184
Part-Time Chad
Part-Time Chad
enoderpeno
Replies
5
Views
78
mi(r)in
mi(r)in
dnrjoindate
Replies
14
Views
113
not.lovable_Lawa
not.lovable_Lawa
tiredman
Replies
10
Views
74
Rick_bozo
Rick_bozo

Users who are viewing this thread

  • lory
Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →