Why do people like white girls

[Deleted member 6273]

I mean I see where your coming from but do you consider the South African phenotypes to be closer to white Women? How is the south Sudanese phenotype closer to that of a white women the ones I’m showing you look fairly different to that of a white woman.

your correct that me saying that more negroid like features are more unattractive but that’s no different than saying British or Irish women or the more Northern European women just lack attention features compared to their southern counterparts. How do those women make up the minority you can find more aquiline features in the saheal region which is the belt of Africa, eastern African countries like Rwanda Tanzania and Kenya some southern African Bantus can look more East African the horn and some parts of South Sudan.

the places to where you don’t see this is in western African and Central Africa.

lol bro you said bantus were unattractive, the vast majority of black south Africans are bantu the name originated from there btw, majority of Tanzania, Kenya and Rwanda too are bantu, approximately only 10% of africans are caucasoids, and even then they aren't fully caucasoid in their bone structures, they are classified as such to keep the Hamitic theory consistent.

so essentially what you're saying is that 90% of populations in Africa are unattractive and the 10% who are attractive have a similar bone structure and several features to white women except maybe south sudanese or nilo sahara people.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

lol bro you said bantus were unattractive, the vast majority of black south Africans are bantu the name originated from there btw, majority of Tanzania, Kenya and Rwanda too are bantu, approximately only 10% of africans are caucasoids, and even then they aren't fully caucasoid in their bone structures, they are classified as such to keep the Hamitic theory consistent.

so essentially what you're saying is that 90% of populations in Africa are unattractive and the 10% who are attractive have a similar bone structure and several features to white women except maybe south sudanese or nilo sahara people.

The thing is Bantus don’t represent a race South African women look different than the western African women. Even the himba Bantu tribe still look more attractive than some of the women in west Africa. Each race has their attractive phenotypes and their unattractive phenotypes.

I’m just talking about phenotypes I’m not just talking about Caucasianiod features in black Africans some Africans can have more mongliod like features or a mix between that. Africa was the birthplace of humans so it makes sense

the Hamitic theory was just another way to deny civilization to sub Saharan Africans it was used when they saw obvious civilization in west and Central Africa they all just contributed it to the so called “Hamitic race” as a way of denying any credibility to black Africans in their own civilizations it what the exact cause of the Rwandan genocide. Caucasianiod features were naturally developed in some ethnic groups and today we have arclogical and crinal data to prove this

 

[Deleted member 6273]

The thing is Bantus don’t represent a race South African women look different than the western African women. Even the himba Bantu tribe still look more attractive than some of the women in west Africa. Each race has their attractive phenotypes and their unattractive phenotypes.

West Africans aren't bantus first of all, bantu populations in South Africa literally originated from central Africa lol, most moved into the region less than 1000 years ago, they look phenotypically very similar to say Congolese with slight variations on average, the vast majority of South Africans either have very little or no khoid or sanid dna.

These are bantus in South Africa on average and the other pic are central African bantus and north bantus in countries like Tanzania

You can see they look similar with slight variations to things like skin colour

I’m just talking about phenotypes I’m not just talking about Caucasianiod features in black Africans some Africans can have more mongliod like features or a mix between that. Africa was the birthplace of humans so it makes sense

that's very fucking rare lmao and you also said caucasianiod features multiple times, majority (at least 90%) of African women neither have caucasonoid nor mongoloid features, and the ones who do like horn africans have a significant amount eurasian ad mixture, which others either don't or have minimal amounts.

the Hamitic theory was just another way to deny civilization to sub Saharan Africans it was used when they saw obvious civilization in west and Central Africa they all just contributed it to the so called “Hamitic race” as a way of denying any credibility to black Africans in their own civilizations it what the exact cause of the Rwandan genocide. Caucasianiod features were naturally developed in some ethnic groups and today we have arclogical and crinal data to prove this

yeah that's what I was implying lol, horn Africans aren't "true" caucasians, they were classified that way to justify the hamitic theory.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

West Africans aren't bantus first of all, bantu populations in South Africa literally originated from central Africa lol, most moved into the region less than 1000 years ago, they look phenotypically very similar to say Congolese with slight variations on average, the vast majority of South Africans either have very little or no khoid or sanid dna.

These are bantus in South Africa on average and the other pic are central African bantus and north bantus in countries like Tanzania

View attachment 1259651View attachment 1259652View attachment 1259653
You can see they look similar with slight variations to things like skin colour

that's very fucking rare lmao and you also said caucasianiod features multiple times, majority (at least 90%) of African women neither have caucasonoid nor mongoloid features, and the ones who do like horn africans have a significant amount eurasian ad mixture, which others either don't or have minimal amounts.

yeah that's what I was implying lol, horn Africans aren't "true" caucasians, they were classified that way to justify the hamitic theory.

Your right that horners do have Eurasian dna and I’ll be delusional in denying it but I don’t take something that happened in the Neolithic era and likely the Eurasians they mixed with wouldn’t had looked too different from the horners and the Eurasians themselves were one of the first populations out of Africa so would you personally still consider that mixed?

I’ve always thought that southern Africans are mixed with Khoisan populations since their skin is lighter on average but that could be the climate of South Africa changing their skin after a while, also correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t the Bantu people originate in the Cameroon?

Honestly there’s no such thing as the Caucasian race because genetically actual Caucasians from the caucuses are genetically distinct from Europeans same with middle Easterns. Horners are just a ancient mix of Neolithic Nilotic populations and Neolithic populations from the Levent it’s why despite them being related to Eurasians and Africans they still predate these populations I think considering the horners as their own separate group is a lot better than claiming them as black or mixed.

I mean even certain populations in west Africa like Mali northern sengal and senagambia they could look fairly different from southern west Africans like Nigerians and Ghanaians though they admittedly look very similar to one another I find that the senagambaiana tend to be better looking with better facial development compared to other western Africans also you have groups like the Fulani and wodaabe who are one of the largest populations in west Africa and they have more quote on quote Caucasian features I think it’s more common than you think.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Your right that horners do have Eurasian dna and I’ll be delusional in denying it but I don’t take something that happened in the Neolithic era and likely the Eurasians they mixed with wouldn’t had looked too different from the horners and the Eurasians themselves were one of the first populations out of Africa so would you personally still consider that mixed?

They would look different you can even see a significant phenotypic difference betweem the tygray people who have nearly 50/50 nilotic and west eurasian dna and Maasai who have about 19% west Eurasian dna. They are intermediate populations and cluster between nilotics and contemporary west eurasians.

I’ve always thought that southern Africans are mixed with Khoisan populations since their skin is lighter on average but that could be the climate of South Africa changing their skin after a while, also correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t the Bantu people originate in the Cameroon?

It could be a geographical adaptation since south Africa is far from the equator, most South Africans aren't that light btw, some South Africans also are colored and have European ancestry but most do not. Yes they did originate from Cameroon but majority of Bantu populations are located in centtral Africa and southern africa

Honestly there’s no such thing as the Caucasian race because genetically actual Caucasians from the caucuses are genetically distinct from Europeans same with middle Easterns. Horners are just a ancient mix of Neolithic Nilotic populations and Neolithic populations from the Levent it’s why despite them being related to Eurasians and Africans they still predate these populations I think considering the horners as their own separate group is a lot better than claiming them as black or mixed.

This has nothing to do with my arguement, I'm also going by what earlier anthropologist used to classify groups in terms of features, my point is they look phenotypically different and you only use them, nilotics and sehelians who all have external admixture and make less than 10% of Africa's population and you acknowledge the 90% outside of niche groups like Fulani as being unattractive lol.

I mean even certain populations in west Africa like Mali northern sengal and senagambia they could look fairly different from southern west Africans like Nigerians and Ghanaians though they admittedly look very similar to one another I find that the senagambaiana tend to be better looking with better facial development compared to other western Africans also you have groups like the Fulani and wodaabe who are one of the largest populations in west Africa and they have more quote on quote Caucasian features I think it’s more common than you think.

Senegambians look like stereotypical west Africans with darker skin like those you'll see in like France like Kante and Pogba, Fulani have external ad mixture btw the ones with low amounts look like typical west Africans, the Nigerian president himself is Fulani does he look unique to other Nigerians.

The most ironic part of all this is you only consider around 10% of Africa's population of women as attractive, while the 90% you consider them as unattractive, also Caribbean, south American and North American blacks are primarily of west/central African origin with some European and Native ad mixture.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

They would look different you can even see a significant phenotypic difference betweem the tygray people who have nearly 50/50 nilotic and west eurasian dna and Maasai who have about 19% west Eurasian dna. They are intermediate populations and cluster between nilotics and contemporary west eurasians.

It could be a geographical adaptation since south Africa is far from the equator, most South Africans aren't that light btw, some South Africans also are colored and have European ancestry but most do not. Yes they did originate from Cameroon but majority of Bantu populations are located in centtral Africa and southern africa
View attachment 1259685

This has nothing to do with my arguement, I'm also going by what earlier anthropologist used to classify groups in terms of features, my point is they look phenotypically different and you only use them, nilotics and sehelians who all have external admixture and make less than 10% of Africa's population and you acknowledge the 90% outside of niche groups like Fulani as being unattractive lol.

Senegambians look like stereotypical west Africans with darker skin like those you'll see in like France like Kante and Pogba, Fulani have external ad mixture btw the ones with low amounts look like typical west Africans, the Nigerian president himself is Fulani does he look unique to other Nigerians.
View attachment 1259690




The most ironic part of all this is you only consider around 10% of Africa's population of women as attractive, while the 90% you consider them as unattractive, also Caribbean, south American and North American blacks are primarily of west/central African origin with some European and Native ad mixture.

1. True that they did have west Eurasian dna I’m not disagreeing with that it’s just the climate of East Africa is far different and it has more mountain areas than west Africa. That Nubian study I sent you https://www.researchgate.net/public..._site_of_Kulubnarti_in_Christian_Period_Nubia
Points out that despite genetic gene flow the Nubian still morphology remained unchanged

2. Chadians have a European Hal group R1b1a2 and it makes up 90 percent of their genome yet they don’t look Eurasian or middle eastern they practically look identical to any black African.

3. the Maasai are around 17-19 percent Eurasian yet they phenotype wise look extremely different from black Americans. Black Americans still look western African with on average 25 percent European dna yet the massia with less Eurasian dna looks more different than black Americans


1. I’m saying compared to Nigerians southern Africans are on average lighter than the other Africans though you can find dark skinned South Africans. Tribes like the Xhosa mixed with the Khoisan also.

2. Yeah I agreed with you that Gambian people look similar to other Nigerians I’m just saying face wise they are better looking than a lot of other Africans especially the madinka who mog a lot of western Africans some of these Africans can even have straighter noses.

3. Black Americans cluster in certain ethnic groups from Africa and I have a chart that can detail it I just need to find it lol but overall most black Americans are Akan, Yoruba, Igbo, Shona Hausa and some Central African groups who are from west and Central Africa.

4. Fulanis tend to mix with what ever population they just happen to be at but Fulani people tend to have an distinctive look and they are mostly African.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

They would look different you can even see a significant phenotypic difference betweem the tygray people who have nearly 50/50 nilotic and west eurasian dna and Maasai who have about 19% west Eurasian dna. They are intermediate populations and cluster between nilotics and contemporary west eurasians.

It could be a geographical adaptation since south Africa is far from the equator, most South Africans aren't that light btw, some South Africans also are colored and have European ancestry but most do not. Yes they did originate from Cameroon but majority of Bantu populations are located in centtral Africa and southern africa
View attachment 1259685

This has nothing to do with my arguement, I'm also going by what earlier anthropologist used to classify groups in terms of features, my point is they look phenotypically different and you only use them, nilotics and sehelians who all have external admixture and make less than 10% of Africa's population and you acknowledge the 90% outside of niche groups like Fulani as being unattractive lol.

Senegambians look like stereotypical west Africans with darker skin like those you'll see in like France like Kante and Pogba, Fulani have external ad mixture btw the ones with low amounts look like typical west Africans, the Nigerian president himself is Fulani does he look unique to other Nigerians.
View attachment 1259690




The most ironic part of all this is you only consider around 10% of Africa's population of women as attractive, while the 90% you consider them as unattractive, also Caribbean, south American and North American blacks are primarily of west/central African origin with some European and Native ad mixture.

1.I didn’t say that 90 percent of the Africa’s population is unattractive i said that the southern Africans sehelian,Africans, Sudanese horners and some East African types are attractive. That’s already a huge chunk of sub Saharan Africa.

2. Plus also the Eurasian element in East Africans are related to early Eurasians who genetically were 30 percent sub Saharan African and the other northern African still making these populations Africans. And are related to one of the first out of Africa populations meaning that you can technically consider East Africans mixed but in some context do you consider Africans mixing with other Africans to be mixed?

So yes the East Africans do have a Eurasian element but looking into their genetics their “Eurasian” was still African in nature.

 

[Xangsane]

better pheno and usually more neotenous

> more neotenous

 

[Deleted member 6273]

1. True that they did have west Eurasian dna I’m not disagreeing with that it’s just the climate of East Africa is far different and it has more mountain areas than west Africa. That Nubian study I sent you https://www.researchgate.net/public..._site_of_Kulubnarti_in_Christian_Period_Nubia
Points out that despite genetic gene flow the Nubian still morphology remained unchanged
View attachment 1259704
2. Chadians have a European Hal group R1b1a2 and it makes up 90 percent of their genome yet they don’t look Eurasian or middle eastern they practically look identical to any black African.

bad faith argument also diversion since haplotypes are more indicative of migratory routes than anything else, there are highland nilotes to but somehow they didn't adapt to look like cushitic people, even when living in close proximity, anyway this has very little to do with my actual argument. Phenotypically horn Africans have contemporary west asian features, and genetically they cluster between contemporary west asian and nilotic groups, it would be foolisht to assume that has no influence on phenotypic qualities.

3. the Maasai are around 17-19 percent Eurasian yet they phenotype wise look extremely different from black Americans. Black Americans still look western African with on average 25 percent European dna yet the massia with less Eurasian dna looks more different than black Americans

What??? they are nilotics with some Neolithic eurasian dna why would they look similar to west African populations with European dna??? Also there's a notable variance between the averaged black american face and west African face due to admixture ffs, they also have a lot of phenotypic variance.

1. I’m saying compared to Nigerians southern Africans are on average lighter than the other Africans though you can find dark skinned South Africans. Tribes like the Xhosa mixed with the Khoisan also.

2. Yeah I agreed with you that Gambian people look similar to other Nigerians I’m just saying face wise they are better looking than a lot of other Africans especially the madinka who mog a lot of western Africans some of these Africans can even have straighter noses.

3. Black Americans cluster in certain ethnic groups from Africa and I have a chart that can detail it I just need to find it lol but overall most black Americans are Akan, Yoruba, Igbo, Shona Hausa and some Central African groups who are from west and Central Africa.

4. Fulanis tend to mix with what ever population they just happen to be at but Fulani people tend to have an distinctive look and they are mostly African.

1. and???? most south Africans have little to no khoisan dna what's so hard to understand?

2. Literally all african populations have straight noses from the side profile, they just don't have very prominent and projected nasal bridges except some horn Africans and sehelians who sometimes exhibit hook noses like Arabs and North Africans, wonder why???

3. Ok?

4.Cause of admixture lmao at you.


This whole post is deflection tbh, I simply said you only consider like 10% of African populations of women as attractive while you consider 90% unattractive (west african populations, central and southern bantuid populations and hunter gatherers except Khoisan)

 

[Deleted member 12002]

Honestly I want to know the appeal of white girls vs other races of girls

They can be hot.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

1.I didn’t say that 90 percent of the Africa’s population is unattractive i said that the southern Africans sehelian,Africans, Sudanese horners and some East African types are attractive. That’s already a huge chunk of sub Saharan Africa.

You explicitly said west African populations of women (aside from a few communities like fualni) central and southern African women(aside from the ones with khoisan admixture) were unattractive, this is literally most African women and almost all diaspora black populations btw, don't make me look for the posts and screenshot them.

2. Plus also the Eurasian element in East Africans are related to early Eurasians who genetically were 30 percent sub Saharan African and the other northern African still making these populations Africans. And are related to one of the first out of Africa populations meaning that you can technically consider East Africans mixed but in some context do you consider Africans mixing with other Africans to be mixed?
View attachment 1259758
View attachment 1259760
So yes the East Africans do have a Eurasian element but looking into their genetics their “Eurasian” was still African in nature.

I'm literally not even trying to start an arguement on this cause it's purely deflection again read what I wrote above.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

What??? they are nilotics with some Neolithic eurasian dna why would they look similar to west African populations with European dna??? Also there's a notable variance between the averaged black american face and west African face due to admixture ffs, they also have a lot of phenotypic variance.

I’m saying that nubains are mostly related to Cushitic ethnic groups in Ethiopia who are the Oromo and the afar. I don’t know about the Amhara and tygray. These populations Eurasian element were from mostly Ancient levant populations that’s what I’m saying if these nubains morphology didn’t change the same thing can be applied to some ethnic groups in Ethiopia.

plus most African Americans are brown skinned to dark skinned with some lighter skin blacks but you are correct that black Americans have a lot of different phenotypes though some black Americans have dna connecting them to the Tuareg and other sehleian groups who are a mixture of west Africans and Berbers not Arabs.

bad faith argument also diversion since haplotypes are more indicative of migratory routes than anything else, there are highland nilotes to but somehow they didn't adapt to look like cushitic people, even when living in close proximity, anyway this has very little to do with my actual argument. Phenotypically horn Africans have contemporary west asian features, and genetically they cluster between contemporary west asian and nilotic groups, it would be foolisht to assume that has no influence on phenotypic qualities.

you are correct that southern Ethiopians more or less resemble their Nilotic side and I should had clarified that certain groups of Ethiopians can have more recent Eurasian mixture that can be from 3,000 years ago relating to Arabs and middle Easterns that was my fault for not saying that.

plus the climate in northern Ethiopia is very different from southern Ethiopia relating more to the Sudan and Central Africa. These are Most likely the original inhabitants of Ethiopia would had looked similar to this

Plus it’s proven that your genotype doesn’t always equal phenotype. The Nilotics even in Eastern Africa are not jet black like their south Sudanese cousins though this could be due to mixing with the Bantus and Cushitic people

1. and???? most south Africans have little to no khoisan dna what's so hard to understand?

2. Literally all african populations have straight noses from the side profile, they just don't have very prominent and projected nasal bridges except some horn Africans and sehelians who sometimes exhibit hook noses like Arabs and North Africans, wonder why???

3. Ok?

4.Cause of admixture lmao at you.


This whole post is deflection tbh, I simply said you only consider like 10% of African populations of women as attractive while you consider 90% unattractive (west african populations, central and southern bantuid populations and hunter gatherers except Khoisan

1. And I agreed with you I just said some Bantus mixed with the Khoisan creating the Xhosa reading is critical.

2. North Africans like the Berbers are genetically distinct from Arabs Berbers as genetically African meaning that sehalian Africans would actually be mixed with some Berbers who are themselves genetically African. Plus northern sengal and the saheal has a vastly different climate than west Africa

3. Most of the diaspora is from those areas when did I say this wasn’t the case I said most of west and Central Africa. But I assumed that the southern African women were mostly mixed with Khoisan

 

[Deleted member 5802]

You explicitly said west African populations of women (aside from a few communities like fualni) central and southern African women(aside from the ones with khoisan admixture) were unattractive, this is literally most African women and almost all diaspora black populations btw, don't make me look for the posts and screenshot them.


I'm literally not even trying to start an arguement on this cause it's purely deflection again read what I wrote above.

Plus I just said western and Central African groups to an extent typically and objectively don’t have attractive features that but other types of west Africans like in The Gambia northern sengal ( which black Americans manily came from) tend to possess better facial development and more attractive features

 

[Deleted member 13495]

> more neotenous

View attachment 1259763

so cute

 

[Deleted member 13495]

> more neotenous

View attachment 1259763

check discord

 

[Xangsane]

check discord

aight, I'll do so, I haven't been on discord for a long time

 

[Abstraktbbttpm]

Females need more calcium during pregnancy and lactation. The body synthesizes vitamin D from sunlight, which helps it absorb calcium. Females evolved to have lighter skin so their bodies absorb more calcium. Not only this but 1 out of every 3 northern European has a Neanderthal gene variant that is linked to increased fertility. Also white women have wider hips on average. Black womens hips are more narrow they just look wider sometimes because black women store more fat on their buttocks and thighs and less in their waist. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/05/200526151738.htm

 

[Deleted member 6273]

I’m saying that nubains are mostly related to Cushitic ethnic groups in Ethiopia who are the Oromo and the afar. I don’t know about the Amhara and tygray. These populations Eurasian element were from mostly Ancient levant populations that’s what I’m saying if these nubains morphology didn’t change the same thing can be applied to some ethnic groups in Ethiopia.

plus most African Americans are brown skinned to dark skinned with some lighter skin blacks but you are correct that black Americans have a lot of different phenotypes though some black Americans have dna connecting them to the Tuareg and other sehleian groups who are a mixture of west Africans and Berbers not Arabs.

you are correct that southern Ethiopians more or less resemble their Nilotic side and I should had clarified that certain groups of Ethiopians can have more recent Eurasian mixture that can be from 3,000 years ago relating to Arabs and middle Easterns that was my fault for not saying that.

plus the climate in northern Ethiopia is very different from southern Ethiopia relating more to the Sudan and Central Africa. These are Most likely the original inhabitants of Ethiopia would had looked similar to this View attachment 1259827
Plus it’s proven that your genotype doesn’t always equal phenotype. The Nilotics even in Eastern Africa are not jet black like their south Sudanese cousins though this could be due to mixing with the Bantus and Cushitic people

1. And I agreed with you I just said some Bantus mixed with the Khoisan creating the Xhosa reading is critical.

2. North Africans like the Berbers are genetically distinct from Arabs Berbers as genetically African meaning that sehalian Africans would actually be mixed with some Berbers who are themselves genetically African. Plus northern sengal and the saheal has a vastly different climate than west Africa

3. Most of the diaspora is from those areas when did I say this wasn’t the case I said most of west and Central Africa. But I assumed that the southern African women were mostly mixed with Khoisan

Plus I just said western and Central African groups to an extent typically and objectively don’t have attractive features that but other types of west Africans like in The Gambia northern sengal ( which black Americans manily came from) tend to possess better facial development and more attractive features

View attachment 1259880
View attachment 1259884

Yeah most of this has zero to do with my actual point.

Reminder that you find 90% of populations of African women as unattractive, the 10% you find have a significant amount of external ad mixture with a few exceptions (we could argue all day whether that affects phenotype, which I obviously think it does but that's not my point)

So you also basically think black women are unattractive on average with a few exceptions.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Yeah most of this has zero to do with my actual point.

Reminder that you find 90% of populations of African women as unattractive, the 10% you find have a significant amount of external ad mixture with a few exceptions (we could argue all day whether that affects phenotype, which I obviously think it does but that's not my point)

So you also basically think black women are unattractive on average with a few exceptions.

Dude did you read my post the saheal is the belt of Africa South Africa makes up a huge chunk out is sub Saharan Africa, East African( not the horn) and then the horn region. Dude how does that not make up a huge chunk of Africa.

I think he can explain the fact that East Africans are not really mixed better than me
@hairyballscel

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Yeah most of this has zero to do with my actual point.

Reminder that you find 90% of populations of African women as unattractive, the 10% you find have a significant amount of external ad mixture with a few exceptions (we could argue all day whether that affects phenotype, which I obviously think it does but that's not my point)

So you also basically think black women are unattractive on average with a few exceptions.

How is this 90 percent of the continent

Plus like I said before the Eurasian element is actually Northern Africa not Arab or Eurasian so these populations that northern Nubians and some East Africans mixed with we’re still African, and due to the climate of East Africa it’s likely it wouldn’t had effected their phenotype

 

[Deleted member 6273]

How is this 90 percent of the continent
View attachment 1260987
Plus like I said before the Eurasian element is actually Northern Africa not Arab or Eurasian so these populations that northern Nubians and some East Africans mixed with we’re still African, and due to the climate of East Africa it’s likely it wouldn’t had effected their phenotype

Literally all the all the countries under Ethiopia and Somalia are predominantly bantus who you said were unattractive these are your on words btw try again lol

I actually calculated the totals and it comes down to that you find 25% of African populations of women attractive and 75%ugly give or take.

Now if we include balcks in the diaspora who are predominantly west African or bantu it comes close to 80% give or take.

So from your own words almost 80% of African populations of women are ugly, and the remaining 20% have external ad mixture whether you want to cope it's North African or not it doesn't change my point.

 

[ChristianChad]

Literally all the all the countries under Ethiopia and Somalia are predominantly bantus who you said were unattractive these are your on words btw try again lol
View attachment 1261002


I actually calculated the totals and it comes down to that you find 25% of African populations of women attractive and 75%ugly give or take.
View attachment 1261018View attachment 1261019View attachment 1261023

Now if we include balcks in the diaspora who are predominantly west African or bantu it comes close to 80% give or take.

So from your own words almost 80% of African populations of women are ugly, and the remaining 20% have external ad mixture whether you want to cope it's North African or not it doesn't change my point.
View attachment 1261028

not a word. nigger = ugly

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Literally all the all the countries under Ethiopia and Somalia are predominantly bantus who you said were unattractive these are your on words btw try again lol
View attachment 1261002


I actually calculated the totals and it comes down to that you find 25% of African populations of women attractive and 75%ugly give or take.
View attachment 1261018View attachment 1261019View attachment 1261023

Now if we include balcks in the diaspora who are predominantly west African or bantu it comes close to 80% give or take.

So from your own words almost 80% of African populations of women are ugly, and the remaining 20% have external ad mixture whether you want to cope it's North African or not it doesn't change my point.
View attachment 1261028

I’ve told you many times that the Bantus in southern and Eastern Africa are way better looking than the western and Central African ones. My map detailed a huge chunk of sub Saharan Africa.

most descendants of black Americans came manily from many locations in west Africa like in the seheal and parts of Angola.

If you read my posts I’ve acknowledged my mistake of assuming that west Africans were Bantus when that’s wrong. What my original post said was that west and Central African women are not that attractive, I didn’t say south of East Africa Remember reading is critical

 

[Deleted member 5802]

not a word. nigger = ugly

Cope

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Literally all the all the countries under Ethiopia and Somalia are predominantly bantus who you said were unattractive these are your on words btw try again lol
View attachment 1261002


I actually calculated the totals and it comes down to that you find 25% of African populations of women attractive and 75%ugly give or take.
View attachment 1261018View attachment 1261019View attachment 1261023

Now if we include balcks in the diaspora who are predominantly west African or bantu it comes close to 80% give or take.

So from your own words almost 80% of African populations of women are ugly, and the remaining 20% have external ad mixture whether you want to cope it's North African or not it doesn't change my point.
View attachment 1261028

There’s a lot of evidence to pinpoint that the Eurasian element in East and seheal Africans is actually African in nature

I think this right here sums it up for the question of if East Africans are mixed

 

[Deleted member 6273]

I’ve told you many times that the Bantus in southern and Eastern Africa are way better looking than the western and Central African ones. My map detailed a huge chunk of sub Saharan Africa.

most descendants of black Americans came manily from many locations in west Africa like in the seheal and parts of Angola.

If you read my posts I’ve acknowledged my mistake of assuming that west Africans were Bantus when that’s wrong. What my original post said was that west and Central African women are not that attractive, I didn’t say south of East Africa Remember reading is critical

What a load of horseshit central african bantus are very closely related to east and south African bantus and phenotypically look very similar outside of small variations. This is just a cop out I posted the average phenotypes before.

Angolans are arguably central Africans and look almost exactly the same as other central Africans excluding the ones with external ad mixture.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

There’s a lot of evidence to pinpoint that the Eurasian element in East and seheal Africans is actually African in nature
View attachment 1261042
I think this right here sums it up for the question of if East Africans are mixed

Literally has nothing to do with my point and I'll go with established researchers any day instead of people on here lol.

Also,

 

[Deleted member 9003]

There’s a lot of evidence to pinpoint that the Eurasian element in East and seheal Africans is actually African in nature
View attachment 1261042
I think this right here sums it up for the question of if East Africans are mixed

Bruh East Africans are obviously mixed with eurasians

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Literally has nothing to do with my point and I'll go with established researchers any day instead of people on here lol.

Also,
View attachment 1261055

There’s already a lot of establishment research on this subject the Eurasians who mixed with the East Africans were already African

(PDF) The morphological significance of the Homo I Skeleton from the PPNB submerged site at Atlit-Yam, Israel

PDF | Resume. — Le site ď Atlit Yam est situe a 10 km au Sud de Haifa, en Israel, a une distance de plus de 200 m du rivage actuel et a une profondeur... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

www.researchgate.net

East Africans are a direct mix of Proto nilo Saharans and proto Eurasian farmers who both predates that of Arabs and Europeans and west Africans. The proto farmers were the natufians and ancient leavent people who were themselves descendants or North Africans and crinal wise has a sub Saharan component

We don’t know how much of the “ erasian element is actually Eurasian instead of African but that 50-60 percent Eurasian Number is very exaggerated. You’ll find that eastern Africans cluster more with other black Africans than Arabs and middle Easterns, and the Nubian data has proven that without the Eurasian dna the nubains will still look similar to how they do now.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Bruh East Africans are obviously mixed with eurasians

Those Eurasians still predated Europeans, Arabs and even west Africans

 

[Deleted member 14455]

@Blackeycel
@africancel

Tyrone fucking your crush rn

 

[RODEBLUR]

Honestly I want to know the appeal of white girls vs other races of girls

those boring cookie-cutter rehashed picket fence copy paste generic blonde white bitches get me so hard it's unreal

 

[Deleted member 6273]

There’s already a lot of establishment research on this subject the Eurasians who mixed with the East Africans were already African
View attachment 1261076

(PDF) The morphological significance of the Homo I Skeleton from the PPNB submerged site at Atlit-Yam, Israel

PDF | Resume. — Le site ď Atlit Yam est situe a 10 km au Sud de Haifa, en Israel, a une distance de plus de 200 m du rivage actuel et a une profondeur... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

www.researchgate.net

East Africans are a direct mix of Proto nilo Saharans and proto Eurasian farmers who both predates that of Arabs and Europeans and west Africans. The proto farmers were the natufians and ancient leavent people who were themselves descendants or North Africans and crinal wise has a sub Saharan component
View attachment 1261092
View attachment 1261094
We don’t know how much of the “ erasian element is actually Eurasian instead of African but that 50-60 percent Eurasian Number is very exaggerated. You’ll find that eastern Africans cluster more with other black Africans than Arabs and middle Easterns, and the Nubian data has proven that without the Eurasian dna the nubains will still look similar to how they do now.

of course the usual deflection, I'm not going to go in depth on this post cause it literally has zero to do with my point.

Regular reminder that you directly said that close to 80% of populations of African women were ugly, so you find the vast majority of black women as ugly

 

[Deleted member 5802]

of course the usual deflection, I'm not going to go in depth on this post cause it literally has zero to do with my point.

Regular reminder that you directly said that close to 80% of populations of African women were ugly, so you find the vast majority of black women as ugly
View attachment 1261115

I was responding to your statement that East Africans and sahelian Africans are not mixed.
Dude didn’t see my post Jfl im done you can’t really seem to debunk my post this time but nice discussion im done

 

[Deleted member 5802]

What a load of horseshit central african bantus are very closely related to east and south African bantus and phenotypically look very similar outside of small variations. This is just a cop out I posted the average phenotypes before.

Angolans are arguably central Africans and look almost exactly the same as other central Africans excluding the ones with external ad mixture.

Angolan people phenotype wise look pretty different from Central Africans

Central African women

Not I’m not saying all people from South Africa or central Africa look like that I’m just working with generally what you see

 

[hairyballscel]

Dude did you read my post the saheal is the belt of Africa South Africa makes up a huge chunk out is sub Saharan Africa, East African( not the horn) and then the horn region. Dude how does that not make up a huge chunk of Africa.

I think he can explain the fact that East Africans are not really mixed better than me
@hairyballscel

east africans are mixed to an extent, it doesnt matter anyway, im assuming @africancel is saying north and east africans are better looking than west and central africans? due to "caucasian" features? these features are largely indigenous anyway, recall 8000BC kenyans have "caucasian" craniofacial structure, this is before any admixture dates, so things like thin pointed noses, curly/wavy hair, smaller lips etc... are native to africa

 

[hairyballscel]

It's objectively obvious that white women are more attractive on average, which is why they are universally seen as the most attractive, but people have their individual preferences.

in terms of objective correlates of beauty such as, symmetry, dimorphism, health indicators, neoteny/paedomorphism, i only see white girls beating "negroid" girls in dimorphism, lighter skin and a narrow nose is more feminine but i doubt white women are objectively universally attractive, white feautures have only been lusted for the past few hundred years, after the advent of colonialism and the current reach of western media
thin noses, white skin, straight hair etc... have only been the global beauty standard in the past few hundreds years, shit like this wasnt lusted over in pre colonial sub saharan africa, so you have to take in to account the social factor
if you remove that factor i doubt the smv of west/central african women will be completely equal to a white women, but the disparity will definitely diminish, idk to what extent

 

[hairyballscel]

less bitchy, less demanding, more empathetic (these things are not to be confused with more submissive, which is actually something I find very unattractive). Before some low IQ moron shows up, yes these are GENERAL ideas of how things are - not every white girl is great looking and pleasant to deal with.

In summary:
- So much less bitchy than ethnic women

this is insane copium right here JFL if you think white girls are less demanding than ethnics

a fresh off the boat ethnic wants you to be taller than them and earn avg salary, white girls are entitled to 6 figure earning chad

 

[Deleted member 5802]

east africans are mixed to an extent, it doesnt matter anyway, im assuming @africancel is saying north and east africans are better looking than west and central africans? due to "caucasian" features? these features are largely indigenous anyway, recall 8000BC kenyans have "caucasian" craniofacial structure, this is before any admixture dates, so things like thin pointed noses, curly/wavy hair, smaller lips etc... are native to africa

No he’s saying that I’m saying that I only find 25 percent of the people in Africa attractive and the rest unattractive because their Bantus even though I made it clear that the southern African women are attractive compared to their western counterparts. It was my mistake to classify western and Central African groups as Bantu.

in Western Africa I say above northern Nigeria and The Gambia and northern sengal ( just before you reach the sehel) you’ll still find a lot of attractive women( and I should had clarified that) when I was generalizing all these Africans as Bantus.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

in terms of objective correlates of beauty such as, symmetry, dimorphism, health indicators, neoteny/paedomorphism, i only see white girls beating "negroid" girls in dimorphism, lighter skin and a narrow nose is more feminine but i doubt white women are objectively universally attractive, white feautures have only been lusted for the past few hundred years, after the advent of colonialism and the current reach of western media
thin noses, white skin, straight hair etc... have only been the global beauty standard in the past few hundreds years, shit like this wasnt lusted over in pre colonial sub saharan africa, so you have to take in to account the social factor
if you remove that factor i doubt the smv of west/central african women will be completely equal to a white women, but the disparity will definitely diminish, idk to what extent

I think it if wasn’t for European colonism I think each race would prefer their own and will see the uniqueness and beauty in other races but I think this will depend on the person.

Even though Africans was getting praised for their looks by others (greek and rome) at the same token you can find accounts of arabs describing the ugluness of East Africans. I think everyone will have their own opinion on the attraction of race and I largely blame the media even more since most of the things in the media of America is white same with movies and videos games ( which isn’t a problem)

 

[Deleted member 6273]

No he’s saying that I’m saying that I only find 25 percent of the people in Africa attractive and the rest unattractive because their Bantus even though I made it clear that the southern African women are attractive compared to their western counterparts. It was my mistake to classify western and Central African groups as Bantu.

in Western Africa I say above northern Nigeria and The Gambia and northern sengal ( just before you reach the sehel) you’ll still find a lot of attractive women( and I should had clarified that) when I was generalizing all these Africans as Bantus.

you're backtracking now after I told you southern Africans were bantus lol, they also look phenotypically similar and have similar features to central Africans for the most part, bantu migration started only in 2000BC btw there's it's not like all of a sudden they develop unique features.

It's kinda funny how you acknowledge JBW for men and not for women btw, it could be through environmental factors or intrinsically but in the end it doesn't matter in the globalized world whites are seen as being objectively more attractive both men and women, it is what it is. Women are more dependent on soft features, like nose, hair, lips, skin etc for attractiveness so it has a big impact for black women who deviate most from what Caucasian women look like

 

[hairyballscel]

Even though Africans was getting praised for their looks by others (greek and rome) at the same token you can find accounts of arabs describing the ugluness of East Africans. I think everyone will have their own opinion on the attraction of race and I largely blame the media even more since most of the things in the media of America is white same with movies and videos games ( which isn’t a problem)

yhh tbh, at one point southern ethiopian(nilotes) women were seen as beautiful, and were sold into north africa as sex slaves because of it, while afroasiatic speakers(tigray, amharic, afar, bilen etc) were seen as ugly according to medieval iran, yet they are seen as attractive to many today and have caucasian features

this shit changes over time

 

[Deleted member 9670]

Bump