Tall midwit
Iron
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2026
- Posts
- 31
- Reputation
- 25
90% of them are horrible. They're overly verbose and pretentious asl in the way they're written, extremely unintuitive.
You have your studies that have horrible methadology, it's not 1960 why is your study using a small sample size, why does your study have short time, i don't want to read a study on the effects of smt on the human body only for it to have been run for like a month with half its participants quitting.
You have topics that have existed for decades now, with not enough studies to end basic discourse in them. Why are we still discussing muscle growth optimization. Why are we still discussing Accutane accumulative dosage in relation to relapse.
You have your studies that have horrible methadology, it's not 1960 why is your study using a small sample size, why does your study have short time, i don't want to read a study on the effects of smt on the human body only for it to have been run for like a month with half its participants quitting.
You have topics that have existed for decades now, with not enough studies to end basic discourse in them. Why are we still discussing muscle growth optimization. Why are we still discussing Accutane accumulative dosage in relation to relapse.