Why Do Females get mad when you Don't give them a seat on the Train?

inyerta

inyerta

Kraken
Joined
Dec 24, 2025
Posts
3,241
Reputation
5,967


What women refer to as "chivalry" was actually just an unspoken agreement between men and other men. Random women barely factored into it. The vast majority of men were indirectly in on the agreement whether they realized it or not. It was self-interest at play.

Chivalry was a code of conduct that mainly revolved around treating your inferiors with kindness. Not "inferior" in the derogatory sense either, but the natural assumption was that capable adult men were physically, intellectually and morally superior than other members of society (or should be). If you throw it that assumption then the chivalrous code of conduct goes with it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MangoLover, pleasevanity, jkxdy and 2 others
Foids have no power other than the power/influence that men voluntarily give them.

Then they use that power to humiliate, dominate and destroy the men that gave them power.

They vote for and promote every society destroying policy they can, import every nigger and shitskin on the plannet and stab straight white men in the back every chance they get.

They see all the guardrails of life and community and society and nations as >"Muh, oppressive."

And also want to be mens competition in the workplace, then have the stupidity of thinking the very men they are fucking over will jump through hoops to impress them and give up seats on public transport.

1782602134855
 
  • +1
Reactions: DoNotResusciate, pleasevanity, jkxdy and 1 other person
they are feminist only when it benefits them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jkxdy and inyerta
they are feminist only when it benefits them.
all questions of female behavior just need to be filtered through this quote first:

Women crave for being loved, not for loving. They scream out at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving any in return, for they cannot remember your affairs long enough to do so... They cannot state a fact accurately to another, nor can that other attend to it accurately enough for it to become information. Now is not all this the result of want of sympathy?... I am sick with indignation at what wives and mothers will do of the most egregious selfishness. And people call it all maternal or conjugal affection, and think it pretty to say so. No, no, let each person tell the truth from their own experience.
- Florence Nightingale
 
  • +1
Reactions: jkxdy and eyes33
View attachment 5281467

What women refer to as "chivalry" was actually just an unspoken agreement between men and other men. Random women barely factored into it. The vast majority of men were indirectly in on the agreement whether they realized it or not. It was self-interest at play.

Chivalry was a code of conduct that mainly revolved around treating your inferiors with kindness. Not "inferior" in the derogatory sense either, but the natural assumption was that capable adult men were physically, intellectually and morally superior than other members of society (or should be). If you throw it that assumption then the chivalrous code of conduct goes with it.
isint that nga reporter for the ufc lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: jkxdy
Ngl I would give up my seat ( I always do that) but complaining about it is weird because most of these females support feminism and all that bs
 
  • +1
Reactions: jkxdy
View attachment 5281467

What women refer to as "chivalry" was actually just an unspoken agreement between men and other men. Random women barely factored into it. The vast majority of men were indirectly in on the agreement whether they realized it or not. It was self-interest at play.

Chivalry was a code of conduct that mainly revolved around treating your inferiors with kindness. Not "inferior" in the derogatory sense either, but the natural assumption was that capable adult men were physically, intellectually and morally superior than other members of society (or should be). If you throw it that assumption then the chivalrous code of conduct goes with it.
bitches expect everything handed to them but never reciprocated
 
And also want to be mens competition in the workplace, then have the stupidity of thinking the very men they are fucking over will jump through hoops to impress them and give up seats on public transport.
this is a good point
 
Foids have no power other than the power/influence that men voluntarily give them.

Then they use that power to humiliate, dominate and destroy the men that gave them power.

They vote for and promote every society destroying policy they can, import every nigger and shitskin on the plannet and stab straight white men in the back every chance they get.

They see all the guardrails of life and community and society and nations as >"Muh, oppressive."

And also want to be mens competition in the workplace, then have the stupidity of thinking the very men they are fucking over will jump through hoops to impress them and give up seats on public transport.

View attachment 5281498
What a stupid fucking poster. :ROFLMAO: Pretty sure rape is entirely optional too. :forcedsmile:
 

Similar threads

pslturi
Replies
19
Views
63
Whoever
Whoever
LowTierBateman
Replies
13
Views
71
lit
lit
Arrlo
Replies
3
Views
29
byro..
byro..
valentine
Replies
36
Views
174
swedchud
swedchud
leckerman
Replies
9
Views
52
_Nazareth_
_Nazareth_

Users who are viewing this thread

  • inyerta
  • MangoLover
  • Gengar’s Ghost
  • DoNotResusciate
Back
Top