mewannaascendnow
Iron
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2026
- Posts
- 146
- Reputation
- 34
The premise that Black people "can't" reach Chad in looksmaxxing or that "BP needs to stop" is a misunderstanding of both genetics and the "looksmaxxing" community's actual goals. Here is the objective breakdown:
Genetic Variability: "Chad" is a slang term for a specific archetype of male attractiveness (usually hyper-masculine, high testosterone features, specific jawline, etc.). Attractive and "Chad-like" individuals exist in every race, including Black people. There are countless Black men who fit the physical criteria of a "Chad" (high cheekbones, strong jaw, muscular build, etc.). The idea that a specific race is genetically barred from achieving high levels of attractiveness is scientifically baseless.
Different Beauty Standards and Features: The "looksmaxxing" community often focuses on specific features (like jawline definition, mewing, etc.) that are influenced by both bone structure and soft tissue. While bone structure is largely genetic, soft tissue can be manipulated to an extent. Black individuals have different skin properties (higher collagen density, different fat distribution) which can affect how certain "looksmaxxing" techniques (like mewing or specific facial exercises) manifest visually. This doesn't mean they can't be attractive; it means the path or the result might look different than the white-centric "Chad" ideal often portrayed in those communities.
The "BP" (Black Pill) Misconception: The "Black Pill" ideology often promotes a fatalistic view that genetics are the only factor and that certain races are inherently disadvantaged. While genetics play a massive role, the idea that Black people are genetically incapable of reaching peak attractiveness is a distortion. Many "looksmaxxing" techniques (gym, style, grooming, confidence, social skills) are universally applicable and effective regardless of race.
Community Bias: The "looksmaxxing" and "Black Pill" communities have historically been dominated by white males, leading to a bias in the "ideal" image being discussed. This can create a false perception that the standard is unattainable for non-white individuals. However, attractiveness is subjective and culturally influenced. What is considered a "Chad" in one context may not be in another.
Conclusion: Black people can absolutely reach high levels of attractiveness ("Chad" status). The notion that they can't is a mix of genetic misunderstanding, community bias, and a narrow definition of the "ideal." The idea that "BP needs to stop" is a value judgment, but objectively, the fatalistic and often racially skewed narratives within some parts of that community can be counterproductive and inaccurate. Focus on maximizing your own unique genetic potential rather than comparing yourself to a potentially biased and narrow ideal.
Genetic Variability: "Chad" is a slang term for a specific archetype of male attractiveness (usually hyper-masculine, high testosterone features, specific jawline, etc.). Attractive and "Chad-like" individuals exist in every race, including Black people. There are countless Black men who fit the physical criteria of a "Chad" (high cheekbones, strong jaw, muscular build, etc.). The idea that a specific race is genetically barred from achieving high levels of attractiveness is scientifically baseless.
Different Beauty Standards and Features: The "looksmaxxing" community often focuses on specific features (like jawline definition, mewing, etc.) that are influenced by both bone structure and soft tissue. While bone structure is largely genetic, soft tissue can be manipulated to an extent. Black individuals have different skin properties (higher collagen density, different fat distribution) which can affect how certain "looksmaxxing" techniques (like mewing or specific facial exercises) manifest visually. This doesn't mean they can't be attractive; it means the path or the result might look different than the white-centric "Chad" ideal often portrayed in those communities.
The "BP" (Black Pill) Misconception: The "Black Pill" ideology often promotes a fatalistic view that genetics are the only factor and that certain races are inherently disadvantaged. While genetics play a massive role, the idea that Black people are genetically incapable of reaching peak attractiveness is a distortion. Many "looksmaxxing" techniques (gym, style, grooming, confidence, social skills) are universally applicable and effective regardless of race.
Community Bias: The "looksmaxxing" and "Black Pill" communities have historically been dominated by white males, leading to a bias in the "ideal" image being discussed. This can create a false perception that the standard is unattainable for non-white individuals. However, attractiveness is subjective and culturally influenced. What is considered a "Chad" in one context may not be in another.
Conclusion: Black people can absolutely reach high levels of attractiveness ("Chad" status). The notion that they can't is a mix of genetic misunderstanding, community bias, and a narrow definition of the "ideal." The idea that "BP needs to stop" is a value judgment, but objectively, the fatalistic and often racially skewed narratives within some parts of that community can be counterproductive and inaccurate. Focus on maximizing your own unique genetic potential rather than comparing yourself to a potentially biased and narrow ideal.
