Why do ethnics even find white people attractive?

[Deleted member 21340]

somewhat , there will always be a genetic element esp when it comes to bone structure development and muscle development >
its a mix of both nature(genetic) and nurture(society)

its just not though
literally everything in your life is determined by your genes
your race, iq, personality, height, who and what youre sexually attracted to, athletic ability, bone structure and so on - everything that matters in this world is determined by your genetic code

blaming something on "nurture" is just a lazy euphemism for saying someone has undesirable genes

 

[tallnegga]

over for moai heads like you.

Show us yourself curry

 

[darkness97]

you cant socially condition someone to be sexually attracted to something they arent
otherwise the blackpill wouldnt exist
people wouldnt be attracted to 8psl white chads if attraction was the result of "social conditioning"
we're animals who are hard wired to find certain phenotypes attractive, its why youre on looksmax.org in the first place

i understand but you are conflating general attractiveness and race. and by social conditioning it goes far beyond just media's influence because you can choose what type of media to consume. when i talk about social conditioning i mean placing a white girl in a black neighborhood, having her raised there, and seeing what she will prefer.

she will more likely gravitate towards black music, black culture and black ideas because that is just what she has been around.

she will still prefer 8psl men, but 8psl men that are black. this is what i mean by exposure.

 

[Deleted member 2382]

you cant socially condition someone to be sexually attracted to something they arent
otherwise the blackpill wouldnt exist
people wouldnt be attracted to 8psl white chads if attraction was the result of "social conditioning"
we're animals who are hard wired to find certain phenotypes attractive, its why youre on looksmax.org in the first place

Attraction is only objective at the extreme ends
If you ignore all men under 25 who can run skin halo game to overcome their bone shortcomings, then only a tiny percentage of men are objectively attractive. For everyone who lays on the subjective part of the spectrum, it is a brutal fight to reproduce because you will have guys who most would consider to be genetic shit, outperforming above average guys because of retarded trivial shit foids care about that the male brain can't comprehend

I cannot comprehend how any female on earth who isn't black could find this man attractive enough to have sex with

But put him on stage and give him a following and suddenly women are somehow able to develop attraction towards him to the point where they would fuck him

The ironic thing about women is that they are the pickiest creatures of any animal species when it comes to selecting a mate
Yet under specific circumstances they would be willing to fuck a 2.5/10

I would be fine with it if they were consistently Chad only across the board but the fact they also decide to fuck some subhumans while expressing disgust towards above average guys, really makes me wish they could all suffer

 

[Deleted member 21340]

You seriously believe in "BlackPill", when literally everyday in your life you see the direct contradiction to this theory right in the street?

Looks are important, but BLACKPILL IS AUTISM Though funny NGL

Lol this is bullshit. OFC NOT. A LOT of things in attraction are not determined by looks. How do Women love Ed Sheeran, this ginger ugly midget, if everything is determined by "looks"?

First LOOKS ARE NOT OBJECTIVE. There is a LOT of variation. What is the bullshit about Prettyboy vs Masc all about then? This argument itself contradicts the tenet of Blackpill, that attraction is objective.

Fairy tale though.

Black people and asians are not insects though my Nazi friend

blackpill is essentially genetic determinism but only in regards to physical attraction
so yes like everything else in life, the blackpill is mostly correct considering genes are the main factor and therefore decider

and looks are objective otherwise lookism, which you should know is very real, wouldnt exist
the reason why women "like" ed sheeran is because of his recourses (wealth) and status (fame), he would make the perfect beta buxx provider for their off spring

and the insects was just an analogy
genetically distinct groups, sub species, species, races whatever you want to call them usually aren't sexually attracted to one another so why are ethnics attracted to whites

 

[darkness97]

its just not though
literally everything in your life is determined by your genes
your race, iq, personality, height, who and what youre sexually attracted to, athletic ability, bone structure and so on - everything that matters in this world is determined by your genetic code

blaming something on "nurture" is just a lazy euphemism for saying someone has undesirable genes

it is and it isn't. people are a little bit more malleable than that i would say. it is a mixture of both nature and nurture. otherwise, the Flynn effect wouldn't exist.

your race is for ssure determined by genes. iq, yeah i would say so but people are getting smarted over time and this has to do with television, better education, better food and nutrition.

who and what you are sexually attracted to is wrong i would say. personality as well. have you never heard of a white acting black guy (oreo) or wonder bread italian? personality and prefrences are more malleable. athletic ability yeah i would say so. not everything is genetics.

 

[Deleted member 4362]

Attraction is only objective at the extreme ends
If you ignore all men under 25 who can run skin halo game to overcome their bone shortcomings, then only a tiny percentage of men are objectively attractive. For everyone who lays on the subjective part of the spectrum, it is a brutal fight to reproduce because you will have guys who most would consider to be genetic shit, outperforming above average guys because of retarded trivial shit foids care about that the male brain can't comprehend

I cannot comprehend how any female on earth who isn't black could find this man attractive enough to have sex with

View attachment 1920219

But put him on stage and give him a following and suddenly women are somehow able to develop attraction towards him to the point where they would fuck him

View attachment 1920222

The ironic thing about women is that they are the pickiest creatures of any animal species when it comes to selecting a mate
Yet under specific circumstances they would be willing to fuck a 2.5/10

I would be fine with it if they were consistently Chad only across the board but the fact they also decide to fuck some subhumans while expressing disgust towards above average guys, really makes me wish they could all suffer

6’5 deep voice, dimorphic + DarkTriad is enough. Doubt he was incel even before the fame.

 

[Artemis]

blackpill is essentially genetic determinism but only in regards to physical attraction
so yes like everything else in life, the blackpill is mostly correct considering genes are the main factor and therefore decider
and looks are objective otherwise lookism, which you should know is very real, wouldnt exist

Dude i just gave you an example that directly contradicts the BlackPill: ED fucking SHEERAN.

Lookism is NOT saying that EVERYTHING in life is determined by looks. Looks are important, but NOTHING EVEN CLOSE to objective OR completely determining. And blackpill is autism

"Muh blackpill, muh genetic determinism"

Blackpill SO VERY determinate

the reason why women "like" ed sheeran is because of his recourses (wealth) and status (fame), he would make the perfect beta buxx provider for their off spring

You literally contradicting what YOU yourself said. So money IS important then?

BUT BUT BUT MONEY != LOOKS/GENES omg

 

[tallnegga]

over for moai heads like you.

Why you quite now curry? Show us what you look like. I’m sure you’re just another ethnic femboy who has less sexual dimorphism than my little sister

 

[Bipedal Dog]

Cuz whites are better evolved and developed

 

[Deleted member 21340]

it is and it isn't. people are a little bit more malleable than that i would say. it is a mixture of both nature and nurture. otherwise, the Flynn effect wouldn't exist.

your race is for ssure determined by genes. iq, yeah i would say so but people are getting smarted over time and this has to do with television, better education, better food and nutrition.

who and what you are sexually attracted to is wrong i would say. personality as well. have you never heard of a white acting black guy (oreo) or wonder bread italian? personality and prefrences are more malleable. athletic ability yeah i would say so. not everything is genetics.

in the west, a stable environment that is
your genes determine your entire life
look at the various amount of twin studies that have been conducted
- here's one for example
- heres another
twins even when separated at birth and placed in two utterly contrasting environments still end up being the exact same people, they'll have the same habits, the same personality, same likes and interests, same height, same weight. SAME EVERYTHING
because they share the exact same genes

its so utterly bluepilled to think one can manipulate their destiny and act like it wasnt already set in stone the second they were born

 

[Deleted member 17920]

i

Dude i just gave you an example that directly contradicts the BlackPill: ED fucking SHEERAN.

Lookism is NOT saying that EVERYTHING in life is determined by looks. Looks are important, but NOTHING EVEN CLOSE to objective OR completely determining. And blackpill is autism

"Muh blackpill, muh genetic determinism"

Blackpill SO VERY determinate

You literally contradicting what YOU yourself said. So money IS important then?

BUT BUT BUT MONEY != LOOKS/GENES omg

in what world is ed sheeran attractive? i’ve seen many tiktoks where they make fun of his looks, couldn’t say the same for Brad Pitt or Vinnie Hacker. Also you don’t need looks to get money, it helps you though. Better looking men earn more on average, and artists like Central Cee have 50% of their fan base because of looks

 

[Deleted member 21340]

Cuz whites are better evolved and developed

there's no such thing as "better evolved and developed" you have to be more precise, better developed at doing x or y
evolution doesn't have a purpose nor a destination so you cant quantify whether a species is "better evolved" or not

 

[Artemis]

i

in what world is ed sheeran attractive? i’ve seen many tiktoks where they make fun of his looks, couldn’t say the same for Brad Pitt or Vinnie Hacker.

He sleeps with A LOT of women, there are rumours he fucked multiple Victoria Secret models. In fact, there are probably MORE women who think Ed Sheeran > Brad Pitt, than visa versa.

A few haters of Sheeran online actually would probably jump into the sac with him at the first opportunity.

Also you don’t need looks to get money, it helps you though. Better looking men earn more on average, and artists like Central Cee have 50% of their fan base because of looks

And also you do not need looks to get women IF you have MONEY.

You can literally sleep with top notch gold diggers until the very end. This contradicts the blackpill. Blackpill in its autism says that nothing is relevant but looks WHICH IS FALSE

 

[Deleted member 17920]

He sleeps with A LOT of women, there are rumours he fucked multiple Victoria Secret models. In fact, there are probably MORE women who think Ed Sheeran > Brad Pitt, than visa versa.

A few haters of Sheeran online actually would probably jump into the sac with him at the first opportunity.

And also you do not need looks to get women IF you have MONEY.

You can literally sleep with top notch gold diggers until the very end. This contradicts the blackpill. Blackpill in its autism says that nothing is relevant but looks WHICH IS FALSE

Obviously him literally being in the top 20 of most famous people, also no, people would not say ed sheeran is more attractive is more attractive than brad pitt.

Let me ask you if it’s easier to become a millionaire, or pay 40-60k to ascend through surgery? Improving your looks has the best ROI, even redpillers preach this jfl.

i agree with you though that people over exaggerate the effect of “genetic determinism” on your money/success.

also you type very over expressively with your emojis, are you a faggot?

 

[darkness97]

in the west, a stable environment that is
your genes determine your entire life
look at the various amount of twin studies that have been conducted
- here's one for example
- heres another
twins even when separated at birth and placed in two utterly contrasting environments still end up being the exact same people, they'll have the same habits, the same personality, same likes and interests, same height, same weight. SAME EVERYTHING
because they share the exact same genes

its so utterly bluepilled to think one can manipulate their destiny and act like it wasnt already set in stone the second they were born

yeaah i guesss but it's not the greatest argument.

i think the biggest flaw in your reasoning is your refusal to accept variability. speaking in absolutes is not the best way to represent human behavior. you can speak to perhaps a tendency but it is really difficult to make a strong claim without a proper study.

the experiment cannot be done ethically so we can only theorize. based on my experiences an just what makes logical sense to me i think it is just exposure.

if everything was predetermined by genetics then white acting black people or interracial couples wouldn't exist. the very thing that allows these things to happen in the first place is exposure. when i also speak to tendency it is also important to acknowledge that interracial couples are comparatively rare. these things wouldn't have been able to happen centuries ago because there was no real exposure to the extent we have today.

 

[Deleted member 21340]

yeaah i guesss but it's not the greatest argument.

i think the biggest flaw in your reasoning is your refusal to accept variability. speaking in absolutes is not the best way to represent human behavior. you can speak to perhaps a tendency but it is really difficult to make a strong claim without a proper study.

the experiment cannot be done ethically so we can only theorize. based on my experiences an just what makes logical sense to me i think it is just exposure.

if everything was predetermined by genetics then white acting black people or interracial couples wouldn't exist. the very thing that allows these things to happen in the first place is exposure. when i also speak to tendency it is also important to acknowledge that interracial couples are comparatively rare. these things wouldn't have been able to happen centuries ago because there was no real exposure to the extent we have today.

human behavior is best described in absolutes
we are merely animals at the subjugation of our genes, to think we are any more than that is borderline delusional and a narcissistic fallacy founded on the belief that humans are ever so "superior" and "higher" than other species which has inevitably came to the conclusion that we're capable of manipulating our destiny

we're not, its a fairy tale
and i dont understand how you havent realized this yet

 

[darkness97]

human behavior is best described in absolutes

cmon man, enough with the jokes. i'm being serious

the very title of this thread that you wrote says otherwise. the debate was never if people are capable of finding other races attractive, it was why.

i give you reasons, and you still cant wrap your head around it happening in reality in the first place. exposure is like the lowest level most basic explanation that cannot be wrong, but cannot be proven to be the entire answer.

you are literally denying the reality of interracial relationships existing because it doesn't fit your claim of genetic predeterminism. it does exist, it has to, but to what extent is the real debate.

 

[Deleted member 21340]

cmon man, enough with the jokes. i'm being serious

the very title of this thread that you wrote says otherwise. the debate was never if people are capable of finding other races attractive, it was why.

i give you reasons, and you still cant wrap your head around it happening in reality in the first place. exposure is like the lowest level most basic explanation that cannot be wrong, but cannot be proven to be the entire answer.

you are literally denying the reality of interracial relationships existing because it doesn't fit your claim of genetic predeterminism. it does exist, it has to, but to what extent is the real debate.

im not denying the existence of interracial relationships
all i was doing was questioning your answer as to why, which was mere exposure being one of the causes

 

[anactualdude]

biologically it doesn't make a lot of sense
i mean, crocodiles only find other crocodiles attractive, koalas only find other koalas attractive and it's practically the same with every other species on the planet
hybrids are extremely rare and unnatural for a reason because they don't make a lot of evolutionary sense

so why are ethnics even capable of finding whites physically attractive in the first place and to go as far as to preferring whites to their very own kind??

because we’re not….. a different species????

 

[Deleted member 22124]

We're wired to like dissimilarities in appearance to avoid incest

 

[Deleted member 18361]

though ur point is invalid, i still get what you’re asking

and the way i see it is culture is beauty. ethnics grew up in a culture where their favorite shows/movies are white main characters. the most popular singers are white

 

[Detona]

white females have submissive personalty tight pussy

Coping level 9000