Why are so many men chopped compared to women?

CorinthianLOX

CorinthianLOX

๐˜Œ๐˜ˆ ๐˜๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ ๐˜Š๐˜– ๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ
Joined
Mar 26, 2025
Posts
10,256
Reputation
18,469
It doesn't make sense from a biological standpoint
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Rainman988, sigma boii, Magnus Ironblood and 9 others
It doesn't make sense from a biological standpoint
Throughout most of our history attractiveness was relative to culture. Since European culture now runs most of the world European attractiveness is standard making other people look weird (but even then there are still definitely unattractive guys out there no matter the culture).
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Rainman988, mmmousaa, choppedshyt and 8 others
Throughout most of our history attractiveness was relative to culture. Since European culture now runs most of the world European attractiveness is standard making other people look weird (but even then there are still definitely unattractive guys out there no matter the culture).
Luckily i'm european
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, grilldaddyโค๏ธ, Verveine and 2 others
makeup.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jeremy Meeks, Ascending2Tyrone, pslgod3000 and 15 others
Gender ratio was never meant to be 1:1
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jeremy Meeks, LTNUser, drimprovement and 5 others
Because society only advertises improving appearance for girls and says that men don't need it
 
  • +1
Reactions: zharupodrugu, LTNUser, Lars2 and 1 other person
u just overrate woman bcs u attract them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jewgymmaxx
Takes more to be attractive as a guy

You cannot possibly be attractive if you're have a bodyfat percentage above 20%, and if you're boneless you need to be way less than that

Women have a much wider range, they can be skinny, skinny fat, or slightly chubby and still be seen as attractive


Attractiveness for dudes is based on bones, for women it's just fat distribution
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, MiserableMan, Yeagerist and 2 others
Because male beauty comes from hard tissue (bone), something you're born with genetically and is next to impossible to change. You need to be born with a good skull as a male

Female beauty comes from soft tissue (skin, lips, nose, etc) which is extremely easy to fix with makeup, bodyfat, softmaxxing, fillers, etc

The majority of people have good soft tissue at least during their prime, but it's rare to have good hard tissue
 
  • +1
Reactions: nvr13, Jeremy Meeks, BeanletMogger and 5 others
@1966Ford where is ur avi from
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and Jewgymmaxx
Probably makeup, also this may be a controversial thing to say but women need to be more physically attractive on a biological basis
 
low testosterone levels and high body fat levels therefore higher estrogen in males than in females themselves
 
Throughout most of our history attractiveness was relative to culture. Since European culture now runs most of the world European attractiveness is standard making other people look weird (but even then there are still definitely unattractive guys out there no matter the culture).
Ppl here often deny this
 
  • +1
Reactions: GodDeityEyeBro and brotatoes
Make up . Surgery . Looksmaxx are often used more by females than males
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing
It doesn't make sense from a biological standpoint
Because christianity stopped eugenics
Back in the days it used to be only top warriors,kings,tribal chiefs reproducing(Eugenics)
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
It doesn't make sense from a biological standpoint
bad craniofacial development gives an advantage to women + they always fraud with makeup. or culture fucked us up, testosterone levels in men plummeted, microplastics in our balls, etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
men will height and skull mog any female like she's from the slums of delhi
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
Because christianity stopped eugenics
Back in the days it used to be only top warriors,kings,tribal chiefs reproducing(Eugenics)
Agreed. Christianity was a mistake precisely because of this
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL and Michelangelo
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
It doesn't make sense from a biological standpoint
Because makeup is covering women's face 24/7.

Also men bald, which is aesthetically unpleasant..
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitecelcoper, 1966Ford, LTNUser and 1 other person
Cuz it is not true. Facial features do not matter for women, height does not matter, hardly any balding, there is body halo and fakeup.

Standards for men are insane. Women are chopped to oblivion if same standards get applied to them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jeremy Meeks, whitecelcoper and CorinthianLOX
false
the average man mogs the average foid
you think they look better because of makeup and because beauty standards for foids are much lower
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitecelcoper and CorinthianLOX
Newgen retards have 6k posts in 4 months and donโ€™t have any sign of intelligence
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: White_Bwoi and CorinthianLOX
Newgen retards have 6k posts in 4 months and donโ€™t have any sign of intelligence

Eren

Deleting after Trimax​

JoinedJun 17, 2022Posts2,302Reputation2,004
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eren
Idk, most women are sub-human tier to me..

But agree, guys are even worse - bald, fat, unhealthy looking pigs - the BLOAT_lord factor is the worst, and we don't hide behind make-up, don't have elaborate clothing options for frauding, like ALL women do, or ENCHANCE (looksmaxxing since day one).
So there you have it :what:
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
It doesn't make sense from a biological standpoint
Well itโ€™s it true
Most girls look like shit
Most girls just have abysmal harmony
IMG 7923
IMG 7804

Youโ€™re just overrating funny looking ugly girls cuz youโ€™re desperate for pussy
 
I donโ€™t overrate shit
U do. If you put women beside that morph youโ€™ll realize theyโ€™re all just as far away from Stacy as men are from Chad.
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitecelcoper
U do. If you put women beside that morph youโ€™ll realize theyโ€™re all just as far away from Stacy as men are from Chad.
I agree that sheโ€™s not stacy
 
it might because ur standards have raised for men while u have glorified woman in ur brain like the foids in the social media
and
the most men u called chopped is pretty much average and people see them normal irl
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitecelcoper
It doesn't make sense from a biological standpoint
Take the face of a becky, and imagine her with short hair and slightly more masculine facial traits suddenly a tappable female turns into a chopped normie
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jeremy Meeks
men dont looksmax as much as women. Simple as that
 
It's easier for women to looksmax.

Like hardmaxxing, for example. For males actual surgeries that make a difference are quite complex.

Foids on the other hand can ascend by a simple rhino and say fixing a crooked nose.

Also things like upper eyelid exposure isn't really a falio on foids compared to men. And fixing it is not only dangerous but results are pretty variable.
 
The same falios a woman has, most times a man would be a truecel if he had them. Just take the time to look at some female faces and skulls and you will notice so many subhumans
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
greater male variability hypothesis (GMVH). male species tend to show more signs of variability. genetically, this results in more exceptional chads and sub5 incels on the male side with more females closer to an average. there's also social shit too ofc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX

Similar threads

Thief
Replies
10
Views
203
Sub5kang
Sub5kang
whiteegyptian
Replies
5
Views
224
g4rlic
g4rlic
Vantablack
Replies
14
Views
166
Vantablack
Vantablack
Azooe
Replies
20
Views
286
OxyFanNigga
OxyFanNigga
puniteking
Replies
22
Views
336
butterfly401
butterfly401

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top