Why calories are complete bs

gigell

gigell

15 year old neet
Joined
Jul 7, 2023
Posts
10,941
Reputation
10,684
Calories are a measurement of a specific form of energy. Explicitly defined , explicitly measured as such.

There is a mathematical way convert energy into another form of energy but there is needed some kit or machinery in the world to be transformed

And the body doesn't have that

The physical thing that causes something to express heat is the energetic state of electrons , the valence.

The energy transfer between electrons or a food substances in a bath of water , is achieved via photons. Which are electromagnetic waves in the photon field which are at certain wavelengths we experience heat. Explicitly defined as such. We cant use it for a metabolic process. There is no equivalent between calories and actual physical work being undertaken by the human body.
We are often told that calorie in , calorie out is a good tool(not true) to predict what will happen to our weight over time if we control it. Youre not actually controlling your calorie intake if you do , you control the amount of food you eat/mass you are putting into your body. The only thing that affects your weight is the balance between mass and mass out , a case limiting example of energy in and energy out.

No amount of absorbing photons and taking out photons will change your mass.

Why not ?

Because photons don't have any mass that cant be brought to rest. You cannot change your weight by retaining photons it is mass retained that changes your weight

Calories arent appropriate measurement to calculate a bowl of food. It wont work effectively at losing weight for example unless you vastly under eat in order to "swamp in "signal to noise ratio"(noise in this context means something missing).

When you do exercise you use ATP , not calories

So its better to use a mass model to see how much you eat

In conclusion calories are complete nonsense to the human body
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: descension, Madridista and maarda
So how do I get lean quick
 
They are but if u eat raw food then it kinda makes sense but not completely
Calories are a measurement of a specific form of energy. Explicitly defined , explicitly measured as such.

There is a mathematical way convert energy into another form of energy but there is needed some kit or machinery in the world to be transformed

And the body doesn't have that

The physical thing that causes something to express heat is the energetic state of electrons , the valence.

The energy transfer between electrons or a food substances in a bath of water , is achieved via photons. Which are electromagnetic waves in the photon field which are at certain wavelengths we experience heat. Explicitly defined as such. We cant use it for a metabolic process. There is no equivalent between calories and actual physical work being undertaken by the human body.
We are often told that calorie in , calorie out is a good tool(not true) to predict what will happen to our weight over time if we control it. Youre not actually controlling your calorie intake if you do , you control the amount of food you eat/mass you are putting into your body. The only thing that affects your weight is the balance between mass and mass out , a case limiting example of energy in and energy out.

No amount of absorbing photons and taking out photons will change your mass.

Why not ?

Because photons don't have any mass that cant be brought to rest. You cannot change your weight by retaining photons it is mass retained that changes your weight

Calories arent appropriate measurement to calculate a bowl of food. It wont work effectively at losing weight for example unless you vastly under eat in order to "swamp in "signal to noise ratio"(noise in this context means something missing).

When you do exercise you use ATP , not calories

So its better to use a mass model to see how much you eat

In conclusion calories are complete nonsense to the human body
 
  • +1
Reactions: gigell
Stop eating carbs , when you get full stop eating and fasting

You worded that weirdly. Did you mean to say: "Stop eating carbs. When you get full, stop eating and start fasting"?
 
  • +1
Reactions: gigell and descension
For what purpose?
To spike your insulin, raise igf-1, and to get useless sugar it for sure does mog
raising igf1 from carbs is a myth
 
  • +1
Reactions: descension
it isnt
jewgle it
Most studies have no claims made by the sugar industry. But still if it did , i still eat carbs as i drink milk daily and other diary
 
  • +1
Reactions: descension
Most studies have no claims made by the sugar industry. But still if it did , i still eat carbs as i drink milk daily and other diary
It's pretty hard to cut out sugar all the way
And it's not easy to be in a state of ketosis all the time
 
  • +1
Reactions: gigell
For what purpose?
To spike your insulin, raise igf-1, and to get useless sugar it for sure does mog
These are subhumans problems or come from Unprocessed Carbs jfl

cutting out carbs is genuine goofball behaviour and low iq
 
These are subhumans problems or come from Unprocessed Carbs jfl

cutting out carbs is genuine goofball behaviour and low iq
It’s not , other animals eat species specific diets we should do the same. And humans are supposed to be carnivore. Carbs is just a backup for survival situations
 
  • JFL
Reactions: try2beme
It’s not , other animals eat species specific diets we should do the same. And humans are supposed to be carnivore. Carbs is just a backup for survival situations
Carbs are natural too jfl,

U dont know what ur talking about
 
Post ur physiques if carbs are terrible
Im skinny not a lot of muscle

This is not relevant

There’s a lot of bod builders that don’t eat carbs

And why would you bod build it’s not natural
 
  • JFL
Reactions: try2beme

Similar threads

Bonesbonesbonesbone
Replies
10
Views
185
Jamaldickjavontus
Jamaldickjavontus
armemann
Replies
35
Views
698
copamine
copamine
gigell
Replies
28
Views
362
disillusioned
disillusioned

Users who are viewing this thread

  • realrx
Back
Top