Why do we not banning the homos here?

[Deleted member 2832]

I suggest to ban them already

 

[thenewhebbe]

So you want 0 members

 

[Deleted member 2832]

So you want 0 members

we should ban all these repulsive faggots

 

[Willmogulater]

 

[Deleted member 2832]

I Hate them fags
@TRUE_CEL

 

[Banasura]

Get ‘em out of here.

 

[Banasura]

So you want 0 members

Difference between mirin and homosexuality, most users aren’t looking at moggers sexually and are comparing/contrasting their own features to see what to work on and how they stack up.

 

[AlexBrown84]

we’ve shifted our policy

 

[Deleted member 2832]

Get ‘em out of here.

i don't got problem with any users unless they are hella degens (e.g. lgbtq+) or are the nigger supremacist "we wuz kangz" etc. type shit

 

[Banasura]

i don't got problem with any users unless they are hella degens (e.g. lgbtq+) or are the nigger supremacist "we wuz kangz" etc. type shit

I have a major problem with these people, they are like a cancer in any place they are given some freedom slowly spreading corruption trying to kang and literally me everything as faggotry to the point they brainwash every person into believing everything is some form of faggotry and look at anything one does under a lense of faggotry, suddenly everything becomes some form of gay or not gay dichotomy which ruins everything. These people need to either be completely gone or lurk in the shadows unseen, these are the actual incels incapable of finding the femenine beautiful or attractive, a purely incapable (most likely intentional) refusal to acknowledge the beauty of womyn, truly a disgusting form of chaos.

 

[thenewhebbe]

Difference between mirin and homosexuality, most users aren’t looking at moggers sexually and are comparing/contrasting their own features to see what to work on and how they stack up.

Nah they looking at in a homo way

 

[Gengar]

I suggest to ban them already

They changed the rules because they believe gay men are the biggest looksmaxxers and they know what makes a man look good.

 

[Gus17]

They changed the rules because they believe gay men are the biggest looksmaxxers and they know what makes a man look good.

But gay people are applying to the male gaze since their not even trying to Looksmax to attract women.

 

[looks>books]

How would you find them

 

[JBcollector]

I suggest to ban them already

Because looksmax is compromised

 

[Deleted member 22124]

I think gays know more about looksmaxing on average. They also understand female gaze better. Do you want to look better for androphiles (mostly women) or do you want guys to pat you on the back and compliment you on your beard and overblown trapezius muscles?

 

[Deleted member 27746]

So you want 0 members

im not gay

 

[HitAndRun]

Forum would die

 

[Gengar]

But gay people are applying to the male gaze since their not even trying to Looksmax to attract women.

That’s a nice rebuttal, however, the focus is on looksmaxxing.

 

[einzigartig]

I suggest to ban them already

would you also be gone then?

 

[einzigartig]

They changed the rules because they believe gay men are the biggest looksmaxxers and they know what makes a man look good.

why were they not allowed btw?

 

[Gengar]

why were they not allowed btw?

Manosphere generally excludes gays.

 

[einzigartig]

Manosphere generally excludes gays.

ah yes makes sense thanks

 

[plukee]

I have a major problem with these people, they are like a cancer in any place they are given some freedom slowly spreading corruption trying to kang and literally me everything as faggotry to the point they brainwash every person into believing everything is some form of faggotry and look at anything one does under a lense of faggotry, suddenly everything becomes some form of gay or not gay dichotomy which ruins everything. These people need to either be completely gone or lurk in the shadows unseen, these are the actual incels incapable of finding the femenine beautiful or attractive, a purely incapable (most likely intentional) refusal to acknowledge the beauty of womyn, truly a disgusting form of chaos.

Dnr + take your meds + have sex incel

 

[PLA1092]

That’s a nice rebuttal, however, the focus is on looksmaxxing.

This is a joke though right. Let me see if that @Aloha nigger is banned.

 

[Gengar]

This is a joke though right. Let me see if that @Aloha nigger is banned.

Even if he’s gay, he’s allowed to be here.

 

[Deleted member 42009]

So you want 0 members

nah, half this forum are indians

 

[Gus17]

That’s a nice rebuttal, however, the focus is on looksmaxxing.

PSL has always been about looksmaxxing to attract women. It all starred from a puahate which was making fun of redpill cope of game and transitioned to the truth that you need to Looksmax to get girls. Gay people offer no useful advice for applying the female gaze and tbh don’t need to Looksmax because men will fuck anything.

 

[Gus17]

That’s a nice rebuttal, however, the focus is on looksmaxxing.

Tbh it’s pretty disingenuous to suggest this forum is not about looking more attractive to women specifically but just vague Looksmaxing. Like why don’t we add women too so they can talk about the best makeup to attract chad JFL.

 

[Gengar]

PSL has always been about looksmaxxing to attract women. It all starred from a puahate which was making fun of redpill cope of game and transitioned to the truth that you need to Looksmax to get girls. Gay people offer no useful advice for applying the female gaze and tbh don’t need to Looksmax because men will fuck anything.

Tbh it’s pretty disingenuous to suggest this forum is not about looking more attractive to women specifically but just vague Looksmaxing. Like why don’t we add women too so they can talk about the best makeup to attract chad JFL.

This isn’t a continuation of PUAhate/Sluthate/Lookism. This is a separate forum. We call it a PSL scale and not PSLL scale for a reason, with the second L standing for Looksmax.org. This isn’t a spiritual successor to these forums. Also, what I’m telling you is what the admins say. That this forum is about looksmaxxing, not specifically looksmaxxing for women. Women aren’t even allowed to post here, because their opinions are not relevant. Now, if we allowed women to be here so they could weigh in and share their opinions with us freely, then yes, your argument would make sense, that we looksmax for women. But we don’t allow them, so that argument goes out of the window. It’s about looksmaxxing in general as opposed to looksmaxxing for women. Don’t get me wrong, I am not pro-LGBT. In fact, I am against it, but I won’t let my personal views affect my ability to moderate. Otherwise I would have deleted all the anti-Islam threads here, but this isn’t my forum, I’m just here to enforce the existing rules. And the rules now don’t say that homosexuals and transsexuals aren’t allowed.