Why do pigskins eat the shittiest foods oat

https://reasonwithoutrestraint.com/...parities-in-test-scores-in-the-united-states/ this is the statistic for iq , whites literally invented more significant historical inventions, Swimming was more of a racist joke on my part plus , crime statistics View attachment 5557910
superiority and inferiority are not their own substances, they are our own social constructs that we made up to explain how reality works, but its not the reality itself thus its subjective
 
  • JFL
Reactions: HappyChud
incorrect information the ottomans fell behind because we had guns and they used swords
Lmao, what happened to Constantinople (Istanbul) again?


Last thing pigskins saw in 1453

1787562820512



Also ur point was ape as shit, guns were being widely used by the 1500s but the ottomans kept raping Europe till the very late 1600s (first major loss was the Great Turkish war, had to have all of Europe band together yet again just to stop the ottomans) so ur telling me Turkish niggas with swords were sliming armed Europeans left and right? High t as shit.
 
superiority and inferiority are not their own substances, they are our own social constructs that we made up to explain how reality works, but its not the reality itself thus its subjective
It’s wrong aswell lol. According to him East Asians and middle easterns would be the “superior race”
 
Polish food = resident evil food
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ndslth8r and Ghoulish
Lmao, what happened to Constantinople (Istanbul) again?


Last thing pigskins saw in 1453

View attachment 5557969


Also ur point was ape as shit, guns were being widely used by the 1500s but the ottomans kept raping Europe till the very late 1600s (first major loss was the Great Turkish war, had to have all of Europe band together yet again just to stop the ottomans) so ur telling me Turkish niggas with swords were sliming armed Europeans left and right? High t as shit.
western turks are native anatolians not central asians
(aka 1:1 same race as greeks)
 
western turks are native anatolians not central asians
(aka 1:1 same race as greeks)
Turks are also mixed with Kurds, central Asians, northern euros, Arabs, and whatever the fuck.

Regardless Anatolia is still in Asia, so those Greeks from Anatolia would be from Asia.
 
atleast we have food
Everyone got food, other than some parts of Africa.

Although if you really wanna be a bitch then go ask the Russians and ukranians how foods going for em.
 
Turks are also mixed with Kurds, central Asians, northern euros, Arabs, and whatever the fuck.

Regardless Anatolia is still in Asia, so those Greeks from Anatolia would be from Asia.
well western turks (which is like MOST of turks) have only like 5% asian admixture but rest is greek. modern greeks are like 30% slavic tho so turks would be closer to ancient greeks than to modern ones. but again i still consider this white whether its placed in asia or not, and there's no strict border between asia and europe anyway
 
well western turks (which is like MOST of turks) have only like 5% asian admixture but rest is greek. modern greeks are like 30% slavic tho so turks would be closer to ancient greeks than to modern ones. but again i still consider this white whether its placed in asia or not, and there's no strict border between asia and europe anyway
white doesnt exist, Mediterranean and Northern European is a better grouping.
 
Everyone got food, other than some parts of Africa.

Although if you really wanna be a bitch then go ask the Russians and ukranians how foods going for em.
yea beacause there is a war
 
white doesnt exist, Mediterranean and Northern European is a better grouping.
white is a simplified term. north euros and meds are different i agree but still closer to each other than to anyone else. in 19th century people were using terms like the alpine or dinaric or nordic or whatever race which would be a better grouping than med vs. north euro but its shit in common use
you can also say that asians, indians, blacks, amerindians don't exist because they are different from each other depending on region
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ghoulish
19th century people were using terms like the alpine or dinaric or nordic or whatever race which would be a better grouping
Ye that is a lot better, although it then leads to bs like Irish people being black and English people being Nordic (both self proclaimed by Anglos :lul:)

you can also say that asians, indians, blacks, amerindians don't exist because they are different from each other depending on region
India is a country, I get what u mean thi, but yeah there are many ethnicities in all four you mentioned. None of em exist.
 
Same applies to like 99% of those starving African countries btw.
not only war but also poverty , weak infrastracture , they are unpreaper for climat changes and high food prices caused by politics
 
Ye that is a lot better, although it then leads to bs like Irish people being black and English people being Nordic (both self proclaimed by Anglos :lul:)


India is a country, I get what u mean thi, but yeah there are many ethnicities in all four you mentioned. None of em exist.
its better but i use more simplified terms. instead of saying a bunch of terms like dinaric/pontid/atlantic etc race i just say "white" since its more useful, since it takes less time to list them
 
Js not true is it bro

Ik fucking pierogi goat ballsack is not better than kebabs. Theres a reason it’s so famous in Germany, every German girl wants Big Turkish kebab.
Eat your kebabs then
 
not only war but also poverty , weak infrastracture , they are unpreaper for climat changes and high food prices caused by politics
All hand in hand with colonial aftermath and war btw.
 
then why australia , USA and Canada dont starve
USA is a settler project, same with Canada and Australia. Both were developed by the colonialism entities, not exploited. Look at how the native people of those countries are living (barely even exist anymore)

White people arent some beings immune to being exploited, look at the stage of the post communist countries or the post ottoman countries (post ottoman wasnt so bad tho they werent exploited even a percent as much as under the Europeans)
 
It's true, national foods are pretty shit even as a polish guy myself

most national dishes you see around europe are - atleast partly - derived from the world wars era (1900-1950), which means it's literally peasant broke food.

It was originally designed to give you enough calories to survive. It's not nutrient dense and doesn't have good protein.

It's why you still see England eat beans on toast, or Germany and Poland still spam potatoes in every dish.

The ones predating WWI-WWII aren't any better either. In 1600's the traditional polish dishes were mainly fermented vegetables and soups (and pierogi as you show on the image).

Some of the dishes can be good taste-wise though.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: KubiXX and Ghoulish

Similar threads

Doublex2J
Replies
23
Views
150
iblamelm
iblamelm
tei
Replies
21
Views
87
Went2Jupiter
Went2Jupiter
Doublex2J
Replies
0
Views
32
Doublex2J
Doublex2J
Nyrо
Replies
29
Views
157
Went2Jupiter
Went2Jupiter

Users who are viewing this thread

  • KubiXX
  • JewishNationalist
Back
Top