Why beauty is actually subjective

L

lbg

Bronze
Joined
May 23, 2025
Posts
286
Reputation
285
Beauty, to a certain extent, is subjective and shouldn’t be considered as cookie cutter

To prove it, I looked at the opposite gender, chose a subject, rated them based on my personal preference and ran a poll for other users here to vote on


IMG 6036


The results were quite surprising. Votes across each group, including MTB, HTB and SL were nearly the same. This shows that we all have polarizing views when it comes to rating women

I can deduce this likely applies to men as well. We tend to think that beauty standards are objective and that we have to hit certain criteria to be called Chad, but it’s not black and white. Once you are above MTN, it really depends on the beholders

There is general agreement that someone like Hexum or David Gandy ranks high on the PSL chart. But even then, not all foids find them attractive just like how we disagree on a foid’s rating, as the poll above shows

This is just a theory, obviously you can’t say everything is the same for both genders. It’s still worth considering since many here treat male beauty as 100% objective
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, MiserableMan and sluttysuzy420
intersting
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, MiserableMan and lbg
Beauty, to a certain extent, is subjective and shouldn’t be considered as cookie cutter

To prove it, I looked at the opposite gender, chose a subject, rated them based on my personal preference and ran a poll for other users here to vote on


View attachment 3837517

The results were quite surprising. Votes across each group, including MTB, HTB and SL were nearly the same. This shows that we all have polarizing views when it comes to rating women

I can deduce this likely applies to men as well. We tend to think that beauty standards are objective and that we have to hit certain criteria to be called Chad, but it’s not black and white. Once you are above MTN, it really depends on the beholders

There is general agreement that someone like Hexum or David Gandy ranks high on the PSL chart. But even then, not all foids find them attractive just like how we disagree on a foid’s rating, as the poll above shows

This is just a theory, obviously you can’t say everything is the same for both genders. It’s still worth considering since many here treat male beauty as 100% objective
While beauty is subjective, "good looking people" are still treated better in general. What u mena by GL is whether u would fuck someon eor not. That is very subjective sex appeal and types are subjective. But things like being treated by other people is very objective as we all like things like mild dimorphism, harmony, good colouring, symetry, height, fitness.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, anxiety, 1966Ford and 2 others
While beauty is subjective, "good looking people" are still treated better in general. What u mena by GL is whether u would fuck someon eor not. That is very subjective sex appeal and types are subjective. But things like being treated by other people is very objective as we all like things like mild dimorphism, harmony, good colouring, symetry, height, fitness.
You are right
Sex appeal and aesthetics are different things
 
This is true but dyed blonde hair with clearly dark eyebrows is a massive failo so i can see why people went mtb with this one
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and lbg
i somewhat agree, beauty is subjective only after a certain level, someone who is ugly is going to be ugly to almost everyone.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser, Mighty_One and lbg
ur asking for an objective rate though, meaning half of users cant rate for shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and lbg
No. Beauty is almost solely objective until you reach a certain threshold. Say like a 5-10, then it becomes more subjective. If you have an ugly person, say 2/10 and you ask 100k people, like 99% will say ugly. Also, you have to few votes to conclude with anything. Sample size has to be much bigger.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and lbg
ur asking for an objective rate though, meaning half of users cant rate for shit
Yeah
Many here can’t rate objectively
Maybe my poll was skewed though just take this thread with a grain of salt
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and pfl
Yeah
Many here can’t rate objectively
Maybe my poll was skewed though just take this thread with a grain of salt
if u asked them to rate subjectively ur point would make sense
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and lbg
No. Beauty is almost solely objective until you reach a certain threshold. Say like a 5-10, then it becomes more subjective. If you have an ugly person, say 2/10 and you ask 100k people, like 99% will say ugly. Also, you have to few votes to conclude with anything. Sample size has to be much bigger.
It’s a small sample I get what you’re saying
The lower the looks tier the more objective it gets
 
  • +1
Reactions: PeopleAreFake
Greycel ramblings
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LTNUser
if u asked them to rate subjectively ur point would make sense
Do you think my poll’s results are more objective or subjective?
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and pfl
Do you think my poll’s results are more objective or subjective?
wdym, well u posted it in ratings so all of them are trying to rate objective
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and lbg
  • +1
Reactions: pfl and lbg
wdym, well u posted it in ratings so all of them are trying to rate objective
They rated more based on their personal preferences than objectively
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top