Why are some sexually dimorphic features only valued when in combination with others?

A

Account717

Silver
Joined
Aug 2, 2020
Posts
696
Reputation
578
For example, body and facial hair is a sexually dimorphic feature, but men look unattractive if they have body hair but aren't also big and tall.
Even being bald is a sexually dimorphic feature but that's just considered subhuman. However, even in that case, balding can look aesthetic if you're big and tall.
Why do sexually dimorphic traits look worse if you aren't big and tall as a man?
Screen Shot 2022 11 17 at 121751 PM
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard
I'd guess the extreme importance of mental congruence for humans plays a big part in this
 
Idk what that means unfortunately
Well I used the word somewhat wrongly anyway, but congruence in psychology, broadly means for something to be in agreement, harmony, compatible, you know.

It's weird too, I've taken a psychology class and when I read your question the word just popped into my consciousness, funny how the brain works man.
 

Similar threads

jaylololo
Replies
7
Views
69
jaylololo
jaylololo
Sixatheconqueror
Replies
8
Views
90
bluebandz
bluebandz
jedifry
Replies
0
Views
43
jedifry
jedifry
Dylan972
Replies
4
Views
81
hornygoatweed
H

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →