Elmo The Faggot
All of your "facts" are just mere opinions to me.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2025
- Posts
- 159
- Reputation
- 360
It's just such a fucking sad excuse of a cope to pass off sex/nude scenes as "art."
Most people just play with themselves while watching nudity or sex scenes on TV/movies.
Does anyone think 50 Shades of Grey is "artistic?" Is any tits/nude scene art?
It's 40+ fat bitches rubbing their pussy to clean porn. It's people fapping.
Just like porn, people watch it to play with themselves, not "for art."
Why the fuck is there still this cope that "nudity is an art form?"
If stroking my dick or people masturbating to it is "art" then sure, call it what you want.
But who the fuck watches nude scenes and considers it art? It's almost always sexual.
It's just fap material & all actors who do nudity are just making porn for people to fap to. Can anyone tell me otherwise? No normal person watches sexual scenes for "art."
For example, when DiCaprio paints the naked bitch on Titantic, is that art or arousal?
When we see tits or nudity or sex scenes we humans are instinctually driven to fap, not process it as "art." You can appreciate a film & fap to the nudity, but that's not just "art."
How can anyone consider -- unless maybe asexual -- bouncy tits or asses or fully nude people prancing around with alluring bodies to be "purely art form, not sexual?" JFL.
Most people just play with themselves while watching nudity or sex scenes on TV/movies.
Does anyone think 50 Shades of Grey is "artistic?" Is any tits/nude scene art?
It's 40+ fat bitches rubbing their pussy to clean porn. It's people fapping.
Just like porn, people watch it to play with themselves, not "for art."
Why the fuck is there still this cope that "nudity is an art form?"
If stroking my dick or people masturbating to it is "art" then sure, call it what you want.
But who the fuck watches nude scenes and considers it art? It's almost always sexual.
It's just fap material & all actors who do nudity are just making porn for people to fap to. Can anyone tell me otherwise? No normal person watches sexual scenes for "art."
For example, when DiCaprio paints the naked bitch on Titantic, is that art or arousal?
When we see tits or nudity or sex scenes we humans are instinctually driven to fap, not process it as "art." You can appreciate a film & fap to the nudity, but that's not just "art."
How can anyone consider -- unless maybe asexual -- bouncy tits or asses or fully nude people prancing around with alluring bodies to be "purely art form, not sexual?" JFL.
Last edited:
