Why did British not get pajeetas pregnant??

[zoomermogg]

While the Alexander the Great wed his best men to Persian princesses and Spaniards bedded natives of South and Central America , whose offspring now constitute a big part of latam population (mestizos), and while the Japanese bedded Korean and Chinese women and what not, the British don’t seem to have done so with Indian and Pakistani women. There is no big offspring to be seen there. I don’t see million of British ancestry kids in India

What are the reasons?

 

[zoomermogg]

@Former Shortcel @denizfabio @Chadeep

 

[subhuman37]

While the Alexander the Great wed his best men to Persian princesses and Spaniards bedded natives of South and Central America , whose offspring now constitute a big part of latam population (mestizos), and while the Japanese bedded Korean and Chinese women and what not, the British don’t seem to have done so with Indian and Pakistani women. There is no big offspring to be seen there. I don’t see million of British ancestry kids in India

What are the reasons?

Bc they’re ugly

 

[Former Shortcel]

lol nigga got ragebaited so hard by me that he had to make a separate thread to seethe

You are now my pet

 

[zoomermogg]

lol nigga got ragebaited so hard by me that he had to make a separate thread to seethe

You are now my pet

Nigga I was rage baiting YOU get the fuck off org stop wasting your life bro

 

[Former Shortcel]

Nigga I was rage baiting get the fuck off org stop wasting your life bro

Schrodingers idiot

You legit had to go and make a separate thread because you were so upset

 

[zoomermogg]

Schrodingers idiot

You legit had to go and make a separate thread because you were so upset

“SchRodiNgErs” stop talking you stinky pajeet I don’t want your bad breath around here …

Bro heard “schrodingers” and thinks he is high iq

 

[Chadeep]

@jertbaksto

 

[Former Shortcel]

stop talking you stinky pajeet

 

[Ghoulish]

While the Alexander the Great wed his best men to Persian princesses and Spaniards bedded natives of South and Central America , whose offspring now constitute a big part of latam population (mestizos), and while the Japanese bedded Korean and Chinese women and what not, the British don’t seem to have done so with Indian and Pakistani women. There is no big offspring to be seen there. I don’t see million of British ancestry kids in India

What are the reasons?

Because britons were low t cucks but they did fuck lots of pajeetas in the south (not too many tho, total offspring was like 30k out of millions of Indians through the decades of rule.

The north west part of the continent was important for Britain since they relied on a racial hierarchy between south Asians to hold the British raj together, so they needed to appease the punjabis etc in the north so they could rule India for them, as they deemed them a “martial race”

Tldr, they raped and slaughtered the south of India but had to cater to the north because Punjabi bulls would’ve fucked them up.

 

[Hess]

Bcuz they are ugly, also british colonization was unique in that they brought their own peoples both men and women rather than rape the local population and dilute their bloodlines, colonial society also seperated itself from the locals and was very minimal there as the whole point of colonization there was just to utilize the resources and not establish much land there

 

[Hess]

Because britons were low t cucks but they did fuck lots of pajeetas in the south (not too many tho, total offspring was like 30k out of millions of Indians through the decades of rule.

The north west part of the continent was important for Britain since they relied on a racial hierarchy between south Asians to hold the British raj together, so they needed to appease the punjabis etc in the north so they could rule India for them, as they deemed them a “martial race”

Tldr, they raped and slaughtered the south of India but had to cater to the north because Punjabi bulls would’ve fucked them up.

Retarded take, they just brought their own society with them as well as their own women, not to mention that they kept settlement mostly minimal as the whole point was aquisition of resources as opposed to taking land itself, colonization like the spanish in which one mixed with the locals just lead to disgusting mutted out subhuman countries while british colonization which killed off the natives lead to the establishment of multiple first world and prosperous countries

 

[Ghoulish]

Retarded take, they just brought their own society with them as well as their own women, not to mention that they kept settlement mostly minimal as the whole point was aquisition of resources as opposed to taking land itself, colonization like the spanish in which one mixed with the locals just lead to disgusting mutted out subhuman countries while british colonization which killed off the natives lead to the establishment of multiple first world and prosperous countries

They DID produce mixed children, the Anglo Indian society are the descendants of them. Theyre all from south India tho which is why point. Anglos had to cater to the north west (pakistan and the Indian region of Punjab) and slaughtered and raped the south.

 

[Hess]

They DID produce mixed children, the Anglo Indian society are the descendants of them. Theyre all from south India tho which is why point. Anglos had to cater to the north west (pakistan and the Indian region of Punjab) and slaughtered and raped the south.

Ya, an extremely minimal did, the point of the british raj though was never actual settler colonialism though and they kept british migration to the raj fairly minimal, only just keeping a very small set of colonial brits in the raj to serve as governers and bureaucrats as the main purpose of the raj was commerce and not settler colonialism like australia, NZ, the americas or some african countries