Why do HGH

[greycell42]

Genuinely, I'm curious why I, as a 16-year-old would inject 8 IU of HGH per week for several months when a 16–17-year-old naturally produces roughly 4–7 IU per day in perfectly timed pulses that are far more biologically effective than any flat exogenous dose. Why then do people promote HGH, because it just sounds like I'm getting less if i inject it exogenously rather than getting it naturally? please prove me wrong and stay patient i know i'm a retard

just trynna ascent brah

 

[Zagro]

Genuinely, I'm curious why I, as a 16-year-old would inject 8 IU of HGH per week for several months when a 16–17-year-old naturally produces roughly 4–7 IU per day in perfectly timed pulses that are far more biologically effective than any flat exogenous dose. Why then do people promote HGH, because it just sounds like I'm getting less if i inject it exogenously rather than getting it naturally? please prove me wrong and stay patient i know i'm a retard

just trynna ascent brah

Yes bro that 30 minute spike in igf-1 levels will surely be better i agree, it’s almost as if it isn’t guaranteed and as “perfectly” timed as you might think it is. We actually produce 20 units daily bro because this one study showed a spike of 20 units so anything lower than 20 units is bad bro yes pulsatile vs continuous bro 8 units throughout the whole day is worse then 20 minutes

And no you also don’t even have spikes that high at 16-17 and no you probably aren’t an exception nor do you have “late puberty”