why do ricecels love studying so much ?

[LampPostPrime]

I am not fat nor is my haircut shit. Nor do I have acne. But studying does promote bad habits. I said it was on me myself anyways. The point is, studying isn't going to get you girls.

Now you're backpedalling . Man yall incels are fucking pieces of shit. Glad shit like this is being made

Incel Tears - 100 Servings

The Boys' Incel Tears GG energy drink. 100 servings of peach-cream flavor. Keto-friendly, zero-sugar formula with caffeine and nootropics. Tub art by @POISONP1NK.

gamersupps.gg

And its almost as if theres things that are good outside getting girls . . . . . Christ you incel freaks are fucking retarded lol

 

[esrgan]

You shouldnt aspire to be legendarily successful people who contribute to societal progression?

If you truly believe this, you're a bigger idiot than i thought. None of them contribute to society. A brick layer contributes more to society than some chinky kid sitting in an air conditioned room trying to solve a problem that doesn't matter. Let me fucking guess, you're a bloody chink yourself. I'll remind you that chink girls will always prefer an australian surfer and not some flat recessed faced chink. And you use emojis to make your point seem more important haha.

 

[ngannou]

creativity, spirit of innovation and initiatives it's not = raw power of ur neurons

What's the meaning of raw powers if you lack of creativity???

 

[esrgan]

What's the meaning of raw powers if you lack of creativity???

being first. that is a hell of a lot more important than being right or being creative

 

[LampPostPrime]

If you truly believe this, you're a bigger idiot than i thought. None of them contribute to society. A brick layer contributes more to society than some chinky kid sitting in an air conditioned room trying to solve a problem that doesn't matter. Let me fucking guess, you're a bloody chink yourself. I'll remind you that chink girls will always prefer an australian surfer and not some flat recessed faced chink. And you use emojis to make your point seem more important haha.

They both contribute to society. But in the long run academics and intellectuals are far more valuable. Only 1 in a million can invent or discover life changing things while most can be a bricklayer.

And those "problems that dont matter" often end up mattering the most, we just dont know how to apply them yet. Like guys in the 1600-1700s doing early scientific work. Back then it seemed purely theoretical but 100 years later they used it to make the modern world. And even if it doesnt apply to anything practical, knowledge is valuable for its own sake.

my point had nothing to do with chinese vs euro intellectuals. Obviously BWC mogs the most lol half my posts are defending BWC against ethnics here. My point is about whats important in life not who gets girls. Girls interests definitely do not align with whats good for humanity as many point out here .

 

[Troglodyte452]

Why do black americans like being in gangs so much?
Why do whites like being racist so much?

It's in the culture

 

[ngannou]

being first. that is a hell of a lot more important than being right or being creative

Creativity is the matter of fact that divides the geniuses like einstein, newton
and normie studycelling currycells and ricecells

How is it not important.

The west caucasians dominated east mongolids becaues they had higher creativity they couldn't create anything astonishing

such as airplanes, calculus, nuclear bomb, theory of relativity, newton's law...etc

 

[esrgan]

They both contribute to society. But in the long run academics and intellectuals are far more valuable. Only 1 in a million can invent or discover life changing things while most can be a bricklayer.

And those "problems that dont matter" often end up mattering the most, we just dont know how to apply them yet. Like guys in the 1600-1700s doing early scientific work. Back then it seemed purely theoretical but 100 years later they used it to make the modern world. And even if it doesnt apply to anything practical, knowledge is valuable for its own sake.

my point had nothing to do with chinese vs euro intellectuals. Obviously BWC mogs the most lol half my posts are defending BWC against ethnics here. My point is about whats important in life not who gets girls. Girls interests definitely do not align with whats good for humanity as many point out here .

pure delusion. Most of the scientific problems that you thought were important in the long run (and the kind of problems that you think these mathematicians solved) , are just used to create more weapons and kill each other.

Human quality of life improves with good diet and safe shelter. The single biggest engineering/scientific achievement after the wheel is electricity because it allowed us to store food better and live better. Any other "important problem" is just an illusion. We never needed those.

Do you actually believe that elliptic curve cryptography, number theory and DES are important ? They are not important. The reason why this obscure useless domain of math became useful in the first place is because humans wanted to fight and wanted secure communication during a WAR. It was solving a problem that in no way improves the quality of life of humans. It only becomes a weapon to prolong the fighting.

So yes, most scientific achievements in the long run have only been used to create weapons. And if you consider weapon manufacturing a worthwhile investment of human resources, then you're completely wrong

 

[esrgan]

Creativity is the matter of fact that divides the geniuses like einstein, newton
and normie studycelling currycells and ricecells

How is it not important.

The west caucasians dominated east mongolids becaues they had higher creativity they couldn't create anything astonishing

such as airplanes, calculus, nuclear bomb, theory of relativity, newton's law...etc

europeans were first. first at pretty much everything. They have larger brains while the mongoloids have flat, wide heads and an underdeveloped prefrontal cortex.

Europe does it first. and then the east copies. JFL if you think that creativity has anything to with calculus. newton invented calculus at age of 25-26 because he a superior brain. a brain with much faster neurons

 

[ngannou]

europeans were first. first at pretty much everything. They have larger brains while the mongoloids have flat, wide heads and an underdeveloped prefrontal cortex.

Europe does it first. and then the east copies

So basically the europeans have higher creativity. Because they come up with something "new".

Computer, AI has better raw power but they can't come up with something innovative as human

 

[esrgan]

So basically the europeans have higher creativity. Because they come up with something "new".

Computer, AI has better raw power but they can't come up with something innovative

you're hilarious. Modern transformers are built using matrix transforms which aren't remotely as complicated as the human brain. They haven't surpassed humans because we only train them for a month or so. A reputed scientist spends decades honing his or her craft. This is the reason why transformers are more stupid compared to a scientist.

The reason why transformers have such "raw power" is because they use a buttload of electricity and cooling. Humans are actually MORE powerful when it comes to performance per watt. We require very little energy to be high functioning. The side effect is of course, we gotta sleep.

Third, transformers are getting there very soon. They are able solve coding problems they've not earlier encountered. Soon they will be able to automate complex tasks and ingest larger data and do better research than humans. They will be designed to do just that.

Fourth, stop typing like that nigger.

 

[ngannou]

you're hilarious. Modern transformers are built using matrix transforms which aren't remotely as complicated as the human brain. They haven't surpassed humans because we only train them for a month or so. A reputed scientist spends decades honing his or her craft. This is the reason why transformers are more stupid compared to a scientist.

The reason why transformers have such "raw power" is because they use a buttload of electricity and cooling. Humans are actually MORE powerful when it comes to performance per watt. We require very little energy to be high functioning. The side effect is of course, we gotta sleep.

Third, transformers are getting there very soon. They are able solve coding problems they've not earlier encountered. Soon they will be able to automate complex tasks and ingest larger data and do better research than humans. They will be designed to do just that.

Fourth, stop typing like that nigger.

Yeah that exactly proves itself that just simple raw power shown in performance cannot exceed creativity.

 

[ngannou]

you're hilarious. Modern transformers are built using matrix transforms which aren't remotely as complicated as the human brain. They haven't surpassed humans because we only train them for a month or so. A reputed scientist spends decades honing his or her craft. This is the reason why transformers are more stupid compared to a scientist.

The reason why transformers have such "raw power" is because they use a buttload of electricity and cooling. Humans are actually MORE powerful when it comes to performance per watt. We require very little energy to be high functioning. The side effect is of course, we gotta sleep.

Third, transformers are getting there very soon. They are able solve coding problems they've not earlier encountered. Soon they will be able to automate complex tasks and ingest larger data and do better research than humans. They will be designed to do just that.

Fourth, stop typing like that nigger.

Einstein is the good example of thinking of something innovative doesn't always correlate with raw power.

Fellow mathematician and physicist John von neumman was a guy who had probably strongest raw power intelligence which he was able to calculate

8 digits times 8 digits numbers in a second and memorize the whole phone book, and he was the fastest problem solver

However he admits and other fellow Nobel Prize winners says John von neumman was the fastest among us but wasn't able to create mind blowing ideas like einstein

 

[esrgan]

Yeah that exactly proves itself that just simple raw power shown in performance cannot exceed creativity.

you're stupid. There is no such thing as creativity. Just pure neurons. I wrote all that to explain to you how insane an LLM that was trained only for 1 month can perform. And you still didn't get it

Its already outperforming ALL undergrads and it will soon completely kill mathematicians. All because we will always have enough electricity

 

[ngannou]

you're stupid. There is no such thing as creativity. Just pure neurons. I wrote all that to explain to you how insane an LLM that was trained only for 1 month can perform. And you still didn't get it

Its already outperforming ALL undergrads and it will soon completely kill mathematicians. All because we will always have enough electricity

Einstein is the good example of thinking of something innovative doesn't always correlate with raw power.

Fellow mathematician and physicist John von neumman was a guy who had probably strongest raw power intelligence of in human history
which he was able to calculate

8 digits times 8 digits numbers in a second and memorize the whole phone book in a minute, and he was the fastest problem solver even among the nobel prize winners.

However he admits and other fellow Nobel Prize winners says John von neumman was the fastest among us but wasn't able to create mind blowing ideas like einstein.

 

[ngannou]

you're stupid. There is no such thing as creativity. Just pure neurons. I wrote all that to explain to you how insane an LLM that was trained only for 1 month can perform. And you still didn't get it

Its already outperforming ALL undergrads and it will soon completely kill mathematicians. All because we will always have enough electricity

Plus the results of iq tests proves raw intelligence such as memorizing, fast calculations, fast puzzle solving doesn't directly shows creative results.

Even The creator of the iq tests david weschler and louis termann proclaimed through iq test they weren't able to detect real geniuses.

 

[esrgan]

Einstein is the good example of thinking of something innovative doesn't always correlate with raw power.

Fellow mathematician and physicist John von neumman was a guy who had probably strongest raw power intelligence which he was able to calculate

8 digits times 8 digits numbers in a second and memorize the whole phone book, and he was the fastest problem solver

However he admits and other fellow Nobel Prize winners says John von neumman was the fastest among us but wasn't able to create mind blowing ideas like einstein

you're comparing 2 geniuses against each other. Its obviously possible for einstein to overperform. He had amazing grades in math.
Von neumann made major contributions to quantum mechanics and computer architecture. His achievments are superior to einstein. Enjoy creativecelling and studycelling bro

 

[ngannou]

you're comparing 2 geniuses against each other. Its obviously possible for einstein to overperform. He had amazing grades in math.
Von neumann made major contributions to quantum mechanics and computer architecture. His achievments are superior to einstein. Enjoy creativecelling and studycelling bro

Cope bro, the fellow nobel prize winners claimed Von Neumann's ideas were never astonishing as einstein.

 

[esrgan]

Cope bro, the fellow nobel prize winners claimed Von Neumann's ideas were never astonishing as einstein.

you're now speaking like a true studycel. "einstein was better bro. trust me bro"

Boys, never become this guy. This is the lesson you must learn from this entire thread

 

[ngannou]

you're comparing 2 geniuses against each other. Its obviously possible for einstein to overperform. He had amazing grades in math.
Von neumann made major contributions to quantum mechanics and computer architecture. His achievments are superior to einstein. Enjoy creativecelling and studycelling bro

you're comparing 2 geniuses against each other. Its obviously possible for einstein to overperform. He had amazing grades in math.
Von neumann made major contributions to quantum mechanics and computer architecture. His achievments are superior to einstein. Enjoy creativecelling and studycelling bro

Cope look what "Eugene Wiegener" says

he is a Nobel Prize winner an a very close friend of John Von neumman even during teenage years

Professionals claim Neumman's idea was no level of Einstein, you claiming you know better than a Nobel prize winner and a close friend of John??

Being fast doesn't means you have better ideas

 

[esrgan]

View attachment 3530759

Cope look what "Eugene Wiegener" says

he is a Nobel Prize winner an a very close friend of John Von neumman even during teenage years

"ohh rehab bro i'm a noble prize winner and invented e=mc2 and binding energy bro. No way that 6'5 chad is superior to me. Just no way"

 

[LampPostPrime]

pure delusion. Most of the scientific problems that you thought were important in the long run (and the kind of problems that you think these mathematicians solved) , are just used to create more weapons and kill each other.

Human quality of life improves with good diet and safe shelter. The single biggest engineering/scientific achievement after the wheel is electricity because it allowed us to store food better and live better. Any other "important problem" is just an illusion. We never needed those.

Do you actually believe that elliptic curve cryptography, number theory and DES are important ? They are not important. The reason why this obscure useless domain of math became useful in the first place is because humans wanted to fight and wanted secure communication during a WAR. It was solving a problem that in no way improves the quality of life of humans. It only becomes a weapon to prolong the fighting.

So yes, most scientific achievements in the long run have only been used to create weapons. And if you consider weapon manufacturing a worthwhile investment of human resources, then you're completely wrong

Im not referring to just mathematicians, im referring to pure theoretical work in general. You're strawmanning

You bring up science being misused as if that makes science unimportant. which theres a lot of truth in that science was used for evil. Thats not the fault of science though. Its the most powerful tool created by humans, it can be used for either good or evil.

Its also ridiculous to discount everything besides electricity and the wheel lol. Not even worth responding to cuz its such a ridiculous point, i think ur trolling there.

Also how are u gonna say science isnt important while bringing up things that only science can achieve, like shelter and good diet and such? Lol

I cant comment on the pure math stuff but ironic u bring up what its been used for (cryptography) while saying its all useless lol. And my point earlier applies to it, that we cant know the important of purely abstract stuff +knowledge important for own sake. And just cuz its used for weapons doesnt mean it cant be used for other stuff. Are u saying cryptography isnt important generally? Lol

 

[ngannou]

"ohh rehab bro i'm a noble prize winner and invented e=mc2 and binding energy bro. No way that 6'5 chad is superior to me. Just no way"

John is also a baldcel he no mog einstein interms of looks too JFL

 

[LampPostPrime]

Einstein is the good example of thinking of something innovative doesn't always correlate with raw power.

Fellow mathematician and physicist John von neumman was a guy who had probably strongest raw power intelligence which he was able to calculate

8 digits times 8 digits numbers in a second and memorize the whole phone book, and he was the fastest problem solver

However he admits and other fellow Nobel Prize winners says John von neumman was the fastest among us but wasn't able to create mind blowing ideas like einstein

Both were geniuses, neuman made major contributions as well but yea didnt go as deep as einstein seemingly

But ur point is correct, fundamental understanding > speed of thought

 

[esrgan]

Also how are u gonna say science isnt important while bringing up things that only science can achieve, like shelter and good diet and such? Lol

good diet and shelter is done by hunting in the savannah and by knowing how to lay bricks. Not studycelling like the chink i posted. You're stupid af damn.

Compare that to the idiot to who eats cheetos, gets constipated and then goes to a doctor to fix a problem he himself created.

 

[esrgan]

John is also a baldcel he no mog einstein interms of looks too JFL

John and einstein are both jewish incels

 

[Nick.Harte]

They think studying like a good little cuck is gonna get them high paying jobs and it’s the only way for them to get pussy.

They have based parents because their moms know their sons won’t be able to compete against 6’8 Tyrone. “ Study like a good little cuck and you’ll get his leftovers at 35. It’s better than nothing son.”

 

[LampPostPrime]

good diet and shelter is done by hunting in the savannah and by knowing how to lay bricks. Not studycelling like the chink i posted. You're stupid af damn.

Compare that to the idiot to who eats cheetos, gets constipated and then goes to a doctor to fix a problem he himself created.

>Guy who says all inventions are pointless besides electricity and the wheel and thinks getting laid matters more to humanity then literal inventions calling someone dumb

Massive projection. You're a literal retarded troll with the mindset of a mentally stunted 14 yo sex crazed boy

Also love how the rest of my post obliterated your argument so you ignore it

 

[ngannou]

John and einstein are both jewish incels

You literally said John mogs Einstein in terms of creativity but he clearly doesn't

which proves raw speed and capacity doesn't always indicates better innovative idea

 

[esrgan]

>Guy who says all inventions are pointless besides electricity and the wheel and thinks getting laid matters more to humanity then literal inventions calling someone dumb

Massive projection. You're a literal retarded troll with the mindset of a 14 yo sex crazed boy

Also love how the rest of my post obliterated your argument so you ignore it

now i really know you're an idiot. Humans are self replicating automatons like all eukaryotes on this planet. If you think that studycelling is more important than getting laid, you're a dumbfuck. Go and cope in inceltears sub bro.

 

[LampPostPrime]

You literally said John mogs Einstein in terms of creativity but he clearly doesn't

which proves raw speed and capacity doesn't always indicates better innovative idea

Its also the biggest weakness of iq tests. Neuman probably wud have higher iq but the scientific creativity is what brought us all the life changing ideas

 

[esrgan]

Its also the biggest weakness of iq tests. Neuman probably wud have higher iq but the scientific creativity is what brought us all the life changing ideas

i'm sure e=mc2 was very life changing for you. What a bum lol. It was only used to make a few bombs

 

[Nick.Harte]

age the asian babies are more neurotic and less extroverted, which fits in with being compliant, non-adventurous, submissive,

Brutal for Asians

 

[LampPostPrime]

You literally said John mogs Einstein in terms of creativity but he clearly doesn't

which proves raw speed and capacity doesn't always indicates better innovative idea

He seems smart and like i cud have an actual interesting conversation with him if it werent for the deep immaturity lol. Sad

 

[esrgan]

He seems smart and like i cud have an actual interesting conversation with him if it werent for the deep immaturity lol. Sad

You're an oldcel and you'll be dead before me

 

[ngannou]

Its also the biggest weakness of iq tests. Neuman probably wud have higher iq but the scientific creativity is what brought us all the life changing ideas

Even the creators of iq tests admits such as David weschler or louis terman
claims you can't claim someone is a genius just by mere iq test.

"By the 1937 second revision of the Stanford–Binet test, Terman no longer used the term "genius" as an IQ classification, nor has any subsequent IQ test.[In 1939, David Wechsler specifically commented that "we are rather hesitant about calling a person a genius on the basis of a single intelligence test score".

 

[LampPostPrime]

i'm sure e=mc2 was very life changing for you. What a bum lol. It was only used to make a few bombs

>Nuclear power
>Radiology in medicine

What is the practical use of E=mc2?

Answer (1 of 6): The production of nuclear power from Uranium and plutonium relies on the principles of radioactivity, derived by E=mc^2 The Atom Bomb based on both Fusion and Fission reaction has its destructive power as a direct result of the equation. The radioactivity of various elements tha...

www.quora.com

ur probably trolling but just in case ur serious .

 

[esrgan]

You literally said John mogs Einstein in terms of creativity but he clearly doesn't

which proves raw speed and capacity doesn't always indicates better innovative idea

he literally does. Which do you think is more impact. a few bombs or computers which allowed us to communicate with little effort

 

[LampPostPrime]

Even the creators of iq tests admits such as David weschler or louis terman
claims you can't claim someone is a genius just by mere iq test.

"By the 1937 second revision of the Stanford–Binet test, Terman no longer used the term "genius" as an IQ classification, nor has any subsequent IQ test.[In 1939, David Wechsler specifically commented that "we are rather hesitant about calling a person a genius on the basis of a single intelligence test score".

Iq tests are like strength and speed in athletes. A definite indicator but not everything

 

[LampPostPrime]

You're an oldcel and you'll be dead before me

U done trolling yet?

 

[esrgan]

U done trolling yet?

Nope. I can do this all day. Come at me baldy

 

[ngannou]

U done trolling yet?

Nope. I can do this all day. Come at me baldy

It seems he is on a stubborn state because he can't accept his logics were all refuted

 

[LampPostPrime]

Like its sad the whole idea of science being misused is thread worthy by itself but @esrgan just wants to troll. Its ironic he brings it up cuz i spend half my days pissed off about how tech is being misused. The causes for it can be argued about but no one can deny progress is definitely being misused

 

[esrgan]

It seems he is on a stubborn state because he can't accept his logics were all refuted

No one here will agree with you you just gotta keep coping and studycelling with your math phd and maybe do incest cousin fucking like einstein

 

[esrgan]

We have jewish infiltrators here boys. Beware of the