Why did this Pakistani girl get so many underrates in the ratings section?

[Menalookingcurry]

I asked users to rate this Paki girl in the ratings section several days ago:

There were the results:

37% of voters said she is MTB or lower. I'm not trying to simp, but I think she's clearly above average. Were they just racist trolls or am I missing something?

 

[Matthias8272]

They probably did so because ethnic + plastered in makeup, but yeah she looks above average but not a stacy

 

[Acion]

She looks good especially for being ethnic but I personally think her lips are too big

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

my reaction to this bad bitch

 

[greycel]

She's a frauder

I rated her genetics compared to global.
A paki mother is a death sentence, for the kids bonemass/features
Doesn't matter what she looks like under filters + 10 layers of makeup

Low LTB genetics if contacts (globally)
Low MTB genetics if real eyes (globally), and this is an overrate.

Check this thread:

I can give many examples, Ive looked at hundreds of mothers and their chad children, online and good looking ppl IRL. Just look at this one:

Lady on left, terrabonemass

Same lady much older, incredible bone mass

Her son?

Spoiler: Answer

Or how about this bone fogger?

Spoiler: Answer

Spoiler: The man himself

 

[OldRooster]

Partly because she used so many filters she barely looks human. Partly because terms like MTB are stupid and mean different things to different people. Partly because there are users on this forum that never leave their parents basement and their only basis for comparison is Tiktok bimbos and porn sluts.

 

[horizontallytall]

She's a frauder

I rated her genetics compared to global.
A paki mother is a death sentence, for the kids bonemass/features
Doesn't matter what she looks like under filters + 10 layers of makeup

Low LTB genetics if contacts (globally)
Low MTB genetics if real eyes (globally), and this is an overrate.

Check this thread:

Woah dude great reply

 

[NoaA99]

She isn’t all that but most are just gay and she clearly has high female dimorphism, which apparently doesn’t appeal to most user here.

 

[NoaA99]

She's a frauder

I rated her genetics compared to global.
A paki mother is a death sentence, for the kids bonemass/features
Doesn't matter what she looks like under filters + 10 layers of makeup

Low LTB genetics if contacts (globally)
Low MTB genetics if real eyes (globally), and this is an overrate.

Check this thread:

What a load of bullshit.
Normal men pursue women instinctively, hence what nature dictates them to find attractive. Only autists and obsessive user here will approach it this way.
She clearly has high dimorphism and good proportions and yes more delicate or average bones, which is expected and attractive in women.
Men, that aren’t excessively emerged in the Blackpill and male aesthetics will rate her significantly above average.

 

[longjohnmong]

her clown makeup?

 

[Copeful]

htb with makeup but there’s so much she’s probably ltb without it

 

[normie_joe]

I asked users to rate this Paki girl in the ratings section several days ago:
View attachment 3185742View attachment 3185743View attachment 3185745View attachment 3185747

There were the results:
View attachment 3185751

37% of voters said she is MTB or lower. I'm not trying to simp, but I think she's clearly above average. Were they just racist trolls or am I missing something?

Her face is layered with so much makeup that it only shows the slight semblance of a woman.

 

[greycel]

What a load of bullshit.
Normal men pursue women instinctively, hence what nature dictates them to find attractive. Only autists and obsessive user here will approach it this way.
She clearly has high dimorphism and good proportions and yes more delicate or average bones, which is expected and attractive in women.
Men, that aren’t excessively emerged in the Blackpill and male aesthetics will rate her significantly above average.

Did you not read what I said you twat

I rated her genetics compared to global.

Looking good from a subjective standpoint, when averaged, has a strong correlation with ideal objective genetic quality, which is why we "instinctively" decide to go for women.
I skipped the correlation and went straight to rating her genes.
To call that a "load of bullshit"

You ignorant dog.
I don't care if other guys are deluded enough to allow frauding/emotions/ignorance, affect what they deem to be physically ideal.
It won't change reality
It will never be objectively fit. It will never translate to the next generation

Don't even bother replying to question my ability at doing so now. You didn't decide to earlier, and it's the only thread you can pull.
I don't need to prove myself to some lowlife like you.

 

[NoaA99]

Did you not read what I said you twat


Looking good from a subjective standpoint, when averaged, has a strong correlation with ideal objective genetic quality, which is why we "instinctively" decide to go for women.
I skipped the correlation and went straight to rating her genes.
To call that a "load of bullshit"

You ignorant dog.
I don't care if other guys are deluded enough to allow frauding/emotions/ignorance, affect what they deem to be physically ideal.
It won't change reality
It will never be objectively fit. It will never translate to the next generation

Don't even bother replying to question my ability at doing so now. You didn't decide to earlier, and it's the only thread you can pull.
I don't need to prove myself to some lowlife like you.

Just relax and stop acting like a hurt animal.
You really broke the charts with that realisation.
It’s just, that a biased sample like in this forum can’t be taken seriously for actual objective rating accuracy.
What are your objective criteria then for superior genetic quality in females? High Bone mass? Hunter eyes? In a women?
So as usual the sole focus lies on potentially producing superior male offspring.
Of course, this is what normal men instinctively go for in real life environments, hence masculine and high Test women are always the most desired ones.

I already said before that she in particular isn’t all that and yes highly frauded as most women are, however she’s definitely not low average range, unless you are a closeted gay.
Your perception is simply warped. Ultimately scientific research determines objective beauty or in your words genetic quality, not some narcissistic incel like you.

 

[greycel]

Just relax and stop acting like a hurt animal.
You really broke the charts with that realisation.
It’s just, that a biased sample like in this forum can’t be taken seriously for actual objective rating accuracy.
What are your objective criteria then for superior genetic quality in females? High Bone mass? Hunter eyes? In a women?
So as usual the sole focus lies on potentially producing superior male offspring.
Of course, this is what normal men instinctively go for in real life environments, hence masculine and high Test women are always the most desired ones.

I already said before that she in particular isn’t all that and yes highly frauded as most women are, however she’s definitely not low average range, unless you are a closeted gay.
Your perception is simply warped. Ultimately scientific research determines objective beauty or in your words genetic quality, not some narcissistic incel like you.

Like I said
I knew you would pull on this only thread.

And like I said.
I'm not going to explain myself to you.

If you were nicer with your initial approach rather than starting with "what a load of bullshit", I'd have given you my knowledge.
You don't deserve to benefit from knowing what I know

Chase this girl if you'd like. Your future is of no concern to me
But I'm not going to get tempted to replying to your narcissistic ass, because you're trying to egobait me.

Reply again to me
It took you 20 mins to conjure up this load of bullshit
Waste another 20 mins of your life

 

[NoaA99]

Like I said
I knew you would pull on this only thread.

And like I said.
I'm not going to explain myself to you.

If you were nicer with your initial approach rather than starting with "what a load of bullshit", I'd have given you my knowledge.
You don't deserve to benefit from knowing what I know

Chase this girl if you'd like. Your future is of no concern to me
But I'm not going to get tempted to replying to your narcissistic ass, because you're trying to egobait me.

Reply again to me
It took you 20 mins to conjure up this load of bullshit
Waste another 20 mins of your life

I gladly want to hear about that knowledge, though I don’t know how I’d benefit from it. Sorry for my initial rather unkind response.

I don’t have to chase anyone anymore. I am in a relationship since over 3 years lmao and the sole purpose why I am still prevalent in this TikTok infested forum is, that there are some quality threads, that can be beneficial for my upcoming and medically necessary jaw surgery.

 

[greycel]

I gladly want to hear about that knowledge, though I don’t know how I’d benefit from it. Sorry for my initial rather unkind response.

I don’t have to chase anyone anymore. I am in a relationship since over 3 years lmao and the sole purpose why I am still prevalent in this TikTok infested forum is, that there are some quality threads, that can be beneficial for my upcoming and medically necessary jaw surgery.

Check this post:

Rate these indian girls

First girl is stacylite easily @Jason Voorhees @SidharthTheSlayer @StrangerDanger

looksmax.org

I've outlined a few

I could make a very long thread on this, talking about every trend I've personally seen / read upon.
And I can talk about each of their significance in terms of evolutionary desirability
Acknowledging priorities

But anyways for now, I took all of that into account when I outlined the general 3/4 points in that post.
Bonemass is most important, which is why I say that 99% of Pajeetas/Pakistanis/most Asians are unfit to have children with.
Craniofacial development isn't.
Ramus length is.
Infra shape that determines medial canthus is very hereditary. Most people think it's to do with skin elasticity but that's not true it's the shape of the infra bone largely

And ye that's for sclera show too

There's a lot more bro, but u should just do your research.
The interesting part isn't this but it's the trends I've seen between children and parents, from many years of analysing similarities, differences and how similiar/different too

Anyways, this girl is far from special. So you'd benefit more from breeding with (on average) 50+% of women if her eyes are real.. and much less if contacts