Why do shorter people tend to have better face cards?

[calvvvin]

what’s the science behind it

 

[ybuyhgui]

what’s the science behind it

the more you get fucked by life in one avenue the higher the chances of being not fucked in another ig

I bet loads of blessed chads have tiny dicks, can't get lucky in all areas (unless you're me ofc)

 

[yuuwaku]

there is no study behind it, manlet cope

 

[yuuwaku]

the more you get fucked by life in one avenue the higher the chances of being not fucked in another ig

I bet loads of blessed chads have tiny dicks, can't get lucky in all areas (unless you're me ofc)

chad=high t=high dht during puberty=big-above average dick

 

[ybuyhgui]

chad=high t=high dht during puberty=big-above average dick

depends you can have high t and low genetic t to dht conversion which is what’s actually responsible for puberty dick growth, plus you can have a good bone structure and be chad without high t

but yeah a bit of a shit example

 

[yuuwaku]

depends you can have high t and low genetic t to dht conversion which is what’s actually responsible for puberty dick growth, plus you can have a good bone structure and be chad without high t

but yeah a bit of a shit example

u cant be chad with low t bcs t is important for development of jaw, chin, midface, browridge, orbital density. low t=undeveloped

 

[Frogooboi]

They don’t on average it’s worse

 

[jasonblackworf]

what’s the science behind it

taller peopple are more attractive since they developed better

 

[esrgan]

height genes are rarer and they require the parents to be tall. But a HTN face is possible even when both your parents are LTN. all because of recombination.
Another thing is that : you're comparing these two groups
GROUP A: average height + good face
GROUP B: good height + good face
Use your head, work out the probabilities of both of these groups. The absolute numbers that belong to Group B is fewer because both of these are hard to get. But if you look at the conditional probability, then you will see that taller people are in fact slightly better facially.

P(good face| good height) > P(good face| bad height)
but since there are few people with truly good height, the sample size (and thereby the actual number) of attractive + short people is greater. I hope you're a mathcel. this is quite easy to understand

 

[lowiqcel__.]

what’s the science behind it

They dont? On average its worse especially because short people are usually malnourished, just look at the shorter guy in a family and hes always the ugliest

 

[ybuyhgui]

u cant be chad with low t bcs t is important for development of jaw, chin, midface, browridge, orbital density. low t=undeveloped

80% genetic tbh

also the data shows that test timing is more important than total test, so if you get a test surge (even if limited) at especially 13-15, you'll likely get the most craniofacial growth

this means that you can have adequate development without high test, angrogen sensitivity also plays a big role

 

[calvvvin]

wouldn’t there be a connection with shorter people having higher testosterone thus higher estrogen due to conversion thus closing growth plates sooner?

 

[calvvvin]

I feel like in my experience the tallest people I know always have ltn face cards

 

[ybuyhgui]

wouldn’t there be a connection with shorter people having higher testosterone thus higher estrogen due to conversion thus closing growth plates sooner?

good point but more factors are at play in final height than just estrogen, no matter how much aromasin a 5'2 guy took he's not becoming 6'0

 

[laworg]

what’s the science behind it

Theres no science behind it neither is it true jfl

 

[yuuwaku]

80% genetic tbh

also the data shows that test timing is more important than total test, so if you get a test surge (even if limited) at especially 13-15, you'll likely get the most craniofacial growth

this means that you can have adequate development without high test, angrogen sensitivity also plays a big role

80% nutrition and hormones

 

[idc.ethann]

what’s the science behind it

Cope

 

[esrgan]

I feel like in my experience the tallest people I know always have ltn face cards

you haven't even met many tall people since they're few in number. Come back after meeting 100 tall people and 100 short people everyday. Taller people are better looking on average

 

[calvvvin]

good point but more factors are at play in final height than just estrogen, no matter how much aromasin a 5'2 guy took he's not becoming 6'0

when i say short I mean 5’6-5’10

you haven't even met many tall people since they're few in number. Come back after meeting 100 tall people and 100 short people everyday. Taller people are better looking on average

I live in a place where the average height is genuinely 6-6’1 so i see someone 6’5+ at least everyday

 

[hej1377]

Theres prob mo correlation its just that most attractive men you see that are attractive will be considered short since there is a bigger total population of people that are considered short since the average height in usa is 5'9 whoch is considered short

 

[calvvvin]

Theres prob mo correlation its just that most attractive men you see that are attractive will be considered short since there is a bigger total population of people that are considered short since the average height in usa is 5'9 whoch is considered short

best answer i think

 

[esrgan]

when i say short I mean 5’6-5’10

I live in a place where the average height is genuinely 6-6’1 so i see someone 6’5+ at least everyday

do you see 6'5 just as frequently as 5'11. If not, my point still stands. You're encountering 5'11-6'1 more simply because of statistics and a portion of them have better faces. But since this group is larger than the 6'5 group, a fraction of 5'11-6'1 will be larger than a fraction of 6'5. I can't simplify this concept any further.

 

[esrgan]

when i say short I mean 5’6-5’10

I live in a place where the average height is genuinely 6-6’1 so i see someone 6’5+ at least everyday

i'm guessing montana and dakota. Or maybe you're from holland denmark. Either way, i've explained the statistics in all of my comments

 

[calvvvin]

do you see 6'5 just as frequently as 5'11. If not, my point still stands. You're encountering 5'11-6'1 more simply because of statistics and a portion of them have better faces. But since this group is larger than the 6'5 group, a fraction of 5'11-6'1 will be larger than a fraction of 6'5. I can't simplify this concept any further.

i understand this point and i guess this is the best answer

i'm guessing montana and dakota. Or maybe you're from holland denmark. Either way, i've explained the statistics in all of my comments

mormon corridor